This study examines contrasting predictions of the dual coding theory and the context availability hypothesis regarding concreteness effects in monolingual and bilingual lexical processing. In three experiments, concreteness was controlled for or confounded with rated context availability. In the first experiment, bilingual subjects performed lexical decision in their native language (Dutch, L1). In the second experiment, lexical decision performance of bilinguals in their second language (English, L2) was examined. In the third experiment, bilinguals translated words “forwards” (from L1 to L2) or “backwards” (from L2 to L1). Both monolingual and bilingual tasks showed a concreteness effect when concreteness was confounded with context availability. However, concreteness effects disappeared when abstract and concrete words were matched on context availability, and even occasionally reversed. Implications of these results for theories that account for concreteness effects, particulary in bilingual processing, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalotaD. A.FerraroF. R.ConnorL. T. (1991). On the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature.SchwanenflugelP. J.The psychology of word meanings.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc187–222.
2.
BarsalouL. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts.Memory and Cognition10, 82–93.
3.
BeggI.PaivioA. (1969). Concreteness and imagery in sentence meaning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior8, 821–827.
4.
BransfordJ. D.JohnsonM. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 717–726.
5.
BransfordJ. D.McCarrellN. S. (1974). A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension: Some thoughts about understanding what it means to comprehend.WeimerW. B.PalermoD. S.Cognition and the Symbolic pricesses.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc189–229.
6.
BreedinS. D.SaffranE. M.CoslettH. B. (1994). Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia.Cognitive Neuropsychology11, 617–660.
7.
BurnageG. (1990). CELEX: A guide for usersNijmegen, The Netherlands: SSN.
8.
de GrootA. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency assessed through word association.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition15, 824–845.
9.
de GrootA. M. B. (1992a). Determinants of word translation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18, 1001–1018.
10.
de GrootA. M. B. (1992). Bilingual lexical representation: A closer look at the conceptual representations.FrostR.KatzL.Orthography phonology morphology and meaning.Amsterdam: Elsevier389–412.
11.
de GrootA. M. B.DannenburgL.van HellJ. G. (1994). Forward and backward word translation by bilinguals.Journal of Memory and Language33, 600–629.
12.
de GrootA. M. B.HoeksJ. C. J. (1995). The development of bilingual memory: Evidence from word translation by trilinguals.Language Learning45, 683–724.
13.
HamptonJ. A. (1981). An investigation of the nature of abstract concepts.Memory and Cognition9, 149–156.
14.
JinY.-S. (1990). Effects of concreteness on cross-language priming in lexical decisions.Perceptual and Motor Skills70, 1139–1154.
15.
JohnsonM. K.BransfordJ. D.NybergS. E.ClearyJ. J. (1972). Comprehension factors in interpreting memory for abstract and concrete sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 451–454.
16.
JonesG. V. (1985). Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication.Brain and Language24, 1–19.
17.
KierasD. (1978). Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information-processing models for imagery effects in verbal memory.Psychlogical Bulletin85, 532–554.
18.
KolersP. A. (1963). Interlingual word associations.Journal of Verbal Leaning and Verbal Behavior2, 291–300.
19.
KrollJ. F. (1993). Accessing conceptual representations for words in a second language.SchreuderR.WeltensB.The bilingual lexicon.Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins53–81.
20.
KrollJ. F.MervesJ. S. (1986). Lexical access for concrete and abstract words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition12, 92–107.
21.
KrollJ. F.StewartE. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations.Journal of Memory and Language33, 149–174.
22.
La HeijW.HooglanderA.KerlingR.van der VeldenE. (1996). Nonverbal context effects in forward and backward word translation: Evidence for concept mediation.Journal of Memory and Language35, 648–665.
23.
LordF. M. (1969). Statistical adjustments when comparing preexisting groups.Psychological Bulletin72, 336–337.
24.
MarscharkM. (1985). Imagery and organization in the recall of prose.Journal of Memory and Language24, 734–745.
25.
MarscharkM.PaivioA. (1977). Integrative processing of concrete and abstract sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior16, 217–231.
26.
MartinW.TopsG. A. J. (1984). Van Dale Groot Woorderboek Engels-Nederlands [Van Dale large English-Dutch dictionary]Utrecht, The Netherlands: Van Dale Lexicografle Antwerpen, Belgium:.
27.
MartinW.TopsG. A. J. (1986). Van Dale Groot Woorderboek Nederlands-Engels [Van Dale large Dutch-English dictionary]Utrecht, The Netherlands: Van Dale Lexicografle Antwerpen, Belgium:.
28.
NelsonD. L.SchreiberT. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall.Journal of Memory and Language31, 237–260.
29.
PaivioA. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approachNew York: Oxford University Press.
30.
PaivioA.ClarkJ. M.LambertW. E. (1988). Bilingual dual-coding theory and semantic repetition effects on recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition14, 163–172.
31.
PaivioA.DesrochersA. (1980). A dual-coding approach to bilingual memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology34, 388–399.
32.
PaivioA.YuilleJ. C.MadiganS. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, Monograph Supplement76, 1–25.
33.
PlautD. C.ShalliceT. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology.Cognitive Neuropsychology10, 377–500.
34.
PotterM. C.SoK.-F.von EckardtB.FeldmanL. B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior23, 23–38.
35.
RansdellS. E.FischlerI. (1987). Memory in a monolingual mode: When are bilinguals at a disadvantage?.Journal of Memory and Language26, 392–405.
36.
RansdellS. E.FischlerI. (1989). Effect of concreteness and task context on recall of prose among bilingual and monolingual speakers.Journal of Memory and Language28, 278–291.
37.
SchönpflugU.Bilingualism and memoryPaper presented at the International Symposium on Bilingualism.AprilNewcastle Upon TyneUnited Kingdom1997.
38.
SchwanenflugelP. J.AkinC. E. (1994). Developmental trends in lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words.Reading Research Quarterly29, 215–262.
39.
SchwanenflugelP. J.AkinC.LuhW.-M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words.Memory and Cognition20, 96–104.
40.
SchwanenflugelP. J.HarnishfegerK. K.StoweR. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words.Journal of Memory and Language27, 499–520.
41.
SchwanenflugelP. J.ShobenE. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition9, 82–102.
42.
SchwanenflugelP. I.StoweR. W. (1989). Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences.Reading Research Quarterly24, 114–126.
43.
SmithC. D. (1981). Recognition memory for sentences as a function of concreteness/abstractness and affirmation/negation.British Journal of Psychology72, 125–129.
44.
SnodgrassJ. G. (1993). Translating versus picture naming: Similarities and differences.SchreuderR.WeltensB.The bilingual lexicon.Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins83–114.
45.
TaylorI.TaylorM. M. (1990). Psycholinguistics: Learning and using languageEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46.
van HellJ. G.Candia MahnA. (1997). Keyword mnemonics versus rote rehearsal: Learning concrete and abstract foreign words by experienced and inexperienced learners.Language Leaning47, 507–545.
47.
van HellJ. G.de GrootA. M. B. (1996). Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association Manuscript submitted for publication.
48.
van HellJ. G.OosterveldP.de GrootA. M. B. (1996). Covariance structure analysis in experimental research: Comparing two word translation models.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers28, 491–503.
49.
WarringtonE. K. (1981). Concrete word dyslexia.British of Psychology72, 175–196.
50.
WattenmakerW. D.ShobenE. J. (1987). Context and the recallability of concrete and abstract sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition13, 140–150.
51.
WinogradE.CohenC.BarresiJ. (1976). Memory for concrete and abstract words in bilingual speakers.Memory and Cognition4, 323–329.
