HenrikssonJ, ChenX, GomesT, et al.Genome-wide CRISPR screens in T helper cells reveal pervasive crosstalk between activation and differentiation. Cell, 2019 Jan 7 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.044.
2.
CiofaniM, MadarA, GalanC, et al.A validated regulatory network for Th17 cell specification. Cell, 2012; 151:289–303. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.016.
3.
LaMannaC, BarrangouR. Enabling the rise of a CRISPR world. CRISPR J, 2018; 1:205–208. DOI:10.1089/crispr.2018.0022.
4.
TzelepisK, Koike-YusaH, De BraekeleerE, et al.A CRISPR dropout screen identifies genetic vulnerabilities and therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Rep, 2016; 17:1193–1205. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.079.
5.
LiM, YuJSL, TilgnerK, et al.Genome-wide CRISPR-KO screen uncovers mTORC1-mediated Gsk3 regulation in naive pluripotency maintenance and dissolution. Cell Rep, 2018; 24:489–502. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.027.
6.
DoenchJG. Am I ready for CRISPR? A user's guide to genetic screens. Nat Rev Genet, 2018; 19:67–80. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.97.
7.
SmithI, GreendsidePG, NatoliT, et al.Evaluation of RNAi and CRISPR technologies by large-scale gene expression profiling in the Connectivity Map. PLoS Biol, 2017; 15:1–23. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003213.
8.
MorgensDW, DeansRM, LiA, et al.Systematic comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 and RNAi screens for essential genes. Nat Biotechnol, 2016; 34:634–636. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3567.
9.
ZhaoD, BadurMG, LuebeckJ, et al.Combinatorial CRISPR-Cas9 metabolic screens reveal critical redox control points dependent on the KEAP1–NRF2 regulatory axis. Mol Cell, 2018; 69:699–708.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.017.
10.
BoettcherM, TianR, BlauJA, et al.Dual gene activation and knockout screen reveals directional dependencies in genetic networks. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36:170–178. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4062.
11.
NajmFJ, StrandC, DonovanKF, et al.Orthologous CRISPR-Cas9 enzymes for combinatorial genetic screens. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36:179–189. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4048.
12.
DixitA, et al.Perturb-seq: dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell, 2016; 167:1853–1866.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.038.
13.
AdamsonB, NormanTM, JostM, et al.A multiplexed single-cell CRISPR screening platform enables systematic dissection of the unfolded protein response. Cell, 2016; 167:1867–1882.e21. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048.
14.
JaitinDA, WeinerA, YofeI, et al.Dissecting immune circuits by linking CRISPR-pooled screens with single-cell RNA-Seq. Cell, 2016; 167:1883–1896.e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.039.
15.
DatlingerP, RendeiroAF, SchmidlC, et al.Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout. Nat Methods, 2017; 14:297–301. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4177.
16.
GasperiniM, HillAJ, McFaline-FigueroaJL, et al.A genome-wide framework for mapping gene regulation via cellular genetic screens. Cell, 2019; 176:377–390. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.029.
17.
MimitouE, ChengA, MontalbanoA, et al.Expanding the CITE-seq tool-kit: detection of proteins, transcriptomes, clonotypes and CRISPR perturbations with multiplexing, in a single assay. bioRxiv, 2018 Nov 8 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1101/466466.
18.
AllenF, CrepaldiLR, Alsinet-ArmengolC, et al.Mutations generated by repair of Cas9-induced double strand breaks are predictable from surrounding sequence. bioRxiv, 2018; 37:400341. DOI: 10.1101/400341.
19.
ShenMW, ArbabM, HsuJY, et al.Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants. Nature, 2018; 563:646–651. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0686-x.
