Assessing the Impact of the United States Postal System and Election Administration on Absentee and Mail Voting in the 2012 to 2020 U.S. Midterm and Presidential Elections

Abstract

Absentee and mail voting were important ways of ballot casting during the coronavirus pandemic and the 2020 presidential election. Several studies (Burden et al. 2014, 2017; Ritter and Tolbert 2020) have established that the impact of absentee and mail voting is shaped by the presence of other election laws and broader features of a state's election administration. However, more study is needed to address whether and to what degree accessible versus restrictive features of a state's election administration impact the ability of individuals to vote in these ways. Using the accessible voting framework (Ritter and Tolbert 2020) and data from the 2018 and 2020 Catalist voter file as well as the 2012 to 2020 Cooperative Election Study, this study evaluates the impact of excuse required absentee, no-excuse absentee, permanent absentee, and universal mail voting laws on individual-level voting. In addition, this study evaluates whether state cure laws, voter identification laws, notary or witness signature requirements, and variations in United States Postal Service delivery times moderate the impacts of absentee and mail voting laws. Ultimately, this study demonstrates that the level of accessibility of state absentee and mail voting laws as well as their administration have significant effects on voter turnout. The results also reveal that higher performing U.S. Postal Service administration can enhance the impact of absentee and mail voting laws, particularly in states with the most restrictive mail voting laws.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

Michael R.

, Levin

Ines

, and Sinclair

J. Andrew

. 2012. “Making Voting Easier: Convenience Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election.” Political Research Quarterly, 65: 248-262.

Alvarez

R. Michael

, Atkeson

Lonna Rae

, and Hall

Thad E.

. 2013. Evaluating Elections: A Handbook of Methods and Standards. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Ansolabehere

Stephen

, and III

Charles Stewart

. 2005. “Residual Vote Attributable to Technology.” Journal of Politics, 67(2): 365-389.

Arceneaux

Kevin

, Kousser

Thad

, and Mullin

Megan

. 2012. “Get Out the Vote-by-Mail? A Randomized Field Experiment Testing the Effect of Mobilization in Traditional and Vote-by-Mail Precincts.” Political Research Quarterly, 65(4): 882-94.

Ashok

Vivekinan

, Feder

Daniel

, McGrath

Mary

, and Hersh

Eitan

. 2016. “The Dynamic Election: Patterns of Early Voting Across Time, State, Party, and Age.” Election Law Journal, 15(2): 115-128.

Atkeson

Lonna Rae

, and Saunders

Kyle L.

. 2008. “Election Administration and Voter Confidence.” In Democracy in the States: Experimentation in Election Reform. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 21-34

Barber

Michael

, and Holbein

John B.

. 2020. “The Participatory and Partisan Impacts of Mandatory Vote-by-Mail.” Science Advances, 6(35): 1-7.

Baringer

Anna

, Herron

Michael C.

, and Smith

Daniel A.

. 2020. “Voting by Mail and Ballot Rejection: Lessons from Florida for Elections in the Age of the Coronavirus.” Election Law Journal, 19(3): 289-320.

Biggers

Daniel R.

, and Hamner

Michael J.

. 2015. “Who Makes Voting Convenient? Explaining the Adoption of Early and No-Excuse Absentee Voting in the American States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 15(2): 192-210.

10.

Berinsky

Adam J.

2005. “The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States.” American Politics Research, 33: 471-490.

11.

Berinsky

Adam J.

, Burns

Nancy

, and Traugott

Michael W.

. 2001. “Who Votes by Mail? A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-By-Mail Systems.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 65: 178-197.

12.

Bowler

Shaun

, and Donovan

Todd

. 2008. “Mobilizing Political Engagement and Participation in Diverse Societies: The Impact of Institutional Arrangements.” In Designing Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work, eds. Margaret Levi, James Johnson, Jack Knight, and Susan Stokes. New York, NY: Russell Sage. Foundation.

13.

Burden

Barry C.

, and III

Charles Stewart

. 2014. The Measure of American Elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Burden

Barry C.

, Canon

David T.

, Mayer

Kenneth R.

, and Moynihan

Donald P.

. 2017. “The Complicated Partisan Effects of State Election Laws.” Political Research Quarterly. 1-13.

15.

Burden

Barry C.

, Canon

David T.

, Mayer

Kenneth R.

, and Moynihan

Donald P.

. 2014. “Electoral Laws, Mobilization, and Turnout: The Unanticipated Consequences of Election Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 58.1(January):. 95-109.

16.

Catalist. 2021. <https://catalist.us/> (accessed August 1, 2021).

17.

Collingwood

Loren

, and O'Brien

Benjamin Gonzalez

. 2021. “Is Distance to Drop Box an Appropriate Proxy for Drop Box Treatment? A Case Study of Washington State.” American Politics Research. 1-14.

18.

Cooperative Election Study. 2021. <https://www.prc.gov/dockets/quarterly-performance> (accessed August 1, 2021).

19.

Corasaniti

Nick

, and Lu.

Denise

. 2020. “How Quickly Will Your Absentee Vote Be Counted? A State-by-State Timeline.” New York Times. October 21. <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/politics/when-votes-counted-tonight-election.html> (accessed October 25, 2020).

20.

Davidson

Chelsey

, and Levine

Zahavah

. 2021. “The Virus and the Pandemic: Administering the 2020 U.S. Election in a Pandemic.” Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. <pacscenter.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Virus-And-The-Vote.pdf> (accessed May 8, 2023).

21.

Donovan

Todd.

2008. “A Goal for Reform.” In Democracy in the State, eds. Bruce E. Cain, Todd Donovan, and Caroline J. Tolbert. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Press.

22.

Downs

Anthony.

1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

23.

Federal Election Commission. 2022. “Election and Voting Information.” <https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/election-and-voting-information/> (accessed January 12, 2023).

24.

Fullmer

Elliot B.

2015a. “Early Voting: Do More Sites Lead to Higher Turnout?” Election Law Journal, 14(2): 81-96.

25.

Fullmer

Elliot B.

2015b. “The Site Gap: Racial Inequalities in Early Voting Access.” American Politics Research, 43(2): 283-303.

26.

Gerken

Heather.

2009. The Democracy Index. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

27.

Gerber

Alan S.

, Huber

Gregory A.

, and Hill

Seth J.

. 2013. “Identifying the Effect of All-Mail Elections on Turnout: Staggered Reform in the Evergreen State.” Political Science Research and Methods, 1(1): 91-116.

28.

Government Accountability Office. 2018. “U.S. Postal Service: Enhancing Procedures Could Improve Product Scanning.” <https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-18-638.pdf> (accessed September 10, 2021).

29.

Gronke

Paul

, Galanes-Rosenbaum

Eva

, Miller

Peter A.

, and Toffey

David

. 2008. “Convenience Voting.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (February):. 437-455.

30.

Gronke

Paul.

2014. “Voter Confidence as a Metric of Election Performance.” In The Measure of American Elections, eds. Barry C. Burden and Charles Stewart III. New York, NY: Cambridge University. Press

31.

Hale

Kathleen

, and Brown

Mitchell

. 2020. How We Vote: Innovation in American Elections. Georgetown University. Press.

32.

Hanmer

Michael J.

, and Herrnson

Paul S.

. 2014. “Provisional Ballots.” In The Measure of American Elections, eds. Barry C. Burden and Charles Stewart III. New York, NY: Cambridge University. Press.

33.

Hanmer

Michael J.

2009. Discount Voting: Voter Registration Reforms and Their Effects. New York, NY; Cambridge University. Press.

34.

Hersh

Eitan D.

2015. Hacking the Electorate: How Campaigns Perceive Voters. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Hufford

Axel.

2021. “The U.S. Postal Service and the 2020 Elections.” In The Virus and the Vote: Administering the 2020 Election in a Pandemic, eds. Chelsey Davidson, and Zahavah Levine. Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. <pacscenter.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Virus-And-The-Vote.pdf> (accessed May 8, 2023).

36.

Karp

Jeffrey A.

, and Banducci

Susan A.

. 2001. “Absentee Voting, Mobilization, and Participation.” American Politics Research, 29: 183-195.

37.

Karp

Jeffrey A.

, and Banducci

Susan A.

. 2000. “Going Postal: How All-Mail Elections Influence Turnout.” Political Behavior, 22: 223-239.

38.

Keyssar

Alexander.

2009. The Right to Vote: The Contest History of Democracy in the United States. New York, NY: Basic Books.

39.

Kosar

Kevin R.

2011. “Federal Government Corporations: An Overview.” Congressional Research Service. Federal Government Corporations: An Overview (fas.org) (accessed September 10, 2021).

40.

Lamb

Matt.

2021. “The ‘Costs' Of Voting: The Effects of Vote-by-Mail on Election Administration Finance in Colorado.” Social Science Quarterly. 1-19.

41.

Larocca

Roger

, and Klemanski.

John S.

2011. “Election Reform and Turnout in Presidential Elections.” <https://files.oakland.edu/users/larocca/web/index.htm> (January 15, 2016).

42.

Leighley

Jan E.

, and Nagler

Jonathan

. 2013. Who Votes Now? Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

43.

Leonard

Devin.

2016. Neither Snow Nor Rain: A History of the United States Postal Service. Grove. Press.

44.

Mann

Christopher B.

2014. “Mail Ballots in the United States: Policy Choice and Administrative Challenges.” In The Measure of American Elections, eds. Barry C. Burden and Charles Stewart, III. Cambridge University. Press.

45.

MIT Election Data and Science Lab. 2020. Election Performance Index. <https://electionlab.mit.edu/epi-press-release> (accessed March 23, 2020).

46.

National Conference of State Legislatures. 2020a. “VOPP: Table 1: States with No-Excuse Absentee Voting.” <https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/vopp-table-1-states-with-no-excuse-absentee-voting.aspx> (accessed July 1, 2021).

47.

National Conference of State Legislatures. 2020b. “VOPP: Table 14: How States Verify Voted Absentee Ballots.” <https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/vopp-table-14-how-states-verify-voted-absentee.aspx> (accessed October 25, 2020).

48.

National Conference of State Legislatures. 2020c. “VOPP: Table 15: States That Permit Voters to Correct Signature Discrepancies.” <https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/vopp-table-15-states-that-permit-voters-to-correct-signature-discrepancies.aspx> (accessed October 25, 2020).

49.

National Conference of State Legislatures. 2020d. “VOPP Table 16: When Absentee/Mail Ballot Processing and Counting Can Begin.” <https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/vopp-table-16-when-absentee-mail-ballot-processing-and-counting-can-begin.aspx> (accessed October 25, 2020).

50.

National Conference of State Legislatures. 2022. “Table 3: States with Permanent Absentee Voting Lists.” <https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/table-3-states-with-permanent-absentee-voting-lists> (accessed December 12, 2022).

51.

Neeley

Grant W.

, and Richardson

Lilliard E.

Jr.

2001. “Who is Early Voting? An Individual Level Examination.” The Social Science Journal, 38: 381-392.

52.

Nickerson

David W.

, and Rogers

Todd

. 2014. “Political Campaigns and Big Data.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2): 51-74.

53.

Norris

Pippa.

2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University. Press.

54.

Oliver

J. Eric.

1996. “The Effects of Eligibility Restrictions and Party Activity on Absentee Voting and Overall Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science, 40: 498-513.

55.

Postal Regulatory Commission. 2021. Quarterly Service Performance Reports. <https://www.prc.gov/dockets/quarterly-performance> (accessed June 1, 2021).

56.

Reevaluating the Universal Service Obligation. 2020. Office of the Inspector General. United States Postal Service Obligation. <https://www.oversight.gov/report/usps/reevaluating-universal-service-obligation> (accessed July 31, 2021).

57.

Report on Universal Postal Service and the Postal Monopoly. 2008. United States Postal Service. <https://about.usps.com/universal-postal-service/usps-uso-report.pdf> (accessed August 1, 2021).

58.

Ritter

Michael

, and Tolbert

Caroline

. 2020. Accessible Elections: How the States can Help Americans Vote. Oxford University. Press.

59.

Rogers

Todd

, and Aida

Mashahiko

. 2014. “Vote Self-Prediction Hardly Predicts Who Will Vote, and Is (Misleadingly) Unbiased.” American Politics Research, 42(3): 503-528.

60.

Southwell

Priscilla L.

2009. “Analysis of the Turnout Effects of Vote by Mail Elections.” The Social Science Journal, 46(1): 211-216.

61.

Springer

Melanie.

2014. American Electoral Institutions and Voter Turnout, 1920-2000. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

62.

Stein

Robert M.

, and Vonnahme

Greg

. 2014. “Polling Place Practices and the Voting Experience.” In The Measure of American Elections, eds. Barry C. Burden and Charles Stewart III. New York, NY: Cambridge University. Press.

63.

Stewart

Charles

, III. 2010. “Losing Votes by Mail.” New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy. Symposium Issue—Helping America Vote: The Past, Present, and Future of Election Administration, 13(3): 573-601.

64.

Stewart

Charles

, III. 2014. “Measuring Elections.” In The Measure of American Elections, eds. Barry C. Burden and Charles Stewart III. New York, NY: Cambridge University. Press.

65.

Stewart

Charles

, III. 2020. “The Election Performance Index: Past, Present, and Future.” In The Future of Election Administration, eds. Mitchell Brown, Kathleen Hale, and Bridgett A. King.

66.

Sullivan

Marybeth.

2014. “States Offering No-Excuse Permanent Absentee Voting.” Office of Legislative Research. Connecticut General Assembly. <https://www.cga.ct.gov/2014/rpt/2014-R-0273.htm> (accessed September 1, 2021).

67.

Tierney

John T.

1988. The U.S. Postal Service: The Status and Prospects of a Free Enterprise. Auburn Publishing. House.

68.

United States Elections Project. 2020. “2020 General Election Early Vote Statistics.” <https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/index.html> (accessed November 2, 2020).

69.

United States Postal Service. 2012. “DMM Revision: District Consolidations ZIP Code Realignments.” <https://about.usps.com/postal-bulletin/2012/pb22332/html/updt_002.htm> (accessed August 10, 2021).

70.

U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. 2022. Report on Rate Increases for Market Dominant Product. 2021-2023 Sess., 9 December. <https://www.prc.gov/sites/default/files/testimonies/Rate%20Increases%20for%20M-D%20Products_1.pdf> (accessed May 8, 2023).

71.

Wolfinger

Raymond E.

, and Rosenstone.

Steven J.

1980. Who Votes? Yale University Press.

72.

Zoch

Amanda.

2021. “Then and Now: How 8 Election Policies have Changed Since 2000.” State Legislatures Magazine. National Conference of State Legislatures. <https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/then-and-now-election-policies-in-2000-and-2020-magazine2021.aspx> (accessed August 1, 2021).