Abstract
Among survivors of pediatric cancers, brain tumor survivors are comparatively at high risk for experiencing relapsed disease. However, little is known about how disease relapse affects long-term psychological functioning in this cohort. This study of 162 pediatric brain tumor survivors, now adolescents and young adults (ages 12–36), demonstrates that survivors who have experienced relapsed disease are at increased risk for symptoms of anxiety, even years after successful treatment for relapse. Results underscore the need for adolescent and young adult survivors, particularly those with a history of relapsed disease, to receive ongoing psychosocial assessment and intervention that is integrated with their oncology follow-up care.
Introduction
T
Contributing to the sense of future uncertainty in this population is the need for continued monitoring for disease recurrence. While all childhood cancer patients will be monitored for relapse after treatment, brain tumor survivors require closer monitoring over a longer time period than many other pediatric cancer survivors, as risk of relapse and treatment-related sequelae remains high even years after completed therapy.2,5 Consequently, AYA brain tumor survivors are typically seen for frequent medical appointments and are often followed yearly with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or other imaging to detect recurrence. There is concern that frequent medical appointments during the survivorship period may hinder an AYA survivor's ability to move past the acute phases of their illness and treatment.7,8 Fear of cancer recurrence is common in cancer survivors who typically report heightened periods of acute anxiety or “scanxiety” in the days and weeks leading up to follow-up visits,9–11 but less is known about the impact of an actual relapse on emotional functioning. While clinically we know survivors experience acute anxiety and distress at the time of relapse, we were interested in investigating the potential long-term impact of psychological outcomes in AYA brain tumor survivors. We hypothesized that even years after being successfully treated for relapsed disease these survivors would exhibit increased incidences of clinically significant anxiety and depression compared with survivors who did not relapse.
Methods
Participants and procedures
Participants were pediatric brain tumor survivors seen in a pediatric neuro-oncology follow-up clinic and enrolled on Project Research Evaluating After Cancer Health (REACH), a cohort study of cancer survivors followed at a single cancer center.12,13 Participants in Project REACH agree to complete regular self-report health surveys and have their medical record information made available to the research team. To be eligible for Project REACH, participants must be: (1) ≥2 years since initial cancer diagnosis; (2) ≥1 year since completion of cancer treatment; and (3) English speaking. Participants were excluded if they had documented mental retardation, pervasive developmental delay, or severe sensory impairment (i.e., deaf and/or blind). As previously described, 12 204 pediatric brain tumor survivors were recruited to Project REACH and 162 enrolled and completed study measures described below. Participants were 84 males and 78 females. They ranged in age from 12 to 36 years, (M = 19.50 years, standard deviation [SD] = 4.66) with 83 in the 12–18-year age group and 79 in the 19–36-year age group. Demographic and medical characteristics of the sample are summarized in Table 1.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Participants by Relapse Status
Participants, their parent or caregiver, and a psychosocial clinician completed study measures during a single scheduled clinic visit. Medical information, including relapse (defined as MRI confirmed progression or new disease at the original tumor site), was taken from medical records. Study procedures were approved by the cancer center's Institutional Review Board.
Measures
Self-report
Participants completed self-report measures of anxiety and depression on one of two measures according to age.
The Beck Youth Inventories-II 14
Participants 12–17 years of age completed the Depression and Anxiety scales of the Beck Youth Inventories-II (BYI-II). Each BYI-II scale consists of 20 symptom items rated on a four-point scale, reflecting the frequency with which each symptom occurred during the prior 2 weeks. To identify participants with significant symptoms of distress, participants were classified as clinical cases if they had moderately elevated scores on the Depression or Anxiety scales, with t-scores ≥60 as outlined in the test manual. 14
Brief Symptom Inventory-18 15
Participants, ≥18 years of age completed the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), which includes six-item Depression and Anxiety subscales used in this study; respondents rate on a five-point Likert scale their level of distress in the past week associated with each symptom. Participants with a t-score ≥57 on the Anxiety or Depression subscales were classified as having clinically significant symptom elevation. Although the BSI-18 manual 15 recommends a cutoff score of ≥63, studies of cancer patients and survivors have demonstrated that lower cutoff scores are more sensitive to detecting psychological distress16,17 leading us to select a previously recommended lower cutoff.
Caregiver report
One hundred fifty-four caregivers described survivors' symptoms on one of two closely related measures, the Child Behavior Checklist for adolescents 12–17 years of age, or the Adult Behavior Checklist for young adults, ages 18+. 18 Caregivers are asked to rate the survivor on each symptom using a three-point scale ranging from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true or often true). The overall Internalizing and Externalizing subscale scores were used in this study; t-scores ≥60 were used to classify participants as clinical cases. Caregivers were predominantly parents as only 11 survivors lived with spouses or partners.
Clinician report
Clinical interview
As part of routine clinical care all participants were interviewed by a psychologist or postdoctoral psychology fellow. The semistructured interview, 13 developed at our center asks about symptoms of depression, anxiety, behavioral problems, and social issues by scoring them from 0 to 10 (0 = no/almost no symptoms; 10 = significant symptoms); participants with scores ≥6 were categorized as having significant anxiety or depression. Interviewers also rated each participant on overall functioning from 0 to 100 scale (0 = worst functioning; 100 = best functioning) on the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) 19 ; those with GAF scores ≤60 indicating moderate impairment functioning were identified as clinical cases on the GAF.
Results
Symptoms of psychological distress
The majority of participants (87.7%; 142/162) denied clinically significant symptoms on self-report measures; 14.2% (23/162) endorsed significant depressive symptoms and 12.3% (20/162) endorsed significant anxiety (Table 2). Caregiver reports were similar, with 18.2% (28/154) of survivors classified as cases on the Internalizing and 9.1% (14/154) on the Externalizing scale. A higher proportion of survivors were classified as clinical cases on clinician report; 20.5% (33/161) were rated as having significant depression, 23% (37/161) with significant anxiety, and 27% (44/161) scored in the clinical range for overall psychological impairment on the GAF.
Comparison of Relapsed and Nonrelapsed Participants on Psychological Variables
Probability calculated using two-sided Fisher's exact test.
N's vary because of missing data: bn = 161; cn = 154.
GAF, global assessment of functioning; OR, odds ratio.
Relapse and psychological distress
Of 162 participants, 23 experienced a cancer relapse. Relapsed and nonrelapsed survivors were compared on the dichotomous psychological distress variables (case vs. noncase) using univariate logistic regression (Table 2). History of relapse was significantly related to elevated self-reported anxiety; the proportion of relapsed survivors categorized as clinical cases of anxiety (30.4%) was more than three times greater than the proportion of nonrelapsed survivors reporting this elevated level of anxiety (9.4%; odds ratio [OR] = 4.24 p = 0.001). Relapsed survivors were also more likely to report elevated depression (24% vs. 14.5%), but this difference was not statistically significant. While parents were also more likely to report that relapsed survivors had elevated internalizing (25.0% vs. 17.0%) and externalizing difficulties (15.0% vs. 8.2%), these differences were moderate in size and not statistically significant. Clinicians rated relapsed and nonrelapsed survivors quite similarly on anxiety (26.0% vs. 22.5%), depression (21.7% vs. 20.0%), and overall functioning (GAF; 30.4% vs. 26.6%), with no statistical differences observed between groups.
To determine if the observed relationship between relapse and self-reported anxiety might be influenced by other factors, we screened the demographic and treatment variables in Table 1 (Age at interview, Gender, Race, Diagnosis, Surgery, Chemotherapy, Radiation, Age at Diagnosis, Time since diagnosis) for inclusion in an adjusted logistic regression model. This was done in a series of univariate logistic regression models of self-reported anxiety (case vs. noncase) with a liberal alpha level of 0.10. For these analyses Race was recoded into White versus Nonwhite, Diagnosis was recoded into low-grade glioma versus other diagnosis, and age at interview, age at cancer diagnosis, and time since cancer diagnosis were evaluated as both continuous and categorical variables. In these analyses, only one variable, radiation therapy, approached statistical significance (OR = 2.68, p = 0.069), and was included in the adjusted model along with Relapse. In this logistic regression model, Relapse remained significantly associated with self-reported anxiety (OR = 3.83, p = 0.014), while radiation therapy was not (OR = 2.39. p = 0.12).
Discussion
Although many AYA cancer survivors adapt well after completion of treatment, a significant group of survivors will exhibit clinically significant psychological symptoms, including symptoms of anxiety and depression.3,13 Our results indicate that AYA brain tumor survivors who experience relapsed disease are at particularly increased risk for symptoms of anxiety even when other demographic and treatment factors are adjusted for. While it could be expected that anxiety symptoms would gradually decrease over time following relapse, our findings indicate this is not always the case; almost a third of AYAs with relapsed brain tumors report significant anxiety even years after successful treatment for relapse. At least one prior study of cancer-related worry in a mixed diagnostic group of AYA survivors did not find that prior relapse was associated with increased health concerns, 20 suggesting our results may be specific to AYA survivors of central nervous system (CNS) disease. At the same time, our results are broadly consistent with research on illness uncertainty suggesting that unpredictable medical outcomes are associated with increased psychological distress, including anxiety and depressive symptomatology in individuals with cancer histories. 21
As AYA brain tumor survivors are at risk for poor health outcomes, including relapse, our results, like those of prior studies, underscore the importance of ongoing psychosocial follow-up.3,13,20 For AYAs with relapse history, and perhaps more broadly for those at elevated risk for relapse, receiving regular psychological follow-up in conjunction with their oncologic care is critically important. Patients with low-grade gliomas, for example, are often told their tumor is highly curable and less aggressive than other brain tumors, but their slow and potentially recurring nature may present significant psychological challenges. Family functioning has been shown to be associated with the impact of late effects on the quality of life in young adult brain tumor survivors 22 ; providing patients and families with anticipatory guidance about the expectable disease course and potential long-term effects may promote adaptive coping and facilitate early identification of associated psychological distress.
Our findings are limited by the modest size of our sample of AYA brain tumor survivors surveyed at a single institution, and the small number of these survivors who experienced a relapse. Although the study benefitted from multiple reporters, it lacked a “gold standard” mental health measure, such as a structured diagnostic interview that would provide a stronger measure of psychological adaptation. Future studies with larger samples will be needed to validate our findings, explore the impact of relapse of other cancer types on AYA's adjustment, and investigate how additional treatments required for relapsed disease may contribute to later psychological symptoms.
Conclusion
Despite these limitations, our results have important implications for clinical care of AYAs after brain tumor relapse. Established guidelines for pediatric oncology survivors call for regular assessment of their psychosocial needs.23,24 In this study, survivors who experienced relapse were at increased risk for anxiety even years later, suggesting they should be closely followed. Although future research will need to further investigate the validity of AYAs self-report, our results are consistent with previous research,13,25 indicating self-report is a key component for assessing AYA's psychosocial functioning, particularly for assessment of internal states, such as anxiety and depression.
Footnotes
Acknowledgment
This research was supported in part by Swim Across America.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
