The U.S. life science industry, including biotechnology, employs 2.2 million people and continues to grow rapidly, creating intense competition for a limited talent pool. Companies reported importing talent from other states and countries to meet these needs, while also removing barriers by expanding remote positions and reconsidering baseline educational requirements. As the biotechnology sector strives to improve health equity, it will be critical to train, recruit, and retain an inclusive and equitable workforce. Many companies report recruiting individuals with certificates, often strategically partnering with institutes of higher education to train and secure the talent required. The University of Colorado, Denver | Anschutz Medical Campus has partnered with the Colorado Bioscience Institute and nearly 40 representatives from industry to build a micro-credential program and diversify the workforce in Colorado and across the United States. Online, non-degree pathways are an innovative new tool for learner-centered inclusivity and aligning educational outcomes with industrial needs.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research: Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups. (Bibbins-DomingoK, HelmanA., eds). National Academies Press (US): Washington (DC). 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK4119/ [May 15, 2024]. Copyright 2022 by the National Academy of Sciences.
ØstergaardCR, TimmermansB, KristinssonK. Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 2011; 40(3):500–509; doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004
14.
OzgenC. The economics of diversity: Innovation, productivity and the labour market. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2021; 35(4):1168–1216; doi: 10.1111/joes.12433
MaytinK, FulmoreF, LeonY, et al.From macro to micro: Applying a theoretical framework for the development of innovative online instruction, micro-learning, and micro-credentialing. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2023; 15(1):161–172.
18.
LeongK, SungA, AuD, et al.A review of the trend of microlearning. JWAM, 2021; 13(1):88–102; doi: 10.1108/JWAM-10-2020-0044
19.
WhiteR. Shift Happens: Micro-Credential’s Effect on Student Achievement and Engagement [Ed.D.]. Valdosta State University: United States—Georgia; 2023.
20.
RodriguezSR, HarronJR, DeGraffMW. UTeach Maker: A Micro-Credentialing Program for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 2018; 34(1):6–17; doi: 10.1080/21532974.2017.1387830
21.
ChenHL, KusimoAC, Cardenas-NaviaI. Enabling a Skilled and Diverse Engineering Workforce with Non-Degree Credentials. A. Johri. Routledge Publishers: New York, NY; 2023.
22.
ChemersMM, ZurbriggenEL, SyedM, et al.The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 2011; 67(3):469–491; doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x
23.
SimpsonA, BouhafaY. Youths’ and Adults’ Identity in STEM: A systematic literature review. Journal for STEM Educ Res, 2020; 3(2):167–194; doi: 10.1007/s41979-020-00034-y
24.
Davis-HallD, FarrellyL, RisteffM, et al.Evaluating how exposure to scientific role models and work-based microbadging influences STEM career mindsets in underrepresented groups. Biomed Eng Education, 2023; 3(1):23–38; doi: 10.1007/s43683-022-00096-x
25.
PirkkalainenH, SoodI, Padron NapolesC, et al.How might micro-credentials influence institutions and empower learners in higher education? Educational Research, 2023; 65(1):40–63; doi: 10.1080/00131881.2022.2157302
26.
LyonLA, GreenE. Women in coding boot camps: An alternative pathway to computing jobs. Computer Science Education, 2020; 30(1):102–123; doi: 10.1080/08993408.2019.1682379
Colorado: The U.S. Bioscience Industry: Fostering Innovation and Driving America’s Economy Forward. 2022. Available from: https://www.bio.org/csba-resources-and-reports [Last accessed: May15, 2024].
29.
Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics [Internet]. ]. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2024. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes172031.htm#st [Last accessed: May15, 2024].
30.
DiepAN, ZhuC, CocquytC, et al.Adult learners’ needs in online and blended learning. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 2019; 59(2)[:223–253.
31.
LinnesJC, MooreE, PorrasAM, et al.Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering. Nat Rev Bioeng, 2024; 2(6):521–530; doi: 10.1038/s44222-024-00183-4
VesikiviP, LakkalaM, HolvikiviJ, et al.The impact of project-based learning curriculum on first-year retention, study experiences, and knowledge work competence. Research Papers in Education, 2020; 35(1):64–81; doi: 10.1080/02671522.2019.1677755
36.
Kimble-HillAC, Rivera-FigueroaA, ChanBC, et al.Insights gained into marginalized students access challenges during the COVID-19 academic response. J Chem Educ, 2020; 97(9):3391–3395; doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00774
37.
WhiteKN, Vincent-LaytonK, VillarrealB. Equitable and inclusive practices designed to reduce equity gaps in undergraduate chemistry courses. J Chem Educ, 2021; 98(2):330–339; doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01094
