Recent work has found an affective priming effect using the naming task: In pronouncing target words, pronunciation latencies were consistently shorter when the target (e.g., loyal) was preceded by an evaluatively congruent (e.g., sunshine) rather than incongruent prime word (e.g, rain). Using the naming task, no affective priming was found in the present studies irrespective of prime-set size and target-set size (Experiment 1), irrespective of stimulus-onset asynchrony (Experiment 2), and even when a nearly exact replication of previous work that demonstrated the effect was conducted (Experiment 3). Finally, bilingual German/English speakers exhibited strong associative priming, but no affective priming, in both the English as well as the German language (Experiment 4). The results show that priming for evaluatively related words is not a general finding.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ. R. (1976). Language, memory, and thoughtHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2.
AndersenN. (1968). Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology9, 272–279.
3.
BalotaD. A.LorchR. F.Jr. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition12, 336–345.
4.
BarghJ. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.Handbook of social cognition.WyerR. S.SrullT. K.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Vol. 1, 1–40.
5.
BarghJ. A.ChaikenS.GovenderR.PrattoF. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology62, 893–912.
6.
BarghJ. A.ChaikenS.RaymondP.HymesC. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology32, 104–128.
7.
BesnerD.SmithM. C. (1992). Basic processes in reading: Is the orthographic depth hypothesis sinking?.Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning.FrostR.KatzL.Amsterdam: Elsevier45–66.
8.
BesnerD.SmithM. C. (1992b). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18, 468–482.
9.
BowerG. H. (1991). Mood congruity of social judgements.Emotion and social judgments.ForgasJ.Oxford: Pergamon31–53.
10.
CarelloC.LukatellaG.PeterM.TurveyM. T. (1995). Effects of association, frequency, and stimulus quality on naming words in the presence or absence of pseudowords.Memory & Cognition23, 289–300.
11.
CarelloC.LukatelaG.TurveyM. T. (1988). Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax.Memory & Cognition16, 187–195.
12.
ChiarelloC.BurgessC.RichardsL.PollockA. (1990). Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't … sometimes, some places.Brain and Language38, 75–104.
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14.
CollinA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review82, 407–428.
15.
de GrootA. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology36A, 253–280.
16.
De HouwerJ.HermansD.Nine attempts to find affective priming of pronunciation responses: Effects of SOA, degradation, and languagePaper presented to the 7th Tagung der Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie.Kassel, GermanyJune1999.
17.
De HouwerJ.HermansD.RothermundK.WenturaD. (1998). Affective priming of semantic categorization responses Manuscript submitted for publication.
18.
de Mornay DaviesP. (1998). Automatic semantic priming: The contribution of lexical- and semantic-level processes.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology10, 389–412.
19.
ErdfelderE.FaulF.BuchnerA. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program.Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments & Computers28, 1–11.
20.
FazioR. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility.Attitude structure and function.PratkanisA. R.BrecklerS. J.GreenwaldA. G.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.153–179.
21.
FazioR. H.SanbonmatsuD. M.PowellM. C.KardesF. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50, 229–238.
22.
FranksJ. J.Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.BilbreyC. W.Roskos-EwoldsenB. (1998). Artifacts in attitude priming research Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
FrostR.KatzL.BentinS. (1987). Strategies for visualword recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance13, 104–115.
24.
GlaserJ.BanajiM. R. (1999). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation.Journal of Experimental Psychology and Social Psychology77, 669–687.
25.
GraingerJ.JacobsA. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review103, 518–565.
26.
GreenwaldA. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypotheses.Psychological Bulletin82, 1–20.
27.
HagerW.HasselhornM. (1994). Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen [Handbook of German word norms]Göttingen: Hogrefe.
28.
HedgesL. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators.Journal of Educational Statistics6, 107–128.
29.
HermansD. (1996). Automatische stimulusevaluatie. Een experimentele analyse van de voorwaarden voor evaluatieve stimulusdiscriminatie aan de hand van het affectieve-primingparadigma [Automatic stimulus evaluation. An experimental analysis of the preconditions for evaluative stimulus discrimination using an affective priming paradigm]Belgium: University of Leuven Unpublished doctoral disssertation.
30.
HermansD.De HouwerJ.EelenP. (1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory.Cognition and Emotion8, 515–533.
31.
HermansD.De HouwerJ.EelenP. (2001). A time course analysis of the affective priming effect [special issue].Cognition and Emotion15, 143–165.
32.
HermansD.De HouwerJ.SmeestersD.EelenP.Affective priming with associatively unrelated primes and targetsPaper presented at the 6th Tagung der Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie.Kassel, GermanyJune1999.
33.
HinesD. (1992). Effect of masked picture primes on semantic priming of easy and difficult-to-name words.Journal of General Psychology120, 149–164.
34.
HinesD.CzerwinskiM.SawyerP. K.DwyerM. (1986). Automatic semantic priming: Effect of category exemplar level and word association level.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance12, 370–379.
35.
HolenderD. (1992). Expectancy effects, congruity effects, and the interpretation of response latency measurement.Analytic approaches to human cognition.AlegriaJ.Junça de MoraisJ.RadeauM.HolenderD.North Holland: Elsevier351–375.
36.
KaplanK. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique.Psychological Bulletin77, 361–372.
37.
KatzL.FeldmanL. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition9, 157–166.
38.
KlauerK. C. (1998). Affective priming.European Review of Social Psychology8, 67–103.
39.
KlauerK. C.RoßnagelC.MuschJ. (1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition23, 246–255.
40.
KlauerK. C.SternE. (1992). How attitudes guide memory-based judgments: A two-process model.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology28, 186–206.
41.
KlingerM. R.BurtonP. C.PittsG. S. (2000). Mechanisms of unconscious priming I: Response competition not spreading activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 441–455.
42.
LukatelaG.FeldmanL. B.TurveyM. T.CarelloC.KatzL. (1989). Context effects in bi-alphabetical word perception.Journal of Memory and Language28, 214–236.
43.
LukatelaG.TurveyM. T.FeldmanL. B.CarelloC.KatezL. (1989). Alphabet priming in bi-alphabetical word perception.Journal of Memory and Language28, 237–254.
44.
LupkerS. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look.Journal of Verbal Learning and Behaviour23, 709–733.
45.
MartinL.LeveyA. B. (1978). Evaluative conditioning.Advances in Behavioural Research and Therapy1, 57–102.
46.
McKoonG.RatcliffR. (1995). Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and priming in lexical decisions and naming.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review2, 527–533.
47.
McNamaraT. P. (1992a). Priming and constraints its places on theories of memory and retrieval.Psychological Review99, 650–662.
48.
McNamaraT. P. (1992b). Theories of priming: I. Associative distance and lag.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18, 1173–1190.
49.
MurphyS. T.ZajoncR. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64, 723–739.
50.
MuschJ. (2000). Affektives Priming: Kongruenzeffekte bei der evaluativen Bewertung [Affective priming: congruency effects in evaluative decisions]Germany: University of Bonn Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
51.
MuschJ.KlauerK. C. (1997). Der Anteilseffekt beim affektiven Priming: Replikation und Bewertung einer theoretischen Erklärung [The consistency proportion effect in affective priming: Replication and evaluation of a theoretical explanation].Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie44, 266–292.
52.
NeelyJ. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval fromlexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General106, 226–254.
53.
NeelyJ. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories.Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition.BesnerD.HumphreysG. W.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.264–336.
54.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J. (1955). Factor analysis of meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology50, 325–338.
55.
PecherD.ZeelenbergR.RaaijmakrsJ. G. W. (1998). Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation.Journal of Memory and Language38, 401–418.
56.
PeetersG.CzapinskiJ. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects.European review of social psychology.StroebeW.HewstoneM.Chichester: WileyVol. 1, 33–60.
57.
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control.Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium.SolsoR. L.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.55–85.
PrattoF.JohnO. P. (1991). Automatic vigilence: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61, 380–391.
60.
RatcliffR.McKoonG. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory.Psychological Review95, 385–408.
61.
Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.FazioR. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63, 198–211.
62.
RothermundK.WenturaD. (1998). Ein fairer Test für die Aktivationsausbreitungshypothese: Untersuchung affektiver Kongruenzeffekte in der Stroop-Aufgabe [An unbiased test of a spreading activation account of affective priming: Analysis of affective congruency effects in the Stroop task].Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie45, 120–135.
63.
SeidenbergM. S.WatersG. S.SandersM.LangerP. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition12, 315-238.
64.
SheltonJ. R.MartinR. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18, 1191–1210.
65.
SmithM. C.BesnerD.MiyoshiH. (1994). New limits to automaticity: Context modulates semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology20, 104–115.
66.
StolzJ. H.NeelyJ. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology21, 596–611.
67.
TaylorS. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin110, 67–85.
68.
WenturaD. (1998). Affektives Priming in der Wortentscheidungsaufgabe: Evidenz für postlexikalische Urteilstendenzen [Affective priming in the lexical decision task: Evidence for postlexical judgmental tendencies].Sprache und Kognition17, 125–137.
69.
WenturaD. (1999). Activation and inhibition of affective information: Evidence for negative priming in the evaluation task.Cognition and Emotion13, 65–91.
70.
WenturaD. (2000). Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: Responding with “yes” vs. “no” to word targets reveals evaluative judgment tendencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 456–469.
71.
WhittleseaB. W. A.JacobyL. (1990). Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon?.Journal of Memory and Language29, 546–565.
72.
WilliamsJ. N. (1996). Is automatic priming semantic?.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology8, 113–161.
