Abstract
The development of bone-targeting drug delivery systems holds immense promise for improving the treatment of skeletal diseases. By precisely delivering therapeutic agents to the affected areas of bone, these strategies can enhance drug efficacy, minimize off-target effects, and promote patient adherence, ultimately leading to improved treatment outcomes and an enhanced quality of life for patients. This review aims to provide an overview of the current state of affinity-based bone-targeting agents and recent breakthroughs in innovative bone-targeting adeno-associated virus (AAV) strategies to treat skeletal diseases in mice. In particular, this review will delve into advanced AAV engineering, including AAV serotype selection for bone targeting and capsid modifications for bone-specific tropism. Additionally, we will highlight recent advancements in AAV-mediated gene therapy for skeletal diseases and discuss challenges and future directions of this promising therapeutic approach.
LAY SUMMARY
Bone-targeting drug delivery systems, utilizing affinity-based agents and innovative AAV strategies, hold immense potential to treat skeletal diseases. By precisely delivering therapeutic agents to affected skeletal tissues, they offer enhanced drug efficacy, reduced off-target effects, and improved patient adherence, leading to better treatment outcomes and improved quality of life. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current affinity-based bone-targeting agents and recent breakthroughs in bone-targeting AAV strategies, including AAV serotype selection for bone targeting and capsid modifications.
INTRODUCTION
Bone serves as the scaffold of the human body, providing structural support, facilitating movement, and protecting more fragile organs. 1 However, conditions affecting bone, such as osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and bone metastases, can profoundly impact an individual’s quality of life. Conventional systemic drug delivery methods often lack tissue-targeting specificity, resulting in adverse effects in non-skeletal tissues and suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. 2 To overcome these challenges, a field of bone-targeting drug development has emerged, aiming to deliver therapeutic agents precisely to bone lesions undergoing active remodeling. Bone-targeting strategies offer several advantages. 3 (1) Enhanced drug efficacy: bone-targeting strategies maximize local concentration of therapeutic agents, optimizing therapeutic effects while minimizing systemic exposure and potential side effects. (2) Reduced drug dosage: Bone-targeting strategies efficiently deliver therapeutic agents at lower doses, minimizing patients’ exposure to potential adverse effects while sustaining therapeutic efficacy. (3) Improved patient compliance: By reducing the frequency of drug administration and mitigating adverse effects, bone-targeting strategies enhance patient adherence to treatment, leading to more favorable treatment outcomes.
The development of bone-targeting drugs requires a multidisciplinary approach, integrating expertise from pharmacology, biochemistry, materials science, and bioengineering. Bone-targeting strategies can be broadly divided based on the nature of the targeting agents (Fig. 1). These include the following: (A) Antibody-based targeting: Utilizing antibodies that specifically bind to bone-associated proteins or receptors to deliver therapeutic agents directly to targeted bone sites. 4 (B) Nanoparticle-based targeting: Engineered nanoparticles selectively accumulate in the bone, providing a versatile platform for delivering diverse therapeutic agents, including small molecules, proteins, and nucleic acids. 3 (C) Cell-based targeting: Employing skeletal stem cells or macrophages as carriers of therapeutic agents for homing delivery to the damaged bone sites. 5,6 (D) Affinity-based targeting: Leveraging ligands such as bisphosphonates, tetracycline, acidic peptides, and novel bone-targeting recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAVs) with high affinity to hydroxyapatite (HA). 7 Bone-targeting drugs hold significant promise to improve treatment outcomes for bone-related diseases. This review endeavors to offer a comprehensive overview of the current status of affinity-based bone-targeting agents and recent advancements in innovative bone-targeting AAV strategies to treat skeletal diseases.

Schematic representation of bone-targeting strategies. On the basis of nature of targeting agent, bone-targeting strategies can be broadly divided into
BONE-TARGETED MEDICINE
Bisphosphonates
Due to a high affinity to HA, bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most extensively utilized bone-targeting ligands for the treatment of skeletal diseases. They have been in use since the 1960s, and since then, many BP products have been developed. These molecules were initially developed as water softeners that could remove calcium from hard water. Nitrogen-containing BPs inhibit farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPPS) synthase in osteoclasts, effectively halting bone turnover. The structure of BPs is derived from a stabilized pyrophosphate (Fig. 2). Pyrophosphate naturally regulates bone mineralization through an unstable, rapidly cleaved anhydride bond. The carbon–phosphate part of BP is highly stable, allowing BPs to reside in bone up to 20 years. 8 The deprotonated hydroxyls in the two phosphates of a BP molecule are separated by approximately 2.9 to 3.1 Å, which is similar to a native spacing of oxygen atoms in HA. 9 The hydroxyl group that extends from the geminal BP carbon also interacts with HA, further enhancing its bone affinity. 9

Chemical structures of bone-targeting molecules. In the field of ligand-based targeting, various compounds have been explored, including pyrophosphate
BPs have been widely used to treat cancer-associated skeletal lesions, nonbacterial osteomyelitis, osteoporosis, dental diseases, and other bone-related diseases. One study successfully completed a phase I clinical trial for delivering cytarabine to cancer-induced bone lesions using a BP-based carrier. The improved targeting resulted in a favorable safety profile, with reduced activity in over half of the treated bone lesions. 10 Another study developed a bortezomib-BP conjugate with a special boron linker designed to remain stable in the bloodstream to treat multiple myeloma. Compared with untargeted bortezomib, the BP-conjugated bortezomib with the molar equivalent dose exhibited an increase in the ability to reduce tumor burden in multiple myeloma and while reducing the occurrence of the neuropathy and thrombocytopenia associated with bortezomib. 11 A significant effort was made to utilize a BP that would not prevent resorption through FPPS inhibition once the bortezomib was released. However, the pyrophosphate-like structure of BPs has been shown to inhibit mineralization without any interaction with osteoclasts. 12 It remains unclear whether these nonactive BPs would be effective for targeting bone fractures, as the effect of the BP targeting moiety to inhibit mineralization can itself have undesirable effects.
BPs have also been employed to deliver radionuclides such as targeted radiotherapy of bone metastases. BPs enabled highly selective delivery of radionuclides to the metastases, minimizing soft tissue damage during radiotherapy. 13,14 Other research has focused on developing nanoparticles and micelles with chemotherapeutics to target bone cancers. 15 –19 BPs have proven effective in improving the pharmacokinetics of and antibiotics in treating osteomyelitis. 20 –22 More relevant to fracture treatment is the use of BPs to target anabolic agents for osteoporosis. 23 Young et al. has developed BP-based carriers that deliver prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) agonists through a releasable ester linkage for the treatment of osteoporosis. Upon cleavage and hydrolysis, the bone conjugate releases both an antiresorptive BP and an anabolic PGE2 agonist and effectively reverses ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis and improves the overall mechanical properties of the bone. 24,25 The targeted combination therapy proved more effective than its constituents delivered simultaneously but not tethered together, highlighting the potential of bone-targeting approaches. 23 Notably, identification of the appropriate linkage is crucial for the success of these conjugates. Other osteoporosis treatments have focused on localizing estrogens 26 or anabolic agents to the bone. 27,28 BPs have also been used to deliver anabolic agents to treat periodontal diseases. 29,30 Despite limited success, BPs have been used to deliver proteins and cells to bone surfaces. 31,32
While BPs are attractive tools to localize various compounds to HA, they have also been reported to cause several adverse effects, including osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), atypical subtrochanteric fractures in the femur, and esophageal cancer, at relatively high frequencies. 12,33 Although arguments can be made that concentrations of BPs for targeting are far lower than concentrations that induce side effects, the association with BP-related ONJ has hindered the full development of most BP-based drugs. 9 Current research in this field focuses on nonactive forms of BPs as targeting ligands or dual action targeting compounds where the skeletal activity of BP is desired. Sato et al. demonstrated that focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibition can replicate the effects of mechanical loading. 34 This finding holds promise for the development of bone-targeting therapeutics for disuse osteoporosis utilizing nonactive BPs.
Tetracycline
Tetracycline is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that inhibits protein synthesis in bacteria. It was originally isolated from the bacterial genus Streptomyces and has been used as a therapeutic agent for decades. 35,36 However, its strong affinity to calcium resulted in unexpected skeletal side effects, such as discoloring bones and teeth and preventing normal tooth development in children. Tetracycline should therefore be taken without milk to prevent reducing its bioavailability by binding to calcium ions. 37 These same properties responsible for tetracycline’s skeletal side effects also enable its use as a biomarker for dynamic histomorphometry measurements in bone, as it displays intrinsic fluorescence emission at 390 nM. The β-diketone system at positions 1 and 2, the enol system at positions 4 and 6, and the carboxamide group at position 5 are responsible for its chelating behavior. 9 Moreover, since the chelation of tetracycline is irreversible, the undesirable side effects are also permanent. 38
The ability of tetracycline to bind and label primarily growing bone is useful to localize anabolic agents to bone surface by conjugating them to tetracycline and tetracycline-derived analogs. Moreover, its oral bioavailability makes it an attractive targeting ligand. However, its toxicity and skeletal side effects have prevented it from being fully developed as a bone-targeting strategy. Tetracyclines have been used to create bone-targeted poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) nanoparticle systems to deliver the drug simvastatin to osteoporotic bone with modest success. 39 However, given that tetracyclines decrease collagenase expression and osteoblast activity, a previous study attempted to modify the structure of tetracycline to reduce its toxicity. 37 For example, Neale et al. demonstrated that 50% of the full tetracycline bone-binding ability can be retained after the modification of one of the rings in estradiol, improving its safety profile for the treatment of osteoporosis. 40 Tetracycline preferentially binds to areas of low crystallinity on bone-forming surface rather than those of high crystallinity on bone-resorption surface. 41 The osteoblastic toxicities associated with tetracyclines and their strong affinity to newly formed bone make them better targeting ligands for osteosarcoma and bone metastases than for osteoporosis. 40
Acidic oligopeptides
Nature harnesses the potential of acidic oligopeptides to facilitate the protein localization to bone. Prominent examples such as bone sialoprotein and osteopontin possess amino acid sequences exhibiting remarkably high acidity, including up to 22% of glutamic acid residues. 42 These proteins play pivotal roles in protein localization to bone structures, instigating HA nucleation, and facilitating collagen mineralization. 43 The carboxylic acid side chains within these amino acids are presumed to chelate the calcium component of bone, thereby enhancing protein’s affinity to HA. 9,44 As the number of repeating units of aspartic acid or glutamic acid increases, affinity toward bone typically increases, plateauing at around 6–8 repeated units. 45 Nevertheless, longer chains demonstrate augmented compound delivery and in vivo retention. 46,47
The interaction between acidic oligopeptides and HA manifests as a nonchiral interaction, where both L and D enantiomers of amino acids exhibit similar affinities to HA. However, in vivo observations suggest that the D enantiomer degrades at a slower rate, resulting in greater accumulation. 45,47 –49 Acidic oligopeptides stand as promising targeting ligands for bone, given their minimal toxicity compared with BPs and tetracyclines. 17 They also exhibit shorter half-lives than tetracyclines and BPs. 33,38,49 Moreover, acidic oligopeptides offer tunability, facilitating the localization of nanoparticles using as few as three aspartic acid molecules or longer polymers to achieve the desired half-life. 50 Their versatile application extends to targeting therapies for various bone-related diseases. For example, the clinically approved agent asfotase alfa relies on a chain of 10 aspartic acids (D10) to target tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNALP) to bone for hypophosphatasia treatment. In preclinical contexts, they have shown potential to deliver antibiotics to osteomyelitis lesions, 51 liposomes, and micelles containing chemotherapy agents to osteosarcoma tumors and bone metastasis lesions, 52,53 and radionucleotides to bone tumors for imaging and photothermal treatment. 47,54,55 Broader applications to target bone infections and osteolytic lesions in cancer have also been suggested. Finally, the ability of acidic oligopeptides to deliver EP1 agonists to bone 41 or small compounds to bone fracture sites improves the therapeutic efficacy and safety of bone anabolic agents. 56 For instance, subcutaneous administration of dasatinib-conjugated acidic oligopeptide showed significant tolerability and accelerated recovery of fractured femurs by over 50%. 57 However, despite their promising safety profiles and suitable half-lives for acute skeletal damage, acidic oligopeptide requires further investigation to optimize enantiomeric configurations and lengths for effective bone fracture repair pharmacokinetics.
Tripeptide repeats of aspartate–serine–serine
Tripeptide repeats of aspartate–serine–serine (DSS)n have been originally identified as a HA-binding motif of dentin phosphoprotein (DPP). DPP, a major noncollagenous protein component of the dentin extracellular matrix, plays a pivotal role in HA nucleation during dentin mineralization. Its HA-binding region harbors a plethora of DSS repeats, which are extensively phosphorylated. Notably, unphosphorylated DSS repeats can still localize to HA, indicating that phosphorylation is not essential for binding. Moreover, replacing the serines in the DSS repeats with alanine did not affect binding affinity. Previous studies demonstrated that increasing the number of DSS repeats proportionally enhances targeting capacity up to approximately six repeats. 58 DSS peptide exhibits a preferential affinity to bone-forming surfaces over bone resorption pits characterized by low crystallinity HA. 59 (DSS)6 has been shown to favorably bind to mantle dentin, comprising small and randomly oriented crystals, rather than the enamel surface, which consists of elongated and well-oriented HA crystals. These properties make DSS an attractive targeting ligand due to its ability to target newly formed bone.
DSS has emerged as a promising delivery platform for osteoporosis treatment. Saidak et al. demonstrated that (DSS)6 effectively delivers an osteogenic cyclic peptide ligand for α5β1 integrin to the bone. Priming this integrin stimulates the differentiation of osteolineage progenitors into osteoblasts. The targeted delivery of this ligand restricts its effects to the desired regions and enhances long bone mass and microarchitecture. 60 (DSS)6 has also proven effective for the delivery of siRNA-encapsulating liposomes to bone-forming surfaces by dioleoyl trimethylammonium propane (DOTAP)-based cationic liposomes. 61 This system holds the potential to expand the use of siRNA to treat bone diseases. While DSS6 may not possess as high affinity to HA as BPs and can exhibit relatively high liver and renal uptake, it offers the advantages of biocompatibility, low toxicity, and a preference for bone-forming surfaces.
ADENO-ASSOCIATED VIRUSES: A PROMISING PLATFORM FOR GENE THERAPY
AAVs are nonenveloped, single-stranded DNA viruses measuring approximately 22 nm in diameter that require helper viruses for replication. 62 Their replication cycle requires coinfection with a helper virus, typically an adenovirus or herpesvirus, which provides proteins required for DNA replication and second-strand synthesis. 63 The AAV vector genome can accommodate transgene cassettes of up to 4.6 kb, 64 while AAV’s capsid shows broad cellular tropism, which further expands their therapeutic potential. AAV-based gene therapy has shown promising results in over 250 clinical trials for various monogenic inherited disorders, including sickle cell anemia, Fanconi anemia, β-thalassemia, and cystic fibrosis. 65
AAVs were initially discovered as contaminants in adenovirus preparations, highlighting their intimate association with human adenoviruses. Despite a high seroprevalence of AAV2 infection in adults, it is rarely associated with clinical symptoms. Due to their requirement for helper viruses, such as adenoviruses or herpes simplex viruses, or cellular stress induction to achieve productive infection, AAV serotypes are classified as a distinct genus within the Parvoviridae family, designated Dependovirus. The encapsidated AAV genome comprises a linear, single-stranded (ss) DNA molecule harboring four known open reading frames (ORFs): rep, encoding replication proteins; cap, encoding capsid proteins VP1-3; assembly-activating protein (AAP), promoting capsid assembly within the host cell nucleus; and membrane-associated accessory protein (MAAP), with an incompletely understood function. The genome is flanked by two T-shaped hairpin structures known as inverted terminal repeats (ITRs). 66 –68 The diversity of AAV serotypes stems from variations in their capsid proteins, each conferring unique tissue tropism profiles. This diversity has spurred the exploration of multiple AAV serotypes as gene therapy vectors in numerous clinical trials. Currently, 13 different AAV serotypes (AAV1-13) and over 100 natural variants have been identified, with more being discovered continuously. To date, 7 gene therapy drugs based on AAV1, AAV2, and AAV9 have been approved for clinical use by the FDA or European Medicines Agency (EMA), while others are undergoing phase I and phase II clinical trials. 66,67,69 AAV capsids exhibit remarkable versatility, allowing for various modifications, including amino acid substitutions, post-translational processing, and chemical alterations. 70 This adaptability facilitates the development of AAV vectors that can evade pre-existing immunity, target-specific tissues, and modulate immune responses, further enhancing their therapeutic potential.
To generate recombinant AAV (rAAV) vectors, all viral genes of wtAAV, except for the ITRs, are deleted to create space for packaging a transgene cassette of up to 4.6 kb. Following rAAV transduction, the linear ssDNA genome undergoes conversion into circular double-stranded (ds)DNA episomes, which stably reside within the nucleus and are protected from exonucleases. These episomes are remarkably stable, displaying low genotoxic potential, and mediate sustained transgene expression due to their persistent transcriptional activity. 71 –73 For example, patients in a clinical trial using rAAV2-F.IX minigene show persistent expression of the transgene encoding blood coagulation factor IX for over a decade. 74,75 Notably, integration of the rAAV-delivered DNA into the host genome can occur at extremely low frequencies. 76,77 Self-complementary (sc) AAV vectors, in which both the sense and antisense sequences of the transgene are packaged within the vector, circumvent the ssDNA to dsDNA conversion step. 66,67 This modification leads to faster transgene transcription and enhanced transduction efficiency at the expense of reducing cargo size by half. As a standalone formulation, rAAV vectors can efficiently deliver transgenes to cells both in vitro and in vivo. rAAV exhibits a broad tropism, successfully transducing a wide range of primary human and animal cells, as well as established cell lines. This ability is strongly influenced by both the AAV serotype and the target cell type. 78 Multiple studies have employed rAAV vectors to modify cells ex vivo, a process involving the isolation of cells from patients, their genetic modification using vectors, and subsequent re-transplantation into the host. 79,80 While natural AAV infections typically remain asymptomatic in humans, recent reports and clinical trials have demonstrated the potential for host immune responses to high systemic doses of rAAV vectors and their encoded transgene products. These findings have been comprehensively reviewed, highlighting the activation of innate and humoral immune pathways triggered by rAAV administration. 81 –83 Despite these potential immunological concerns, rAAV vectors generally exhibit low immunogenicity, making them an attractive platform for in vivo transgene delivery by cotreating with immunosuppressors.
BONE-TARGETED rAAV VECTOR
Identification of AAV serotype transducing bone cells
The initial reports of AAV serotype tests for bone targeting were designated against bone fracture or bone loss using AAV2, AAV-DJ, and AAV8 84 –86 listed in Table 1. Lee et al. tested a panel of 18 AAV variants (AAV1, AAV2, AAV3, AAV4, AAV5, AAV6, AAV8, AAV9, AAVrh10, AAV-DJ, AAV-DJ8, AAV2i8, AV-7m8, AAV-LK01, AAV-LK02, AAV-LK03, AAV-LK19, and AAV-Anc80), encompassing both natural and engineered variants, which show tdTomato (Red fluorescent protein, RFP) expression following cre-mediated recombination by Cre-loxP system in bone tissue. 87 Subsequently, rAAV vectors were designed to restrict Cre expression to osteoblast-lineage cells using the Sp7 and Col2.3 promoters (rAAV-Sp7-Cre or rAAV-Col2.3-Cre). When intravenously administrated, AAV8 harboring the CAG promoter drove tdTomato expression in bone, liver, heart, spleen, and kidney. On the other hand, Yang et al. performed in vitro screening of 14 distinct AAV capsids (AAV1, AAV2, AAV3, AAV4, AAV5, AAV6, AAV6.2, AAV7, AAV8, AAV9, AAVrh.8, AAVrh.10, AAVrh.39, and AAVrh.43) using the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) reporter gene (rAAV-eGFP) to identify AAV variants that can transduce skeletal cells. 69 In this screening, eight AAV capsids (rAAV1, rAAV4, rAAV5, rAAV6, rAAV7, rAAV9, rAAVrh.10, and rAAVrh.39) exhibited the ability to transduce osteoblasts. Additionally, rAAV1, rAAV4, rAAV5, rAAV6, rAAV7, and rAAV9 vectors demonstrated transduction of osteoclasts, while rAAV1, rAAV6, rAAVrh.10, and rAAVrh.39 vectors transduced chondrocytes. When intravenously administered into mice, only rAAV9 was able to transduce osteoblasts and osteoclasts on the bone surface and osteocytes embedded within the bone matrix. As previously reported, 87,88 systemically delivered rAAV9 also transduced heart, muscle, and liver while little to no transduction of lung, kidney, or spleen. Notably, rAAV-eGFP vectors were not effective in transducing articular cartilage when administered intra-articularly (i.a.) into mouse knee joints. This discrepancy is potentially attributable to the limited accessibility of rAAV vectors to chondrocytes, which are embedded within the avascular microenvironment of these structures. In this study, among 14 conventional AAV variants, rAAV9 was most effective in targeting osteoblast lineage cells and osteoclasts in mice. 89
Previous Publications Showing Bone-Targeted rAAV
Capsid modifications for bone targeting
While rAAV2, rAAV8, or rAAV9 demonstrated promise in bone-targeting delivery, their non-specific transduction of nonskeletal tissues poses a challenge due to the potential for undesirable off-target effects. Inspired by previous studies demonstrating high affinity of the bone-targeting peptide motif to osteoclast-enriched bone-resorption surfaces, an aspartic acid octapeptide (D8) was fused to the capsid to increase vector affinity to HA, 90 Alméciga-Díaz et al. demonstrated that grafting of aspartic acid octapeptide (D8) insertion to the N-terminus of the rAAV2-VP2 capsid protein increased transgene delivery and expression in the bone. On the other hand, Yang et al. applied a rational design approach to incorporate DSS-encoding DNA sequences into the N-terminus of rAAV9-VP2 capsid (AAV9.DSS-Nter, Fig. 2Q). 91,92 rAAV9.DSS-Nter capsid exhibited robust transduction of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro and were as effective as the rAAV9 capsid in transducing osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes in mouse femurs. 89 However, compared with the rAAV9 capsid, rAAV9.DSS-Nter capsid exhibited significantly less transduction of the liver (∼50% less) and muscle (∼30% less) with minimal transduction of heart. An (Asp)14 that preferentially binds osteoclast-enriched bone-resorbing surfaces 47 was also grafted to the N-terminus of rAAV9-VP2 capsid (AAV9.D14-Nter). Both AAV9.DSS-Nter and AAV9.D14-Nter capsids increased HA-binding affinity without affecting the ability of an rAAV9 vector to transduce osteoclasts and osteoblasts in vitro. In contrast to rAAV9.DSS-Nter capsid, systemic delivery of the AAV9.D14-Nter capsid to mice did not confer bone-homing specificity to rAAV9. These results suggest that incorporation of the DSS6-VP2 capsid protein, but not the D14-VP2 capsid protein, significantly enhanced the bone-homing specificity of rAAV9 vectors by reducing their ability to transduce nonrelevant tissues as an example of a detargeting strategy. 89 This modification presents a promising strategy for improving the specificity and safety of rAAV9-mediated gene therapy applications, particularly in the context of bone-related disorders.
AAV-Mediated gene therapy to treat skeletal diseases
Expression of the N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate transferase alpha and beta subunits (GNPTAB) using AAV8-mediated delivery has shown therapeutic effects in a mucolipidosis II (ML-II) model established by the deletion of GNPTAB exons12—20. ML-II is a severe systemic genetic disorder caused by a dysfunctional mannose 6-phosphate recognition system. This impairment disrupts the proper targeting of multiple lysosomal hydrolases, consequently leading to the accumulation of nondegraded materials within lysosomes. ML-II mice display hip dysplasia, scoliosis, rickets, and osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). Systemic delivery of AAV8-expressing GNPTAB alleviated bone loss in ML-II mice by reducing IL-6 production. Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (MPS-IVA), also known as Morquio A disease, is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase (GALNS). This results in the systemic accumulation of the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) keratan sulfate and chondroitin-6-sulfate. Skeletal manifestations, such as short stature and skeletal dysplasia, are the primary clinical features, driving the therapeutic focus. Systemic administration of the AAV2-expressing GALNS with bone-targeted capsid modification by acidic oligopeptides (D8) increased GALNS enzyme activity in the skeleton of GALNS-deficient mice. However, long-term studies to evaluate pathological and clinical improvement in skeletal phenotypes have yet to be performed for this strategy. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive extraskeletal bone formation. 93 AAV gene therapy is an attractive therapeutic approach for FOP in that approximately 97% of FOP patients harbor a recurrent, heterozygous missense ACVR1R206H mutation (c.617G>A;p.R206H). Treatment with an rAAV9 carrying an ACVR1R206H -specific silencer and codon-optimized human ACVR1 reduced aberrant activation of BMP-Smad1/5 signaling and the chondrogenic/osteogenic differentiation of Acvr1R206H skeletal progenitors. Moreover, systemic delivery of this same AAV vector prevented spontaneous heterotopic ossification (HO) in FOP mice while trauma-induced HO was also decreased when this vector was administered transdermally to injured muscle. 94 This AAV vector was further advanced by a subsequent strategy to simultaneously suppress Activin A and its receptor ACVR1R206H while limiting activity in nonskeletal organ, such as liver, through the silencing of transgene expression using liver-expressing miRNA (miR-122)-targeting sequence. 95
In addition to rare skeletal diseases, AAV-mediated gene therapy utilized to express human COX2 carried by the AAV-DJ capsid to promote the healing of bone fracture through local administration. 84 Using the rAAV9.DSS-Nter capsid, Yang et al. employed AAV-mediated silencing of the bone-forming suppressor Schnurri-3 [SHN3, human immunodeficiency virus type I enhancer-binding protein 3 (HIVEP3)] in osteoblasts to reverse bone loss and enhance bone quality in ovariectomized osteoporotic mice. 89 SHN3 is a large zinc finger protein and its deletion results in a progressive increase in bone mass due to augmented osteoblast function. 96 –99 Notably, as rAAV9 is also capable of transducing osteoclasts, rAAV9-mediated silencing of osteoclast forming/activating factors such as receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (rank) or cathepsin K in osteoclasts resulted in increased bone mass by inhibiting osteoclast differentiation or activity. 100 These findings highlight that rAAV9 can mediate suppression of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and promotion of osteoblast-mediated bone formation simultaneously, thereby counteracting bone loss and enhancing bone quality in osteoporosis. In a report from Oh et al., single or dual silencing of WNT antagonists, Sclerostin (Sost) and/or Shn3, through a rAAV9.DSS-Nter-mediated delivery effectively enhanced WNT signaling, osteoblast function, and bone formation. 101 Systemic administration of these rAAVs not only reversed bone loss in both postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis models, but also promoted healing of bone fractures. Additionally, transplantation of AAV-bound allograft bone to osteotomy sites significantly improved critical-sized bone defect repair. 101 Bhat et al. has reported that AAV9-mediated modulation of natural osteoblast and osteoclast-regulating miRNAs, miR-214-3p or miR-39a-5p, effectively reversed bone loss in mouse models of postmenopausal osteoporosis and aging-associated osteoporosis. 102 Finally, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that causes systemic and articular bone loss by activating bone resorption and suppressing bone formation. 91 Despite current therapies, inflammation-induced bone loss in RA remains a significant clinical challenge due to joint deformity and impaired articular and systemic bone repair. Stavre et al. has identified SHN3 as a potential target to prevent bone loss in RA. Silencing of Shn3 expression in RA mouse models using systemic delivery of a rAAV9.DSS-Nter effectively limited articular bone erosion and systemic bone loss. 103 These findings underline the transformative potential of AAV-mediated gene therapy to address a wide range of bone disorders, including osteoporosis, bone fractures, critical-sized bone defects, and RA. AAV-mediated gene therapy can provide a solid foundation for further development and clinical translation of these therapeutic strategies.
CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Compared with existing therapies such as BPs, tetracyclines, and acidic peptides, bone-targeting rAAVs therapies are emerging as a promising therapeutic approach for various bone diseases. Especially, the bone-targeting rAAV-mediated gene transfer platform provides gene replacement, gene silencing, or gene editing strategies to address skeletal disease-related therapeutic targets using tissue-specific AAV capsids. This holds promise as a therapeutic platform for skeletal diseases due to their nonimmunogenic nature, ability to transduce a wide range of bone cells, sustained gene expression, and bone-specific tropism. Bone-targeting rAAV-mediated gene therapy offers potential therapeutic options for various complex skeletal diseases, such as primary osteoporosis (senile, postmenopausal, disuse), secondary osteoporosis (accompanied by diabetes, chronic kidney diseases, and chemotherapy), osteoarthritis (OA), RA, and bone cancer. 104 For instance, rAAVs can deliver transgenes that drive increases in bone formation or decreases in bone resorption in osteoporotic settings, deliver transgenes that can reduce inflammation and pain or promote cartilage formation/bone formation in OA or RA, and deliver transgenes that can eliminate cancer cells or promote bone regeneration in bone cancer. Additionally, bone-targeted rAAVs can be utilized for enzyme replacement therapy, such as expression of the lysosomal enzyme GALNS in a rare skeletal disease, MPS-IVA. Furthermore, rAAVs can mediate gene silencing through artificial microRNA/miRNAs (amiRs), shRNAs, or other gene silencing molecules to suppress expression of disease-causing genes. Additionally, bone-targeted rAAVs can serve as versatile carriers for delivering a variety of therapeutic agents, including intracellular proteins, secreted proteins, and/or nanobodies, to bone tissues. While rAAV-based therapies are still under development, they have demonstrated promising outcomes in preclinical studies (Table 1) and are currently being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of skeletal disorders.
To date, approximately 10,000 human diseases have been identified, of which 7,000 are classified as rare, affecting less than 200,000 individuals in the United States. Although the patient population for each rare disease is small, the collective number of rare disease patients worldwide is estimated to reach 400 million. Moreover, many monogenic disorders are severe and lack effective treatment options, making gene therapy a promising therapeutic approach. 105,106 However, due to the limited market size and challenges associated with developing therapies for individual rare diseases, approximately 95% of rare diseases lack effective treatment options. 105,107 In light of these challenges, bone-targeted rAAV9, particularly rAAV9-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, holds promise for treating skeletal rare diseases such as OI or FOP, the most prevalent bone fragility disorder. Bone-targeting gene editing therapy presents a promising avenue for correcting genetic mutations, enhancing bone regeneration, and treating bone cancer. However, there are key challenges to develop AAV-mediated gene editing therapy for skeletal diseases. AAV-mediated delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing machinery requires two AAV vector genomes that carry guide RNA(s), the Cas nuclease(s), and repairing DNA templates due to AAV’s packaging limit, which needs a high dosage for treatment and is costly to manufacture. In addition, the ability of rAAV9 to target the skeleton in human should be validated since AAV tropisms differ between humans and mice. Finally, long-term safety and efficacy data are still needed to comprehensively evaluate the risks and benefits of this therapeutic approach. Further development of tissue-specific capsids and regulatory transgene expression is also required to maximize gene editing efficiency and minimize off-target effects in specific bone tissues.
To circumvent the limitations of AAV-mediated gene therapy, bone marrow (BM)-derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) isolated from healthy donors are transplanted into the patients with skeletal rare diseases, such as OI. 108 –115 However, BM-MSC-based cell therapy is challenging, given limited accessibility of healthy donors with HLA-matching, invasive and painful BM-MSC collection procedures, less MSC yield, less proliferation/expansion rate, and multiple treatment frequencies for lasting therapeutic outcomes. Overall, bone-targeting gene editing therapy represents a transformative approach with the potential to revolutionize bone disease treatment and improve bone health. As research continues to address current challenges and expand clinical applications, this innovative therapy holds promise for significantly improving the lives of patients with skeletal conditions.
Footnotes
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
T.S. is supported by NIH/NIAMS (R21AR079633) and Center for Skeletal Research P30 core. JHS is supported by NIH/NIAMS (R21AR077557, R01AR078230), the International FOP Association, AAVAA Therapeutics, and Dong-A ST. M.B.G. is supported by NIH/NIAMS (R01AR075585), a Career Award for Medical Scientists from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, and the Pershing Square Sohn Cancer Research Alliance and a Pershing Square MIND Prize. G.G. is supported by grants from the NIH (R01NS076991, P01HL131471, R01AI121135, UG3HL147367, R01HL097088, R01HL152723, U19AI149646, and UH3HL147367).
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL
No original data were included in this review.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
T.S.: Conceptualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing; and funding acquisition. S.C.: Conceptualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. M.G.: Writing—review and editing. G.G.: Writing—review and editing. J.-H.S.: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; and funding acquisition.
AUTHOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
J.-H.S. is a scientific cofounder of AAVAA Therapeutics and holds equity in this company. G.G. is a scientific cofounder of AAVAA Therapeutics, Voyager Therapeutics, and Aspa Therapeutics and holds equity in these companies. G.G. is an inventor on patents with potential royalties licensed to Voyager Therapeutics, Aspa Therapeutics, and other biopharmaceutical companies. These pose no conflicts for this study. Other authors declare no competing interests.
FUNDING INFORMATION
No funding was received for this article.
