Abstract
Introduction:
Research is increasingly demonstrating a range of benefits of practicing yoga, such as improved physical and mental health, social connectedness, and self-care. Mechanisms of action are less well understood, but may include both psychological and physiological changes. The aim of this study was to understand more about benefits and mechanisms of yoga practice, using qualitative data collected from a large-scale survey of yoga use in the United Kingdom.
Methods:
The mixed methods, cross-sectional online survey collected data on yoga use and perceived benefits from 2434 U.K. yoga practitioners. The qualitative survey element used open-ended questions to gain “real life” data regarding practice and perceived benefits. Data were analyzed thematically and deductively. A practice-based model describing yoga practice, mechanisms, and benefits, based on the Khalsa logic model of yoga, was developed to explain the data.
Findings:
Findings highlighted that a diverse range of yoga practices and nonspecific contextual factors related to practicing yoga, needed to be considered to understand how yoga was benefitting people. These practices encompassed both modern and traditional conceptions of yoga as a deeper lifestyle practice. Key mechanisms for change included improvements in physical strength and flexibility, stress regulation, resilience, equanimity, mind–body awareness, and spiritual/personal growth. These mechanisms resulted in diverse improvements in global health functioning, particularly physical and mental health and well-being.
Conclusions:
The Khalsa model provided a useful base upon which to guide the new population-practice-based model, to understand participants' “real life” experiences of yoga, how yoga is helping people and why. It provides important information for practitioners, teachers, and those delivering yoga interventions as to the range of skills and potential benefits of yoga practice. In addition, findings indicate directions for future research, by highlighting key yoga mechanisms that researchers may choose to focus on in future studies.
Introduction
The worldwide popularity of yoga has increased substantially, with more than a doubling of those practicing yoga in the past decade in the United States alone, 1 where it is the most commonly reported complementary medicine practice. 2 Research on efficacy studies for improving physical and mental health conditions has similarly grown incrementally as evidenced by bibliographic analyses. 3,4 The roots of yoga as a transformative spiritual practice lie in Indian philosophy, in which the eight limbs of yoga include physical and meditative practices as well as moral precepts, to support a healthy and meaningful life. 5 In the West, yoga practice is primarily associated with physical postures, breathing techniques, relaxation, and meditation. Although western practitioners may initially be drawn to the physical and stress-relieving qualities of yoga, evidence suggests a shift toward more holistic motivations, including spirituality, with continued practice. 6 –8
Observational and clinical studies have reported a wide range of health outcomes from yoga practice. 9 –11 In terms of physical health, yoga has been found to impact on fitness, balance, and physical functioning 12,13 as well as a wide range of long-term conditions, such as musculoskeletal, 14,15 metabolic, 16,17 and cardiovascular conditions. 18 Positive impacts on mental health have been noted for both clinical conditions such as depression, 19 –22 and broader indices of well-being and quality of life. 11,23 Yoga is also associated with increases in other positive health behaviors such as exercise and diet, as practitioners increase their mind–body awareness and place greater emphasis on self-care. 24 –26 Broader benefits of practice include increases in social connectedness, connection with environment, and improved relationships. 27 –29
Although the evidence base for mechanisms of action is still developing, studies suggest that yoga has significant physiological effects on the brain and body, including regulation of the autonomic nervous system, 30 reductions in inflammatory markers, 31 and positive changes in brain structures and function. 32 Psychological mechanisms include enhanced self-regulation, cognitive function, and mind–body awareness. 33,34 Based on existing research, Khalsa has proposed a logic model describing the main aspects by which yoga practices impact on “global health functioning” through physiological, psychological, and experiential mechanisms 35 (Fig. 1).

Khalsa's framework describing the main aspects by which yoga practices impact on “global health functioning” through physiological, psychological, and experiential mechanisms. 34
This framework has various iterations, evolving from when it was first published, as new evidence and input emerged, for example, with spirituality added at a later stage. 36,37 The framework describes how the multicomponent practice of yoga builds skills and competencies in physical fitness, self-regulation, awareness, and spiritual experience, recognizing that these competencies are interrelated, for example, increased mindfulness leading to improved emotional regulation. 34 These skills then work holistically to improve a range of health, interpersonal, and behavioral outcomes.
The corresponding author recently conducted a mixed-methods survey to assess the practice and perceived impact of yoga among a large sample of yoga practitioners in the United Kingdom. 6 Quantitative data showed that practitioners attributed a wide range of physical and psychological benefits to their yoga practice, including its value in managing health conditions. Khalsa's research-based logic model appeared to provide a useful opportunity upon which to guide the authors' explorations of qualitative data and further their understanding of this “real life” survey data.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to understand the processes by which yoga may impact on healthy functioning through practitioners' experiences and perceptions of their practice, by developing a population-practice-based model-, based on and informed by the Khalsa framework. The practice-based model is intended, not only as a framework with which to describe the practitioner experience of yoga, but also to inform future yoga studies as a hypothesis generating tool.
Methods
Design
A cross-sectional anonymous online survey collected both quantitative and qualitative data regarding yoga use and perceived impact; qualitative data only are reported in this study. The Khalsa model of hypothesized mechanisms and outcomes of yoga (Fig. 1) was used as a guiding framework through which to explore and understand the qualitative data, providing a base upon which to inform the development of the population-practice-based model of yoga mechanisms. This approach represents a deductive-dominant analysis 38,39 : initially the researcher takes an inductive approach to their study where they are open to whatever emerges from their data. Then, as initial examinations of the data reveal patterns and dimensions of interest, an appropriate framework or theory may be selected to verify or elucidate emerging from the data; thus adopting a deductive approach. 40 Deductive approaches make use of what is already known on a topic and can improve the validity and reliability 41 of qualitative analysis, supporting “conviction” of the findings. 42
Recruitment
Survey participants were recruited through U.K.-based yoga organizations, e-mail invitations to yoga studios, marketing at U.K. yoga events and social media. The survey was open for completion between June and December 2016. Inclusion criteria included: U.K. resident, practiced yoga within the past 12 months, and over 18 years The survey measured sociodemographic, health, and lifestyle variables, yoga practice characteristics, perceived health impact, and yoga-related injuries; full details of the survey are reported elsewhere. 6 Ethical approval was gained from the University of Westminster Ethics committee (REF: 1516–0614) and all participants gave informed consent.
Study sample
In total, 2434 people completed the online survey, with the majority being female (87%), white (91%), and well educated (71% ≥ degree), with a wide age range (18–92 years, M = 48.7 ± 12.5). Participants reported a high degree of yoga engagement, practicing 3.88 (±1.96) days per week, with an average of 13.90 (±11.60) years of practice. Forty percent (n = 906) of the sample were yoga teachers. Full quantitative findings are reported elsewhere. 6
Qualitative data collection
The survey contained four free-text questions that followed relevant sections in the questionnaire, asking participants if they would like to add further qualitative detail: Following questions relating to style and duration of practice, “Is there anything else you would like to add about your yoga practice?” (n = 534) Following fixed response questions regarding improvements to physical and mental health attributed to yoga, “Please feel free to add further detail” (n = 353) Following questions relating to specific health issues, “Feel free to provide further details, including which practices you found most helpful or least helpful” (n = 696) At the end of the survey, “any further comments” (n = 413).
Analysis
Qualitative responses to the open-ended questions were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis based on Khalsa's logic model, adopting a realist epistemology. 43 Initially, 10% of the data (split equally between the four open-ended questions) were coded according to the Khalsa framework by both authors (A.C. and T.C.) independently. In addition, the researchers highlighted any data that they felt they could not fit into the Khalsa framework—highlighting where this “real life” data may differ from research study data. The researchers then met to compare coding; where data were coded differently it was discussed and debated until agreement was reached on how best to code the data. For data that did not fit into the existing Khalsa framework an additional category was added or an existing theme was amended/expanded to fit the data. For example, the resilience subtheme (under self-regulation) was amended to resilience/coping. This process was then repeated for another 10% of the data using the amended framework for coding. A final amended framework was then agreed upon and all data were coded (by A.C.) into NVivo software using this new population-practice-based framework. Any uncertainties that arose regarding coding of the remaining data were discussed with T.C.
Results and Discussion
The Khalsa model provided a useful guide upon which to base the new population-practice-based model, to understand participants' “real life” experiences of yoga. The population-practice-based model of yoga is shown in Figure 2; more details of the themes are presented in Table 1 and elucidated in the text hereunder. Results and discussion are combined and structured around the different elements of the model: the practitioner experience of yoga is described, differences between this real-life data compared with the Khalsa framework are discussed and examined, and suggestions for future research are proposed.

A population-practice-based model of yoga practice.
A Population-Practice-Based Model of Yoga Practice: Qualitative Data Analysis Categories and Example Quotes
CFS, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; ME, myalgic encephalomyelitis.
Practicing yoga
Although the yoga practices outlined in the Khalsa model (i.e., postures, breathing, relaxation, and meditation) were regularly described by participants, they also reported using additional practices (e.g., chanting, yoga philosophy, devotion, and yoga nidra). Many participants described yoga as a “way of life” practiced not just on, but also off, the mat. In the seminal yoga text of the Yoga Sutras, Patanjali describes the “eight limbs of yoga”: key aspects of yoga practice that lead toward higher levels of consciousness. 44 These eight limbs include posture and breathing practices (more common in western yoga practices), but also the ethical and moral precepts and ways of living described by some participants as important to their practice. Therefore, the population-practice-based model uses “limbs of yoga” as a descriptor to capture the broad lifestyle practices of yoga in the community.
In addition, participants described a number of important experiential factors in their yoga practice, such as connection with the teacher and other class members, enjoyment, accessibility, and sense of belonging. The importance of “nonspecific” factors in complementary and alternative medicine and psychological therapies is well documented, 45 –48 with the role of teacher/therapist appearing key. 47,49,50 However, research into these nonspecific factors in yoga is warranted, particularly on the role of yoga teacher characteristics and their impact on practitioner outcomes and experiences.
Yoga mechanisms
Physical
This theme was guided by the Khalsa framework “Fitness” category, which the population-practice-based model has termed “Physical” to better reflect the broader content of this category, which has also been used by others. 34,51 Unsurprisingly, development of flexibility and strength were the most dominant subcategories. Although co-ordination/balance and respiratory function were less commonly cited, solid support for these subthemes was present. However, in this study, descriptions of physical self-efficacy were better captured by the broader self-regulation subtheme of “self-efficacy,” since it constitutes a psychological construct reflecting confidence in exerting control over one's motivation and behaviour. 52
In addition, there was support for two additional subthemes: (1) improved posture, due to musculoskeletal changes and/or improved awareness of poor posture and (2) muscle tension release, which could be general or specifically in relation to release in the back, neck, and shoulders. These data are supported by preliminary research that suggests yoga practice improves posture, 53 –55 and supports reductions in muscular tension, 56 –58 suggesting avenues for future research studies.
Self-regulation
This Khalsa model category was commonly endorsed by participants. Many described how yoga had improved their emotion regulation, stress regulation, resilience, equanimity, and self-efficacy; see Table 1. However, the population-practice-based model expands the resilience category to include coping more broadly, as participants frequently described improved coping 59,60 that encompassed, but extended beyond, resilience: “It has provided me with essential coping mechanism tools for difficult times in my life.” Other research has found that yoga supports emotion-focused and problem-focused coping; 59,60 and it has been the focus of other conceptual frameworks of how yoga improves well-being 46 suggesting an important area for further research.
Awareness
Participant data fitted well with the Khalsa awareness mechanism subcategories for mindfulness, concentration, and meta-cognition. Analysis showed participants also reported improvements in their “focus” (rather than “attention” used by Khalsa): “I start every day with my Sadhana, it sets me up for the day and keeps me centred and focused.” Improved focus as a result of yoga has been described by other studies. 61 –63 As the term “focus” is often used interchangeably with the term concentration, a subtheme of “concentration/focus” was included for the population-practice-based model. Data coded to the Khalsa “cognition” subcategory were minimal, including general statements around clearer thinking and improved brain function. However, it is plausible that cognitive changes (e.g., improved memory and problem-solving ability) are better identified under experimental conditions rather than through practitioner reports, which explains the low reporting in this study.
Yoga is categorized by the medical community as a mind–body medicine, 14 with definitions of yoga including the “union” of mind and body, with practices to train the mind and prepare the body for meditation. It is perhaps, therefore, unsurprising that there were a significant number of participant reports on improved mind–body awareness: “Overall understanding of body and mind through yoga gives confidence to deal with physical and mental conditions.” Other research also has demonstrated that yoga produces improvements in mind–body awareness in practitioners 64 –66 and awareness (of mind, body, and emotions) has been identified as a key skill learnt during mindfulness training. 67 Therefore, a “mind–body awareness” subcategory was included for the population-practice-based model.
Spiritual and personal growth
Although only a small proportion of participants specifically mentioned “spirituality” in relation to their yoga practice, many identified the specific spiritual aspects and states described by Khalsa, suggesting unitive state, transcendence, flow, transformation, and life meaning/purpose are all useful operationalizations of spirituality and relatable for practitioners. Changes in life-meaning/purpose was the most commonly cited subcategory, including reports of yoga as helping to find meaning/purpose, yoga AS life meaning or new life opportunities that have arisen due to yoga. Future studies may wish to explore these different aspects for finding life meaning through yoga.
In addition to spiritual aspects, a body of data appeared to describe “personal growth” as a result of yoga, including improved happiness, positivity, understanding of self/life, and approaches to life: “[I do yoga to] balance my ego, ambition and energy. I believe yoga teaches responsibility for self.” These data were included with the “transformation” subcategory and may also benefit from further research.
Global health functioning
Data from this study fitted well with the Khalsa model global health functioning (GHF) subcategories of improved physical and mental health, positive behavior change, well-being, and spirituality. Physical and mental health was by far the most prevalent subcategory, which covered a broad range of issues such as maintenance of health, general health, managing specific mental and physical health conditions, supporting pregnancy, pain-management, reductions in medication use, recovery from injury/illness, and sleep.
In addition, a number of participants reported yoga as integral to successful aging and improved energy: “I have a lot more energy and my fitness levels are better for my age than my peer group.” There is also evidence from the research literature that yoga can improve energy levels, 68,69 as well as age-related conditions 11,70 and cellular aging. 71 Thus, the population-practice-based model also included these subcategories. From a practice perspective, yoga may be useful to support Western aging populations; however, populations who are less physically confident may be unsure about attending standard yoga classes. Tailored interventions may, therefore, be more effective. 72
Although the Khalsa model's description of improved physical performance due to yoga was commonly cited, participants also described improvements to mental performance and general functioning at work: “Yoga postures are incredibly well aligned to the technique and posture required for rowing. Yoga gives me the mental resilience to deal with the pressure of competition too.” Therefore, the authors have included a broader subcategory of “performance” for the population-practice-based model, as in earlier iterations of the Khalsa framework. 36
Participants reported improvements to relationships as a result of yoga, which is echoed in the literature. 27,37 For example, Ross et al. 29 identified four ways in which yoga improved interpersonal relationships through personal transformation, increased social interaction, coping mechanisms to weather relationship loss and spiritual transcendence. Thus, “relationships” is included in the model here.
Four subthemes that appear in the GHF theme of the Khalsa model also appear in the yoga mechanisms categories: stress and emotion regulation, awareness/mindfulness, meta cognition, life purpose and meaning, indicating that they are both mechanisms and outcomes of yoga. When examining participant data, their yoga experiences were either more reflective of mechanisms or there was no way to distinguish between reports as GHF or mechanisms. For example, this quote supported mindfulness as a mechanism: “yoga has made me much more mindful which is why I believe it is so beneficial to so many areas of life.” Theoretical data indicate these aspects may be mechanisms. 23,33,46,73 However, the reality is complex, indeed mechanisms in the framework may also be outcomes—or even both mechanisms and outcomes.
It is important that future studies investigate moderators and mediators of yoga outcomes to refine future models of yoga mechanisms and effects. It would also be useful to explore the amount of practice required for changes to occur; some may emerge more quickly (e.g., changes to physical and mental health, which were commonly endorsed by participants), whereas those less commonly endorsed (e.g., spirituality) may require a more dedicated practice. In addition, different styles of yoga may be associated with differential physical and psycho-spiritual changes.
Study strengths and limitations
A strength of this research was the large sample size that enabled the exploration of yoga practices and impact across practitioners with diverse experiences and duration of practice. However, the sample, although perhaps reflective of the demographic practicing yoga in the United Kingdom and other western countries, lacked diversity. The experiences and perspectives of ethnic minority groups, men and those of lower socioeconomic status may not be fully represented by the findings.
The Khalsa model was chosen as a framework for analysis, after data had been collected and initially examined. The model was chosen because as an established framework it allowed the authors to make use of existing knowledge on the topic and provided a robust foundation upon which to guide the authors' explorations and further their understanding of these “real life” data. However, this approach also comes with some implications for this study. The data collection questions were broad, asking participants to provide additional details to quantitative ratings of health and well-being, as well as anything they wanted to add about their practice. Although this has the advantage that topics unanticipated by researchers are allowed to emerge, which is important in initial stages of framework formation, it may also mean that specific experiences of yoga, not prioritized by participants, may have not been uncovered by this study. It may also be that changes in physical and mental health are overemphasized as a result of the approach. Specific questions representing each subcategory in the Khalsa model may have provided additional data, for example, if participants had been specifically asked if their values had changed as a result of yoga, further data may have been obtained on this topic. Future research should now adopt this approach to test the population-practice-based model further.
Conclusions
This study provides further insight into the practices, mechanisms, and perceived impact of yoga from the perspective of practitioners and teachers. A population-practice-based model of yoga was developed, based upon and guided by the Khalsa logic model of yoga. Findings highlighted that a diverse range of yoga practices and nonspecific contextual factors related to practicing yoga, needed to be considered to understand how yoga was benefitting people. These practices encompassed both modern and traditional conceptions of yoga as a deeper lifestyle practice. Key mechanisms for change included improvements in physical strength and flexibility, stress regulation, resilience, equanimity, mind–body awareness, and spiritual/personal growth. These mechanisms resulted in diverse improvements in global health function, particularly physical and mental health and well-being.
This systematic enquiry into subjective experiences of yoga sheds light on how yoga is helping people and why. It provides important information for practitioners, teachers, and those delivering yoga interventions as to the range of skills and potential benefits of yoga practice. In addition, findings indicate directions for future research, by highlighting key yoga mechanisms and outcomes that researchers may choose to focus on in large-scale quantitative studies or in-depth qualitative enquiry.
Footnotes
Authors' Contributions
T.C. collected the survey data. A.C. and T.C. co-developed the idea for the article and how to present the qualitative data. A.C. led on the data analysis, with input from T.C. T.C. and A.C. jointly wrote the article. All coauthors have reviewed and approved the article before submission.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to all yoga studios, teachers, and the British Wheel of Yoga for promoting the survey and to participants for taking their time to complete the questionnaire. With additional thanks to Karen Pilkington and Heather Mason for their involvement in the survey design and to the reviewers for their valuable suggestions, which substantially improved the article.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
No funding was received for this article.
