BurtA. Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations. Proc Biol Sci, 2003; 270:921–928. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2319.
2.
GantzVM, BierE. Genome editing. The mutagenic chain reaction: a method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations. Science, 2015; 348:442–444. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa5945.
3.
GantzVM, JasinskieneN, TatarenkovaO, et al.Highly efficient Cas9-mediated gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015; 112:E6736–6743. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1521077112.
4.
HammondA, GaliziR, KyrouK, et al.A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. Nat Biotechnol, 2016; 34:78–83. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3439.
5.
AkbariOS, BellenHJ, BierE, et al.Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory. Science, 2015; 349:927–929. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac7932.
6.
NobleC, MinJ, OlejarzJ, et al.Daisy-chain gene drives for the alteration of local populations. biorXiv, 2016; 057307. DOI: 10.1101/057307.
7.
ChamperJ, ReevesR, OhSY, et al.Novel CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive constructs reveal insights into mechanisms of resistance allele formation and drive efficiency in genetically diverse populations. PLOS Genet, 2017; 13:e1006796. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006796.
8.
HammondAM, KyrouK, BruttiniM, et al.The creation and selection of mutations resistant to a gene drive over multiple generations in the malaria mosquito. PLOS Genet, 2017; 13:e1007039. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007039.
9.
EsveltKM, SmidlerAL, CatterucciaF, et al.Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations. Elife, 2014; 3. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.03401.
NobleC, AdlamB, ChurchGM, et al.Current CRISPR gene drive systems are likely to be highly invasive in wild populations. bioRxiv, 2017; 219022. DOI: 10.1101/219022.
