The effects of extinction of the blocking or overshadowing stimulus on conditioned responding controlled by the blocked or overshadowed stimulus were examined in seven appetitive conditioning experiments with rats. The experiments differed in their designs, stimuli used, the amounts of conditioning and extinction training, and the levels of conditioned responding produced. In all cases, conditioned responding to the blocked or overshadowed cue was either unaffected or reduced by extinction of the blocking or overshadowing cue. These data are consistent with accounts of overshadowing and blocking that attribute those phenomena to acquisition deficits, rather than to retrieval failures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportA. (1989). Visual attention.Foundations of cognitive science.PosnerM.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press631–682.
2.
BalazM. A.GutsinP.CacheiroH.MillerR. R. (1982). Blocking as a retrieval failure: Reactivation of associations to a blocked stimulus.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology34B, 99–113.
3.
BroadbentD. E. (1958). Perception and communicationLondon: Pergamon.
4.
BroadbentD. E. (1971). Decision anil stressLondon: Academic Press.
5.
GallistelC. R. (1990). The organization of learningCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
GuntherL. M.ColeR. P.MillerR. R. (1998). Overshadowing of occasion setting.Learning and Motivation29, 323–344.
7.
HallG. (1996). Learning about associatively-activated stimulus representations: Implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning.Animal Learning & Behavior24, 233–255.
8.
HollandP. C. (1977). Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes3, 77–104.
9.
HollandP. C. (1980). Influence of visual conditioned stimulus characteristics on the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes6, 81–97.
10.
HollandP. C. (1984). Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes10, 476–497.
11.
HollandP. C. (1985). Element pretraining influences the content of appetitive serial compound conditioning in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes11, 367–387.
12.
HollandP. C. (1988). Excitation and inhibition in unblocking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes14, 261–279.
13.
HollandP. C.ForbesD. T. (1982). Representation-mediated extinction of flavor aversions.Learning and Motivation13, 454–471.
14.
HoneyR. C.HallG. (1989). The acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes15, 338–346.
15.
KaminL. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning.Punishment and aversive behavior.CampbellB.ChurchR.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts279–298.
16.
KasprowW. J.CacheiroH.BalazM. A.MillerR. R. (1982). Reminder-induced recovery of associations to an overshadowed stimulus.Learning and Motivation13, 155–166.
17.
KaufmanM. A.BollesR. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society18, 318–320.
18.
KehoeE. J.GormezanoI. (1980). Configuration and combination laws in conditioning with compound stimuli.Pscyhological Bulletin87, 351–378.
19.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review82, 276–298.
20.
MarkmanA. B. (1989). LMS rules and the inverse base-rate effect: Comment on Gluck and Bower (1988).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118, 417–421.
21.
MatzelL. D.SchachtmanT. R.MillerR. R. (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus.Learning and Motivation16, 398–412.
22.
MillerJ. S.McKinzieD. L.KraebelK. S.SpearN. E. (1996). Changes in the expression of stimulus selection: Blocking represents selective memory retrieval rather than selective associations.Learning and Motivation27, 307–316.
23.
MillerR. R.BarnetR. C.GrahameN. J. (1992). Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes18, 251–264.
24.
MillerR. R.MatuteH. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General125, 370–386.
25.
MillerR. R.SchachtmanT. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition.Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition.MillerR. R.SpearN. E.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc51–88.
26.
MorellJ. R. (1997). The hippocampus: S-R, S-S, and spatial learningDurham, NC: Duke University Unpublished PhD dissertation.
27.
PavlovI. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexesLondon: Oxford University Press.
28.
PearceJ. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.Psychological Review94, 61–75.
29.
PearceJ. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model.Psychological Renew101, 587–607.
30.
PearceJ. M.HallG. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review106, 532–552.
31.
RescorlaR. A. (1982). Simultaneous second-order conditioning produces S-S learning in conditioned suppression.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes8, 23–32.
32.
RescorlaR. A.CunninghamC. L. (1978). Within-compound flavor associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes4, 267–275.
33.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.Classical conditioning II.BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts64–99.
34.
ShanksD. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgment.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37B, 1–21.
35.
SpeersM. A.GillanD. J.RescorlaR. A. (1980). Within-compound associations in a variety of compound conditioning procedures.Learning and Motivation11, 135–149.
36.
SutherlandN. S.MackintoshN. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learningNew York: Academic Press.
37.
Van HammeL. J.WassermanE. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements.Learning and Motivation25, 127–151.
38.
WilliamsB. A. (1996). Evidence that blocking is due to associative deficit: Blocking history affects the degree of subsequent associative competition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review3, 71–74.
