Abstract

Nevertheless, the shortcoming of laparoscopic RFA is an inability to image the ablation zone in real time or at least immediately after treatment as occurs with CT-guided percutaneous procedures where intravenous contrast is administered to delineate the ablation zone. Thus, the use of CEUS during the laparoscopic approach would logically provide the surgeon with a comparable “perfusion-deficit” surrogate for treatment success. Currently, temperature monitoring and needle position confirmation by ultrasonography are the only laparoscopic methods. It must be emphasized that immediate ablation success, defined as lack of enhancement immediately (or on the initial post-treatment CT), does not translate perfectly to long-term treatment success. Recurrences as late as 5 years after RFA and cryoablation have been reported, despite initial success. Whether the lack of perfusion on CEUS at the time of ablation improves the long-term oncologic outcome of the procedure is not known. Unfortunately, this study's follow-up was insufficient (median 16 months) to assess whether the oncologic efficacy was improved with CEUS. This would be the ultimate test and cost justification for using CEUS routinely during laparoscopic RFA.
