Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into oncology is revolutionizing clinical practice by enabling personalized and data-driven cancer care. However, the successful implementation of AI solutions faces significant challenges, including a lack of clinical expertise among those deploying health information technology (IT) systems, insufficient AI knowledge among clinician informaticists, and geographic disparities in informatics expertise. This article explores the evolving role of physician informaticists, Chief Medical Information Officers, and physician Chief Information Officers in bridging these gaps. By 2022, over 2000 physicians in the United States have achieved dual board certification in clinical informatics and a medical specialty. These professionals uniquely integrate both clinical and health care IT expertise, serving as essential liaisons between clinical caregivers and IT developers. They lead innovations that streamline workflows, mitigate biases, and ensure ethical AI deployment, significantly enhancing patient care. Additionally, physician informaticists advocate for collaborative engagement among diverse experts, including IT professionals, AI specialists, and end-users, to foster comprehensive AI integration in oncology. As AI continues to advance, these medical IT leaders are essential in translating technological innovations into meaningful improvements in patient outcomes, quality of care, and health care delivery across provider organizations, insurance companies, and pharmaceutical firms. By embracing collaborative efforts and expanding their roles, physician informaticists are shaping the future of health care.
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the field of oncology, offering unprecedented opportunities for early cancer detection, personalized treatment plans, and improved patient outcomes. Advanced AI algorithms now assist in analyzing complex datasets—from genomic sequences and medical imaging to electronic health records (EHRs)—facilitating breakthroughs in cancer research and clinical practice. However, the successful integration of AI into oncology is not without challenges and necessitates the involvement of professionals who can bridge the gap between technology and patient care. This is where physician informaticists become crucial. Physician informaticists play a critical role in bridging this gap.
Integrating AI into oncology without adequate clinical input poses significant challenges. AI models developed solely by technologists may lack clinical relevance, overlook nuanced patient needs, or introduce biases that can adversely affect diagnosis and treatment. Without the deep clinical understanding that physicians bring, technological solutions risk being misaligned with real-world clinical workflows, potentially leading to suboptimal patient care and even safety concerns.
This article will briefly explore the evolving role of physician informaticists in oncology within the AI era. We will discuss how their unique combination of clinical expertise and informatics proficiency positions them to effectively integrate AI advancements into health care workflows. By serving as critical intermediaries between clinical oncology and technological innovation, physician informaticists ensure that AI tools are not only cutting-edge but also clinically relevant and aligned with patient needs. We will review the current state of AI in oncology, the challenges of integrating AI without clinical expertise, and how physician informaticists are shaping the future of cancer care by enhancing patient outcomes through effective AI integration.
Growth of Physician Informaticists
Physician informaticists in the United States have experienced significant growth over the past decade. This expansion is largely due to the widespread adoption of EHRs following the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009, which incentivized health care organizations to implement EHR systems. 1 In 2011, clinical informatics was recognized as a medical subspecialty by the American Board of Medical Specialties, further legitimizing the field and encouraging more physicians to pursue formal training and certification. 2 The increasing complexity of health care technology and the need for experts who can bridge clinical practice and IT have amplified the demand for physician informaticists. 3
The number of physician informaticists have grown over time (Table 1).1–4 Since 2013, more than 2000 physicians have become certified in the clinical informatics subspecialty. 5 Based on data published through 2022, there were 2366 clinical informatics subspecialty board-certified physicians. 6 Consistent with physician population density in the United States, most (49.5%) clinical informaticist physicians are located in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic regions (605 physicians) or the West Coast/Pacific Northwest (565 physicians), while the Mountain West and Midwest locations have the fewest (Fig. 1), based on the American Board of Preventive Medicine (ABPM) board-certified physician database. 7

Geographical distribution of American Board of Preventive Medicine clinical informatics board-certified physicians.
Milestones and Estimated Number of Board-Certified Physician Informaticists over Time
HITECH, Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health; EHR, electronic health record; ABMS, American Board of Medical Specialties; ACGME, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
The Unique Value of Physician Informaticists in Oncology
Oncology is characterized by complexity and rapid evolution. The sheer volume of data—from genomic sequences to imaging studies to EHRs—presents both challenges and opportunities. AI has the potential to analyze these vast data to identify patterns, predict outcomes, and personalize treatment plans. However, leveraging AI effectively in oncology requires a profound understanding of both the clinical aspects of care and technical data.
Physician informaticists uniquely integrate clinical expertise with health care IT mastery to enhance patient care through advanced data management and AI integration. 8 They serve as vital liaisons between clinical teams and technical developers, leading innovations that streamline workflows, improve operational efficiency, and ensure ethical AI deployment. In the era of AI, their role is essential for translating technological advancements into meaningful improvements in patient outcomes and oncology health care delivery.
As the field of physician informatics has expanded, its influence on specialized areas like oncology has become more pronounced. Physician informaticists play a crucial role by leveraging data analytics to enhance patient care, optimize EHR systems for better workflow, and facilitate the integration of new technologies. Physician informaticists are uniquely positioned to bridge clinical oncology, data science, and IT. They can translate complex clinical needs into quantitative models that AI systems can process, ensuring that technological advancements are clinically relevant and effectively implemented. This unique combination of skills enables more personalized and efficient cancer care, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
The Shifting Roles of Physician Informaticists
The roles of physician informaticists, and especially executive level positions including Chief Medical Information Officers (CMIOs) and physician Chief Information Officers (CIOs), have evolved. Traditionally, CMIOs have focused on EHR implementation and optimization, while CIOs have overseen the broader IT infrastructure. However, the advent of AI and data analytics in health care is pushing the boundaries and redefining traditional roles. CMIOs and physician CIOs are now strategic leaders who guide their organizations through digital transformation, data governance, and AI integration.
In provider organizations, CMIOs and physician CIOs are responsible for ensuring that AI tools enhance clinical workflows without adding undue burden on health care providers. Leveraging their expertise in technology adoption, these leaders ensure that new solutions are seamlessly integrated into workflows, enhancing provider experience and care quality. They play a pivotal role in selecting and implementing AI solutions that improve patient outcomes, streamline operations, and enhance provider satisfaction. Their clinical background allows them to critically evaluate AI technologies, assessing their efficacy and safety within the context of patient care. Their direct patient care experience enables them to recognize gaps that can be addressed through informatics solutions.
In oncology specifically, the application of AI has seen rapid advancements, arguably more than in any other specialty, across all these domains—medical literature, clinical trials, genomics, pathology, and radiology. CMIOs are now evaluating and implementing AI-powered clinical decision support systems that analyze vast amounts of data from these sources, including genomic, pathomic, and radiomic information. This specialized approach is enabling oncology care teams to leverage AI in delivering more personalized and precise treatment options, thereby advancing the quality and effectiveness of cancer care.
Within insurance companies, CMIOs/physician CIOs are leveraging AI to improve risk assessment, patient stratification, and personalized care management programs. Their understanding of clinical practice enables them to align technological innovations with strategies that promote preventive care, reduce unnecessary health care spend, and ultimately reduce health care costs while maintaining or improving quality, thus driving value across the care delivery ecosystem. A significant portion of health care costs arises from chronic conditions like diabetes, heart disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. New AI-powered tools hold promises of developing and implementing new platforms aimed at early identification of high-risk members and the creation of personalized intervention plans.
In pharmaceutical companies, CMIOs and physician CIOs are instrumental in incorporating AI into drug discovery, clinical trials, and pharmacovigilance. They will help design AI models that mitigate risk across the drug development continuum including predicting drug efficacy, identifying potential adverse effects, and optimizing clinical trial recruitment through deep understanding of patient populations and development of novel biomarkers. We anticipate physician informaticists being vital to incorporating new technologies like DeepMind’s AlphaFold to make drug discovery far more clinically relevant. 9
Common Threads Among Medical IT Leadership Roles
The common thread among physician informaticists, CMIOs, and physician CIOs is their ability to bridge the gap between clinical practice and technology. Their medical expertise allows them to understand the intricacies of patient care, while their informatics and leadership skills enable them to guide technological innovation effectively. They serve as translators, communicating complex technical concepts in a way that is accessible to clinical staff and ensuring that technology solutions are aligned with clinical needs.
Another shared aspect is their role in data governance and ethical considerations surrounding AI. As AI systems become more integrated into health care, issues of data privacy, algorithmic bias, and transparency become increasingly important. Medical IT leaders are at the forefront of developing policies and frameworks that address these concerns, ensuring that AI implementation adheres to ethical standards and regulatory requirements.
The Critical Role in AI Integration and Evaluation
The integration of AI into clinical workflows presents both opportunities and challenges. AI models can assist in early cancer detection through image analysis, predict patient responses to therapies, and identify potential new drug targets. However, evaluating the performance of these models requires careful consideration of local data and patient populations. Physician informaticists, CMIOs, and physician CIOs play crucial roles in this evaluation process. They assess how AI models perform within specific clinical contexts, ensuring that these tools are not only technically sound but also clinically effective.
Moreover, assessing the value of AI in oncology must go beyond traditional financial metrics. While cost-effectiveness is important, the true value lies in improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality of care, better patient experiences, and increased provider satisfaction. Medical IT leaders are well suited to define and measure these broader value metrics, advocating for a more holistic approach to evaluating AI’s impact in oncology.
Mitigating Biases and Ensuring Ethical AI Implementation
An essential aspect of the physician informaticist’s role is mitigating biases in AI systems and establishing safeguards—or “guardrails”—for real-world implementations. 10 AI models in oncology are trained on vast datasets that may inadvertently contain biases related to race, gender, socioeconomic status, or other factors. If unaddressed, these biases can lead to unequal treatment recommendations and exacerbate health disparities among patient populations.
Physician informaticists are uniquely positioned to identify and address these biases due to their dual expertise in clinical care and informatics. They ensure that AI algorithms are developed with diverse and representative data, promote transparency in AI decision-making processes, and advocate for continuous monitoring of AI performance in clinical settings. By implementing ethical guidelines and regulatory standards, they establish guardrails that protect patient safety and uphold the integrity of health care delivery. Their proactive involvement is crucial for fostering trust in AI technologies, ensuring these tools enhance, rather than hinder, equitable patient outcomes in oncology. This proactive involvement is crucial for fostering trust in AI technologies and ensuring they enhance, rather than hinder, equitable patient outcomes in oncology.
Opportunities and the Future Landscape
Expanding opportunities in medical informatics is crucial, and organizations must be proactive in ensuring they have physicians trained in clinical oncology and data science on staff, actively participating in this transformative process. Despite being an emerging field, there is significant potential for physicians interested in combining clinical oncology with data science and programming. Many health care systems are not yet fully equipped to assess and implement AI solutions effectively within oncology settings. This gap represents an opportunity for medical IT leaders to guide their organizations toward more efficient, effective, and patient-centered care.
However, a major challenge lies in the current landscape: many individuals responsible for deploying health IT systems lack clinical expertise, while numerous clinician informaticists may not possess substantial experience with AI technologies. Additionally, there is a geographic mismatch between the supply and demand of clinical informatics expertise, leading to disparities in the adoption and effectiveness of AI solutions across different regions. Relying solely on one or a few roles to bridge this gap is neither optimal nor reflective of the complexities inherent in health care organizations. Instead, fostering collaborative engagement among multiple experts—including IT professionals, in-house AI specialists, physicians, and other end-users—is imperative. Physician informaticists are ideally positioned to lead these initiatives, acting as the critical link between clinical practice and technological development.
In conclusion, the evolving roles of physician informaticists, CMIOs, and physician CIOs are critical in the age of AI, especially within oncology. Their unique combination of clinical expertise, technological proficiency, and leadership skills positions them to navigate the complexities of integrating AI into health care effectively. As AI continues to advance, these medical IT leaders will be essential in ensuring that innovations translate into meaningful improvements in patient outcomes, quality of care, and the overall effectiveness of health care services across various sectors, including provider organizations, insurance companies, and pharmaceutical firms. By embracing and expanding upon these roles, while promoting collaborative efforts among diverse experts, they can help shape the future of cancer care and health care at large, making it more responsive to the needs of patients and providers alike.
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions
Conceptualization: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Methodology: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Software: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Validation: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Formal Analysis: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Investigation: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and RT. Resources: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Data curation: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Writing—original draft preparation: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Writing—review and editing: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Visualization: N.G.T. Supervision: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T. Project administration: N.G.T., D.G., E.K., J.H., A.J., T.J.R., and R.T.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
No funding was received for this article.
