DNA Electrotransfer Regulates Molecular Functions in Skeletal Muscle

Abstract

Background:

Tissues, such as skeletal muscle, have been targeted for the delivery of plasmid DNA (pDNA) encoding vaccines and therapeutics. The application of electric pulses (electroporation or electrotransfer) increases cell membrane permeability to enhance plasmid delivery and expression. However, the molecular effects of DNA electrotransfer on the muscle tissue are poorly characterized.

Materials and Methods:

Four hours after intramuscular plasmid electrotransfer, we evaluated gene expression changes by RNA sequencing. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed by gene ontology (GO) pathway enrichment analysis.

Results:

GO analysis highlighted many enriched molecular functions. The terms regulated by pulse application were related to muscle stress, the cytoskeleton and inflammation. The terms regulated by pDNA injection were related to a DNA-directed response and its control. Several terms regulated by pDNA electrotransfer were similar to those regulated by pulse application. However, the terms related to pDNA injection differed, focusing on entry of the plasmid into the cells and intracellular trafficking.

Conclusion:

Each muscle stimulus resulted in specific regulated molecular functions. Identifying the unique intrinsic molecular changes driven by intramuscular DNA electrotransfer will aid in the design of preventative and therapeutic gene therapies.

Introduction

The application of external electric fields (electroporation or electrotransfer) is an option for the delivery of nonviral nucleic acid-based therapeutics and vaccines into tissues such as skeletal muscle. While plasmid DNA (pDNA) enters all skeletal muscle cell types to express the encoded protein, regenerated rather than preexisting muscle fibers are primarily responsible for long-term gene expression.¹ Pulse application may induce muscle damage, which initiates signaling and the formation of new muscle fibers by the proliferation of satellite cells.² In addition, pDNA is an activator of fundamental cellular responses through the activation of intracellular DNA-specific pattern recognition receptors.^3–5 Our previous studies have focused specifically on immune effects in response to nucleic acid electrotransfer in cells in vitro,^6–9 3D models,^10,11 tumors,^12–15 and normal tissues.^16,17

Skeletal muscle RNA sequencing data were previously analyzed for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) focusing on inflammatory pathways.¹⁷ In this study, we used a broad approach, gene ontology (GO) analysis, to identify the molecular functions modulated by the delivery of pDNA with external electric fields. Annotations in GO databases may be manual or automated and are based on several types of evidence. These annotations incompletely represent current knowledge and are inherently biased.¹⁸ DNA electrotransfer combines two components that may activate molecular functions, defined as “the activity of a gene product at the molecular level,”¹⁹ DNA injection and pulse application. In spite of the limitations of GO databases, we found that the most significantly regulated terms 4 h after intramuscular DNA electrotransfer were compatible with DNA electrotransfer and its individual components.

Materials and Methods

pDNA delivery and animals

This analysis used previously described RNA sequencing data.¹⁷ University of South Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all protocols (protocol R IS00007249, 2019). For the study, 7- to 8-week-old female C57Bl/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) were used. Briefly, for the experimental group, a plasmid that did not encode a coding sequence expressed by mammalian cells, gWiz Blank was injected into the right caudal thigh muscle followed by the application of eight 20-millisecond pulses with a 2-needle medical-grade stainless steel electrode with a 5 mm gap at a voltage to distance ratio of 100 V/cm (BTX Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) and a frequency of 1 Hertz with an ECM830 pulse generator (BTX). In the control group, muscles were not manipulated. In the pDNA groups, the muscle tissue was injected with gWiz Blank and in the electroporation-only group the muscle was subjected to the application of pulses. Animals were euthanized after 4 h, and muscle samples were collected and RNA sequenced.¹⁷

In the previous study, statistical evaluation was performed to identify DEGs in pairwise comparisons using DESeq2²⁰ and focusing on inflammatory pathways assigned through Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)^21–24 using the R package GSAR.²⁵ In the present study, GO analysis ^26–28 was performed to identify functional enrichment in DEGs using topGO Version 2.42.0²⁹ using the weight algorithm and Fisher's exact test; p-values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The weight algorithm is designed to eliminate nonspecific terms while prioritizing terms supported by other terms in the GO graph network. Gene symbols in the text are as per the Mouse Genome Database.³⁰

Results and Discussion

Genome-wide expression analysis was performed for a skeletal muscle control group and mice that received intramuscular control vector pDNA injection, pulse application alone, or pDNA injection followed by electrotransfer to identify differentially regulated genes. GO enrichment analysis identified 22 molecular functions upregulated by electroporation alone (Fig. 1). Toll-like receptor 4 binding, myogenic regulatory factor (MRF) binding, and 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase (OAS) activity were the three most enriched terms.

FIG. 1.

Enrichment profiles for the primary upregulated molecular functions between the control and electroporation-only groups. The size of each circle indicates the percentage of genes in that category that were differentially expressed and the color indicates −log10 (p-value) of DEGs annotated in the specific GO biological process. The x-axis shows enrichment. Enrichment is defined as the number of DEGs in that category divided by the number of genes in that category expected to be found by chance (Enrichment = Significant/Expected). It is a measure of how many more times genes within a term were found than expected by chance. Terms with a p-value ≤0.05 included in the graph with terms sorted from lowest significant p-value to highest significant p-value. n = 4–5 per group. DEG, differentially expressed gene; EP, electroporation; GO, gene ontology.

The most regulated genes in the toll-like receptor 4 binding term were lymphocyte antigen 96 (Ly96 or MD2) and S100 calcium-binding protein A8 (S100 A8 or calgranulin A). Ly96 complexes with TLR4 to activate an inflammatory cascade.³¹ The calcium sensor S100 A8 is expressed by neutrophils and monocytes.³² Extracellular S100 A8 is an alarmin that also binds TLR4 to activate an inflammatory response.³³ The gene for TLR4 is not included in this term. The classical ligand for TLR4 is lipopolysaccharide, but this receptor may also be indirectly activated by a number of damage-associated molecular patterns such as oxidized phospholipid, β-defensin, high-mobility group protein 1, heat shock proteins, heparin sulfate, and hyaluronic acid.³¹ This group received pulses only; lipopolysaccharide was not a component. Therefore, it is possible that an alternative TLR4 ligand is initiating an inflammatory process. The mRNAs of a number of proinflammatory chemokine RNAs are regulated by pulse application; C-C motif chemokine 2 (CCL2) protein is produced in electroporated muscle.¹⁷

The MRFs Myf5, MyoD, MyoG, and MRF4³⁴ are basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors controlled by MAPK signaling and play a role in satellite cell function to regenerate skeletal muscle^35,36 as well as muscle maintenance.³⁷ The most highly regulated gene was the zinc finger transcription factor Kruppel-like factor 5, which is an essential regulator of muscle differentiation acting in concert with myogenic transcription factors such as MyoD and Mef2.³⁸ Skeletal muscle regeneration may be regulated in response to muscle damage from pulse application.

The OAS family was originally described as antiviral proteins activated by the genome of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viruses.³⁹ Since dsRNA may also be produced endogenously, these proteins may be activated upon the stress-mediated escape of dsRNA from mitochondria or nuclei after pulse application.⁴⁰

GO enrichment analysis identified 35 molecular functions downregulated by electroporation only (Fig. 2). The three most regulated terms were ADP-ribosylation factor binding, RNA polymerase I core promoter sequence-specific DNA binding, and Lin-11, Isl1, and MEC-3 (LIM) domain binding.

FIG. 2.

Enrichment profiles for the primary downregulated molecular functions between the control and electroporation-only groups. Interpretation as described in Fig. 1. n = 4–5 per group.

ADP-ribosylation factors are small GTP-binding proteins⁴¹ that reversibly modify proteins and to control a myriad of cellular processes, including immune responses.⁴² These factors can activate or suppress inflammatory pathways.⁴³ This term is likely regulated in response to the innate immune response upregulated by pulse application alone.

The negative regulation of genes encoding RNA polymerase I core promoter accessory factors, particularly those within the preinitiation complex such as the downregulated gene TATA box-binding protein-associated factor RNA polymerase I subunit C (Taf1c),⁴⁴ implicates a reduction in ribosomal RNA synthesis in the nucleolus. This reduction may generally control protein synthesis,⁴⁵ but is difficult to deduce the precise purpose of negative regulation with respect to the skeletal muscle response to pulse delivery.

LIM domain-containing proteins are mechanosensors that promiscuously bind many proteins⁴⁶ and are involved in several biological functions, including cytoskeletal reorganization.⁴⁷ These proteins bind to stressed actin filaments⁴⁸ and participate in actin polymerization.⁴⁹ Several groups have described transient cytoskeletal perturbations within cells in response to pulse delivery,^15,50–57 including gene expression changes.¹⁵

After pDNA injection, lipoteichoic acid binding, lipopeptide binding, and CCR2 and CCR3 chemokine receptor binding, which significantly overlap in function, were the most highly enriched terms (Fig. 3). Upregulation of the genes triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), TREM 3, and TLR2 in the lipoteichoic acid and lipopeptide-binding terms indicates the influx of myeloid cells such as monocytes and macrophages into the muscle.^58,59 While chemokine receptor RNAs regulated in the molecular function analysis, the CCR2 ligands, CCL7 and CCL12, and the CCR3 ligand CCL24,^60,61 which are chemotactic for these cells, were upregulated. Chemokine receptors such as CCR3 may also participate in muscle regeneration.^62,63 Several related chemokine receptor terms were also upregulated in this group.

FIG. 3.

Enrichment profiles for the primary upregulated molecular functions between the control and plasmid injection-only groups. Interpretation as described in Fig. 1. n = 4–5 per group.

GO enrichment analysis identified 50 molecular functions downregulated by plasmid injection (Fig. 4). Natriuretic peptide receptor activity was highly enriched, whereas 13 secondary terms were equivalently enriched. Natriuretic peptides and their three receptors (NPR1, NPR2, NPR3) have diverse autocrine and paracrine functions.⁶⁴ NPR1 and NPR2 are guanylyl cyclases while NPR3 functions in peptide clearance.⁶⁵ This activity is well characterized in the heart; few studies have been performed in skeletal muscle. In this tissue, NPR1 expression correlates with oxidative metabolism before and after chronic exercise.⁶⁶ Since these peptides may be anti-inflammatory,⁶⁷ they may be released in response to the chemokine expression associated with pDNA injection.¹⁷ Receptor gene expression is negatively regulated by agonist binding,⁶⁵ which may explain the downregulation of NPR gene expression.

FIG. 4.

Enrichment profiles for the primary downregulated molecular functions between the control and plasmid injection-only groups. Interpretation as described in Fig. 1. n = 4–5 per group.

GO enrichment analysis identified 13 molecular functions upregulated by pDNA electrotransfer (Fig. 5). The three most significantly enriched terms were MRF binding, nuclear import signal receptor activity, and ATPase activator activity.

FIG. 5.

Enrichment profiles for the primary upregulated molecular functions between the control and plasmid electroporation groups. Interpretation as described in Fig. 1. n = 4–5 per group.

Similar to electroporation alone (Fig. 1), MRF binding was a highly enriched GO term with pDNA electrotransfer. This confirms the importance of this term to muscle regeneration after pulse delivery.

Nuclear import signal receptor activity was upregulated, which is likely a consequence of nuclear entry by the plasmid. Plasmid import into the nucleus requires encoded DNA nuclear targeting sequences (DTSs),^68,69 which may be cell specific.⁷⁰ While plasmid easily enters the nucleus during mitosis, transcription factors bind these sequences to mediate nuclear entry of DNA in nondividing cells.⁷¹ GO terms related to transcription factor activity, including DNA-binding transcription activator activity and transcription coregulatory activity, were significantly upregulated to a lesser degree.

Several general DTSs have been described.⁷² We compared the gWiz Blank sequence with these general sequences using the default settings of EMBOSS Needle.⁷³ This plasmid lacked the 72 base-pair SV40 enhancer sequence^68,74 or the longer glucocorticoid hormone receptor-binding sequence.⁷⁵ However, the glucocorticoid hormone receptor-binding sequence encodes two hexamers with a three-nucleotide spacer (GGTACAnnnTGTTCT)⁷⁶ and a similar element (GCTACAGAGTTCTT) is located in the plasmid's origin of replication. NFkB⁷⁷ is known to activate the CMV enhancer,⁷⁸ and an NFkB-binding site (GGGACTTTCC)⁷⁹ is located in the CMV promoter and intron of gWiz Blank. Finally, nuclear entry can be driven by hypoxia-responsive elements.⁸⁰ The CMV promoter is intrinsically hypoxia sensitive⁸¹; two hypoxia response consensus elements (A/GCGTG)⁸² are encoded in the CMV promoter and intron. Taken together, it is conceivable that the nuclear localization of gWiz Blank and related vectors is driven by glucocorticoid hormone receptor, NFkB, or by hypoxia-inducible factor binding.

In smooth muscle, importin b1, importin 7, the GTPase Ran, Ran-binding protein P1 (RanBP1), and RanBP2 bind DTSs.⁸³ A study in a cancer cell line confirmed a large number of protein-bound pDNA, including importins, Ran-binding proteins, microtubule-based motor proteins, transcription factors, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins, heat shock chaperones, and histones.⁸⁴ We found a number of regulated importin and transportin mRNAs as well as the mRNAs of a RAN-binding protein and the chaperone Hikeshi (Fig. 2a), indirectly supporting these observations.

ATPase activator activity⁸⁵ provides ATP for contraction and cellular homeostasis. The mRNAs of several subunits of Na+/K+ ATPase are regulated, indicating that this pathway may be activated during muscle regeneration.⁸⁵

GO analysis revealed that 29 molecular functions were downregulated by pDNA electrotransfer (Fig. 6). Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) binding, clathrin adaptor activity, and glutathione peroxidase activity were the three most downregulated terms after pDNA electrotransfer. Interestingly, glutathione peroxidase activity was also significantly regulated by pulse application but to a lesser degree. Additionally, PDGF binding, downregulated in this group, was an upregulated term after pulse application alone.

FIG. 6.

Enrichment profiles for the primary downregulated molecular functions between the control and plasmid electroporation groups. Interpretation as described in Fig. 1. n = 4–5 per group.

PDGF binding was the most enriched and significantly downregulated GO term in this group. Regulated DEGs in the PDGF-binding pathway is shown in Figure 6. While PDGF alpha was slightly upregulated (p < 0.05), other mRNAs associated with PDGF signaling were downregulated. PDGF is known to stimulate the secretion of basement membrane proteins, including Type IV collagen, in skeletal muscle.⁸⁶ We found that the mRNAs of several collagen genes are downregulated. The regulation of PDGF binding after pDNA electrotransfer could suggest a recovery mechanism from muscle damage. PDGF signaling is reduced with myogenic differentiation.⁸⁷

Broadly, endocytosis defines several mechanisms by which cells internalize cargo molecules,⁸⁸ including the clathrin-mediated endocytic pathway. Over 50 proteins participate in clathrin-mediated endocytosis.⁸⁹ These mechanisms play an important role for pDNA entry during transfection by electrotransfer,^90,91 including in muscle.⁹² Treatment with chlorpromazine, monodansylcadaverine, or dynasore, inhibitors of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, significantly inhibits plasmid entry into cells⁹⁰ and subsequent gene expression.⁹³ Within cells, plasmid colocalizes with markers of clathrin-mediated endocytosis.⁹¹ Knockdown of clathrin heavy chain by siRNA affects transfection efficiency.⁹⁴ We detected both upregulated and downregulated genes encoding primarily adapter proteins, although in sum, this pathway downregulation may be the aftermath of the plasmid endocytosis driven by electric pulse application. While glutathione-S-transferase A1 (gsta1) mRNA is upregulated, the remaining regulated genes in the GO term glutathione peroxidase activity were downregulated.

Glutathione-S-transferase conjugates glutathione to a variety of substances; glutathione peroxidase is highly specific to glutathione and catalyzes the reduction of H₂O₂ or organic hydroperoxides.⁹⁵ This enzyme is one of the primary cellular antioxidant enzymes and is inducible in skeletal muscle, particularly after contraction during high-intensity exercise.⁹⁶ This pathway may have been initially upregulated in response to the induction of reactive oxygen species, which has been described during pulse application,^97,98 but downregulated after 4 h during muscle recovery.

Conclusion

Each muscle manipulation generated specific molecular function changes. Several regulated terms in the pulse application group overlapped those in the pDNA electrotransfer group. However, in some cases, different terms were regulated between the pulse application, pDNA injection, and pDNA electrotransfer groups. However, in each case, the regulated terms were relevant to the group. In spite of the ambiguity that can be associated with GO analysis, the regulated terms tended to agree with previously published observations.

Footnotes

Authors' Contributions

A.S.C.: Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing—Original Draft, Data curation, Writing—Review & Editing, and Visualization. J.T.: Validation, Investigation, and Writing—Review & Editing. K.K.: Validation, Investigation, and Writing—Review & Editing. M.Z.: Validation, Investigation, and Writing—Review & Editing. J.G.: Validation, Formal Analysis, Data curation, Writing—Review & Editing, and Visualization. L.H.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing—Review & Editing Supervision, and Funding acquisition.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01CA196796 and by the Department of Medical Engineering.

References

Peng

, Zhao

, Lu

, et al. In vivo plasmid DNA electroporation resulted in transfection of satellite cells and lasting transgene expression in regenerated muscle fibers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2005; 338(3):1490–1498.

Motohashi

, Asakura

. Muscle satellite cell heterogeneity and self-renewal. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2014; 2:1.

Kumar

, Kawai

, Akira

. Pathogen recognition by the innate immune system. Int Rev Immunol, 2011; 30(1):16–34.

Desmet

, Ishii

. Nucleic acid sensing at the interface between innate and adaptive immunity in vaccination. Nat Rev Immunol, 2012; 12(7):479–491.

Abe

, Shapira

. Negative regulation of cytosolic sensing of DNA. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol, 2019; 344:91–115.

Znidar

, Bosnjak

, Cemazar

, et al. Cytosolic DNA sensor upregulation accompanies DNA electrotransfer in B16.F10 melanoma cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 2016; 5(6):e322.

Znidar

, Bosnjak

, Semenova

, et al. Tumor cell death after electrotransfer of plasmid DNA is associated with cytosolic DNA sensor upregulation. Oncotarget, 2018; 9(27):18665–18681.

Semenova

, Bosnjak

, Markelc

, et al. Multiple cytosolic DNA sensors bind plasmid DNA after transfection. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019; 47(19):10235–10246.

Sales Conniff

, Encalada

, Patel

, et al. Poly(I:C) transfection induces a pro-inflammatory cascade in murine mammary carcinoma and fibrosarcoma cells. RNA Biol, 2022; 19(1):841–851.

10.

Znidar

, Bosnjak

, Jesenko

, et al. Upregulation of DNA sensors in B16.F10 melanoma spheroid cells after electrotransfer of pDNA. Technol Cancer Res Treat, 2018; 17:1533033818780088.

11.

Heller

, Bulysheva

, Arpag

, et al. Growth environment influences B16.F10 mouse melanoma cell response to gene electrotransfer. Bioelectrochemistry, 2021; 140:107827.

12.

Heller

, Cruz

, Ferraro

, et al. Plasmid injection and application of electric pulses alter endogenous mRNA and protein expression in B16.F10 mouse melanomas. Cancer Gene Ther, 2010; 17(12):864–871.

13.

Heller

, Todorovic

, Cemazar

Electrotransfer of single-stranded or double-stranded DNA induces complete regression of palpable B16.F10 mouse melanomas. Cancer Gene Ther, 2013; 20(12):695–700.

14.

Bosnjak

, Jesenko

, Kamensek

, et al. Electrotransfer of different control plasmids elicits different antitumor effectiveness in B16.F10 melanoma. Cancers, 2018; 10(2):37.

15.

Bhandary

, Sales Conniff

, Miranda

, et al. Acute effects of intratumor DNA electrotransfer. Pharmaceutics, 2022; 14(10):2097.

16.

Bosnjak

, Znidar

, Sales Conniff

, et al. In vitro and in vivo correlation of skin and cellular responses to nucleic acid delivery. Biomed Pharmacother, 2022; 150:113088.

17.

Sales Conniff

, Tur

, Kohena

, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of the acute skeletal muscle effects after intramuscular DNA electroporation reveals inflammatory signaling. Vaccines, 2022; 10(12):2037.

18.

Gaudet

, Dessimoz

Gene Ontology: Pitfalls, Biases, and Remedies. In: The Gene Ontology Handbook. (Dessimoz C, Škunca N, eds.) Springer New York: New York, NY; 2017, pp. 189–205.

19.

The Gene Ontology Consortium. The gene ontology resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019; 47(D1):D330–D338.

20.

Love

, Huber

, Anders

. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol, 2014; 15(12):550.

21.

Kanehisa

, Goto

. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2000; 28(1):27–30.

22.

Kanehisa

, Goto

, Sato

, et al. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012; 40(Database issue):D109–D114.

23.

Kanehisa

Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci, 2019; 28(11):1947–1951.

24.

Kanehisa

, Furumichi

, Sato

, et al. KEGG: Integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021; 49(D1):D545–D551.

25.

Rahmatallah

, Zybailov

, Emmert-Streib

, et al. GSAR: Bioconductor package for Gene Set analysis in R. BMC Bioinformatics, 2017; 18(1):61.

26.

Ashburner

, Ball

, Blake

, et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet, 2000; 25(1):25–29.

27.

, Muruganujan

, Ebert

, et al. PANTHER version 14: More genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019; 47(D1):D419–D426.

28.

Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology resource: Enriching a GOld mine. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021; 49(D1):D325–D334.

29.

Huber

, Carey

, Gentleman

, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods, 2015; 12(2):115–121.

30.

Bult

, Blake

, Smith

, et al. Mouse Genome Database (MGD) 2019. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019; 47(D1):D801–D806.

31.

Chen

, Fu

, Zheng

, et al. Recent progress in the discovery of myeloid differentiation 2 (MD2) modulators for inflammatory diseases. Drug Discov Today, 2018; 23(6):1187–1202.

32.

Wang

, Song

, Wang

, et al. S100A8/A9 in inflammation. Front Immunol, 2018; 9:1298.

33.

Pruenster

, Vogl

, Roth

, et al. S100A8/A9: From basic science to clinical application. Pharmacol Ther, 2016; 167:120–131.

34.

Shirakawa

, Toyono

, Inoue

, et al. Factors regulating or regulated by myogenic regulatory factors in skeletal muscle stem cells. Cells, 2022; 11(9):1493.

35.

Zammit

PS.

Function of the myogenic regulatory factors Myf5, MyoD, Myogenin and MRF4 in skeletal muscle, satellite cells and regenerative myogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2017; 72:19–32.

36.

Asfour

, Allouh

, Said

. Myogenic regulatory factors: The orchestrators of myogenesis after 30 years of discovery. Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 2018; 243(2):118–128.

37.

Hernandez-Hernandez

, Garcia-Gonzalez

, Brun

, et al. The myogenic regulatory factors, determinants of muscle development, cell identity and regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2017; 72:10–18.

38.

Hayashi

, Manabe

, Suzuki

, et al. Klf5 regulates muscle differentiation by directly targeting muscle-specific genes in cooperation with MyoD in mice. eLife, 2016; 5:e17462.

39.

Gantier

, Williams

. The response of mammalian cells to double-stranded RNA. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 2007; 18(5–6):363–371.

40.

Sadeq

, Al-Hashimi

, Cusack

, et al. Endogenous double-stranded RNA. Noncoding RNA, 2021; 7(1):15.

41.

, Guo

. ADP-ribosylation factor family of small GTP-binding proteins: Their membrane recruitment, activation, crosstalk and functions. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2022; 10:813353.

42.

Palazzo

, Mikolcevic

, Mikoc

, et al. ADP-ribosylation signalling and human disease. Open Biol, 2019; 9(4):190041.

43.

Fehr

, Singh

, Kerr

, et al. The impact of PARPs and ADP-ribosylation on inflammation and host-pathogen interactions. Genes Dev, 2020; 34(5–6):341–359.

44.

Goodfellow

, Zomerdijk

. Basic mechanisms in RNA polymerase I transcription of the ribosomal RNA genes. Subcell Biochem, 2013; 61:211–236.

45.

Hori

, Engel

, Kobayashi

. Regulation of ribosomal RNA gene copy number, transcription and nucleolus organization in eukaryotes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2023; doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00573-9

46.

Yasuoka

, Taira

. LIM homeodomain proteins and associated partners: Then and now. Curr Top Dev Biol, 2021; 145:113–166.

47.

Kadrmas

, Beckerle

. The LIM domain: From the cytoskeleton to the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2004; 5(11):920–931.

48.

Anderson

, Kovar

, Gardel

, et al. LIM domain proteins in cell mechanobiology. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken), 2021; 78(6):303–311.

49.

Smith

, Hoffman

, Beckerle

. LIM proteins in actin cytoskeleton mechanoresponse. Trends Cell Biol, 2014; 24(10):575–583.

50.

Kanthou

, Kranjc

, Sersa

, et al. The endothelial cytoskeleton as a target of electroporation-based therapies. Mol Cancer Ther, 2006; 5(12):3145–3152.

51.

Hall

, Schoenbach

, Beebe

. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields have differential effects on cells in the S-phase. DNA Cell Biol, 2007; 26(3):160–171.

52.

Stacey

, Fox

, Buescher

, et al. Nanosecond pulsed electric field induced cytoskeleton, nuclear membrane and telomere damage adversely impact cell survival. Bioelectrochemistry, 2011; 82(2):131–134.

53.

Yizraeli

, Weihs

. Time-dependent micromechanical responses of breast cancer cells and adjacent fibroblasts to electric treatment. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2011; 61(3):605–618.

54.

Rosazza

, Escoffre

, Zumbusch

, et al. The actin cytoskeleton has an active role in the electrotransfer of plasmid DNA in mammalian cells. Mol Ther, 2011; 19(5):913–921.

55.

Meulenberg

, Todorovic

, Cemazar

. Differential cellular effects of electroporation and electrochemotherapy in monolayers of human microvascular endothelial cells. PLoS One, 2012; 7(12):e52713.

56.

Mao

, Wang

, Chang

, et al. Involvement of a Rac1-dependent macropinocytosis pathway in plasmid DNA delivery by electrotransfection. Mol Ther, 2017; 25(3):803–815.

57.

Graybill

, Davalos

. Cytoskeletal disruption after electroporation and its significance to pulsed electric field therapies. Cancers, 2020; 12(5):1132.

58.

Daws

, Lanier

, Seaman

, et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel mouse myeloid DAP12-associated receptor family. Eur J Immunol, 2001; 31(3):783–791.

59.

Drage

, Pecora

, Hise

, et al. TLR2 and its co-receptors determine responses of macrophages and dendritic cells to lipoproteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cell Immunol, 2009; 258(1):29–37.

60.

Mantovani

, Sica

, Sozzani

, et al. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol, 2004; 25(12):677–686.

61.

Hughes

, Nibbs

RJB

. A guide to chemokines and their receptors. FEBS J, 2018; 285(16):2944–2971.

62.

Summan

, McKinstry

, Warren

, et al. Inflammatory mediators and skeletal muscle injury: A DNA microarray analysis. J Interferon Cytokine Res, 2003; 23(5):237–245.

63.

Warren

, O'Farrell

, Summan

, et al. Role of CC chemokines in skeletal muscle functional restoration after injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2004; 286(5):C1031–C1036.

64.

Potter

, Abbey-Hosch

, Dickey

. Natriuretic peptides, their receptors, and cyclic guanosine monophosphate-dependent signaling functions. Endocr Rev, 2006; 27(1):47–72.

65.

Gardner

, Chen

, Glenn

, et al. Molecular biology of the natriuretic peptide system: Implications for physiology and hypertension. Hypertension, 2007; 49(3):419–426.

66.

Engeli

, Birkenfeld

, Badin

, et al. Natriuretic peptides enhance the oxidative capacity of human skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest, 2012; 122(12):4675–4679.

67.

Fish-Trotter

, Ferguson

, Patel

, et al. Inflammation and circulating natriuretic peptide levels. Circ Heart Fail, 2020; 13(7):e006570.

68.

Dean

DA.

Import of plasmid DNA into the nucleus is sequence specific. ExpCell Res, 1997; 230(2):293–302.

69.

Dean

DA.

Cell-specific targeting strategies for electroporation-mediated gene delivery in cells and animals. J Membr Biol, 2013; 246(10):737–744.

70.

Dean

, Dean

, Muller

, et al. Sequence requirements for plasmid nuclear import. ExpCell Res, 1999; 253(2):713–722.

71.

Miller

, Dean

. Tissue-specific and transcription factor-mediated nuclear entry of DNA. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2009; 61(7–8):603–613.

72.

Bai

, Lester

GMS

, Petishnok

, et al. Cytoplasmic transport and nuclear import of plasmid DNA. Biosci Rep, 2017; 37(6):BSR20160616.

73.

Needleman

, Wunsch

. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol, 1970; 48(3):443–453.

74.

Graessmann

, Menne

, Liebler

, et al. Helper activity for gene expression, a novel function of the SV40 enhancer. Nucleic Acids Res, 1989; 17(16):6603–6612.

75.

Dames

, Laner

, Maucksch

, et al. Targeting of the glucocorticoid hormone receptor with plasmid DNA comprising glucocorticoid response elements improves nonviral gene transfer efficiency in the lungs of mice. J Gene Med, 2007; 9(9):820–829.

76.

Nelson

, Hendy

, Shukin

, et al. Determinants of DNA sequence specificity of the androgen, progesterone, and glucocorticoid receptors: Evidence for differential steroid receptor response elements. Mol Endocrinol, 1999; 13(12):2090–2107.

77.

Mesika

, Grigoreva

, Zohar

, et al. A regulated, NFkappaB-assisted import of plasmid DNA into mammalian cell nuclei. Mol Ther, 2001; 3(5 Pt 1):653–657.

78.

Sambucetti

, Cherrington

, Wilkinson

, et al. NF-kappa B activation of the cytomegalovirus enhancer is mediated by a viral transactivator and by T cell stimulation. EMBO J, 1989; 8(13):4251–4258.

79.

Brignall

, Moody

, Mathew

, et al. Considering abundance, affinity, and binding site availability in the NF-kappaB target selection puzzle. Front Immunol, 2019; 10:609.

80.

Sacramento

, Moraes

, Denapolis

, et al. Gene expression promoted by the SV40 DNA targeting sequence and the hypoxia-responsive element under normoxia and hypoxia. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2010; 43(8):722–727.

81.

Wendland

, Thielke

, Meisel

, et al. Intrinsic hypoxia sensitivity of the cytomegalovirus promoter. Cell Death Dis, 2015; 6:e1905.

82.

Kaluz

, Kaluzova

, Stanbridge

. Regulation of gene expression by hypoxia: Integration of the HIF-transduced hypoxic signal at the hypoxia-responsive element. Clin Chim Acta, 2008; 395(1–2):6–13.

83.

Miller

, Munkonge

, Alton

, et al. Identification of protein cofactors necessary for sequence-specific plasmid DNA nuclear import. Mol Ther, 2009; 17(11):1897–1903.

84.

Badding

, Lapek

, Friedman

, et al. Proteomic and functional analyses of protein-DNA complexes during gene transfer. Mol Ther, 2013; 21(4):775–785.

85.

Qualls

, Southern

, Call

. Mitochondria-cytokine crosstalk following skeletal muscle injury and disuse: A mini-review. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2021; 320(5):C681–C688.

86.

Albrecht

, Tidball

. Platelet-derived growth factor-stimulated secretion of basement membrane proteins by skeletal muscle occurs by tyrosine kinase-dependent and -independent pathways. J Biol Chem, 1997; 272(4):2236–2244.

87.

Contreras

, Cordova-Casanova

, Brandan

. PDGF-PDGFR network differentially regulates the fate, migration, proliferation, and cell cycle progression of myogenic cells. Cell Signal, 2021; 84:110036.

88.

Conner

, Schmid

. Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature, 2003; 422(6927):37–44.

89.

Kaksonen

, Roux

. Mechanisms of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2018; 19(5):313–326.

90.

, Yuan

. Membrane binding of plasmid DNA and endocytic pathways are involved in electrotransfection of mammalian cells. PLoS One, 2011; 6(6):e20923.

91.

Rosazza

, Phez

, Escoffre

, et al. Cholesterol implications in plasmid DNA electrotransfer: Evidence for the involvement of endocytotic pathways. Int J Pharm, 2012; 423(1):134–143.

92.

Markelc

, Skvarca

, Dolinsek

, et al. Inhibitor of endocytosis impairs gene electrotransfer to mouse muscle in vivo. Bioelectrochemistry, 2015; 103:111–119.

93.

Rosazza

, Deschout

, Buntz

, et al. Endocytosis and endosomal trafficking of DNA after gene electrotransfer in vitro. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 2016; 5:e286.

94.

Chang

, Wu

, Yuan

. Role of specific endocytic pathways in electrotransfection of cells. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev, 2014; 1:14058.

95.

Sen

CK.

Glutathione: A Key Role in Skeletal Muscle Metabolism. In: Oxidative Stress in Skeletal Muscle. (Reznick AZ, Packer L, Sen CK, Holloszy JO, Jackson MJ. eds.) Birkhäuser Basel: Basel; 1998, pp. 127–139.

96.

Powers

, Ji

, Kavazis

, Jackson

. Reactive oxygen species: Impact on skeletal muscle. Compr Physiol, 2011; 1(2):941–969.

97.

Bonnafous

, Vernhes

, Teissie

, et al. The generation of reactive-oxygen species associated with long-lasting pulse-induced electropermeabilisation of mammalian cells is based on a non-destructive alteration of the plasma membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1999; 1461(1):123–134.

98.

Pakhomova

, Khorokhorina

, Bowman

, et al. Oxidative effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure in cells and cell-free media. Arch Biochem Biophys, 2012; 527(1):55–64.