Abstract
Vasdeki, Dimitra, Georgios Tsamos, Kleoniki I. Athanasiadou, Vasiliki Michou, Evangelos Botsarakos, Michael Doumas, Kalliopi Kotsa, and Theocharis Koufakis. Above the clouds with diabetes: from pathophysiological considerations to practical recommendations for safe flights. High Alt Med Biol. 26:87–98, 2025.
Background:
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been following an increasing trend in the last decades, leading to a growing number of travelers with diabetes seeking pretravel advice from medical professionals.
Methods:
This narrative review summarizes the existing evidence on the intriguing association between diabetes and air travel, analyzes safety and certification protocols, and provides practical recommendations for the management of diabetes during flights.
Results:
During air travel, individuals with diabetes face challenges arising from inappropriate dietary options, restricted access to medications and healthcare services, disruption of medication dosing intervals, and exposure to hypobaric conditions in the airplane cabin. In addition, people with diabetes, especially those treated with insulin, have traditionally been considered ineligible to become professional pilots. However, this approach gradually changes and numerous countries are now implementing strict protocols to determine the eligibility of pilots with diabetes to operate flights.
Conclusions:
Given the increasing use of technology and new drugs in daily clinical practice, there is a need for further research in the field to shed light on existing knowledge gaps and ensure safe flights for people with diabetes.
Introduction
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been following an increasing trend in the last decades, leading to a growing number of travelers with diabetes seeking pretravel advice from medical professionals (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017; Elfrink et al., 2014). During air travel, individuals with diabetes face challenges arising from inappropriate dietary options, restricted access to medications and healthcare services, disruption of medication dosing intervals, and exposure to hypobaric conditions in the airplane cabin. The perturbation of routine dosing intervals becomes more noticeable when travelers traverse multiple time zones. The east or west direction of the flight compresses or elongates the temporal interval between scheduled doses, respectively. This increases the probability of unplanned, premature, or delayed administration of antihyperglycemic therapy. Travelers must devise strategies to deal with the complexities of crossing multiple time zones, including insulin administration planning, the biological consequences of jet lag, and individual susceptibility to hypoglycemic episodes at high altitudes (Transcend Glucose Gels/Travelling With Diabetes/Flying With Diabetes, 2017).
Furthermore, people with diabetes occasionally perceive themselves as subject to unfair discrimination within the occupational setting, particularly when referring to safety-critical procedures, such as machinery operation and professional driving (Inkster and Frier, 2013; Wientjens and Cairns, 2012). This bias is especially pronounced among people reliant on insulin therapy, who are routinely excluded from safety-sensitive occupations owing to the inherent risk of hypoglycemia and the probability of complications that could jeopardize public safety (i.e., coronary heart disease). The threat of hypoglycemia and the resultant incapacitation is the rationale most frequently cited for implementing a blanket prohibition policy, precluding individuals from engaging in safety-critical occupations (Wientjens and Cairns, 2012).
In 2011, the International Diabetes Federation inaugurated the first international charter of rights and responsibilities dedicated to individuals with diabetes. This pioneering document incorporated the entitlement to social justice harmonized with public safety (International Diabetes Federation, 2012). However, the regulations established by the European Aviation Safety Agency categorically disallow aeromedical certification for commercial air transport pilots with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) managed with insulin. In a notable deviation from the regulations mentioned above, the Civil Aviation Authorities of the United Kingdom (UK), Ireland, and Austria extend approval to pilots with all types of insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM), depending on adherence to a meticulously outlined protocol featuring stringent entry and operational requirements (Mitchell et al., 2017). However, this particular exemption and its accompanying protocol have received criticism from other European member states. The main points of disagreement revolve around the practicality of in-flight glucose measurements for ITDM pilots and the fact that striving for low enough glycemic targets to avert macro- and microvascular diabetic complications could increase the risk of hypoglycemia during flight. On the contrary, proponents argue that targeting glycated hemoglobin levels of 7%, as advocated by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), allows pilots to maintain safe glucose levels during flight within the range of 100–130 mg/dl (5.6–7.2 mmol/l) (Simons et al., 2014).
Modern diabetes management, marked by advances in insulin therapy and glucose monitoring, coupled with meticulous clinical evaluation and scrutiny, has successfully challenged ingrained stereotypes surrounding people with diabetes. During the past two decades, several national authorities have allowed private pilots with ITDM to participate in recreational flights (Simons et al., 2014). In light of these advances, it is not surprising that a significant proportion of diabetes patients, particularly those embarking on long flights, seek more comprehensive travel guidance (Burnett, 2006). However, a lack of knowledge among healthcare professionals about the proper management of diabetes medications during air travel can result in a subset of patients receiving inadequate or potentially hazardous guidance (Gill and Redmond, 1993). Consequently, the formulation of guidelines designed for passengers and pilots with diabetes during flights has gained increased importance in recent years. In this context, our objective was to distill a summary of the existing literature in the field, identify areas of consensus and potential knowledge gaps, and highlight issues warranting further investigation.
Exploring the Impact of High Altitude on the Pathophysiology of Diabetes
In 2014, the International Society for Mountain Medicine defined high altitude as ranging from 1,500 to 3,500 m (5,000 to 11,500 feet), very high altitude spanning 3,500–5,500 m (11,500 to 18,000 feet) and extreme altitude, denoting elevations above 5,500 m (18,000 feet) (Brodmann Maeder et al., 2018). Numerous investigations have examined fasting glucose levels in individuals with sound health exposed acutely and chronically to high altitudes. The findings reveal a spectrum of outcomes, including increases, decreases, or no significant changes, with the disparity attributed to the duration of altitude exposure (Koufakis et al., 2019; Larsen et al., 1997; Sawhney et al., 1986; Stock et al., 1978; Woolcott et al., 2015). Most studies suggest an initial surge in glucose levels at higher altitudes, followed by a subsequent decline as individuals acclimatize over prolonged exposure periods. The interplay of altitude, sympathetic activity during exercise, and increased catecholamine levels is believed to be the basis of these physiological phenomena (Thomas SR, 2001; Rostrup, 1998). Multiple studies consistently demonstrate elevated plasma and urinary catecholamines in response to acute altitude exposure (Woolcott et al., 2015). Furthermore, some researchers propose that the reported elevation in cortisol levels during short-term high-altitude exposure may also contribute to hyperglycemia. These hormones can also be affected by the fight-or-flight response, which includes a variety of catabolic, antireproductive, antigrowth, and immunosuppressive processes (Sharma et al., 2022). In contrast, reduced blood glucose levels have been observed after acute exposure to hypobaric hypoxia in people without diabetes during long fasting periods (Woolcott et al., 2015).
Owing to barometric pressure, the decrease in ambient pressure within the aircraft cabin during the ascent to its cruising altitude triggers an expansion of gases of approximately 30% (UK CAA, 2024.). On the contrary, during descent for landing, the increasing cabin pressure prompts a commensurate reduction in volume. The presence of gas within bodily cavities can pose challenges when it becomes confined and unable to expand unencumbered, or if there are impediments to the free flow of air, hindering the equalization of air pressure. This phenomenon, as well as emergency decompression, can affect the efficacy of medical devices, including insulin pumps, owing to the formation and expansion of air bubbles, potentially resulting in the delivery of excessive or insufficient medication due to abrupt pressure changes and hypobaric hypoxia (Bagshaw and Illig, 2019; UK CAA, 2024.). It is crucial to recognize that additional factors, such as the unintentional release of insulin from pumps through tubing owing to fluctuations in pressure and dissolved gases, can have a more substantial influence in such situations (King et al., 2011). Therefore, the guidelines issued by both the UK and the European Union (EU) for people with diabetes who fly underscore the need to ingest carbohydrates during an emergency decompression. This proactive measure is suggested to ameliorate the potentially harmful consequences of excessive insulin release from pumps during critical circumstances (King et al., 2011).
Undoubtedly, the main influencers of plasma glucose levels at altitude during air travel include diet modifications, lack of physical activity, and timing of carbohydrate and food intake with respect to insulin administration. These factors are expected to exert a significantly more pronounced impact compared with the relatively minor effects resulting from acute pressure changes. Currently, there is a scarcity of data on the consequences of pressure variations in individuals with diabetes at elevated altitudes in the absence of exercise. Consequently, although subtle changes in overall glucose metabolism can manifest in response to acute pressure changes, their significance is considered minor when juxtaposed with the profound influence of dietary changes and the sedentary nature of air travel.
Navigating the Skies: Pursuing a Career as a Professional Pilot with Type 1 or 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Numerous countries have implemented protocols to determine the eligibility of pilots with diabetes to operate flights. These protocols share a typical structure, which features a comprehensive clinical assessment focused on hypoglycemia awareness, detection, and surveillance of complications, and proficiency in self-management of diabetes. Although the evaluation includes measurements within the 30 minutes before take-off and landing, there are variations in the procedures during the actual flight (UK Civil Aviation Authority, 2018).
To guarantee a safe aviation experience, pilots with T1DM or T2DM who are on insulin treatment should carry two glucometers capable of measuring and recording blood glucose values. In addition, they should ensure they have a large supply of glucose measuring strips to analyze blood samples. In the event of a need, it is essential to have a sufficient amount of rapidly absorbable glucose, such as glucose tablets or sugar cubes, readily available throughout the duration of the flight (Handbook of Civil Aviation Medical Examiners-TP 13312, 2024). A “traffic light” system has been introduced to govern acceptable pre- and in-flight glucose levels to ensure standardized monitoring. Under this system, a green sign means “acceptable,” amber indicates the need for “caution” and red demands immediate action. In instances of low amber values, pilots are required to consume 10–15 g of readily absorbed carbohydrates and retest glucose after 30 minutes. On the contrary, low red values require the transfer of duties to the copilot or, in the case of solo flights, prompt consideration of landing. In such situations, pilots are advised to ingest 10–15 g of readily absorbed carbohydrates and retest capillary blood glucose after 15 minutes (Høi-Hansen et al., 2010) (Table 1).
Preflight and In-Flight Guidelines for Glucose Control
Table 2 presents a comprehensive overview of the certification protocols applicable to pilots undergoing insulin treatment, whether T1DM or T2DM, in various parts of the world such as Canada, the UK, Israel, the EU, New Zealand, and the United States. In the case of pilots who manage T2DM exclusively through lifestyle measures, the risk of hypoglycemia is similar to that of individuals without diabetes. However, the risk increases significantly for pilots who receive sulfonylureas or insulin. In particular, for individuals treated with sulfonylureas or glinides, the recommendations on the frequency of glucose measurements during flight vary. Specifically, UK, EU, and New Zealand guidelines require pilots to monitor their glucose levels at least every 2 hours during flight operations. This underscores the critical importance of meticulous glucose management for pilots with diabetes, especially those taking specific medications that pose an elevated risk of hypoglycemia during flight. Although the literature lacks information on other antidiabetic drugs, it is imperative to consider incorporating sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors into the arsenal of suitable medications for aviators with T2DM. This recommendation comes as a result of the widespread prescription of these medications gradually replacing sulfonylureas and glinides and their low risk of inducing hypoglycemia.
An Overview of Flight Protocols Across Different Countries
Medical Certifications
Various classes of medical certificates cater to different categories of pilots. These include Class 1 for professional pilots (holders of air transport pilot, commercial pilot, flight engineer, or flight navigator licenses), Class 2 for private pilots (applicable to holders of student pilot or private pilot licenses), and commercial pilots with specific operational restrictions (pertaining to commercial aircraft pilots not carrying passengers and operating aircraft weighing less than 8,618 kg, as well as commercial balloon pilots). In addition, there is Basic Class 2 designed for private pilots, limited to piston engine-powered aircraft, day visual flight rules, and the carriage of up to five nonfare paying passengers. Lastly, Class 3 is designated for air traffic controllers (ICAO, 2024.).
Over time, the guidelines for aeromedical certification and policies for pilots with diabetes have undergone refinement and modification. Individuals managing diabetes through diet, oral medications, or noninsulin injectables (GLP-1 receptor agonists) can qualify for Class 1, 2, or 3 licenses, subject to demonstrating stable blood glucose levels through home blood glucose monitoring and the absence of complications. Presently, regulations dictate that people with ITDM (Type 1 and 2) are accepted to have Class 1 or Class 3 medical certificates (ICAO, 2024.). Table 3 provides a summary of global standards for the medical certification of pilots on insulin therapy.
A Summary of Global Standards for the Medical Certification of Pilots on Insulin Therapy
Considerations for Airline Passengers with Diabetes
A concise guide to air travel
Several articles have been published, mainly based on expert opinions, to formulate recommendations about air travel for people with diabetes. A consensus has emerged, indicating that patients with diabetes can safely embark on air travel, provided they are well prepared. However, caution or potential delay in travel plans is advised for newly diagnosed or poorly controlled individuals (Shand, 2000). The counsel encompasses a wide spectrum, covering aspects such as education, behavioral considerations, provisions of necessary supplies and devices, medication management, and documentation. In particular, the guidance takes into account various factors to ensure a comprehensive approach to the well-being of individuals with diabetes during air travel. It should be noted that there are some contraindications to flying, such as unstable retinopathy or recent argon photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy, owing to the relatively hypoxic conditions of the cabin environment, although it is crucial to highlight that such cases are rare (Mileno and Bia, 1998; Suh and Mileno, 2005). Table 4 provides comprehensive guidelines for people with diabetes during air travel.
Comprehensive Guidelines for Air Travel: General Recommendations
Packing Materials: Streamlining Your Supplies
Table 5 details indispensable supplies for people with diabetes travelling. It is imperative that these travelers carry up-to-date prescriptions for their medications, insulin, and accompanying supplies. Ensuring that these items align with the traveler’s name on both their ticket and passport is vital to facilitate seamless travel experiences and effectively address unexpected emergency scenarios.
Diabetes Travel Supplies Checklist
Extra medications beyond the amount needed for the duration of the trip.
CGM, continuous glucose monitoring.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the ADA advise travelers with diabetes to pack their essential supplies with care (American Diabetes Association, 2004). This includes medications, insulin, needles, glucometers, test strips, and lancets, all preserved in their original packaging with the appropriate labeling. Lancet needles, securely capped and in original packaging, can be carried in hand luggage with the glucometer. Gel packs serve as an effective means to maintain the ideal temperature for insulin storage. To expedite security checks, it is recommended to pack medications and supplies in a separate clear bag for easy inspection.
Prudent preparation involves doubling the amount of medications necessary to accommodate prolonged stays or possible ruptures of vials or cartridges (Chandran and Edelman, 2003). Although half of these supplies can be stowed in checked luggage, a sufficient amount should be retained in hand luggage to address potential mishaps such as lost baggage. Insulin vials, cartridges, pens, glucometers, and test strips should always be stored in hand luggage to protect them from exposure to freezing temperatures (Bettes and McKenas, 1999). In addition, noninsulin injectables such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and glucagon kits should be included in hand luggage. It is imperative to ensure that insulin remains insulated and undergoes a thorough inspection for crystals or cloudiness before use if any of these items are transported in checked baggage.
Guidelines for Adjusting Antihyperglycemic Treatment
Noninsulin regimens
Most experts recommend maintaining regular doses of oral medications during travel, emphasizing the importance of hydration and consistent meal schedules, especially for individuals taking sulfonylureas (Fatema Jawad, 2016; McCarthy AE, 2004; Shand, 2000; Sullivan, 2016). On the other hand, there are recommendations for adjustments to oral regimens, such as incorporating rapid-acting agents such as repaglinide or nateglinide with meals to bridge coverage gaps (Frier and Strachan, 2010; Suh and Mileno, 2005). These adjustments may involve slight, albeit unspecified, dose modifications based on travel direction. Some experts suggest omitting a second dose of certain medications such as metformin, thiazolidinediones, or sulfonylureas during travel, while advocating the continuation of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and newer nonsulfonylurea secretagogs with meals (Chandran and Edelman, 2003). There are no publications that provide specific recommendations on SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, or amylin analogs in the context of air travel. Maintaining consistent meal patterns and avoiding meal skips is crucial for travelers to prevent hypoglycemia during flight.
Insulin
Recommendations on insulin adjustment for travelers span a spectrum of approaches, underscoring the need for customized modifications that are in accordance with the unique requirements of each traveler. Preferring streamlined adjustments over intricate ones, there is a tendency to lean toward slightly elevated glucose values during travel days (American Diabetes Association, 2004; Benson and Metz, 1984; Chandran and Edelman, 2003; Gill and Redmond, 1993; Josse and Woo, 2013; Saskatchewan health, 2010). Encouraging the adoption of insulin delivery pens in lieu of needles and syringes, specific advice is offered on the optimal insulin type for travelers, alongside a strong emphasis on regular blood glucose monitoring. For example, suggested strategies involve transitioning patients from premixed insulin formulations to a split basal bolus regimen before travel and selecting rapid-acting analogs over regular insulin (Chandran and Edelman, 2003; Ericsson, 2003; Fatema Jawad, 2016; Suh and Mileno, 2005; Sullivan, 2016). Recent research also highlights the potential benefits of ultra-long-acting insulin degludec for frequent travelers, given its relatively stable state amid scheduling disruptions (Fatema Jawad, 2016; Josse and Woo, 2013). Although the 2004 ADA Insulin Administration Practice Guideline advocates for offering guidance on insulin adjustment for travelers crossing three or more time zones, various studies have proposed different thresholds, ranging from two to seven time zones (American Diabetes Association, 2004).
Although official guidelines on insulin adjustment during travel are currently lacking, some authors offer insights based on clinical experience. Patients often opt to reduce the basal insulin dose to mitigate the risk of hypoglycemia, which can lead to hyperglycemia owing to inadequate prandial doses. Adjusting bolus insulin using self-monitoring of blood glucose and carbohydrate counting is relatively straightforward. However, there remains confusion regarding the adjustment of basal insulin, particularly when crossing time zones. When traveling westward, a long day may require an additional bolus dose. On the contrary, eastward travel shortens the day, potentially requiring a reduction in basal insulin dose if the change in time exceeds 2 hours. It is recommended to halve the basal insulin dose during travel and return to the previous schedule upon arrival.
Insulin pumps/insulin pens
Regarding insulin pumps, common recommendations include frequent blood glucose monitoring and the transport of ample injectable insulin as backup in case of pump failure (Chandran and Edelman, 2003; Cross J et al., 2008; Dewey and Riley, 1999; MacNeill and Fredericks, 2015; Sullivan, 2016). However, some publications advise maintaining the regular basal rate and the premeal bolus regimen during travel, whereas others do not specify any adjustments (Cradock, 1997; Fatema Jawad, 2016; Kaplan et al., 1998; Nassar et al., 2012). According to MacNeil et al., individuals are advised to use the lowest basal rate during the flight if the difference between the basal rates of departure and arrival is minimal and to adjust the pump clock to local time upon arrival (MacNeill and Fredericks, 2015). In cases where departure and arrival basal rates differ significantly, a gradual adjustment of the pump clock over several days is recommended. To ensure the safety of insulin pumps during flight and mitigate the risk of inadvertent insulin delivery at high altitudes, King et al. advocate several precautions: restricting the insulin volume in the pump cartridge to 1.5 ml, disconnecting the pump during take-off and in-flight emergencies, and visually inspecting and eliminating any bubbles in the lines and insulin cartridges before reconnecting the pump (Hermanides et al., 2011). Although there is a consensus among experts regarding the necessity of adjusting insulin pump time settings, there remains uncertainty regarding when to synchronize the pump clock with local time and how to appropriately modify basal rates during travel.
Regarding insulin pens, these devices seem to perform reliably even at high altitudes. However, it is recommended to remove the needles after injection due to the potential for changes in air pressure during ascent and descent. These pressure fluctuations can inadvertently introduce air bubbles and lead to the expulsion of insulin. Table 6 provides a concise overview of suggestions for modifying antihyperglycemic therapy while traveling, also taking into consideration the direction of travel (east or west).
Guidance on Adjustments of Antihyperglycemic Therapy During Air Travel
CKD, chronic kidney disease; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase 4; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; SGLT2, sodium glucose cotransporter-2.
Precautions for the accuracy of the blood glucose measurements during flight
Concerns about the accuracy of glucometers in low-pressure cabin environments at high altitudes have received attention. Several publications have meticulously examined the precision of glucometers and implantable subcutaneous glucose sensors in hypobaric settings. These evaluations encompassed a spectrum of enzymatic systems, including methodologies based on hexokinase, glucose dehydrogenase (GDH), and glucose oxidase (GOX). In particular, glucometers that use GOX and GDH enzymes may potentially exhibit an overestimation of glucose values, although GDH meters are generally acknowledged for their higher accuracy. In a study conducted by Fink et al., which evaluated seven commonly used glucometers during mountaineering expeditions, it was found that their performance was influenced by various factors, including elevation, temperature, and relative humidity (Fink et al., 2002). Interestingly, glucometers tended to underestimate glucose levels at higher altitudes. However, conflicting viewpoints persist, some advocating that the margin of error is negligible and others asserting that glucometers remain reliable for decision-making purposes (de Mol et al., 2010; Olateju et al., 2012).
In an evaluation of subcutaneous glucose sensors, a study relied on a GOX enzyme system (Adolfsson et al., 2012). The precision of glucometers appears to be affected by altitude, although there are disparities in the direction of error, either underestimation or overestimation, between different studies and enzymatic systems. A study by Clarke et al. used error grid analysis (EGA) to assess the clinical implications of their findings (Clarke et al., 1987). These analyses revealed that most glucometers operated within EGA-defined “safe zones,” indicating that any inaccuracies in readings at high altitudes would not lead to inappropriate treatment (Giordano et al., 1989; de Mol et al., 2010; Olateju et al., 2012). Despite these reassuring findings, the authors emphasized the importance of patients remaining vigilant about the potential for glucometer inaccuracies in hypobaric conditions.
The growing adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems underscores the need to evaluate both the sensor system and pump functionality under various pressure conditions (Hermanides et al., 2011; Price et al., 1995). Similar to many glucometers, CGM systems commonly use the GOX method. However, it should be noted that the precision and effectiveness of CGM systems are only marginally influenced by hypobaric weather conditions, such as 0.5 and 0.75 atm (Jendle and Adolfsson, 2011). On the other hand, a study conducted under hypobaric conditions found notable discrepancies in glucose input signals at both low and high glucose concentrations (Adolfsson et al., 2012). Consequently, it is prudent to verify CGM readings, as inaccuracies not only influence glucose monitoring but also have implications for the performance of CGM-integrated pumps.
Discussion
General travel guidance has remained relatively consistent, with an increased emphasis on the implementation of airline security protocols. However, strategies for managing and monitoring diabetes among patients are continually advancing, particularly with the advent of novel insulin analogs and medical devices. Although there is alignment in the fundamental principles that govern safe and efficient administration of diabetes medications during travel, specific methodologies for adjusting medication regimens and device usage diverge and are predominantly informed by expert consensus. Despite the concerted effort to mitigate hypoglycemic episodes during travel, the attention given to noninsulin glucose lowering agents in the existing literature is limited. Most publications advocate for the uninterrupted continuation of oral antihyperglycemic agents, despite variations in their mechanisms of action and the recognized risk of hypoglycemia associated with certain agents. However, several references acknowledge the increased risk of hypoglycemia associated with sulfonylureas and recommend omitting a dose during travel or exercising caution about meal skipping and increased physical activity while maintaining the medication regimen (Chandran and Edelman, 2003; Nassar et al., 2012). Certain sources propose that alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, meglitinides, and DPP-4 inhibitors can be continued safely during travel (Aerospace Medical Association Medical Guidelines Task Force, 2003; Chandran and Edelman, 2003; Fatema Jawad, 2016; Frier and Strachan, 2010; Nassar et al., 2012). However, SGLT2 inhibitors, despite their minimal hypoglycemic risk, carry the potential to induce hypotension attributable to their diuretic effects in conjunction with the low humidity and air pressure prevalent in the aircraft cabin environment (Hashiguchi et al., 2013).
The evolution of the insulin analog design, resulting in more predictable and physiologically aligned insulin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, has significantly facilitated the implementation of flight protocols. Furthermore, advancements in insulin delivery systems, coupled with recent advances in digital technology, offer promising avenues for tailoring insulin administration to individual physiological requirements. The advent of noninvasive glucose monitoring techniques has seen widespread adoption, markedly enhancing the time spent within optimal glucose ranges while reducing the frequency, severity, and duration of hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic episodes. In particular, many pilots now rely on CGM devices in conjunction with the fingerpick blood sampling required during duty periods. It is reasonable to assume that the prevalence of out-of-range glucose levels during flight operations has decreased markedly after the widespread integration and accessibility of CGM systems.
Emphasis on the risk of hypoglycemia has been the main reason for adjusting a diabetes medication regimen. However, other potential side effects, such as dehydration, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea, which are more commonly associated with the use of newer antihyperglycemic therapies, have not received adequate attention. These adverse reactions should be carefully considered, especially when providing pretravel counseling to patients who intend to travel for long periods or those with a brief history of medication use.
Conclusions
Ensuring safe air travel for people with diabetes requires thorough preparation and adherence to protocols. These include organizing all relevant documentation and prescriptions, stocking sufficient medications and supplies, and maintaining appropriate storage conditions for insulin. Increased vigilance through frequent blood glucose monitoring helps manage glycemic fluctuations and prevent hypoglycemia. Maintaining hydration is essential during air travel, while adjusting medication doses to match flight schedules and mealtimes ensures optimal glycemic control. However, the findings of relevant studies and recommendations vary, are occasionally contradictory or outdated, and often rely on expert opinion or limited observational data. There is a notable absence of robust evidence, especially considering advances in technology and novel diabetes medications. There is an urgent need for well-designed studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of insulin pump and medication adjustments and establish clinical practice standards for people with diabetes traveling by air.
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions
D.V. reviewed the literature and drafted the first version of the article. G.T., K.A., and V.M. reviewed the literature and created the tables. E.B., M.D., and K.K. reviewed the literature and edited the article. T.K. conceptualized the study, reviewed the literature and edited the article. All authors have read and agreed to the present version of the article.
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest relevant to the publication of this article.
Funding Information
This research received no external funding.
