Abstract

Rapid identification of respiratory pathogens is challenging, and point-of-care testing with rapid pathogen identification could improve antibiotic stewardship.(1) Earlier determination of urease-producing organisms, a virulent category of pathogens causing lower respiratory infections, may allow providers to rapidly tailor antibiotic coverage.
A breath test (BT) for urease activity was previously described for tuberculosis(2) and pseudomonas colonization in cystic fibrosis.(3) This involves administration of nebulized 13C-urea, with increases in exhaled 13CO2/12CO2 indicating urea hydrolysis and presence of urease (Fig. 1A). It is unknown whether this approach is feasible in patients with active infection, and the safety of nebulized urea in lower respiratory infection is incompletely characterized.

Subjects presenting to the emergency department (ED) with community-acquired pneumonia, as identified by chest X-ray (CXR) and clinical criteria, and planned for outpatient treatment were approached for participation (Fig. 1B). Subjects received 50 mg nebulized 13C-urea dissolved in 3 mL sterile water through an Aerogen Aeroneb Solo nebulizer within 6 hours of antibiotic initiation. We collected breath samples before nebulization and at 2-minute intervals after. Metabolic Solutions (CLIA ID #30D0970292) performed BT analysis. We recorded change in 13CO2/12CO2 ratio (delta over baseline or ΔOB, in units of ‰) between pre- and postnebulization samples (Fig. 1C, D). We recorded adverse events (AEs) from enrolment until telephone follow-up at 48–96 hours postnebulization. The Human Research Review Committee of the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center approved the study (HRRC #16–327) on February 3, 2017, and all subjects provided written consent to participate. Protocol is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03100760.
Fifteen subjects, with strong clinical evidence of lower respiratory infection but judged clinically stable for outpatient treatment, completed the study. Subjects were directly observed for at least 20 minutes postnebulization and received standard treatment for pneumonia. Observations were reviewed by the safety monitoring committee.
Three subjects experienced brief coughing, which resolved spontaneously, did not require treatment, and was temporally associated with urea administration. Coughing resolved with a brief interruption of nebulization. There was a single episode of nausea, which was mild and self-limited. One episode of syncope occurred 24 hours after nebulization. The subject had a history of syncope from which the underlying factors remain unclear. Investigators and safety monitor determined these episodes of nausea and syncope to be unrelated to urea administration.
Figure 1C shows 13CO2 ΔOB for all subjects at 2, 4, and 6 minutes. Subjects are listed in chronological order of enrollment. Subjects 3 and 14 (Fig. 1D) had increased signals and notable clinical indicators of disease. Subject 3 demonstrated bilateral pneumonia on CXR, whereas subject 14 demonstrated infiltrate on CXR with elevated procalcitonin, a marker of possible bacterial infection. Collection of sputum was not mandated in these subjects, planned for outpatient treatment, and no culture results were available.
We believe this to be the largest cohort to date of feasibility and initial safety data for subjects exposed to inhaled isotonic 13C-urea during acute lower respiratory infection. This establishes initial logistics of 13C-urea BT administration in ambulatory patients presenting to an ED, and who were treated as outpatients for CAP.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We thank Lucie Jelinkova, Jairo Ulloa, Anne Scripsick, Nguyen Pham, Jet Murphy, Yolanda Moye, Dr. Mark Schuyler, and Dr. Joseph Miller for their support with study implementation.
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors declare they have no financial conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study: in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the article, or in the decision to publish the results. Authors are aware that funders are further developing a point-of-care test based on this principle.
Funding Information
The authors received grant funding from Avisa Pharma. J.T.B. received support from the University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center through NIH grant KL2TR001448.
