Externalizing problems, which are the main reason for youth referrals to mental health agencies, are highly persistent and predict a range of negative outcomes. Youths with externalizing problems are also frequently comorbid with anxiety. Among the most widely recognized evidence-based treatments is cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Although CBT principles seem to be sound, effect sizes remain moderate, suggesting improvements could be made to this conventional treatment approach. The main premise of the current pilot study is to investigate the feasibility of implementing a videogame intervention (“Dojo” [Gamedesk, Los Angeles, CA]) that incorporates CBT principles and aims to address the limitations of conventional CBT delivery models, with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes for this difficult-to-treat population.
Materials and Methods:
“Dojo” is an emotion management game that helps youths to recognize and control their physiological and emotional arousal. We explored the implementation and user experience of “Dojo” in a sample of eight adolescents in residential treatment for both externalizing and anxiety problems.
Results:
Participants attended all sessions without complaints. They evaluated “Dojo” very positively and exhibited high compliance during the training sessions. We encountered some problems with session scheduling and obtaining mentor reports. Quantitative data show the predicted decrease in three out of four measurements.
Conclusions:
The smooth implementation, high user satisfaction, high self-reported compliance during training sessions, and initial outcome results all indicate the high potential “Dojo” holds as an innovative intervention. If additional rigorously designed randomized controlled trials prove to be successful, “Dojo” can be a cost-effective way to engage high-risk youths in effective intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RiceBJ, WoolstonJ, StewartE, et al.Differences in younger, middle, and older children admitted to child psychiatric inpatient services. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev, 2002; 32:241–261.
2.
FrickPJ, VidingE. Antisocial behavior from a developmental psychology perspective. Dev Psychopathol, 2009; 21:1111–1131.
3.
LoeberR. Development and risk factors of juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency. Clin Psychol Rev, 1990; 10:1–41.
4.
MoffitT. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev, 1993; 4:674–701.
5.
OdgersCL, CaspiA, BroadbentJM, et al.Prediction of differential adult health burden by conduct problem subtypes in males. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2007; 64:476–484.
6.
OdgersCL, MoffittTE, BroadbentJM, et al.Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes. Dev Psychopathol, 2008; 20:673–716.
7.
ConnerDF, CarlsonGA, ChangKD, et al.Juvenile maladaptive aggression: A review of prevention, treatment, and service configuration and proposed research agenda. J Clin Psychiatry, 2006; 67:808–820.
8.
WeiszJR, DossAJ, HawleyKM. Youth psychotherapy outcome research: A review and critique of the evidence base. Annu Rev Psychol, 2005; 56:337–363.
9.
EybergSM, NelsonMM, BoggsSR. Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 2008; 37:215–237.
10.
LeonardH, WenX. The epidemiology of mental retardation: Challenges and opportunities in the new millennium. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev, 2002; 8:117–134.
11.
van NieuwenhuijzenM. De (h)erkenning van jongeren met een licht verstandelijke beperking. Amsterdam; SWP; 2010.
12.
SchalockRL, Borthwick-DuffySA, BradleyVJ, et al.Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports, 11th ed. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities; 2010.
13.
van NieuwenhuijzenM, VriensA. (Social) cognitive skills and social information processing in children with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil, 2012; 33:426–434.
14.
BoylanK, VaillancourtT, BoyleM, SzatmariP. Comorbidity of internalizing disorders in children with oppositional defiant disorder. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2007; 16:484–494.
15.
GranicI, MeuselL, LammC, et al.Emotion regulation in children with behavior problems: Linking behavioral and brain processes. Dev Psychopathol, 2012; 24:1019–1029.
16.
LewisMD, GranicI, LammC, et al.Changes in the neural bases of emotion regulation associated with clinical improvement in children with behavior problems. Dev Psychopathol, 2008; 20:913–939.
17.
WolteringS, GranicI, LammC, LewisMD. Neural changes associated with treatment outcome in children with externalizing problems. Biol Psychiatry, 2011; 70:873–879.
18.
StiebenJ, LewisMD, GranicI, et al.Neurophysiological mechanisms of emotion regulation for subtypes of exernalizing children. Dev Psychopathol, 2007; 19:455–480.
19.
FrickPJ. Developmental pathways to conduct disorder: Implications for future directions in research, assessment, and treatment. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 2012; 41:378–389.
20.
FrickPJ, MorrisAS. Temperament and developmental pathways to conduct problems. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 2004; 33:54–68.
21.
VitaroF, BrendgenM, BarkerED. Subtypes of aggressive behaviors: A developmental perspective. Int J Behav Dev, 2006; 30:12–19.
22.
de LangeM, MatthysW, FoolenN, et al.Richtlijn ernstige gedragsproblemen voor de jeugdzorg. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Nederlands Jeugdinstituut; 2013.
23.
KazdinAE. Evidence-based treatment research: Advances, limitations, and next steps. Am Psychol, 2011; 66:685–698.
24.
WeiszJR, KazdinAE. Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2010.
25.
GranicI, LobelA, EngelsRCME. The benefits of playing video games. Am Psychol, 2014; 69:66–78.
26.
GranicI. The role of anxiety in the development, maintenance and treatment of childhood aggression. Dev Psychopathol, 2014; 26:1515–1530.
27.
SturmeyP, HamelinJP. Psychological treatments. In: TsakanikosE, McCarthyJ, eds. Handbook of Psychopathology in Intellectual Disability. Research Practice, and Policy. New York: Springer; 2014: pp. 325–357.
28.
CrenshawDA. Therapeutic Engagement of Children and Adolescents: Play, Symbol, Drawing, and Storytelling Strategies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2008.
29.
KendallAE. Child and Adolescent Therapy: Cognitive-Behavioral Procedures. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
30.
BurbierJL, DrabickDAG. Co-occurring anxiety and disruptive behavior disorders: The roles of anxious symptoms, reactive aggression, and shared risk processes. Clin Psychol Rev, 2009; 29:658–669.
VygotskyL. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
33.
CritchleyHD, MelmedRN, FeatherstoneE, et al.Brain activity during biofeedback relaxation: A functional neuroimaging investigation. Brain, 2001; 124:1003–1012.
34.
SukhodolskyDG, ScahillL. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anger and Aggression in Children. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
35.
GlancyG, SainiMA. An evidence-based review of psychological treatments of anger and aggression. Brief Treat Crisis Interv, 2005; 5:229–248.
36.
AlbanoAM, KendallPC. Cognitive behavioural therapy for children and youths with anxiety disorders: Clinical research advances. Int J Psychiatry, 2002; 14:129–134.
37.
BarrettPM. Evaluation of cognitive-behavioral group treatments for childhood anxiety disorders. J Clin Child Psychol, 1998; 27:459–468.
38.
RapeeRM, WignallA, HudsonJL, SchnieringCA. Treating Anxious Children and Adolescents: An Evidence-Based Approach. Oakland, CA: Harbinger; 2000.
39.
KahnJ, DucharmeP, TraversB, Gonzalez-HeydrichJ. RAGE Control: Regulate and gain emotional control. In: BushkoRG, ed. Strategy for the Future of Health. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2009: pp. 3335–343.
40.
DucharmeP, WharffE, HutchinsonE, et al.Videogame assisted emotional regulation training: An ACT with RAGE-Control case illustration. Clin Soc Work J, 2012; 40:75–84.
41.
KahnJ, DucharmeP, RotenbergA, Gonzalez-HeydrichJ. “RAGE-Control”: A game to build emotional strength. Games Health J, 2013; 2:53–57.
42.
GoodmanR. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1997; 38:581–586.
43.
van WidenfeltBM, GoedhartAW, TreffersPDA, GoodmanR. Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ). Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2003; 12:281–289.
44.
KapteinS, JansenDEMC, VogelsAGC, ReijneveldSA. Mental health problems in children with intellectual disability: Use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. J Intellect Disabil Res, 2008; 52:125–131.
45.
MurisP, MeestersC, van der BergF. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2003; 12:1–8.
46.
SpenceSH. A measure of anxiety symptoms among children. Behav Res Ther, 1998; 36:545–566.
47.
van StarrenburgMLA, KuijpersRCWM, HutschemaekersGJM, EngelsRCME. Effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of a group-based cognitive behavioural therapy-based indicative prevention program for children with elevated anxiety levels. BMC Psychiatry, 2013; 13:183–189.
48.
MurisP, MerckelbachH, OllendickT, et al.Three traditional and three new childhood anxiety questionnaires: Their reliability and validity in a normal adolescent sample. J Behav Assess, 2002; 40:753–772.
49.
CohenJW. Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998.
50.
DeciEL, RyanRM. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inc, 2000; 11:227–268.
51.
AartsH, VerplankenB, van KnippenbergA. Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit?. J Appl Soc Psychol, 1998; 28:1355–1374.
