The Youth Leading Environmental Change Project: A Mixed-Method Longitudinal Study across Six Countries

Abstract

Significant cultural transformations of the kinds that are needed to move our global society toward sustainability require youth to engage in environmental actions. These actions are more than just updating one's personal practice (e.g., recycling). They are “intentional and conscious civic behaviors that are focused on systemic causes of environmental problems and the promotion of environmental sustainability through collective efforts” (Alisat & Riemer, 2015, p. 14). The current study investigated the effectiveness of the Youth Leading Environmental Change (YLEC) program, which fostered such environmental actions in six participating countries. YLEC is an 11-unit evidence-based youth engagement workshop series, with a focus on environmental justice and on building action competence. The study employed a mixed-method longitudinal comparison group design with three follow-ups at 3, 6, and 12 months. Overall, 365 university students from Bangladesh, Canada, Germany, India, Uganda, and the United States participated in either the workshop or comparison group. Sixty-three of the workshop participants participated in semistructured qualitative interviews at the 3-month follow-up. The results suggest that most participants experienced a significant personal transformation both in regard to how they relate to environmental issues and how they perceive themselves as agents of change. Although there was an increase in environmental action in the month immediately following the workshop series, engagement seemed to revert close to baseline levels at the 12-month follow-up for many participants. Implications of the findings for theory and practice are discussed. Key Words: Youth—Environmental action—Environmentalism—Youth engagement—Environmental activism.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alisat

, & Riemer

(2015). The environmental action scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 13–23.

Blythe

, & Harré

(2012). Inspiring youth sustainability leadership: Six elements of a transformative youth eco-retreat. Ecopsychology, 4, 336–344.

Creswell

J. W.

, & Plano Clark

V. L.

(2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dawson

S. L.

, & Tyson

G. A.

(2012). Will morality or political ideology determine attitudes to climate change?. Australian Community Psychologist, 24, 8–25.

de Vreede

, Warner

, & Pitter

(2014). Facilitating youth to take sustainability actions: The potential of peer education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45, 37–56.

Dittmer

L. D.

, Mugagga

, Metternich

, Schweizer-Ries

, Asiimwe

, & Riemer

(2016). Building young people's environmental action competence: Contrasting cases in Germany and Uganda. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Dittmer

L. D.

, & Riemer

(2013). Fostering critical thinking about climate change: Applying community psychology to an environmental education project with youth. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 4(1). Retrieved from http://www.gjcpp.org/en

Harré

N. F.

(2011). Psychology for a better world: Strategies to inspire sustainability. Auckland, New Zealand: Department of Psychology, University of Auckland.

Harré

N. F.

, Tepavac

, & Bullen

(2009). Integrity, efficacy and community in the stories of political activists. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6, 330–345.

10.

Hickman

, Riemer

, & the YLEC Collaborative. (2016). A theory of engagement for fostering collective action in Youth Leading Environmental Change. Ecopsychology, 8, 167–173.

11.

Hickman

G. M.

, Riemer

, & Sayal

(2012). Youth Leading Environmental Change: Facilitator Manual. Waterloo, Canada: Laurier Centre for Community Research, Learning and Action.

12.

Hossay

(2006). Unsustainable: A primer for global environmental and social justice. London: Zed Books.

13.

IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap11_FGDall.pdf

14.

Jensen

B. B.

, & Schnack

(1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3, 163–178.

15.

Kelly

J. G.

(1986). An ecological paradigm: Defining mental health consultation as preventive service. Prevention in Human Services, 4, 1–36.

16.

Kenis

, & Mathijs

(2012). Beyond individual behavior change: The role of power, knowledge and strategy in tackling climate change. Environmental Education Research, 18, 45–65.

17.

Koger

S. M.

, & Winter

D. D.

(2010). The psychology of environmental problems (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis, Psychology Press.

18.

Litell

R. C.

, Milliken

G. A.

, Stroup

W. W.

, Wolfinger

R. D.

, & Schabenberger

(2006). SAS for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

19.

Lubell

(2002). Environmental activism as collective action. Environment and Behavior, 34, 431–454.

20.

Manning

C. M.

, & Amel

E. L.

(2014). No human left behind: Making a place for social and environmental justice within the field of ecopsychology. Ecopsychology, 6, 14–15.

21.

Mezirow

(2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In Mezirow

& Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Miles

M. B.

, Huberman

A. M.

, & Saldaña

(2013). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

23.

Ockwell

, Whitmarsh

, & O'Neill

(2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: Forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement?. Science Communication, 30, 305–327.

24.

Pancer

M. S.

(2015). The psychology of citizenship and civic engagement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

25.

Raudenbush

S. W.

, & Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

26.

Riemer

, & Dittmer

(2016). An introduction to the special issue. Ecopsychology, 8, 174–187.

27.

Riemer

, Lynes

, & Hickman

G. M.

(2013). A model for developing and assessing youth-based environmental engagement programs. Environmental Education Research, 20, 522–574.

28.

Riemer

, Rosof-Williams

, & Bickman

(2005). Theories related to changing clinician practice. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 241–254.

29.

Riemer

, & Schweizer-Ries

(2012). Psychology and sustainability science: Complexity, normativity, and transdisciplinarity in meeting sustainability challenges. Umweltpsychologie, 16, 143–165.

30.

Sayal

, Bidisha

S. H.

, Lynes

, Riemer

, Jasani

, Monteiro

, … Eady

(2016). Fostering systems thinking for Youth Leading Environmental Change: A multinational exploration. Ecopsychology, 8, 188–201.

31.

Shadish

W. R.

, Cook

T. D.

, & Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

32.

Singer

J. D.

(1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323–355.

33.

Sterling

(1996). Education in change. In Huckle

& Sterling

(Eds.), Education for sustainability (pp. 18–39). London: Earthscan Publications.

34.

Whelan

J. M.

(2002). Education and training for effective environmental advocacy (Unpublished dissertation). Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.