Abstract
Background:
Hypnotics are frequently used for insomnia in pregnant and lactating women. This case study assessed zolpidem concentrations in the cord blood and breast milk and ramelteon concentrations in the breast milk of a woman who was treated with zolpidem and ramelteon for insomnia.
Materials and Methods:
Zolpidem concentrations were measured in maternal serum, breast milk, and cord blood. Concentrations of ramelteon and M-II, an active ramelteon metabolite, were measured in maternal serum and breast milk.
Case Report:
A 46-year-old female patient diagnosed with insomnia received 5–10 mg/day zolpidem during pregnancy and lactation and 8 mg/day ramelteon during lactation. A male infant weighing 3,329 g was born at 38 weeks' gestation, with no congenital abnormalities found during pregnancy or at birth. The infant was normal at the 1-month postpartum checkup. The maternal/placental ratio of zolpidem concentrations was 0.1 at 7.4 hours after maternal dosing, similar to that reported in previous studies. The calculated relative infant dose through breast milk based on the maximum drug concentration in breast milk at 2.2 hours after maternal dosing was 2.7% for zolpidem and 0.2% for ramelteon. Ramelteon and its metabolite (M-II) concentrations in the breast milk were equivalent to those in the maternal serum, although the infant exposure of these drugs was low for an oral dose.
Conclusions:
In the current case, zolpidem transferred into the placenta and breast milk, and ramelteon transferred into the breast milk. Further studies should assess the safety of zolpidem and ramelteon in fetus and breastfed infants.
Introduction
Insomnia, which is highly prevalent in the last trimester of pregnancy and the postpartum period,1,2 has been recognized as an important stressor and major risk factor for mental health issues in parents and newborns. 3 Women frequently require treatment with hypnotic agents,4,5 and exposure of the fetus and infant to maternally administered hypnotic drugs as well as the potential toxic effects of these medications should be evaluated. 6
Ramelteon is a melatonin analog used as a hypnotic drug that exhibits higher affinity to the melatonin receptors MT1 and MT2 compared to melatonin. 7 The hypnotic effect of ramelteon is mediated by its potent, long-lasting agonism of the melatonin receptors, and it does not exhibit affinity for benzodiazepine, dopamine, and opiate receptors or ion channels. Ramelteon is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of insomnia characterized by difficulty with sleep onset. 8 However, no study to date has reported information on the transfer of ramelteon to the breast milk.
In addition, no information on the effects of ramelteon in breastfed infants is available in the Drugs and Lactation Database, 9 and caution should be exercised during the administration of ramelteon to nursing women. 8
Zolpidem, which is also used for insomnia during pregnancy and lactation, crosses the placenta. 10 Studies previously demonstrated that the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as low-birth-weight, preterm delivery, small-for-gestational age infants, and neonatal respiratory depression, was higher in mothers who received zolpidem treatment during pregnancy, 11 and that exposed neonates should be monitored for excess sedation, hypotonia, and respiratory depression.12–14 Zolpidem is present in the breast milk of lactating women 15 ; however, information regarding the transfer of zolpidem to breast milk is limited, and no information is available on the safety of zolpidem in breastfed infants. 16
In the present case report of a woman who was administered zolpidem during pregnancy and lactation and ramelteon during lactation, we assessed the concentrations of zolpidem in cord blood and breast milk and the concentrations of ramelteon and its active metabolite M-II, which has a longer half-life and greater systemic exposure than ramelteon, in maternal serum and breast milk.
Materials and Methods
Measurement of zolpidem, ramelteon, and M-II concentrations
Zolpidem, ramelteon, and M-II in serum and breast milk samples were determined using a modified version of a previously validated method based on liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry,17,18 which has good precision and accuracy over the concentration range of 0.10–500.0 ng/mL for zolpidem, ramelteon, and M-II.
In brief, chromatography was performed using an Ultimate 3000 nano-LC system interfaced with a TSQ Vantage mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan). Compounds were eluted from a Unison UK-C18 column (3 μm reversed phase, 3.0 mm × 50 mm; Imtakt, Kyoto, Japan). Zolpidem, ramelteon, M-II, zolpidem-d3 (internal standard for zolpidem), and ramelteon-d3 (internal standard for ramelteon) were obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Canada). Acetonitrile, ammonium acetate, ethyl acetate, formic acid, and methanol were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Water was purified using a Milli-Q system (Millipore Waters, Tokyo, Japan). The lower limits of quantification and detection were 0.05, 0.10, and 0.05 ng/mL for zolpidem, ramelteon, and M-II, respectively, in both breast milk and serum.
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the study institution (2021-007). The participant provided written informed consent.
Case Report
A 46-year-old, gravida 2, para 1 woman weighing 67 kg, who was pregnant with her second child after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, was diagnosed with insomnia before the current pregnancy and prescribed zolpidem 7.5 mg once daily before the blastocyst transplantation. During her first pregnancy at 43 years of age, she was diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and followed with weight management for excessive weight gain, without the need for medical treatment. However, she was diagnosed with impaired glucose tolerance based on a blood glucose levels of 95, 207, and 159 mg/dL with a 3-point oral glucose tolerance test performed 26 weeks' gestational age during the second pregnancy.
The patient was initiated on insulin therapy with 4–10 U of insulin aspart (genetical recombination) that is a rapid-acting insulin administered three times a day and 2–6 U of insulin detemir (genetical recombination) that is a long-acting insulin administered once a day. The patient was also diagnosed with postpartum pre-eclampsia after her first delivery; therefore, during the second pregnancy she was initiated on once daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg/day) at 13 weeks' gestational age, which was continued until 34 weeks' gestational age. She also continued taking 5–10 mg zolpidem during the second pregnancy.
At 38 weeks' gestational age, a male infant was born by suction delivery. The infant weighed 3,329 g at birth, and had 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores of 8 and 9, respectively. The infant required no mechanical ventilation, circulatory support, or drug treatment, and was discharged 5 days after birth. There were no congenital malformations, and the infant exhibited normal neurodevelopmental progress. He received both breast milk and milk formula. Daily milk intake at home ranged from 40 to 100 mL for pumped breast milk and from 100 to 220 mL for milk formula.
During lactation, the mother continued insomnia treatment with immediate-release 5–10 mg zolpidem (Myslee® tablets), and 8 mg ramelteon (Rozerem® tablets) was initiated due to continued insomnia. However, ramelteon was discontinued after 5 days due to the lack of improvement in insomnia. The patient was also initiated on 5 mg amlodipine twice daily for postpartum pre-eclampsia. No drug-related adverse effects were detected in the infant at the 1-month postpartum health checkup with the pediatric care physician. The symptoms of GDM, postpartum pre-eclampsia, and insomnia have been continuously followed in the outpatient department.
Sample collection and preparation
Maternal serum samples were collected after zolpidem and ramelteon dosing, and were immediately separated by ultracentrifugation and stored below −80°C until analysis. The timing of sample collection after ramelteon dosing is presented in Table 1.
Zolpidem and Ramelteon Concentrations in Serum and Breast Milk Samples of the Current Patient
Zolpidem concentrations in maternal serum, umbilical cord blood, and breast milk
Detected zolpidem concentrations in maternal serum, umbilical cord blood, and breast milk are indicated in Table 1. The calculated daily infant dose was 4.0 μg/(kg·d) based on the average breast milk intake of 150 mL/(kg·d). The relative infant dose through breast milk was 2.7% of the weight-adjusted maternal daily dose [0.15 mg/(kg·d)].
Ramelteon and M-II concentrations in maternal serum and breast milk
Detected ramelteon and M-II concentrations in maternal serum and breast milk are indicated in Table 1. Although it was unclear whether the drug concentrations reflected maximum drug levels, the calculated daily infant dose was 0.24 μg/(kg·d) for ramelteon based on the average breast milk intake of 150 mL/(kg·d). The relative infant dose through breast milk was 0.24% of the weight-adjusted maternal daily dose [0.12 mg/(kg·d)], which was considered acceptable. 19
Discussion
Accurate information on the transfer of drugs to the infant across the placenta and breast milk is important for the safe and effective treatment of mothers and infants. We herein presented a patient with insomnia who was treated with zolpidem during pregnancy and lactation as well as with ramelteon during lactation. Zolpidem was detected in the cord blood and breast milk, in line with a previous study of five breastfeeding women who ingested a single oral dose of 20-mg immediate-release zolpidem. 15 In that study, the ratio of zolpidem concentrations in breast milk and plasma samples at 3 hours after the last dose was 0.13, in agreement with that detected in the current case, wherein the ratio at 2.2 hours was 0.10. The current infant did not exhibit any adverse effects after delivery although increased fetal risk has been reported after maternal zolpidem treatment.11–14
We did not examine the milk-to-serum ratio of ramelteon or peak ramelteon concentrations in maternal serum and breast milk in the current patient; however, the reported mean peak ramelteon and M-II concentrations in serum samples of healthy subjects are 1.5 and 54.2 ng/mL at 1.1 hour after the administration of 8 mg ramelteon, 8 similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of the current case. The calculated relative infant ramelteon concentration at 2.2 hours after the last dose was 0.2% of the weight-adjusted maternal dose.
Concerning the safety of zolpidem during lactation, the breastfed infant of the current patient did not exhibit any adverse effects, in agreement with a previous study, 15 suggesting that zolpidem administration during lactation might outweigh the risk of adverse effects in infants caused by breastfeeding.
The current patient received ramelteon for a short duration, which was a limitation of this study, and infant outcomes after prolonged maternal ramelteon treatment could not be evaluated. In addition, the breast milk samples were not collected at the time of peak ramelteon and zolpidem levels in serum, and accurate exposure of these hypnotic drugs to the infant could not be evaluated.
Conclusions
In this case study, we demonstrated that zolpidem transferred from the maternal blood to the fetus across the placenta. We also found that zolpidem, ramelteon, and M-II transferred to the breast milk, although with no harmful effects on the infant. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting ramelteon and M-II concentrations in human breast milk. Although ramelteon was discontinued during lactation in the current case due to the lack of improvement in insomnia, these findings should be useful in extending the current information on ramelteon safety in lactating mothers. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential harmful effects of hypnotic drugs following exposure in utero and during breastfeeding.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We thank Ms. Mariko Takagai for her expert research assistance. We are also grateful to the lactating mother for breast milk donation.
Authors' Contributions
J.S., H.K., Y.M., M.O., N.Y., Y.T., and A.M. contributed to study concept and design, data collection, and drafting and final approval of the article. Y. W., T.S., and H.S. contributed to drafting and final approval of the article. A.Y. contributed to study concept and design, and critical revision and final approval of the article.
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Center for Child Health and Development. The participant provided written informed consent.
Disclosure Statement
A.M. received a research grant and lecture fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Co., Ltd. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. All authors have confirmed compliance with the journal's requirements for authorship.
Funding Information
This work was supported by National Center for Child Health and Development awarded to J.S. (NCCHD2021C-5). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, and the decision to submit the work for publication.
