Abstract
Mood symptoms in adult bipolar disorder are associated with increased proinflammatory markers and decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). We examined serum interleukin-6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and BDNF among 30 bipolar disorder adolescents. Hypomanic/manic symptoms were positively associated with hsCRP. BDNF levels were negatively associated with interleukin-6. Forty percent had cardiovascular high-risk hsCRP levels. Larger longitudinal studies are warranted.
Introduction
Few studies regarding BP have examined peripheral markers of inflammation or BDNF among children or adolescents. A single study examined inflammation among adolescent and young-adult offspring of parents with BP: pro-inflammatory gene expression signature was more prevalent among BP offspring compared with control offspring, particularly among offspring with mood disorders (Padmos et al. 2008). To our knowledge no studies have examined BDNF serum protein levels among BP youth, although a study found decreased lymphocyte BDNF gene expression and platelet BDNF protein levels among manic youth versus controls (Pandey et al. 2008).
We examined this topic among adolescents with BP, hypothesizing that depressive and manic symptom severity would be positively associated with IL-6 and CRP levels and negatively associated with BDNF protein levels. In light of evidence that PIMs may be neurotoxic (Wersching et al. 2010), we further hypothesized that levels of IL-6 and high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) would be negatively associated with BDNF levels. We further sought to examine descriptively the prevalence of hsCRP levels that are considered high-risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), as CVD is highly prevalent among adults with BP and hsCRP may comprise a shared biomarker among these conditions (Osby et al. 2001; Goldstein et al. 2009a, Greenland et al. 2010).
Methods
Subjects
Subjects included 30 participants aged 12–19 years enrolled in the Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth (COBY) (Axelson et al. 2006; Birmaher et al. 2009) study with BP-I (n = 18), BP-II (n = 1), or BP not otherwise specified (BP-NOS) (n = 11). Consecutive COBY subjects presenting for follow-up assessments were invited to participate in this study. Details regarding the COBY methodology, including the operationalized diagnosis of BP-NOS and its longitudinal validation, have been previously reported (Axelson et al. 2006; Birmaher et al. 2009). Exclusion criteria were infectious illness within 14 days, known inflammatory or auto-immune illness, use of steroidal medication or insulin during the past month, and self-reported alcohol or illicit drug use within 24 hours (two subjects who smoked cigarettes regularly were included). These exclusion criteria were determined based on known associations with PIMs (Lovell et al. 2000; Imhof et al. 2001; Pacifici et al. 2003; Joe et al. 2007; Wright et al. 2010). Two potential subjects (not among the 30 included subjects) were excluded due to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; none of the other exclusion criteria was invoked.
Psychiatric and anthropometric measures
Both the categorical BP diagnosis and continuous measures of mood symptoms were assessed by the mood disorder sections of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Aged Children, Present Episode, fourth revision (K-SADS-P) plus additional items from the Mania Rating Scale (MRS) (Chambers et al. 1985; Axelson et al. 2003). Hypomanic/manic symptomatic severity was determined based on MRS total scores, and depressive symptomatic severity was determined based on K-SADS-P depression section total scores. Nonmood diagnoses were determined using the, K-SADS Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) (Kaufman et al. 1997). The primary caretaker was interviewed about the psychiatric status of the subject's first- and second-degree relatives using the Family History Screen, a method that has acceptable reliability and validity (Weissman et al. 2000). This method provides psychiatric history for all 1st and 2nd degree relatives across the major diagnostic categories; however, the present study focused specifically on first degree family history of hypomania/mania. Height and weight were measured using a Tanita scale and stadiometer. Obesity was defined as age- and sex-adjusted body mass index ≥95th percentile according to Center for Disease Control body mass index norms.
Biochemical assays
Twenty milliliters of blood were drawn from each subject by antecubital venipuncture into anticoagulant-free vacuum tubes. Blood draw times ranged between 9:35 a.m. and 3:45 p.m. Blood samples were immediately centrifuged at 3,000 g for 5 minutes, and stored at −80°C until assayed. Serum IL-6 levels (n = 29) were determined using a high sensitivity quantitative sandwich enzyme linked immune sorbent assay kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (R&D Systems). Serum levels of hsCRP (n = 30; Alpco) and BDNF (n = 30; R&D Systems) were also determined using enzyme linked immune sorbent assay in a similar fashion to IL-6.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package or the Social Sciences Version 14 (SPSS). Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05 (two-tailed). Given the dearth of information regarding PIMs and BDNF in this population, these analyses were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Rank correlation coefficients (Spearman's r) were computed to examine the association between mood symptoms, inflammatory cytokines, and BDNF. To examine for associations with categorical demographic and clinical characteristics, exploratory paired t-tests were used for BDNF and IL-6, and Mann–Whitney was used for hsCRP owing to non-normal distribution. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) are presented in Table 2.
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. Nineteen participants (63%) were in the midst of a full-threshold or clinically significant sub-threshold symptomatic interval (7 manic or hypomanic, 5 depressed, 7 mixed). Levels of hsCRP (3.1 ± 4.6 μg/mL), IL-6 (1.3 ± 0.7 μg/mL), and BDNF (25.8 ± 5.8 ng/mL) were detectable for all subjects.
Determined via Hollingshead scale (possible scores 1–5).
Determined via Mania Rating Scale (MRS) total score.
Determined via Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Aged Children, Present Episode, fourth revision (K-SADS-P) depression section total score.
BP-I, Bipolar I disorder; BP-II, bipolar II disorder; BP-NOS, BP not otherwise specified.
Comparability with overall COBY sample
Subjects in the present study were more likely to have a first-degree family history of hypomania/mania compared with the overall COBY sample (60% vs. 35%) and were more likely to be male (80% vs. 53%).
Association between symptoms, PIMs, and BDNF
Manic symptom severity was significantly associated with hsCRP (r = 0.37, p = 0.04), but not IL-6 (r = 0.03, p = 0.90). Depressive symptom severity was not significantly associated with hsCRP (r = 0.10, p = 0.61) or IL-6 (r = 0.23; p = 0.23). BDNF was not significantly associated with manic (r = 0.00) or depressive (r = 0.14) symptom severity. Of note, all 3 subjects with hsCRP levels >10 μg/mL had mania symptom scores >20 on the MRS. In contrast, high MRS scores were not necessarily indicative of high hsCRP levels as there were 3 subjects with MRS scores >20 who had hsCRP levels <1 μg/mL. BDNF levels were significantly negatively associated with IL-6 (r = −0.37, p = 0.048), whereas the negative association between BDNF and hsCRP (r = −0.26, p = 0.17) was not significant.
Association between other clinical characteristics, PIMs, and BDNF
There were no significant differences between subjects with BP-I versus BP-NOS with respect to IL-6, hsCRP, or BDNF. However, compared with nonobese subjects (n = 18), obese subjects (n = 12) had significantly higher levels of hsCRP (4.9 ± 5.2 vs. 2.0 ± 3.8 μg/mL; Mann–Whitney U = 45, p = 0.008) and IL-6 (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 1.1 ± 0.6 μg/mL; t = 2.2, p = 0.04). Associations between PIMs, BDNF, and other demographic and clinical variables, including medications, are reported in Table 2. Although a priori multivariable analyses were not undertaken due to sample size constraints, sensitivity analyses using analysis of covariance were computed to control for obesity. After controlling for obesity, the association between manic symptom severity and hsCRP was reduced to a trend (t = 1.91, p = 0.066), as was the association between IL-6 and BDNF (t = 1.92, p = 0.066).
Spearman's r correlation coefficient.
Cohen's d effect size.
Present versus absent.
hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor.
Cardiovascular risk
Forty percent of participants had levels of hsCRP that are considered at-risk for CVD among adults (≥2 μg/mL) (Ridker et al. 2008).
Discussion
This is the first study to our knowledge that examines both PIMs and BDNF among adolescents with BP. Our preliminary findings suggest a positive association between hypomanic/manic symptom severity and hsCRP levels, and a negative association between BDNF and IL-6 levels. These associations may underlie the mood symptoms and neuropsychological dysfunction associated with adolescent BP. Forty percent of participants had levels of hsCRP that are considered at-risk for CVD among adults (Ridker et al. 2008). Moreover, mean hsCRP was threefold higher than normal and nearly as high as levels reported in acute juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (Lovell et al. 2000). These findings raise concern that adolescents with BP may already be accumulating risk for premature CVD and other medical problems (Goldstein et al. 2009a; Kapczinski et al. 2010).
The association between hsCRP levels and hypomanic/manic symptom severity converges with findings from adults (Dickerson et al. 2007). In addition, present findings provide a tentative signal that, similar to adults, hsCRP may be more strongly associated with manic symptoms, whereas IL-6 may be more strongly associated with depressive symptoms of BP (Goldstein et al. 2009b). A previous study found that BDNF levels were negatively associated with TNF-α levels and positively associated with IL-6 levels (Kauer-Sant'Anna et al. 2009). However, those analyses were collapsed across early- and late-stage BP, which were found in that study to differ with regard to these biomarkers. Future studies are therefore needed to examine for stage-related differences in the associations between PIMs and BDNF. Reasons for the lack of associations between BDNF and mood symptoms in this preliminary study are uncertain, and may be due to confounding as described below.
This study included exploratory analyses regarding potential covariates for future studies. Present findings suggest that psychiatric medications, sex, obesity, history of abuse, BP subtype, and family history of BP are important covariates to consider in future studies. With regard to medications, these preliminary analyses suggest that traditional mood-stabilizers and antidepressants have medium effect sizes in terms of PIMs, and antidepressants have a medium effect size in terms of BDNF. Present findings therefore appear to converge in part with prior evidence regarding these medications (Rapaport and Manji 2001; Bosetti et al. 2002, 2003; Rapoport and Bosetti 2002; Frey et al. 2006; Sen et al. 2008; Yasuda et al. 2009).
The high levels of hsCRP are concerning from a CVD risk perspective. High hsCRP is a risk factor for CVD independent of traditional risk factors (Greenland et al. 2010). A previous study found that adults with BP have a fivefold increased risk of CVD compared with the general population, and manifest CVD 14 years earlier than adults without mood disorders (Goldstein et al. 2009a). Indeed, recent studies suggest that increased risk for CVD in BP may begin in childhood and adolescence (Goldstein et al. 2008; Evans-Lacko et al. 2009; Jerrell et al. 2010). Medications, particularly second-generation antipsychotics and/or concurrent use multiple mood-stabilizing medications, may contribute to weight gain and other metabolic disturbances (Correll 2007). However, it not clear whether these medications contribute to premature CVD mortality despite their clear association with CVD risk factors (Tiihonen et al. 2009). Moreover, the association between BP and CVD was observed before the availability of these medications (Kraepelin 1921; Tsuang et al. 1980; Weeke et al. 1987). Further research is warranted regarding the associations between psychotropic medications, inflammation, and CVD risk among youth.
This study's primary limitation, similar to biomarker research in BP in general, relates to variability in domains such as mood states, obesity, medication regimens, comorbid conditions, history of abuse, and family psychiatric history. Detailed information regarding lifestyle variables such as sleep, nutrition, and exercise was not ascertained. Given the associations of these variables with PIMs and/or BDNF (Irwin et al. 2006; Hamer and Steptoe 2007; Tang et al. 2008; Gorgulu and Caliyurt 2009; Rasmussen et al. 2009), these factors may have contributed to residual confounding. The robustness of these findings is uncertain, as the sample size does not provide sufficient statistical power to control for the above covariates. Similarly, we elected not to correct for multiple comparisons; however, findings would no longer have been statistically significant had we done so. Finally, the present study is constrained by the absence of healthy controls and the cross-sectional methodology.
Conclusions
Despite its limitations, this study provides novel evidence regarding these biomarkers among adolescents with BP, and findings are largely convergent with those from adults with BP. Larger-scale longitudinal studies are needed to examine the temporal relationship between these biomarkers and the symptoms and associated medical comorbidity of BP. Studies of adults are constrained by decades of exposure to BP symptoms and their associated physiological strain, which may exhaust and alter natural adaptive homeostatic mechanisms that are salient to the association between these biomarkers and BP (McEwen 1998; Kapczinski et al. 2008). Parsing the association between these biomarkers and the symptoms, course, and comorbidity of BP among adolescents may therefore be advantageous.
Clinical Significance
Extending this line of research by employing longitudinal methods and repeated assessments has the potential to inform clinical monitoring and treatment of BP in the future. For now, the unequivocal medical risks associated with high levels of PIMs invoke urgency toward mitigating the inflammatory burden of BP. These preliminary findings suggest that first-line medications for BP may not exacerbate inflammatory burden and may have a salutary effect.
Footnotes
Disclosures
The authors have the following disclosures: Dr. Birmaher is a consultant for Schering-Plough, participated in a forum sponsored by Forest, has or will receive royalties for publications from Random House, Inc., and Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Dr. Goldstein has received honoraria from Purdue Pharma and grant support from Pfizer. The other authors have no personal affiliations or financial relationships with any commercial interest to disclose relative to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a generous donation from the Order of the Eastern Star of Ontario (Goldstein), and by NIMH R01 59929 (Birmaher). Findings were presented in part at the 8th Annual NIMH Pediatric BP Conference, Boston, March 2010, and were selected as a Finalist for best poster presentation at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Society of Biological Psychiatry, New Orleans, May 2010.
