Fostering Systems Thinking for Youth Leading Environmental Change: A Multinational Exploration

Abstract

More youth-based environmental engagement programs (EEPs) are needed to help combat the impact of climate change. Current programs just focus their content on individual-level personal practices (e.g., recycling); are designed to be implemented in one setting with little regard for broader implications or opportunities for contextual adaption; and collect little evaluative information about how programs are developed, implemented, and evaluated. In this article, the authors present an example of how these limitations might be addressed through Youth Leading Environmental Change (YLEC), an evidence-based international EEP designed to build young people's capacity for collective action. The goal of this analysis is to explore one specific aspect of this program, fostering systems thinking, which is a critical element of the underlying theory of engagement and a critical skill in finding approaches to dealing with complex problems. Systems thinking is a form of analysis or thought process that places emphasis on how a problem interacts in complex ways with the systems in which it was created. We investigate how two novel program components, a local speaker's personal account of an environmental injustice and a live video exchange of participants from the global North and South (with different experiences of negative environmental impacts), promote systems thinking. We also illustrate how participants' increased capacity in systems thinking resulted in them being more motivated and engaged in collective environmental action. Thirty-four 60 minute semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with participants in Bangladesh, Canada, and India. Findings suggest that participants' experiences of the two program components built their capacity to think about environmental issues at higher levels of systemic complexity, which, in turn, resulted in increased engagement in environmental action. Key Words: Environment—Youth engagement—Systems thinking—Adaptation—Behavior change.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alisat

, & Riemer

(2015). The environmental action scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 13–23.

Arnold

R. D.

, & Wade

J. P.

(2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678.

Aronson

(1996). Overview of systems thinking. Retrieved from http://www.thinking.net/Systems_Thinking/OverviewSTarticle.pdf

Blasé

, & Fixsen

(2013) Core intervention components: Identifying and operationalizing what makes programs work (Research Brief). Washington, DC: Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services.

Blythe

, & Harré

(2013). Inspiring youth sustainability leadership: Six elements of a transformative youth eco-retreat. Ecopsychology, 4, 336–344.

Bragg

(2014). Activist ecopsychology. Ecopsychology, 6, 16–18.

Central Intelligence Agency. (2015). The world fact book. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook

Crowther

, Hemmi

, & Scandrett

(2012). Learning environmental justice and adult education in a Scottish community campaign against fish farming. Local Environment, 17, 115–130.

Dariotis

J. K.

, Bumbarger

B. K.

, Duncan

L. G.

, & Greenberg

M. T

. (2008). How do implementation efforts relate to program adherence? Examining the role of organizational, implementer, and program factors. Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 744–760.

10.

Darkwa

(2011) Environmental justice education: Empowering Ghanaian students to become environmental citizens. Environmental Practice, 13, 314–324.

11.

Davidoff

, Dixon-Woods

, Leviton

, & Michie

(2015). Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Quality Safety, 24, 228–238.

12.

de Vreede

, Warner

, & Pitter

(2014). Facilitating youth to take sustainability actions: The potential of peer education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45, 37–56.

13.

Dimick

A. S.

(2015). Supporting youth to develop environmental citizenship within/against a neoliberal context. Environmental Education Research, 21, 390–402.

14.

Dittmer

L. D.

, & Riemer

(2013). Fostering critical thinking about climate change: Applying community psychology to an environmental education project with youth. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 4(1). Retrieved from http://www.gjcpp.org/en

15.

Dusenbury

, Branningan

, Falco

, & Hansen

W. B.

(2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256.

16.

Gadgil

, & Guha

(1994). Ecological conflicts and the environmental movement in India. Development and Change, 25, 101–136.

17.

Global Carbon Project. (2014). Global carbon atlas. Canberra, Australia, and Tsukuba, Japan: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, and National Institute for Environmental Studies. Retrieved from http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/?q=en/emissions

18.

Haluza-Delay

(2013). Educating for environmental justice. In, Brody

, Dillon

, Stevenson

& Wals

(Eds.), International handbook on environmental education research (pp. 394–402). London: Routledge.

19.

Harré

(2007). Community service or activism as an identity project for youth. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 711–724.

20.

Hickman

(2012). Producing ecological citizens, not just green consumers: Engaging youth in environmental action (Unpublished master's thesis). Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada.

21.

Hickman

, Riemer

, & the YLEC Collaborative. (2016). A theory of engagement for fostering collective action in Youth Leading Environmental Change. Ecopsychology, 8, 167–173.

22.

Hickman

G. M.

, Riemer

, & Sayal

(2012). Youth Leading Environmental Change: Facilitator manual. Waterloo, Canada: Laurier Centre for Community Research, Learning and Action.

23.

IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team, Pachauri

R. K.

and Meyer

L. A.

, Eds.). Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

24.

Jensen

B. B.

& Schnack

(1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3, 163–178.

25.

Jickling

, & Wals

A. E. J.

(2008) Globalization and environmental education: Looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 1–21.

26.

Miles

M. B.

, Huberman

A. M.

, & Saldaña

(2013). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

27.

Moore

J. E.

, Bumbarger

B. K.

, & Cooper B

(2013). Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts. Journal of Primary Prevention, 3, 147–161.

28.

Riemer

, Lynes

, & Hickman

G. M.

(2013). A model for developing and assessing youth-based environmental engagement programs. Environmental Education Research, 20, 522–574.

29.

Riemer

, Voorhees

, Dittmer

, Alisat

, Alam

, Sayal

, … Schweizer-Ries

(2016). The Youth Leading Environmental Change project: A mixed-method longitudinal study across six countries. Ecopsychology, 8, 174–187.

30.

Ringwalt

C. L.

, Vincus

, Ennett

, Johnson

, & Rohrbach

L. A.

(2004). Reasons for teachers' adaptation of substance use prevention curricula in schools with non-White student populations. Prevention Science, 5, 61–67.

31.

Rouser-Renouf

, Maibach

E. W.

, Leiserowitz

, & Zhao

(2014). The genesis of climate change activism: From key beliefs to political action. Climatic Change, 125, 163–178.

32.

Stovold

(2012). The power of the narrative approach in facilitating students' learning about environmental justice (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada.

33.

US Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). Environmental justice. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/compliance/environmentaljustice/index.html

34.

Yiend

(2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing and emotional information. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 3–47.