Abstract
Objectives:
Cancer is an important public health concern, with millions of patients affected worldwide. Given the physical, psychological, and physiologic changes associated with cancer, holistic therapies are needed to treat all aspect of the disease.
Design:
A systematic review was conducted to determine the efficacy of yoga as a treatment option for cancer since 2010. Included studies were published from January 2010 to July 2012 and were indexed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Alt HealthWatch.
Results:
Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight of these studies were performed in the United States, and one each was conducted in Slovenia, Italy, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Turkey.
Conclusions:
The evidence for efficacy of yoga as an alternative and complementary treatment for cancer is mixed, although generally positive. Limitations of the reviewed interventions included a mixed use of instruments, weak quantitative designs, small sample sizes, and a lack of theory-based studies.
Introduction
Much of the recent research into complementary cancer treatments involves the role of physical activity. Researchers have reported, for breast cancer survivors at least, that levels of physical activity among this group is low. 4 Yoga is an alternative, safe, low-impact exercise that combines meditation, breathing, and exercise. 5 In addition, patients unable to participate in traditional exercise may find yoga's slow, gentle movements easier to perform. Many studies have reported increases in quality-of-life scores and a decrease in stress levels among cancer survivors participating in yoga programs versus wait-list controls. 4 It is apparent that the yoga techniques used for thousands of years in India affect emotional well-being, but patients with cancer need a therapy that can treat them physically as well. 2
Researchers are now reporting the physiologic effects of yoga on patients with cancer. Patients who practice yoga regularly while undergoing chemotherapy have a statistically significantly smaller decrease in their natural killer cells during chemotherapy and less DNA damage than patients receiving coping therapy. 2 In addition, yoga users had statistically significantly more natural killer cells at the end of treatment than the group receiving coping therapy. 2 The potential effect of yoga for patients with a cancer diagnosis, as well as those in recovery, is something worth exploring.
The purpose of this review is to determine yoga's influence on the multidimensional factors associated with cancer diagnosis, treatment, and recovery. A meta-analysis on the effects of yoga on psychological health, quality of life, and physical health of patients with cancer was published in 2011. 3 The meta-analysis included 10 studies conducted between 1970 and July 2010. The meta-analysis authors found that compared with control groups, the yoga groups showed significantly greater improvements in aspects of psychological health, such as anxiety reduction (p=.009), depression alleviation (p=.002), distress reduction (p=.003), and stress reduction (p=.006). However, because of the small and different types of studies, the authors concluded that the findings were preliminary. Therefore, it is worthwhile to determine the current evidence on the efficacy of yoga.
Research questions addressed in this study included the following: Since 2010, what new information has been learned about the efficacy of yoga to significantly reduce anxiety, depression, pain, sleep disturbances, and stress levels of patients with a cancer diagnosis, undergoing treatment, or in recovery? Since 2010, have sufficient data become available to enable conclusions about the efficacy of yoga in treating anxiety, depression, pain, sleep disturbances, and stress? Finally, since 2010, has yoga been shown to significantly improve the quality of life among patients with cancer?
Materials and Methods
This study used a systematic review of the literature on yoga as a therapy for the psychological and physical factors associated with cancer. To be included in this review, the study must have (1) been published in the English language; (2) been published between January 2010 and July 2012; (3) included any form of yoga as a part of or the entire intervention for treatment of cancer; (4) used any quantitative study design; and (5) measured anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, pain, quality of life, and/or stress as an outcome (according to such instruments as State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Anxiety/Depression Inventory, visual analogue scale, and Nottingham Health Profile). Studies were excluded if they (1) did not use a quantitative design, (2) were incomplete or ongoing, or (3) were published in a journal not indexed in any of the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, or Alt HealthWatch. Inclusion criteria for the past 2 years were deemed appropriate because a previous meta-analysis covered studies published from 1970 to 2010. 3 Because yoga has been used for numerous disorders, including anxiety, stress, and depression, it was necessary to omit studies on these illnesses unless they were a secondary outcome of cancer diagnosis or treatment.
The three phases of the meta-analysis, returning studies meeting the above criteria, were a Boolean search, distillation, and manuscript and reference review (Fig. 1). To identify studies meeting these criteria, MEDLINE, Alt HealthWatch, and CINAHL were searched during phase I. Boolean operators and search terms used in the data extraction process included “yoga AND cancer AND intervention OR program.” Phase I resulted in 135 articles extracted from MEDLINE (n=49), Alt HealthWatch (n=28), and CINAHL (n=58). Phase II included preliminary distillation of the articles by eliminating duplicates (n=15), review or discussion articles (n=8), studies that did not incorporate a quantitative design (n=35), studies that were still in progress (n=5), and studies that did not focus on tertiary treatment of cancer (n=34). As part of phase III, three researchers independently reviewed the refined list of articles (n=38). In phase III, articles that did not incorporate anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, pain, quality of life, and/or stress as an outcome measure were omitted (n=25). The remaining 13 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria.

Flowchart depicting the three-phase data extraction process.
Results
Table 1 summarizes the year of publication, authors, study design, sample size, age of participants, intervention modality/dosage, and salient findings of the 13 included studies. The studies are listed in ascending order by year of publication.
IL, interleukin; MLT, melatonin.
Discussion
The aim of this review was to determine the efficacy of yoga as an alternative or complementary treatment for the psychological and physical factors associated with cancer from studies published between January 2010 and July 2012. These include pain, sleep disturbances, mental well-being, fatigue, stress, anxiety, and depression, as well as quality of life. The 13 studies that met the inclusion criteria were performed in the United States (n=8), Slovenia (n=1), Italy (n=1), United Kingdom (n=1), Canada (n=1), and Turkey (n=1). Of the 13 studies reviewed, 11 reported significant changes in the psychological or physical functioning of the participants. 2 –12
Six of the studies used a randomized controlled design. 1,2,5,9,11,12 This type of study is considered the most rigorous because it enlists pre- and post-tests, randomly assigns participants to a control and an experimental group, and minimizes threats to internal and external validity. One such randomized controlled trial reported that the physical component scores of a quality-of-life questionnaire (scale, 0–100) increased by 10.7 points for the yoga group, whereas the wait-list group scores decreased by 4.4; this difference was both statistically and clinically significant. 2 It is important to note, however, that trait anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and depression remained stable over time between groups, with no significant changes. This finding counters the suggestion that yoga can act as a holistic approach to cancer.
In another randomized controlled trial, emotional well-being, fatigue, and cortisol levels improved significantly in the yoga group compared with the control group (p<.05). 5 Furthermore, in another study, scores on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale revealed a significant improvement in the yoga group versus the control group after the intervention (p<.0005). 1 Another study found that dosage played a role in improvements in quality-of-life scores; participants who had attended 24 or more yoga classes had statistically significant changes versus controls (p<.05). 12 It is difficult to draw conclusions regarding the mixed results of these randomized controlled trials, but other, less costly, designs do exist.
A pretest–post-test design is the least costly and simplest, but it cannot minimize threats to internal validity, such as maturation and history, because such studies lack a control group for comparison. This review examined six studies that used this design. 4,6 –8,,13,14 One such study reported improvements in Nottingham Health Profile scores for pain, emotional level, sleep, social adaptation, physical skills, and level of energy (p<.05). 7 In addition, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores improved (p<.05) compared with baseline data. 7 An additional pretest–post-test study reported similar significant results for depression and general health improvements at the end of the intervention; these results persisted during the 3-month follow-up. 8 These results are promising, but because the studies did not include a group for comparison, such as physical activity or coping therapy, they cannot determined whether the benefits of yoga outweigh those of other alternative treatments.
Similar to randomized controlled design, quasi-experimental studies do assign participants to a control and an experimental group, but not randomly. This sometimes occurs when the researchers seek to match participants between groups or when random selection is not ethical. 15 One study in the meta-analysis enlisted this type of design. This study showed that the yoga group's scores for well-being significantly improved over those of the dance therapy group. 10 Results such as these should allow for conclusions to be drawn, but unfortunately, small sample size and the existence of few studies for comparison make it difficult to determine the true benefits of a yoga regimen to treat the primary and secondary outcomes of cancer.
As found in a study previously mentioned, dosage of yoga may play just as important a role as the yoga therapy itself. Program durations ranged from a one-time inpatient 45-minute yoga session 6 to a 2-year yoga program taught for 2 hours at 5-day intervals, with home practice twice daily encouraged. 9 Durations in the other studies included 1 week, 9 3 weeks, 1 4 weeks, 4,8,13 6 weeks, 2,4,10 8 weeks, 5 12 weeks, 4,8,14 and 6 months. 12 One study did not specify duration of the yoga program. 11 All studies used a trained instructor for the duration of the intervention, for a weekly class with encouraged home practice, or for a one-time/one weekly training session. The use of an instructor can alleviate issues with self-reporting and ensure that participants are performing yoga correctly. Conversely, it can add to attrition rates as well as increase the cost of an intervention. The duration and dosage needed for sustained regular yoga to act as a beneficial therapy for patients with cancer have yet to be determined.
Limitations of this review include small sample sizes, few studies meeting the inclusion criteria, multiple primary and secondary outcomes of cancer measured, and diverse use of instruments. However, it is important to note the advantage of measuring so many outcomes. Because yoga has been empirically tested in many of the secondary outcomes of cancer and in the primary disease in other studies, this allows for a multitude of studies to examine. Yoga has been tested in patients with depression, anxiety, sleep, chronic pain, and stress, and it is possible that these studies may contribute to determining the efficacy of yoga for patients with cancer.
Conclusion
Cancer claims an estimated 7.4 million lives each year worldwide. The confounding influences of psychological strains impedes physical recovery and the benefits of traditional treatment practices. 3 This systematic review identified few studies on cancer and yoga, so no decisive conclusions can be made regarding yoga's role in cancer treatment. This review highlights the current programs being instituted, but without additional rigorous studies comparing not only control groups but other alternative therapies, the true benefits of yoga, while promising, are still undetermined.
Footnotes
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
