Abstract
The single greatest challenge to an HIV cure is the persistence of latently infected cells containing inducible, replication-competent proviral genomes, which constitute only a small fraction of total or infected cells in the body. Although resting CD4+ T cells in the blood are a well-known source of viral rebound, more than 90% of the body's lymphocytes reside elsewhere. Many are in gut tissue, where HIV DNA levels per million CD4+ T cells are considerably higher than in the blood. Despite the significant contribution of gut tissue to viral replication and persistence, little is known about the cell types that support persistence of HIV in the gut; importantly, T cells in the gut have phenotypic, functional, and survival properties that are distinct from T cells in other tissues. The mechanisms by which latency is established and maintained will likely depend on the location and cytokine milieu surrounding the latently infected cells in each compartment. Therefore, successful HIV cure strategies require identification and characterization of the exact cell types that support viral persistence, particularly in the gut. In this review, we describe the seeding of the latent HIV reservoir in the gut mucosa; highlight the evidence for compartmentalization and depletion of T cells; summarize the immunologic consequences of HIV infection within the gut milieu; propose how the damaged gut environment may promote the latent HIV reservoir; and explore several immune cell targets in the gut and their place on the path toward HIV cure.
Introduction
C
Viral persistence in HIV-infected individuals on ART has classically been attributed to latently infected resting CD4+ T cells, 4 –7 which harbor integrated, replication-competent HIV and do not produce virus constitutively, but can be induced by activation to produce infectious virus. The latent proviral DNA is neither recognized by the immune system nor affected by ART. It is unclear what mechanisms govern HIV latency in vivo, and prior studies have implicated mechanisms such as inhibition of HIV transcriptional initiation, inhibition of transcriptional elongation, and post-transcriptional factors. 8,9 Traditionally, it is believed that the latently infected cells transcribe little if any HIV RNA. However, cell-associated HIV RNA can be readily detected in blood and tissues of ART-suppressed patients. For example, one recent study using highly sensitive cell-associated HIV RNA and DNA single-genome sequencing revealed that some circulating CD4+ T cells from ART-suppressed patients express low levels (1–62 copies/cell) of HIV RNA. 10 Further study is needed to determine if these findings from total CD4+ T cells are recapitulated in latently infected cells. However, latently-infected cells may show varying amounts of HIV transcription, including transcription of short, incomplete, or nonpolyadenylated HIV transcripts; newly developed digital droplet PCR assays that allow measurement of total and elongated HIV RNAs can also support these future studies. 11
The mechanisms by which latency is established and maintained will likely depend on the location and cytokine milieu surrounding the latently infected cells. Therefore, it is critical to identify and characterize the exact cell types that support viral persistence in all anatomic compartments, including the gut. A recent study identified that CD32a+ blood CD4 T cells isolated from ART-treated HIV-1+ participants are highly enriched for inducible replication-competent proviruses, 12 suggesting CD32a as a potential marker for detecting latently infected cells. Given that the study only reported blood cells, further studies will be required to demonstrate the prognostic significance of CD32a in mucosal and lymphoid tissues. 13 Importantly, HIV initiates and sustains a vicious inflammatory cycle by damaging the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which leads to systemic exposure to gut microbial products, increased activation of T cells, and higher viral replication. 14 –16 Despite the significant contribution of gut tissue to viral replication and persistence, little is known about the cell types that support persistence of HIV in the gut.
In this review, we describe how HIV infection leads to depletion of T cells in the GI tract and discuss what is known about the HIV reservoir in the gut compared to other anatomic compartments. We give special consideration to the location and frequency of various subsets of human T cells in various lymphoid and mucosal tissues, as these will prove essential in HIV cure endeavors.
Seeding the Latent HIV Reservoir in the Mucosa
Most of our understanding of how the latent HIV reservoir is established comes from nonhuman primate models of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection and in vitro studies that use human cell culture systems. Upon mucosal SIV infection in rhesus macaques (RM), the viral reservoir is seeded very rapidly. 17 Evidence from in vitro studies 18 as well as HIV-infected individuals, 19,20 indicates that the latent reservoir is also established very early in HIV infection. In agreement with these findings, initiation of ART as early as 10 days after the onset of symptoms of primary HIV-1 infection does not prevent generation of latently infected cells 19 ; however, the size of latent reservoir can be limited by early administration of ART. 1,21,22
Mathematical modeling also suggests that latency is established early and is hardwired into the HIV genome to enhance lentiviral transmission across the mucosa, especially when target cells are not abundant. 23 Although the gut is rich with target cells, other factors in the mucosal milieu may contribute to rapid seeding of latently infected cells. For example, to establish a productive infection, HIV inhibits type I interferon (IFN) expression in T cells and macrophages. 24 HIV blocks IFN production through protease sequestering of the cytoplasmic RNA sensor retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I). 25 IFN resistance confers a distinct advantage to the transmitted viruses, creating a bottleneck at the mucosa and favoring selection of viruses that can replicate and spread efficiently in the face of a potent innate immune response. 26 In vitro studies also support this model, as widespread defects in IFN-I responsiveness are observed within latently HIV-infected cell lines. 27 Thus, latency may be established early after transmission to avoid an IFN-mediated inflammatory response, allowing the virus to surreptitiously traffic away from the mucosa and migrate into the lymphoid tissues, where IFN resistance promotes viral replication, while creating a target-rich environment in which the virus can spread.
Direct measurements of the latent reservoir in patients on ART using limiting dilution coculture (viral outgrowth) assays show variable, but extremely slow decay rates (t1/2 of 6–44 months) in resting CD4+ T cells in blood. 28 –32 In addition, latently infected CD4+ T cells with memory phenotypes are long-lived and undergo homeostatic proliferation and clonal expansion, 33,34 which may add to the prolonged persistence of HIV in these cells. 35 –37 Although residual viral replication may help replenish the latent reservoir in some patients, 29,31 even without such replenishment, the half-life of the latent reservoir is sufficiently long that these cells will persist despite lifelong ART. Lower availability/penetration of drugs in lymphoid tissues 38,39 and peripheral tissues, such as the gut and the central nervous system, may also contribute to possible residual replication in these anatomical sites. 39 –42 Low-level persistent production of HIV may, in turn, contribute to heightened immune activation, rendering cells more permissive to infection and helping replenish reservoirs of HIV-infected cells. 31 Phenotypic identification of latently infected cells may greatly enhance innovative strategies to selectively target these cells in infected individuals, 43 which would be a major milestone toward HIV cure.
T-Cell Subsets: Phenotypes and Compartmentalization
Memory T cells develop over decades in response to exposure to diverse antigens. By the second decade of life, memory T cells constitute up to 35% of circulating T cells. 44 This pool of memory T cells reaches a plateau by the third decade of life and remains stable throughout adulthood. 45,46 After antigen stimulation in lymphoid organs, naive T (TN) cells differentiate into activated effector cells that migrate to nonlymphoid tissues, where they act to clear the infection. A fraction of these cells persists as long-lived memory T cells that can be divided into three main subpopulations: central memory (TCM), effector memory (TEM), and tissue-resident (TRM) memory T cells (Table 1). TCM cells circulate between lymphatic tissues and blood, whereas TEM cells survey peripheral tissues and recirculate through the lymphoid system and the blood. A more recently identified subpopulation termed “transitional memory” T (TTM) cells exhibits functional and transcriptional characteristics that are intermediate to TCM and TEM. These TTM cells can be distinguished through their additional expression of CD27 receptor. 47,48 The long-term circulating memory pool is maintained, in part, by memory stem cells (TSCM) that comprise 2%–4% of circulating memory T cells. 49,50 TSCM exhibit a gene and cell surface molecule expression profile that place them phenotypically between TN and TCM. 51,52 TSCM serve as precursors of other memory cells, 53 but their cellular distribution in humans is poorly understood. In contrast to all these other memory T-cell subsets, TRM cells reside in peripheral and mucosal tissues. They do not reenter circulation, but remain localized and poised for rapid effector function in sites not surveyed by TN and TCM cells. 54,55
γδ T cells, gamma-delta T cells; ICOS, inducible T-cell costimulator; ILCs, innate lymphoid cells; MAIT, mucosal-associated invariant T.
Most prior studies investigating various memory T-cell subsets have focused on peripheral blood samples; however, more recent analyses of tissue biopsies and organ donors have advanced our understanding of the location and frequency of various subsets of human T cells in various lymphoid and mucosal tissues. 46,56 Approximately half of the CD4+ T cells found in adult human blood have a naive phenotype. The proportions of TCM and TEM are similar in blood and peripheral lymph nodes, but most of the memory T cells found in various gut tissues display a TEM phenotype. 46,57 T cells are highly diverse and compartmentalized among various tissue sites, 46,58 and the effect of memory T-cell tissue compartmentalization should be considered in the context of identifying HIV reservoirs. Since the molecular mechanisms of HIV persistence could vary based on the phenotype of HIV-infected cells and the prevailing tissue microenvironment, it is important to understand the frequency of cell subsets that harbor HIV DNA/RNA in all tissue types.
In contrast to blood, where most HIV DNA is found in central and transitional memory CD4+ T cells, 36 most HIV DNA and RNA in the gut are found in effector memory CD4+ T cells. 59 Although the gut contains a significant fraction of the body's memory T cells, most gut T cells also display markers of activation, suggesting that the mechanisms that maintain HIV in these cells are very different from those that maintain HIV latency in blood, where latently infected cells are primarily resting memory CD4+ T cells.
T-Cell Subsets: The Gut Mucosa
The GI tract, composed of a mucus layer, epithelial layer, and underlying lamina propria, constitutes a critical barrier that serves to regulate the uptake of nutrients, water, and electrolytes, while excluding and mediating appropriate responses to a plethora of potentially harmful substances and microbes. 60 The GI tract contains the largest population of T lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages in the human body, harboring up to 85% of all lymphoid tissue and over 90% of all lymphocytes. 60,61 While both the small and large intestine are tightly connected with draining lymph nodes through the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), the small intestine is lined with organized lymphoid structures (including Peyer's patches), whereas the colon contains less structured lymphoid aggregates. 62,63
Most intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) that reside in the epithelial layer are CD8+ T cells. However, CD4+ T cells are not entirely absent from the epithelial layer, and their numbers increase toward the distal parts of the GI tract. 63 While TCRγδ+ cells are more abundant in the epithelium than in other parts of the body, they still represent a minor fraction of IELs. Unlike IELs, most T cells in the lamina propria are CD4+ T cells, which are present at an approximate ratio of 2:1 compared to CD8+ T cells. 56 Several other populations of unconventional cells, such as invariant natural killer T cells, mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, and innate lymphoid cells, also reside in the gut. 63,64 While naive and TCM CD4+ T cells constitute the largest populations in the blood, the gut contains primarily TEM and TTM CD4+ T cells. 65 The lamina propria harbors a diverse pool of CD4+ T-cell populations, including IFNγ+ (TH1), interleukin (IL)-4+ (TH2), IL-17+ (TH17), IL-22+ (TH22), and IFNγ+ and IL-17+ (TH1/TH17) subsets, as well as forkhead box P3 (FoxP3)-expressing regulatory T (Treg) cells producing IL-10.
TH17 and Treg frequencies increase from the jejunum toward the colon, while frequencies of CD4+ TH1 and TH2 cells remain similar through the GI tract. 63 Within the germinal centers (GC) lies a population of CD4+ CXCR5+ PD-1+ lymphocytes, termed T follicular helper cells (TFH), which provide help to B cells during maturation, Ig class switching, and antibody hypermutation through secretion of IL-21 and other cytokines. 66 Thus, the gut harbors a diverse array of T lymphocytes with both common and distinct phenotypic characteristics relative to T cells in other parts of the body.
Depletion of Gut T Cells in Early HIV Infection
The dramatic depletion of CD4+ T cells is one of the defining hallmarks of HIV infection. 67 Studies in the pathogenic SIV model in RM suggest that during acute infection, the gut experiences a more rapid and severe depletion of CD4+ T cells than the peripheral blood, 68 as a result of direct infection 69 and indirectly due to apoptosis of infected and uninfected cells. 70 In acutely infected humans, a dramatic depletion of CD4+ T cells in the gut is observed within 4–6 weeks 71 and continues through all stages of the disease. 67 In lymphoid tissues, >95% of cell death may occur by Caspase-1 induced pyroptosis of abortively infected bystander CD4+ T cells. 72 In contrast, circulating CD4+ T cells are resistant to HIV-induced pyroptosis, 73 suggesting the existence of distinct mechanisms of CD4+ T-cell depletion in lymphoid versus circulating cells. Whether a similar pyroptotic mechanism of cell death is also responsible for rapid depletion of gut CD4+ T cells is yet unknown.
At the mucosal portals of entry, HIV rapidly contacts the epithelium, antigen-presenting cells, and mucosal lymphocytes (Fig. 1). During the first hours of infection, HIV traverses the mucosal barrier into the lamina propria, where abundant CD4+ memory T cells reside. Several factors contribute to the increased vulnerability of gut mucosal CD4+ T cells and their dramatic depletion soon after HIV infection. First, the rectum is lined with dendritic cells (DCs) abundant in DC-specific ICAM-3 grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN), and HIV is selectively engulfed by these DC-SIGN+ mononuclear cells, which are able to transfer the virus to T cells with a fourfold greater efficiency than DC-SIGN− cells. 74

Establishment and maintenance of HIV reservoir in the gut. The healthy GI tract is composed of a mucus layer, epithelial layer, and underlying lamina propria that constitute a critical barrier to potentially harmful microbes. The GI tract contains the largest population of T lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages in the human body. While naive and TCM CD4 T cells constitute the largest populations in the blood, the gut contains primarily TEM and TTM CD4+ T cells and a diverse pool of other CD4+ T-cell populations, including TH17, TH22, TFH, and Treg cells. At the mucosal portals of entry, HIV crosses the epithelial barrier into the lamina propria, where abundant CCR5+CD4+ memory T cells reside. The rectum is lined with DCs positive for DC-SIGN (CD209), and HIV is selectively engulfed by these DC-SIGN+ mononuclear cells that can transfer virus to T cells. Consequently, depletion of CD4+ T cells in the GI tract occurs predominantly in CCR5+CD4+ T cells. The intestinal barrier dysfunction and subsequent immune activation coincide with depletion of CD4+ T cells. This ensues from the destruction of tight junctions between the single layer of epithelium that lines the vast mucosal surfaces of the GI tract, resulting in enhanced microbial permeability. The compromised structural integrity of the mucosal barrier facilitates the translocation of microbial products that may contribute to immune activation during chronic infection and may also result in delayed reconstitution of CD4+ T cells. The dramatic depletion of CD4+ T cells is one of the defining hallmarks of HIV infection and continues through all stages of the disease. During the course of ART and rapid reduction of HIV viremia, the number of HIV DNA-harboring CD4+ T cells gradually declines over the first 1–4 years, and then plateaus without further change, thereby maintaining a stable pool of latently infected cells. CD4+ TEM cells have been shown to harbor the major proportion of HIV DNA in the gut. Other lymphocyte populations such as TH17, TFH, and γδ T cells are among the other potential cellular reservoirs of HIV. Although ART dramatically improves life expectancy, it does not completely restore the immune system or intestinal integrity, and, thus, health in infected individuals. ART, antiretroviral therapy; DCs, dendritic cells; DC-SIGN, DC-specific ICAM-3 grabbing nonintegrin; γδ T cells, gamma-delta T cells; GI, gastrointestinal.
Secondly, compared to CD4+ T cells in the blood, a much higher percent of gut CD4+ T cells expresses markers of memory (CD45RO) 75 and the HIV coreceptor CCR5. 76 –80 Consequently, depletion of CD4+ T cells in the GI tract occurs predominantly in CCR5+CD4+ T cells, 67 with those exhibiting a memory phenotype being most readily infected 81 –84 and depleted, 70 while CD4+-naive T cells are infected at a significantly lower frequency 82 and are relatively spared. 84 In vitro data also indicate that intestinal epithelial cells may select and transfer CCR5-tropic HIV-1 by transcytosis across the tight epithelial cell monolayer, 85 which might contribute to the predominance of R5-tropic HIV during acute primary infection. 86,87
Third, much of the expansive surface area of the GI mucosa endures constant exposure to microbial antigens, resulting in a constant state of immunologic activation, which is characterized by high levels of HIV-1 stimulatory chemokines and proinflammatory mediators. 88
Fourth, expression of the surface receptor α4β7 integrin, which mediates lymphocyte homing to mucosal sites, can also enhance binding to HIV Envelope protein on viral particles, leading to an increase in CD4+ T-cell susceptibility to infection. 89 In par with these observations, a recent study in SIV-infected monkeys found that neutralizing antibody (Ab) to α4β7 significantly lowered detectable viral load in plasma. 90 Further evidence suggested that integrin α4β7 can be incorporated into circulating virions, enabling the virion-α4β7 complex to bind to mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1)-expressing cells to enhance infection, 91 which could be a potential mechanism of anti-α4β7 Ab-mediated reduction in plasma viral load in infected monkeys. 90 The effect of the α4β7 neutralizing Ab on gut as well as other mucosal or lymphoid tissue infection is yet unknown.
Finally, recent in vitro evidence suggests that HIV-mediated changes in the gut microbiome could result in lipopolysaccharide-induced upregulation of CCR5, which in turn could increase T lymphocyte susceptibility to HIV and serve to increase CCR5-tropic HIV-1 production. 92 Together, these factors contribute to the increased susceptibility of CD4+ T cells to initial and ongoing infection, permitting higher levels of infection and viral replication in the gut.
Disruption of the Gut Barrier and Immunologic Sequelae During Chronic HIV Infection
HIV infection results in the marked disruption of the three major components of the GI tract: the microbial barrier, composed of commensal intestinal flora; the immunologic barrier, comprising intramucosal lymphocytes, mesenteric lymph nodes, and secreted factors responsible for mediating the host immune response; and the mechanical barrier formed by epithelial and endothelial cells connected by tight junctions. 93 Intestinal barrier dysfunction and subsequent immune activation coincide with HIV-mediated depletion of CD4+ T cells and result from the destruction of tight junctions between the single layer of epithelium that lines the vast mucosal surfaces of the GI tract, leading to enhanced microbial permeability (Fig. 1). 16,94 The compromised structural integrity of the mucosal barrier facilitates translocation of microbial products, which significantly contribute to immune activation during chronic infection 16,95 and may also result in delayed reconstitution of CD4+ T cells. 96 Microbial translocation can be further exacerbated by intestinal microbiota that degrades tryptophan through the kynurenine pathway, contributing to the dysfunction of gut mucosal CD4+ TH17 and TH22 cells. 97,98
Systemic immune activation arising from gut barrier dysfunction has wide-ranging, mostly deleterious consequences. Chronic immune activation is multifaceted, driven by polyclonal B-cell activation, 99 increased T-cell activation 100 and turnover, 101 and dysregulation of cytokine production. 102 A high turnover of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells disrupts T-cell homeostasis and contributes to lower overall half-lives of these cells. 103,104 This turnover perpetuates HIV infection by generating more viral targets through the production of CD4+ TEM cells from TCM cells, 84 ultimately resulting in depletion and exhaustion of memory T-cell pools. Sustained immune activation may also contribute to decreased thymic function over time. 105,106 In addition, collagen deposition and the ensuing fibrosis of lymphatic tissues create an unfavorable microenvironment for TN cell survival and hinders immune reconstitution with ART. 67,107,108 Moreover, decreases in digestion and absorption result from aberrant expression of genes regulating lymphocyte activation, inflammation, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, active transport, and epithelial barrier maintenance. 109
The profound HIV-mediated damage to the GI tract may also contribute to a multitude of vascular, liver, renal, cardiac, and pulmonary comorbidities that are not remedied by ART. 110,111 Even after years on ART, the absolute number of CD4+ T cells in the gut tissues of HIV-infected individuals is not restored to the levels observed in noninfected individuals, 67,71,112,113 and gut CD4+ T-cell reconstitution lags behind that in the blood. 71,114
The Damaged Gut Environment Promotes Latent HIV Reservoir
Multiple studies in both untreated and ART-treated patients report that HIV levels are higher in the gut versus the blood. In untreated patients, levels of HIV p24 antigen are much higher in intestinal biopsies than in blood. 115 Although CD4+ T cells constitute a much smaller percent of the total mononuclear cells in the gut, compared to peripheral blood, gut HIV DNA levels per million total cells are comparable to 115 or greater than those in the blood 116 of untreated patients, while HIV DNA and RNA per million CD4+ T cells are 13- and 10-fold higher (respectively) in the colon compared to the blood of untreated patients 117 (Table 2).
ART, antiretroviral therapy.
HIV RNA, HIV DNA, and infectious virus have been detected in the gut of ART-suppressed patients, and some cross-sectional studies found little difference between ART-treated and ART-untreated patients in HIV detection frequencies or nucleic acid levels. 118 –120 A prospective study found that initiation of ART during early infection caused similar reductions in HIV RNA in blood and rectum at 6 months, although the rectum still showed less reduction in HIV DNA. 121 In ART-suppressed patients, HIV DNA levels per million CD4+ T cells were on average five to six times higher in the gut than blood, 122,123 and levels of HIV DNA and unspliced HIV RNA per million CD4+ T cells were higher in four different gut sites than in blood. 124 One study calculated that the gut contains twice as many HIV DNA+ cells as blood, 125 while another estimated that the gut contains 1.2 × 109 infected CD4+ T cells, or up to 95% of all HIV-infected cells in the body 124 (Table 2). Based on the responses to ART intensification with one to two new antivirals, a follow-up study suggested that the ileum, but not other gut sites or blood, might be a site of ongoing replication in some patients on ART. 40 In SIV-infected, ART-suppressed monkeys, SIV envelope protein was detected in the small bowel and colon, as well as other tissues, using a whole-body antibody-targeted positron emission tomography (ImmunoPET) with 64 Cu-labeled SIV Gp120-specific antibody. 126 When multiple tissues were analyzed in ART-suppressed SIV-infected macaques, the gut had the highest levels of multiply spliced SIV RNA and the highest ratio of multiply spliced to unspliced SIV RNA. 127
Despite these differences between gut and blood, it is unclear to what degree viral variants or infected cells traffic between the gut and blood. Some studies have reported HIV sequence compartmentalization between gut and blood. In ART-treated patients, phylogenetic trees and resistance profiles of HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase showed differences in HIV strains between blood and rectal mucosa. 128 In chronically infected subjects not on therapy, primary nef quasispecies from paired plasma and sigmoid colon biopsies also showed compartmentalization. 129 In addition, phylogenetic analysis of the Nef protein-encoding region in untreated patients also revealed compartmentalization of viral replication in various parts of the gut. 130 However, phylogenetic analysis of HIV env DNA has also suggested cross-infection among resting and activated CD4+ T cells from blood and gut in patients on ART, 122,131 although variants in the rectum were more heterogeneous than variants in the blood from untreated patients. 131 Furthermore, when phylogenetic analysis was performed on colon, ileum, and blood samples from chronically infected individuals, no evidence of compartmentalization was found. 132 These studies suggest that, while compartmentalization may be difficult to detect during untreated infection, long-term ART can influence HIV sequence compartmentalization in various tissues and regions of gut, but more studies are needed to understand how exactly this occurs.
In addition to tissue-specific differences in the nature of HIV-infected cell types, the mechanisms of transcriptional control may differ between gut and blood. For example, the median ratio of HIV RNA to HIV DNA (average level of transcription per provirus) in the ileum was higher compared with the blood, suggesting that this gut site has a greater ratio of productive to latent infection. However, at all other gut sites, the median HIV RNA/DNA ratio was actually lower than that in the blood, suggesting that gut sites other than ileum have more “latently” infected cells. 124 Since most gut lymphocytes display markers of T-cell activation, “latent” infection of these cells may differ from the classic latent infection in the blood, which was originally described in resting CD4+ T cells. Indeed, since T-cell activation typically drives HIV transcription, it is surprising that gut cells have such low levels of HIV transcription, suggesting that they are hyporesponsive to activating stimuli, or that activation markers have different meanings in the gut and blood. Furthermore, while T-cell activation correlated positively with HIV DNA levels in the blood, it correlated negatively with HIV DNA in the gut. 124 The paradoxically low levels of transcription in the gut and the opposite correlations with T-cell activation in the gut and the blood suggest that activation has different consequences, or that HIV transcription is governed by different mechanisms, in the gut and blood.
It is unclear what mechanisms suppress HIV transcription in the immunologically active environment of the gut. Since most gut CD4+ T cells display markers of activation, it is difficult to invoke a lack of HIV transcriptional initiation due to paucity of host cell initiation factors associated with the resting state. Despite displaying a more active phenotype, likely due to exposure to gut microbial antigens, gut CD4+ T cells may be in a hyporesponsive or anergic state, perhaps as a means to maintain tolerance to normal flora. Future studies should investigate whether this tolerance or anergy could be mediated by epigenetic modification, negative T-cell regulators (PD-1 and CTLA-4), Treg cells, or other mechanisms, and how gut CD4+ T cells may differ from peripheral CD4+ T cells in expression of cellular genes that influence HIV transcription and latency.
Immune Cell Targets in the Gut and the Path Toward HIV Cure
The gut differs from peripheral blood in the types and frequencies of HIV-infected T-cell subsets. For example, while TCM and TTM cells contain the largest proportion of HIV DNA in the blood, 36 in both ileum and rectum, effector memory CD4+ T cells harbor the largest proportion of HIV DNA and RNA, and HIV DNA was also detected in leukocytes other than CD4+ T cells. 59 In the following sections, we explore several major immune cell targets that could contribute to HIV persistence in the gut, and we discuss their fate and key roles in HIV pathogenesis.
Macrophages/monocytes
Myeloid cells are the first line of defense in the gut, as they present antigens and support tissue repair. The expression of CCR5 varies greatly among gut macrophages, correlating with the position within the GI tract. Macrophages within the rectum, which are more likely to be in contact with HIV during rectal viral transmission, express much higher levels of CCR5 than those in proximal regions of the GI tract. 133 Nonetheless, there is no consensus as to whether macrophages might serve as real reservoirs of latent, replication-competent HIV. 134 Most of the controversy stems from the fact that macrophages act as phagocytic scavengers and although HIV DNA, HIV RNA, and protein can be detected in macrophages, it might come from phagocytosis of infected CD4+ T cells, 135,136 as was documented for SIV. 137 Evidence exists both for 138,139 and against 79,140,141 infection of gut macrophages in ART-suppressed patients. While CD4+ T cells harbor most HIV DNA and RNA in the gut, myeloid cells account for 4% of the total HIV DNA. 142,143
Among myeloid cells, monocytes contain HIV variants that are different than those in CD4+ T cells and are genetically closely associated with variants present in long-term recipients of ART. 144 In line with these findings, transmitted/founder viruses have minimal tropism for macrophages, suggesting that macrophage infection occurs at a later stage after viral transmission. 145 However, macrophages can sustain HIV replication in the absence of T cells in humanized myeloid-only mice, 146 and HIV can persist in tissue macrophages even after ART treatment. 147 Therefore, additional research is needed to unravel the contribution of tissue-specific macrophages to the total HIV reservoir in individuals on ART.
Regulatory T cells (Treg)
The impact of Treg cells on HIV infection and their contribution to the HIV reservoir in vivo are subjects of debate, and evidence suggests that Treg cells may play a dual role in HIV pathogenesis. 148 Some studies support the beneficial impact exerted by Treg cells in limiting autoimmunity, HIV replication, and CD4+ T-cell depletion, 149 –152 while others argue that they contribute to disease progression and dampened HIV-specific immune responses. 153 –156 While acutely SIV-infected macaques experience a rapid depletion of Treg cells in gut lymphoid tissue, 157 and IL17+ Tregs derived from naive Treg are selectively reduced in virologically suppressed individuals, 158 numerous studies concur that elevated Treg frequencies are observed in both peripheral blood and the gut in ART-treated and ART-untreated HIV-infected individuals, 148 particularly relative to TH17 and TH22 cells. Increased Treg frequencies may be related to the general inflammation and tissue damage in the gut and peripheral tissues of both ART-naive and ART-treated patients.
Treg cells are susceptible to HIV infection both in vitro 159 and in vivo. 157,160 Circulating Treg cells express CCR5 levels similar to bulk CD4+ T cells. 161 They appear to be more susceptible to R5-tropic than X4-tropic HIV-1 infection in vitro, but are not preferentially infected by HIV, compared with effector T cells in vivo. 159 The burden of HIV DNA harbored by Treg cells is disputed since some studies reported comparatively higher HIV DNA in Treg relative to non-Treg CD4+ cells, 162 –164 while others observed lower levels. 165 Whether Treg cells constitute a reservoir of HIV that harbors inducible and replication-competent virus in the gut is unknown, and more direct evidence is required.
IL-17-producing helper T cells (TH17)
TH17 cells are characterized by the production of IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22. 166 TH17 can alternatively be distinguished phenotypically by their expression of CCR6, 167,168 which regulates cell migration into various anatomic sites, including the intestinal mucosa. 169,170 TH17 cells play a critical role in defense and homeostasis, acting to safeguard mucosal integrity by inducing the proliferation of enterocytes, producing antibacterial defensins, and recruiting neutrophils in response to fungal or bacterial infection. 166
TH17 cells harbor high levels of HIV DNA in vivo in ART-naive HIV-infected individuals. 171 In particular, peripheral CCR6+ TH17, along with TH1-/TH17-polarized cells, contribute disproportionately to the pool of CD4+ T cells that harbor HIV DNA, and CCR6 potentially acts as a marker for blood and gut CD4+ T cells that are enriched for HIV DNA. 172,173 Furthermore, the reported enrichment of HIV DNA and a lower ratio of cell-associated unspliced HIV RNA to DNA ratio in CXCR3+CCR6+ cells, including TH17 cells, are consistent with transcriptional silencing. 173 Collectively, these data allude to the potential of TH17 to harbor latent HIV.
TH17 cells may also undergo self-renewal or homeostatic proliferation and retain a stem cell-like molecular signature, 174,175 a combination of attributes that could make TH17 cells a long-lived, persistent reservoir in vivo. 172,173,176,177 However, these studies did not directly assess replication competence of virus harbored by TH17 cells. Few studies have examined the contribution of TH17 cells to the HIV reservoir in the gut. The sigmoid HIV reservoir remains high despite long-term suppressive therapy, and HIV DNA levels in the sigmoid correlate negatively with sigmoid TH17 frequency, 178 in line with previous work demonstrating a similar observation in peripheral blood. 179 More direct evidence is required to determine if gut TH17 cells harbor significant levels of latent HIV, but current data suggest that TH17 cells are an important HIV reservoir in the gut.
IFN-γ- and IL-17-producing helper T cells (TH1/TH17)
CD4+ T cells producing IL-17 and IFN-γ, termed TH1/TH17, are particularly susceptible to HIV infection 171 and appear to exhibit lower levels of antiviral factors and a higher state of cellular activation, 180 which may contribute to their increased permissiveness to HIV infection. Despite the reduced frequency of TH1/TH17 cells in ART-treated HIV-infected individuals relative to uninfected individuals, TH1/TH17 and TH17 cells contribute significantly to the pool of integrated HIV DNA in peripheral blood. 172 These data are in line with previous work indicating that integrated HIV persists in TH1/TH17, defined by a CXCR3+CCR6+ phenotype, 173,176 and support the in vitro model of latency in which the CCR6-CCL20 axis plays a critical role in latency establishment. 181 Notably, the frequency of CCR6+ memory T cells is higher in the colon than peripheral blood in ART-treated individuals. 172 Although the inducibility and replication competence of integrated HIV DNA recovered from TH1/TH17 remain to be investigated, this subset likely constitutes an important reservoir for latent HIV in the gut.
IL-22-producing helper T cells (TH22)
CD4+ TH22 cells are distinguished by their production of IL-22 and their expression of the chemokine receptors CCR6, CCR4, and CCR10, and the gut microbial sensor aryl hydrocarbon, which is a ligand-activated transcription factor. 182 In concert with TH17, TH22 promotes epithelial barrier integrity and mucosal healing through epithelial proliferation and increased production of mucus. 183 In healthy HIV-uninfected individuals, as well as in SIV-uninfected RM, the levels of TH22 cells in the gut are comparatively lower than TH17 cells, with the majority of IL-22-producing cells also producing IL-17. 184,185 The imbalance of TH22 and Treg cells triggered by HIV infection in the peripheral blood potentially contributes to subsequent loss of mucosal immunity and thus systemic immune activation, 98 since the ablation of TH22 cells is only partially rescued with suppressive ART. 98,186 Administration of IL-21 in combination with ART has been shown to improve TH22 reconstitution, reduce immune activation, and reduce the frequency of CD4+ T cells harboring replication-competent virus in lymph nodes from SIV-infected RM. 187 ART treatment of SIV-infected RM also correlates with increased TH22 cell function and decreased SIV DNA content. 186 However, the extent to which TH22 cells contribute to the pool of CD4+ T cells harboring replication-competent virus is undetermined. Although TH22 cells account for a relatively small proportion of CD4+ T cells in the gut and no studies have examined the levels of replication-competent HIV that they may harbor, the integral role of TH22 cells in maintaining epithelial barrier integrity in the gut suggests that future studies should investigate the contribution of these cells to the gut HIV reservoir.
Follicular helper T cells (TFH)
Within GC located in lymphoid follicles of secondary lymphoid organs, critical interactions between resident B cells and TFH cells promote high-affinity T-dependent antibody responses, somatic hypermutation, and antibody class switching. 188,189 GC TFH are primarily distinguished by their high expression of Bcl-6, a transcriptional regulator, 190,191 and expression of CXCR5, a follicular homing receptor, 192,193 as well as CXCR4, CD95, CD154, BTL, inducible T-cell costimulator (ICOS), CD40L, and PD-1, which are neither exclusive to TFH 188,189,194 nor uniformly expressed on all TFH cells. 192,193,195 Human TFH cells express an RNA expression profile distinct from TH1, TH2, and TH17 cells, 190,196 and this profile can be markedly altered by HIV/SIV infection. 197 –199 This CD4+ T-cell subset serves as a major reservoir for HIV. TFH cells are highly permissive to HIV and SIV 195,197,199 –202 and expand in lymphoid tissue during acute and chronic infection, 199,203 –205 although suppression of viremia by ART can attenuate TFH cell expansion. 200,203 Concomitant with this expansion is an enrichment of HIV-/SIV-infected TFH cells in the lymph nodes. 200,204,206 In contrast, SIV-infected RM experience an early and profound loss of splenic TFH cells, 207 suggesting that HIV/SIV infection has diverging effects on TFH dynamics in various tissues.
TFH cells support high levels of HIV infection, replication, and virus production in vitro 200 and in ART-naive patients, TFH cells exhibit the highest levels of HIV DNA in lymph nodes. 200 A newly identified population of mucosal TFH cells isolated from the jejunum of RM harbors 10-fold higher levels of SIV gag DNA per cell than bulk CD4+ memory cells, 208 underscoring the importance of TFH cells in the gut during HIV/SIV infection. It is unclear whether anatomic barriers facilitate HIV persistence in GC TFH cells. Since the majority of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells lack the chemokine receptors required for migration into B-cell follicles in lymphoid tissue, 206 these follicles may serve as a site of “immune privilege” in which HIV-infected TFH cells are not recognized and killed. However, the exclusion of CD8+ T cells from follicles may not be absolute, as several reports have described populations of CD8+ T cells capable of infiltrating B-cell follicles in rhesus lymph nodes 209 and eradicating virus-infected TFH cells in a mouse model of LCMV infection, 210,211 supporting an earlier discovery of CCR5+CCR7− cytotoxic T cells in B-cell follicles in human tonsillar tissue. 212 The difficulty in identifying these populations may be ascribed to phenotypic and transcriptional differences that distinguish them from other CD8+ T cells. 211 Nonetheless, the importance of cytotoxic T cells capable of infiltrating B-cell follicles is underscored by recent work demonstrating that engineered CD8+ T cells expressing human CXCR5 were shown to localize to B-cell follicles in vitro, 213 alluding to the possibility of a new pathway to suppress persistent viral replication in TFH within these tissue sanctuaries.
In HIV-infected individuals on suppressive ART, lymph node PD-1+ TFH cells constitute the major cell type that can be induced to produce replication-competent virus, 200 although the contribution of these cells to the infectious reservoir progressively decreases with time on ART. 214 PD-1, a marker for T-cell exhaustion and homeostatic or antigen-induced proliferation, acts as a putative marker for memory in GC TFH. 66 PD-1 is one of three immune checkpoint molecules recently implicated in HIV persistence during ART, 215 and its expression can result in TFH dysfunction after interaction with PD-L1 expressed on GC B cells. 216 Furthermore, a strong association exists between PD-1 and the immune activation marker Ki-67 in circulating CD4+ T cells from ART-treated individuals, 36,217 suggesting that homeostatic proliferation is a major mechanism that maintains the HIV reservoir in these cells. However, there is little agreement on expression levels of Ki-67 in TFH cells from HIV-infected individuals; 200,202 so it is unclear to what extent homeostatic proliferation contributes to HIV persistence in TFH cells.
Despite perturbation of TFH cell counts in tissues, such as the lymph nodes and spleen, during HIV infection, recent evidence suggests that there are no differences in gut GC TFH, B cells, or IgA+ B cells between virologically suppressed HIV-infected individuals and uninfected controls. 218 Nonetheless, peripheral (pTFH) cells are highly susceptible to HIV infection, particularly if they express PD-1, and virus reactivation can be observed following ex vivo stimulation. 219 Although this observation has yet to be recapitulated in TFH cells from the gut, it suggests that TFH cells contribute to HIV latency in vivo. Further evidence supporting the contribution of gut TFH cells to the HIV reservoir comes from humanized mouse models of HIV, which suggest that TFH cells rapidly accumulate in gut mucosal tissues and are most permissive to HIV infection. 220 Finally, the ileum is particularly enriched with lymphoid follicles 221,222 and exhibits higher average levels of HIV transcription relative to blood and other gut sites, 124 suggesting the ileum may be a site for HIV persistence in TFH cells. Together, these data underscore the importance of this CD4+ T-cell subset as a potential HIV reservoir in the gut.
Transitional memory T cells (TTM)
Peripheral TTM, along with TCM, are major cellular reservoirs for HIV DNA in circulating CD4+ T cells. 36 Relative to TN, TSCM, and TCM, TTM cells express higher levels of CCR5, which may contribute to their susceptibility to HIV infection. 223 Homeostatic proliferation driven by IL-7-induced mitosis of infected TTM may help maintain the size, genetic diversity, and persistence of the HIV reservoir in TTM. 36 In individuals with low CD4+ T-cell counts, TTM account for a greater proportion of the HIV DNA, with additional contribution from TCM that differentiate into TTM cells. 36 The finding that TTM likely harbor high levels of total or integrated proviral DNA 36 is echoed by other studies in treatment-naive acutely infected individuals, 224 ART-treated individuals, 21,172,225 –227 and long-term nonprogressors. 228 Although one study questioned how much the resting TTM compartment contributes to the pool of cells harboring infectious proviruses, 229 another showed inducible, replication-competent HIV in TTM of posttreatment HIV controllers and implicated this population as the main contributor to the HIV-1 reservoir. 22 In addition, HIV is more robustly reactivated in the TTM/TEM subsets than TCM by a retinoid, all-trans retinoic acid, 172 and NF-kB inducers (e.g., PMA + ionomycin, anti-CD3 + anti-CD28 antibodies, and prostratin) preferentially reactivate HIV provirus from latently infected TTM in vitro. 230 Moreover, PD-1 is highly expressed in TTM during both acute and chronic HIV-1 infection and does not normalize to levels seen in uninfected individuals, despite prolonged ART treatment. 231 Increased PD-1 expression also correlates with inducible virus, 215 providing further evidence implicating TTM as an important HIV reservoir.
Little is known about the contribution of TTM to the HIV reservoir in the gut. Despite high levels of T-cell activation in the gut even during suppressive ART, 113 a paradoxically low level of HIV transcription is observed. 124 TTM account for a larger proportion of CD4+ T cells in the ileum and rectum relative to peripheral blood, 59 and HIV DNA levels per CD4+ T cell are higher in both gut sites than in blood. 124 Furthermore, rectal TTM display lower average levels of HIV transcription per infected cell than peripheral blood TTM, 59 alluding to existence of transcriptionally silent HIV harbored by gut TTM. With these data, TTM likely play a considerable role in HIV persistence in the gut, although further research is required to evaluate the contribution of TTM as a cellular reservoir for latent HIV in the gut.
Tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM)
Most of the memory T cells found in mucosal tissues do not recirculate to the blood; instead, they are retained locally in specific tissue sites. Referred to as tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells, 232,233 they can respond rapidly upon reexposure to cognate antigens. 54,65 Thus, TRM cells are an effective first line of defense against invading pathogens in mucosal tissues. 233,234 In general, less is known about CD4+ TRM cells and their functions than about CD8+ TRM cells. 65 However, CD4+ TRM cells have been identified in lung, skin, and mucosal surfaces, where they seem to direct protective responses and coordinate the recruitment of immune cells. 65
Phenotypically, CD4+ TRM cells are distinguished from circulating TEM populations based on their surface expression of CD69. 65,235 In humans, putative TRM cells in mucosal, lymphoid, and peripheral tissue sites are also identified by expression of CD69. 56 More than 80% of the CD4+ T cells in colon, skin, and tonsil are CD69+, whereas this population is mostly absent in blood. 56,57,236 The lectin CD69 has traditionally been thought of as an early marker of T-cell activation, since it is transiently upregulated early after T-cell receptor stimulation or in response to proinflammatory cytokines, including type I IFNs (IFN-α and IFN-β) and tumor necrosis factor. CD69 contributes to T-cell retention in tissues by regulating sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1, which controls the egress of lymphocytes from certain tissues. Interestingly, in both ileum and rectum, the largest proportion of HIV DNA and RNA is present in CD4+ TEM cells, 59 and since TRM cells in the gut have phenotypes similar to TEM cells, 56 the previously studied gut TEM reservoir may also encompass TRM cells.
TRM cells respond to inflammatory and tissue-specific environmental factors, which also determine their resident memory phenotype. For example, high expression of transforming growth factor-beta within the epithelium induces the expression of CD103 integrin on a subset of TRM cells. 237 –239 CD103 allows T cells to interact with epithelial E-cadherin and to be retained in the epithelium. 240 Compared to CD8+ TRM cells, a very small fraction of CD4+ TRM cells are positive for CD103. 56,241 High frequencies of CD103+ CD4+ TRM cells in the colon, lung, and liver also express CCR5, 56 indicating that these cells could be susceptible to HIV infection. While the exact contribution of TRM cells to the HIV reservoir in the gut or other tissues remains unknown, adipose tissue in ART-treated individuals contains HIV-1 DNA, and most of the CD4+ T cells in adipose tissue are CD69+, suggesting that they belong to the TRM population. Coculturing of adipocytes from uninfected donors enhanced HIV infection of memory CD4+ T cells in a contact-independent manner, indicating that adipocytes promote HIV infection in memory CD4+ T cells by secretion of unknown soluble factors. 242 In another study, CD4+ T cells with TRM phenotype (CD45RO+ CD69+) in adipose tissues were found to harbor HIV DNA, and these cells produced HIV RNA upon in vitro reactivation with allogenic preactivated CD4+ T cells. 243 Furthermore, CD4+ CD69+ T cells collected from female cervix were preferential targets for infection with a CCR5-tropic pseudovirus in tissue culture. 244 Therefore, TRM cells in the gut may also serve as a pool of latently infected cells. 33,245
Gamma-delta T cells
HIV-1 may reside in nonconventional T cells, such as gamma-delta T cells (γδ T cells). The γδ T cells are distinct from αβ T cells, 246 account for 0.5%–5% of adult murine or human CD3+ cells, 247 are mainly CD4− CD8−, 248,249 and are more abundant in mucosal tissues than in peripheral blood or lymph nodes. 247 There are two major subsets of γδ T cells in humans, distinguished by the expression of Vδ1 or Vδ2 genes. 250,251 Vδ1 T cells respond to antigens from pathogenic bacteria, 252,253 whereas stress-related chemical compounds activate Vδ2 cells. 246,250,254 The γδ T cells exert protective functions against a number of viral infections, including HIV, 255 although infection with HIV-1 persistently dysregulates subsets of circulating and mucosal γδ T cells. 256 In healthy individuals, Vδ1 cells are less abundant than Vδ2 cells in blood, 247 whereas in mucosal sites such as the GI tract and endocervical and vaginal tissues, Vδ1 T cells predominate. 257
In mucosal tissues, the Vδ1 T cells are also the most severely diminished subset in chronically HIV-infected patients. 258 –260 During ART, even in patients with CD4+ T-cell reconstitution, γδ T-cell frequency and function are not restored to normal levels. 261 A fraction of both peripheral and mucosal γδ T-cell populations expresses CD4, CCR5, and CXCR4. 258,262 –264 Peripheral Vδ2 T cells express higher levels of CCR5 and can be infected with HIV-1 in vitro. 265,266 Interestingly, peripheral Vδ2 cells from ART-treated patients harbor HIV-1 DNA in quantities that exceed those of resting CD4+ T cells, and the majority of these cells contain replication-competent virus. 267 However, the exact contribution of γδ T cells to the gut HIV reservoir remains unknown.
Other nonconventional T cells, such as NKT and MAIT cells, are also severely diminished in numbers or frequencies in HIV-infected humans. 268 –270 However, no evidence suggests that these nonconventional T cells serve as HIV reservoirs.
Although the following cell types are not typically found in the gut, they may still contribute to the gut reservoir upon activation, differentiation, and subsequent migration to the gut.
Stem cell memory T cells (TSCM)
TSCM cells are permissive to HIV-1 infection with both R5- and X4-tropic viruses, 223,271,272 which can yield latently infected TSCM at a similar propensity to other CD4+ T-cell subsets. 271 There is no consensus regarding the contribution of TSCM cells to the latent HIV reservoir in the gut. To date, the overwhelming majority of research has focused on TSCM in peripheral blood. In this regard, one study demonstrated that TSCM represent a very stable reservoir in vivo, and that a high frequency of HIV-1 provirus was detected in purified TSCM from virologically suppressed, HIV-infected individuals. 273 This study reported that the per-cell levels of HIV-1 DNA were highest in the CD4+ TSCM cell subset (compared to TN, TCM, TEM, and TTD) irrespective of treatment. 273 In contrast, another study observed that TSCM harbor the lowest level of integrated HIV-1 DNA in individuals on suppressive ART. 274 These disparities may reflect differences in the study participants or the methods used to sort TSCM and measure viral DNA. Nonetheless, these studies agree that the contribution of CD4+ TSCM to the pool of infected cells may increase over time, concomitant with the decline of other T cell subsets in vivo. 273,274
Although TSCM may represent an exceptionally stable and durable component of the HIV latent reservoir in peripheral CD4+ T cells, 53,274 TSCM cells in NHP models are virtually absent from mucosal surfaces, including the jejunum and rectum. 53 Furthermore, both CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM are more prevalent in the peripheral blood than in GALT from both healthy and untreated HIV-infected individuals. 275 Additional studies are needed to investigate the contribution of TSCM cells to the gut HIV reservoir, but this contribution might be limited due to the low frequency of TSCM cells in the gut.
Central memory T cells (TCM)
TCM cells are long-lived cells that constitute a major cellular reservoir for HIV in peripheral blood. 36,229,276 The CD4+ TCM subset harbors a high frequency of viral DNA in the blood, exhibiting ∼10-fold greater levels of viral copies than terminally differentiated memory cells. 82 Blood TCM cells are also enriched for cells infected with replication-competent virus. 229 Numerous studies in mice and humans demonstrate that TFH cells develop into memory cells and are part of the TCM compartment. 66 Recent findings suggest that pTFH, defined by their expression of CXCR5, constitute a large proportion of circulating TCM cells and are highly susceptible to HIV infection. 219 In ART-suppressed individuals, pTFH cells harbor inducible virus capable of reactivation upon ex vivo stimulation. 219 Importantly, 20% of human TCM CD4+ T cells are estimated to express CXCR5, suggesting that TFH make up a large proportion of the memory pool. 66 However, memory TFH cells predominantly reside in the spleen, lymph nodes, and bone marrow. 66 Relative to peripheral blood, the proportion of TCM cells as a percentage of all CD4+ T cells is very low in the GI tract, where cells with a more differentiated phenotype, such as TTM, TEM, and TRM, predominate. 59,124 Thus, TCM are unlikely to contribute significantly to the reservoir of latent HIV in the gut.
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
On the path toward HIV cure, further studies are needed to understand the contribution of gut tissue and gut cell subsets to the HIV latent reservoir. Since mechanisms of HIV persistence may vary significantly depending on the cell type and tissue microenvironment, therapeutic strategies for HIV eradication will require identification of all cellular subsets and mechanisms that contribute to viral persistence in ART-treated patients. Although studies on circulating CD4+ T cells have provided valuable knowledge about the mechanisms of cell death and viral persistence that lead to immunodeficiency, tissue CD4+ T cells have very different phenotypic and functional properties, and hence may involve significantly different mechanisms of HIV persistence. Moreover, the proportion of the body's CD4+ T cells in mucosal tissues is much higher than in the blood, which adds to the tremendous value of studying rare subsets of CD4+ T cells in various tissue compartments. In addition, virus production in the gut leads to breakdown of the mucosal barrier, microbial translocation, and local and systemic immune activation, which may further increase viral replication or reactivation from latency and contribute to the organ damage observed even in ART-treated patients. Arresting this vicious cycle of immune activation requires restoration of the gut mucosal barrier, which will require new therapies that can eliminate residual virus production from ongoing replication or latent reservoirs. Thus, understanding how the gut environment contributes to HIV persistence may be critical both for new therapies aimed at reducing HIV-associated immune activation and for strategies aimed at functional or complete HIV cure.
Although recent advances in cytometry and other molecular techniques have allowed deep phenotyping and molecular characterization of various immune cells from blood and mucosal tissues, technical challenges limit the ability to quantify viral DNA/RNA or replication-competent virus from rare subsets of CD4+ T cells from hard-to-obtain mucosal tissues. In addition, current enzymatic digestion protocols allow recovery of only a small fraction of immune cells from tissue biopsies. A comparison of cell numbers by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry on human rectosigmoid biopsies suggested that only ∼20% of T cells can be recovered by enzymatic digestion procedures for downstream analyses. 62 Therefore, improvements in methodologies for maximum cell recovery and viral detection would be helpful to determine rare cell types that contribute to HIV persistence.
The observation that proviral sequences do not significantly change in the HIV-1 reservoir during suppressive therapy 277 raises hope that phenotypic identification of true latently infected cells in patients on long-term ART may greatly enhance innovation of strategies to selectively target these cells, which would be a major milestone toward HIV cure.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We thank Peter W. Hunt (UCSF) for critical reading of this article, and Gary Howard (Gladstone) for editorial assistance. S.S. is also supported by California HIV/AIDS Research Program IDEA Award (CHRP ID15-GI-059) and National Institutes of Health (NIH; DP2 AI112244). S.S. and S.Y. are supported as part of the amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research, with funding from amfAR grant number 109301. S.Y. is also supported by the National Institutes of Health (1R01DK108349–01, U01AI034989). S.K. was supported by a CFAR Mentored Scientist Award (P30 AI027763).
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
