Abstract

To the Editor:
O
Case Report
This is a 14-year-old female diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) combined presentation, panic disorder without agoraphobia, and migraine. She was on a combination of medications including DMPH-ER 25 mg, escitalopram 20 mg, and clonidine 0.1 mg. She presented with emergence of orofacial dyskinesia movement (lip smacking, puckering, and facial grimacing), which was reported to appear after taking the morning dose of DMPH-ER 25 mg, and would last until late afternoon. She had taken different strengths of DMPH-ER for the past 3 years (25 mg for the past 5 months, 20 mg for 8 months, and 15 mg for 23 months).
She had tried another central nervous system (CNS) stimulant (mixed amphetamine salts—extended release) in the past, which was discontinued because of worsening aggressive behavior. She had been on a low dose of risperidone (0.5 mg) in the past, which was successfully tapered off and discontinued around 4 months ago, before the emergence of dyskinesia. As per family report, a similar reaction to the DMPH-ER occurred with the patient's sister, and her mother also had a history of dystonic reaction to metoclopramide. The patient also had a complete neurological evaluation in the past, including magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography, all of which proved negative. There was complete resolution of abnormal orofacial dyskinesia immediately after the discontinuation of DMPH-ER 25 mg. Subsequently, she has been taking methylphenidate immediate release (MPH-IR) 5 mg in the morning and at noon, and has reportedly been doing well with no recurrence of the dyskinesia being noted at follow-up visits for 6 months.
Discussion
There are limited reports in the literature about CNS stimulant (more superficially with immediate release methylphenidate, dexedrine, and dexamphetamine)-induced orofacial dyskinesia (Balázs et al. 2007, Yilmaz et al. 2013). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of extended release (DMPH-ER) preparation-induced orofacial dyskinesia. In contrast to previously reported cases wherein dyskinetic movements occur shortly after starting CNS stimulants and rapidly disappear after discontinuing the drugs (Yilmaz et al. 2013), our case of dyskinetic movements started after the patient had tolerated DMPH-ER 25 mg for an extended period of time.
In developing a plan of care, and in reviewing the literature, we carefully considered several other possible etiologies for the reported symptom. However, the dyskinesia lasted until the afternoon when symptomatic effects of DMPH-ER tend to fade, and given the rapid resolution of symptoms after discontinuing DMPH-ER, as well as finding no compelling evidence of other etiologies, we concluded that the orofacial dyskinesia was associated with the DMPH-ER.
One other possibility includes motor tic disorder. The temporal relationship with the morning dose and lack of history of tics makes the likelihood of tic disorder as an alternate etiology very low. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration requires the package inserts of psychostimulant medications to list a family history of Tourette's syndrome or the presence of a tic disorder as a contraindication. Meta-analysis in children with ADHD and comorbid tics demonstrated that MPH, alpha-2 agonists, and atomoxetine have shown efficacy in treating ADHD symptoms without worsening tics severity (Bloch et al. 2009). In a small crossover study, supratherapeutic doses of dextroamphetamine (1.28 mg/kg per day) worsened tic severity (Castellanos et al. 1997).
The possibility of sensitization of the dopamine receptor associated with discontinuation of risperidone (withdrawal-emergent dyskinesia) cannot be completely ruled out in this case; however, it would seem to be an unlikely cause due to lack of emergence of orofacial dyskinesia during the 4-month interval of risperidone discontinuation.
In this case, there was emergence of orofacial dyskinesia with a higher dose of DMPH-ER (25 mg) after being on this dose for 5 months, but subsequently, the patient was able to tolerate the low dose of MPH-IR (10 mg total daily dose) without emergence of abnormal movements. These two preparations differ in the blood level and duration of action, which could explain why the 5 mg MPH-IR dose was tolerable when the DMPH-ER 25 mg dose was not. In addition, in rodent studies, d-MPH and l-MPH isomers differed in receptor affinity to monoamine transporters (Markowitz et al. 2006), and the l-MPH isomer also inhibited the locomotor stimulation by d-MPH in a dose-dependent manner (Baldessarini and Cambell 2001).
This may further explain variable tolerability of these two preparations. This case highlights the importance of judicious dosing as well as continuous monitoring for the emergence of abnormal movement disorders with CNS stimulants, especially when there is a family history of these events, and even if the patient has tolerated medication for a prolonged period of time.
Footnotes
Disclosures
Dr. R. Baweja has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to report. S. Mills has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to report. In the past 3 years, Dr. Waxmonsky received research funds from NIH and Pfizer and served as a consultant for Noven Pharmaceuticals, IronShore, Purdue Pharma, and NLS Pharma.
