Objective: A case of drug-induced psychosis related to crystalline meth amphetamine is described, highlighting the phenomenology and relevant treatment.
Results: A 44-year-old woman with borderline personality traits and severe drug dependence developed a protracted drug-induced psychosis related to chronic high-dose crystalline methamphetamine use. Complete resolution of symptoms occurred with antipsychotic medication and abstinence from methamphetamine. Rapid recurrence of symptoms occurred at a time of high stress associated with minimal methamphetamine use and cessation of low-dose quetiapine. Symptoms rapidly resolved with abstinence, quetiapine and reduction of stressors.
Conclusions: A drug-induced psychosis resembling paranoid schizophrenia can occur with repeated or high-dose use of methamphetamine. While this generally resolves rapidly with cessation of stimulant use, some cases of protracted drug-induced psychosis in vulnerable individuals have been documented. Behavioural sensitization can also occur, and neuroleptics may prevent the recurrence of further psychosis triggered by ongoing low-dose methamphetamine use.
BakerALeeN KJennerL. Models of intervention and care for psychostimulant users. National Drug Strategy Monograph Series No. 512nd edn. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra2004.
2.
WilkinsCReillyJRoseERoyDPledgerMLeeA. The Social-Economic Impact of Amphetamine Type Stimulants in New Zealand. Centre for Social and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Massey University, Auckland2004.
3.
ToppLDegenhardtLKayeSDarkeS. The emergence of potent forms of methamphetamine in Sydney, Australia: a case study of the IDRS as a strategic early warning system. Drug and Alcohol Review2002; 21: 341–348.
4.
McKetinRMcLarenJ. The Methamphetamine Situation in Australia: A Review of Routine Data Sources. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra2004, NDARC Technical Report No. 172.
5.
ToppLKayeSBrunoR. Australian drug trends 2001: findings of the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS). NDARC Monograph No. 48. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Sydney2002.
6.
SchuckitM A. Drug and alcohol abuse. A Clinical Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment5th edn. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York2000.
7.
SrisurapanontMKittiratanapaiboonPJarusuraisinN. Treatment for amphetamine psychosis (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley, Chichester2001, Issue 4.
8.
SatoMNumachiYHamamuraT. Relapse of paranoid psychotic state in methamphetamine model of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin1992; 18: 115–122.
9.
SweetingMFarrellM. Metamphetamine psychosis: how is it related to schizophrenia? A review of the literature. Current Psychiatry Reviews2005; 1: 115–122.
10.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC1994.
MillerF TAbramsTDulitRFyerM. Psychotic symptoms in patients with borderline personality disorder and concurrent axis I disorder. Hospital Community Psychiatry1993; 44: 59–61.
13.
DowsonJ HSussamsPGroundsA TTaylorJ. Associations of self-reported past ‘psychotic’ phenomena with features of personality disorders. Comprehensive Psychiatry2000; 41: 42–48.
14.
LeDucP AMittlemanG. Schizophrenia and psychostimulant abuse: a review and re-analysis of clinical evidence. Psychopharmacology1995; 121: 407–427.
15.
SegalD SKuczenskiR. Escalating dose-binge stimulant exposure: relationship between emergent behavioral profile and differential caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens dopamine responses. Psychopharmacology1999; 142: 182–192.
16.
ArseneaultLCannonMWittonJMurrayR M. Causal association between cannabis and psychosis: examination of the evidence. British Journal of Psychiatry2004; 184: 110–117.
17.
UjikeH. Stimulant-induced psychosis and schizophrenia: the role of sensitization. Current Psychiatry Reports2002; 4: 177–184.
18.
YuiKGotoKIkemotoSNishijimaKYoshinoTIshiguroT. Susceptibility to subsequent episodes of spontaneous recurrence of methamphetamine psychosis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence2001; 64: 133–142.
