Abstract
Significant differences exist in the production and release of nitric oxide (NO) from human macrophages versus macrophages of mouse origin. Human macrophages have been shown to respond poorly to stimuli that provoke strong inflammatory reactions from mouse macrophages. To address the differences in macrophage function in an animal model, a transgenic mouse was created that contained the entire human NOS2 gene, including the human promoter and all of its exons and introns. The huNOS2 transgenic mouse was then mated to mice lacking a functional NOS2 gene (muNOS2−/− or NOS2 knockout mice) to generate a double transgenic mouse (huNOS2+/0/muNOS2−/−) that expresses a functional human NOS2 gene in place of the mouse NOS2 gene. These double transgenic mice were found to express only human NOS2 mRNA and human iNOS proteins in response to immune stimulation. The production and release of nitric oxide from isolated macrophages from the doubly transgenic mouse also more closely paralleled human responses rather than mouse. Peritoneal macrophages from double transgenic mice generated nanomolar levels of nitrite in response to inflammatory stimuli, while peritoneal macrophages from wild-type mice generated micromolar levels of nitrite in response to the same inflammatory stimuli. Similarly, microglia from the huNOS2+/0/muNOS2−/− mice accumulated nanomolar levels of nitrite following inflammatory stimulation. Reduced nitrite release persisted in spite of normal responsiveness to inflammatory stimulation as measured by tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 production and release. These data suggest that the human-specific release of nanomolar levels of nitrite may largely result from differences between the human and mouse NOS2 genes, which may program different degrees of nitric oxide responses to inflammatory signals in humans than in mice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.