There is significant variability in how rhinoplasty results are presented on social media. This study aims to evaluate the quality and consistency of preoperative and postoperative rhinoplasty photos on the social media platform Instagram.
Methods:
Instagram was queried on April 4, 2024 using the search term #rhinoplastybeforeandafter. Posts meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed for inconsistencies in background, makeup, use of personal photo, and variations in face size between preoperative and postoperative images. Account demographics and time since surgery were also noted.
Results:
A total of 888 sets of before-and-after rhinoplasty photos were included, with nearly all (n = 882) posted by surgeon accounts. Of the posts analyzed, 23.7% had a ≥10% face size discrepancy, and 5.1% had a ≥10% face rotation discrepancy. Only 35.7% of posts were considered “high quality,” with no significant photo discrepancies between postop and preop images and with postoperative time interval reported.
Conclusion:
Instagram before-and-after rhinoplasty photos evaluated in this study exhibited significant heterogeneity in quality and consistency regarding image background, image source, face size, face rotation, and brightness. Surgeons should prioritize consistency between preoperative and postoperative photos when sharing their results to minimize the potential for misleading the public.
ThawanyaratK, HinsonC, GomezDA, et al.#PRS: A study of plastic surgery trends with the rise of Instagram. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023; 5:ojad004; doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad004
3.
ArabK, BarasainO, AltaweelA, et al.Influence of social media on the decision to undergo a cosmetic procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7(8):e2333; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002333
4.
ObeidFM, MortadaH, AlsulaimanM, et al.The use of social media and its influence on undergoing rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022; 10(6):e4375; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004375
5.
TahaM, AlZubaidiHAA, AlkhairyIH, et al.The influence of social media on the decision of rhinoplasty among adults in the Western and Southern Regions of Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus., 2023; 15(6):e40137; doi: 10.7759/cureus.40137
6.
ChoM-J, LiAY, FurnasHJ, et al.Current trends in the use of social media by plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146(1):83e–91e; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006936
7.
LandeenKC, SmetakMR, KeahNM, et al.Professional social media in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery: Usage, resources, and barriers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023; 132(9):1085–1089; doi: 10.1177/00034894221133746
8.
SoriceSC, LiAY, GilstrapJ, et al.Social media and the plastic surgery patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140(5):1047–1056; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003769
VacaEE, PerezMM, LamanoJB, et al.Photographic misrepresentation on instagram after facial cosmetic surgery: Is increased photography bias associated with greater user engagement? Aesthet Surg J. 2021; 41(11):NP1778–NP1785; doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab203
11.
MontemurroP, PorcnikA, HedénP, et al.The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: Literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015; 39(2):270–277; doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3
12.
SchindelinJ, Arganda-CarrerasI, FriseE, et al.Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(7):676–682; doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
13.
ChangJB, WooSL, CedernaPS. Worth the “Likes”? The use of Facebook among plastic surgeons and its perceived impact. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135(5):909e–918e; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001318
14.
RohrichRJ, DayanE, XueAS. Social media in plastic surgery: The future is now? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144(6):1509–1510; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006253
15.
ParkSSE, AkellaSS, MoonJ-Y, et al.Building your brand: Analysis of successful oculoplastic surgeons on social media. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 36(6):582–589; doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001654
16.
OmA, IjeomaB, KebedeS, et al.Analyzing the quality of aesthetic surgery procedure videos on TikTok. Aesthet Surg J. 2021; 41(12):2078–2083; doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab291
17.
GrayMC, GemmitiA, AtaA, et al.Can you trust what you watch? An assessment of the quality of information in aesthetic surgery videos on YouTube. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145(2):329e–336e; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006463
18.
WardB, WardM, NicheporuckA, et al.Assessment of YouTube as an informative resource on facial plastic surgery procedures. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019; 21(1):75–76; doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0822
19.
SoaresDJ, von HavenHN, YiCH. #TheUglyTruth? A qualitative evaluation of outcomes photography on instagram: Introducing the SEPIA scoring system. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022; 10(8):e4464; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004464
20.
ElAbdR, AlghanimK, AlnesefM, et al.Aesthetic surgery before-and-after photography bias on instagram. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023; 47(5):2144–2149; doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03398-9
21.
WardB, WardM, FriedO, et al.Nasal distortion in short-distance photographs: The selfie effect. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018; 20(4):333–335; doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0009
22.
GoshtasbiK, KimD, WongBJF. Before and after rhinoplasty photography on online platforms. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2024; 26(5):615–617; doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0295
23.
KandathilCK, PatelPN, SaltychevM, et al.Differences in social perceptions between digital single lens reflex camera and cell phone selfie images. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020; 22(5):347–354; doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0077
24.
SommerDD, MendelsohnM. Pitfalls of nonstandardized photography in facial plastic surgery patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114(1):10–14; doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000127791.31526.E2
25.
ArchibaldDJ, CarlsonML, FriedmanO. Pitfalls of nonstandardized photography. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2010; 18(2):253–266, Table of Contents; doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2010.01.005
26.
MarshallP, BartolacciA, BurkeD. Human face tilt is a dynamic social signal that affects perceptions of dimorphism, attractiveness, and dominance. Evol Psychol. 2020; 18(1):1474704920910403; doi: 10.1177/1474704920910403
27.
RimlS, PiontkeA, LarcherL, et al.Quantification of faults resulting from disregard of standardised facial photography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64(7):898–901; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.11.005
GaldinoGM, VogelJE, Vander KolkCA. Standardizing digital photography: It’s not all in the eye of the beholder. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108(5):1334–1344; doi: 10.1097/00006534-200110000-00037
30.
FranzblauLE, ChungKC. Impact of medical tourism on cosmetic surgery in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013; 1(7):e63; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000003
31.
VogelEA, RoseJP, RobertsLR, et al.Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychol Popular Media Culture., 2014; 3(4):206–222; doi: 10.1037/ppm0000047
32.
ChenJ, IshiiM, BaterKL, et al.Association between the use of social media and photograph editing applications, self-esteem, and cosmetic surgery acceptance. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019; 21(5):361–367; doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0328
33.
de VriesDA, PeterJ, NikkenP, et al.The effect of social network site use on appearance investment and desire for cosmetic surgery among adolescent boys and girls. Sex Roles., 2014; 71(9–10):283–295; doi: 10.1007/s11199-014-0412-6
34.
WalkerCE, KrumhuberEG, DayanS, et al.Effects of social media use on desire for cosmetic surgery among young women. Curr Psychol. 2021; 40(7):3355–3364; doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00282-1
35.
FanKL, GrazianoF, EconomidesJM, et al.The public’s preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: Demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143(2):619–630; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005205
36.
DorfmanRG, MahmoodE, RenA, et al.Google ranking of plastic surgeons values social media presence over academic pedigree and experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39(4):447–451; doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy285
37.
SoaresD, YamamotoK, LiebertzD. The future of visual documentation? Assessing the use of videography in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 2023; 39(2):118–124; doi: 10.1055/a-1849-3233
