Abstract

Introduction
Among its partners, AMCHP works closely with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the agency that administers the provisions of Title V. Title V (which was authorized as Title V of the Social Security Act in 1935) is the nation's oldest Federal program to improve the health of all mothers and children. It was converted to a Block Grant in 1981; states receive funding through Title V based on a formula.
Public Health Surveillance of Breastfeeding
Surveillance/monitoring is an essential public health service. Breastfeeding surveillance data that are collected by state health departments and reported to the federal government can help inform programs and policy. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sponsors an immunization survey (www.cdc.gov/nis/) that includes breastfeeding questions. Many states include breastfeeding questions on the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) surveys of postpartum women (www.cdc.gov/prams/cponder.htm). Some states have a question about breastfeeding initiation on their birth certificates and newborn metabolic screening tests. Breastfeeding data from many of these sources can be found on health departments' websites and in the MCHB Title V Information System (perfdata.hrsa.gov/MCHB/TVISReports/). The latter includes reports from each state on the percentage of mothers who breastfeed their infants at 6 months of age in their state. Many states use National Immunization Survey and/or PRAMS data for this report.
According to findings by Kogan et al., 1 there is significant variation in both breastfeeding initiation and breastfeeding at 6 months by state of residence. There are also regional variations: Western and northwestern states had the highest rates, and southern states had the lowest. Additionally, Kogan et al. 1 found that children living in states without legislation that supports and protects breastfeeding enacted before their birth were more likely to not be breastfed than those living in states with multiple laws.
State Health Department Breastfeeding Programs
Title V develops health systems to promote maternal and child health, and breastfeeding is part of this preventive care model approach. Examples of such programs, which are often administered in partnership with other programmatic areas in the health department, include:
The development of a web-based training course on breastfeeding to help healthcare workers better understand the potential impact that they have on the health of the community and to educate them on the basics of successful breastfeeding The development of a “Breastfeeding Blueprint,” which will be shared with birthing hospitals to promote maternity care practices that support breastfeeding The promotion of the “Business Case for Breastfeeding,“ a comprehensive kit that contains information geared to business managers, human resource managers, employees, and advocates in the community who want to work towards increasing the number of businesses of all sizes who provide facilities for lactation support for their employees. A 2-day training has been presented to state breastfeeding coalitions and Healthy Start sites in 30 states. Involvement in the Association of State and Territorial Public Health Nutrition Directors' Maternal and Child Health Nutrition Council, which provides leadership for achieving optimal well being through healthy living. There is a Title V representative from most of the states on the Maternal and Child Health Nutrition Council. This Council works on joint activities to strengthen the relationship between nutrition and maternal and child health, including breastfeeding. The promotion of World Breastfeeding Week
The Public Health Division of the Oregon Department of Human Services is an example of a state agency that has shown national leadership in the development of programs to support breastfeeding. The state has among the highest breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity rates in the country. The Public Health Division has collaborated with numerous stakeholders to collectively address a supportive environment for breastfeeding (legislation that passed in 1999), worksite support for breastfeeding (legislation, tools, and recognition for businesses and to some degree child care, peer counseling [Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), nonprofit or volunteer groups]), and breast pump provision through WIC. Their job has been made easier by public support for breastfeeding. The law relating to expression of breastmilk at work, which passed in 2007 and went into effect January 1, 2008, is the strongest in the country guaranteeing workplace accommodation for breastfeeding mothers. The law applies to pumping breastmilk, addresses time and space needs, and provides a remedy for noncompliance. It covers 70% of the Oregon workforce and applies to full- and part-time workers.
Examples of programs in Oregon include:
Providing leadership through convening a meeting of interested stakeholders to address newborn hospital support for breastfeeding in Oregon. Convening of a multidisciplinary breastfeeding "Think Tank" in the Title V agency, which includes WIC staff. This group has developed innovative activities such as promoting the Breastfeeding-Friendly Employer project and creating a resource on the internet (www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/bf/working.shtml), providing breastfeeding information in a Newborn Handbook (distributed to mothers in hospitals), and working with the Division of Medical Assistance Programs (Oregon's Medicaid agency) to assess lactation services and care offered through their contractor programs.
Summary
State maternal and child health programs face many obstacles to increasing breastfeeding rates, including shrinking state budgets, siloed funding streams in public health, lack of designated breastfeeding staff at the state level beyond the WIC program, lack of designated maternal and child health nutrition staff in some states, public and private insurance programs that do not reimburse lactation consultants, and low adoption rates for Baby-Friendly hospitals. However, states also have many successes in comprehensive surveillance efforts that enable states to monitor breastfeeding rates and use data to inform programs and policies and in the development of numerous and creative partnerships to promote breastfeeding. It is only through these partnerships that we will reach our ultimate goal of improving the health of women, infants, and families.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of Ken Rosenberg, M.D., MPH and Robin Stanton, M.A., Oregon Department of Human Services, Public Health Division, Isadora Hare, MSW, LCSW, Jessica Jores, MPH, and Denise Sofka, MPH, MCHB, and Lauren Raskin Ramos, MPH, AMCHP.
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
