Weekly Energy Drink Use Is Positively Associated with Delay Discounting and Risk Behavior in a Nationwide Sample of Young Adults

Abstract

Background:

Energy drink use is associated with increased risk behavior among adolescents and college students. This study examined this relationship in a nationwide sample of young adults and also examined relations between energy drink use and delay discounting.

Methods:

Participants were 874 U.S. adults 18–28 years of age with past 30-day consumption of caffeine and alcohol. Participants completed an online survey of energy drink use, drug use, sexual activity, alcohol misuse (alcohol use disorders identification test [AUDIT]), sensation seeking (four-item Brief Sensation Seeking Scale [BSSS-4]), and delay discounting of monetary rewards and condom use.

Results:

Over one-third of participants (n = 303) reported consuming energy drinks at least once per week. Weekly energy drink users were more likely than less-than-weekly energy drink users to report a recent history of risk behaviors, including cigarette smoking (56% vs. 28%, p < 0.0001), illicit stimulant use (22% vs. 6%, p < 0.0001), and unprotected sex (63% vs. 45%, p < 0.0001). Covariate-adjusted analyses found that weekly energy drink users did not have significantly higher BSSS-4 scores (3.5 vs. 3.1, p = 0.098), but they had higher mean AUDIT scores (8.0 vs. 4.8, p < 0.0001), and they more steeply discounted delayed monetary rewards. Although weekly energy drink users did not show steeper discounting of delayed condom use, they showed a lower likelihood of using a condom when one was immediately available.

Conclusions:

This study extends findings that energy drink use is associated with risk behavior, and it is the first study to show that energy drink use is associated with monetary delay discounting.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Packaged Facts.. Energy Drinks and Shots: U.S. Market Trends; 2013. Available at www.packagedfacts.com/Energy-Drinks-Shots-7124908/ (accessed September 14, 2015).

Larson

, Laska

, Story

, Neumark-Sztainer

. Sports and energy drink consumption are linked to health-risk behaviours among young adults. Public Health Nutr. 2015; 18:1–10.

Skewes

, Decou

, Gonzalez

. Energy drink use, problem drinking and drinking motives in a diverse sample of Alaskan college students. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2013:72. eCollection.

Arria

, Caldeira

, Kasperski

, Vincent

, Griffiths

, O'Grady

. Energy drink consumption and increased risk for alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011; 35:365–375.

Gallucci

, Martin

, Morgan

. The consumption of energy drinks among a sample of college students and college student athletes. J Community Health. 2015 [Epub ahead of print]: DOI: 10.1007/s10900-015-0075-4.

Hamilton

, Boak

, Ilie

, Mann

. Energy drink consumption and associations with demographic characteristics, drug use and injury among adolescents. Can J Public Health. 2013; 104:e496–e501.

Hull

, Dillon

, O'Connell

, Chitnavis

, Svikis

. P.6.016 is use of caffeinated energy drinks associated with higher levels of tobacco, alcohol and other drug use in American students?. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011; 21:S168–S169.

Miller

KE.

Energy drinks, race, and problem behaviors among college students. J Adolesc Health. 2008; 43:490–497.

Terry-McElrath

, O'Malley

, Johnston

. Energy drinks, soft drinks, and substance use among United States secondary school students. J Addict Med. 2014; 8:6–13.

10.

Velazquez

, Poulos

, Latimer

, Pasch

. Associations between energy drink consumption and alcohol use behaviors among college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012; 123:167–172.

11.

Arria

, Caldeira

, Kasperski

, et al. Increased alcohol consumption, nonmedical prescription drug use, and illicit drug use are associated with energy drink consumption among college students. J Addict Med. 2010; 4:74–80.

12.

Azagba

, Langille

, Asbridge

. An emerging adolescent health risk: caffeinated energy drink consumption patterns among high school students. Prev Med. 2014; 62:54–59.

13.

Trapp

, Allen

, O'Sullivan

, Robinson

, Jacoby

, Oddy

. Energy drink consumption among young Australian adults: associations with alcohol and illicit drug use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 134:30–37.

14.

Woolsey

, Williams

Jr. , Jacobson

, et al. Increased energy drink use as a predictor of illicit prescription stimulant use. Subst Abus. 2014; 35:96–103.

15.

Berinsky

, Huber

, Lenz

. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Polit Anal. 2012; 20:351–368.

16.

Buhrmester

, Kwang

, Gosling

. Amazon's Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011; 6:3–5.

17.

Paolacci

, Chandler

, Ipeirotis

. Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgm Decis Making. 2010; 5:411–419.

18.

The Economist.. The Roar of the Crowd; 2012. Available at www.economist.com/node/21555876 (accessed September 14, 2015).

19.

Crump

, McDonnell

, Gureckis

. Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e57410.

20.

Jarmolowicz

, Bickel

, Carter

, Franck

, Mueller

. Using crowdsourcing to examine relations between delay and probability discounting. Behav Processes. 2012; 91:308–312.

21.

Johnson

, Herrmann

, Johnson

. Opportunity costs of reward delays and the discounting of hypothetical money and cigarettes. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015; 103:87–107.

22.

Sprouse

A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behav Res Methods. 2011; 43:155–167.

23.

Ainslie

Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull. 1975; 82:463.

24.

Bickel

, Odum

, Madden

. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999; 146:447–454.

25.

Rachlin

, Green

. Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972; 17:15–22.

26.

Daugherty

, Brase

. Taking time to be healthy: predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Pers Indiv Differ. 2010; 48:202–207.

27.

MacKillop

, Amlung

, Few

, Ray

, Sweet

, Munafò

. Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011; 216:305–321.

28.

Petry

. Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001; 154:243–250.

29.

Johnson

, Bruner

. The sexual discounting task: HIV risk behavior and the discounting of delayed sexual rewards in cocaine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012; 123:15–21.

30.

Johnson

, Bruner

. Test–retest reliability and gender differences in the sexual discounting task among cocaine-dependent individuals. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013; 21:277–286.

31.

Dariotis

, Johnson

. Sexual discounting among high-risk youth ages 18–24: implications for sexual and substance use risk behaviors. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015; 23:49–58.

32.

Herrmann

, Hand

, Johnson

, Badger

, Heil

. Examining delay discounting of condom-protected sex among opioid-dependent women and non-drug-using control women. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 144:53–60.

33.

Herrmann

, Johnson

. Examining delay discounting of condom-protected sex among men who have sex with men using crowdsourcing technology. AIDS Behav. 2015; 19:1655–1665.

34.

Johnson

, Johnson

, Herrmann

, Sweeney

. Delay and probability discounting of sexual and monetary outcomes in individuals with cocaine use disorders and matched controls. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0128641.

35.

Peer

, Vosgerau

, Acquisti

. Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods. 2014; 46:1023–1031.

36.

Saunders

, Aasland

, Babor

, de la Fuente

, Grant

. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Addiction. 1993; 88:791–804.

37.

Stephenson

, Hoyle

, Palmgreen

, Slater

. Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003; 72:279–286.

38.

Vallone

, Allen

, Clayton

, Xiao

. How reliable and valid is the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale (BSSS-4) for youth of various racial/ethnic groups?. Addiction. 2007; 102:71–78.

39.

Kirby

, Petry

, Bickel

. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999; 128:78–87.

40.

Epstein

, Richards

, Saad

, Paluch

, Roemmich

, Lerman

. Comparison between two measures of delay discounting in smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003; 11:131–138.

41.

Mazur

. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In: Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: Vol 5, The Effect of Delay and of Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value. Commons

M.L.

, Mazur

J.E.

, Nevin

J.A.

and Rachlin

(Eds). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1987: pp. 55–73.

42.

Myerson

, Baumann

, Green

. Discounting of delayed rewards: a theoretical interpretation of the Kirby questionnaire. Behav Processes. 2014; 107:99–105.

43.

Myerson

, Green

, Warusawitharana

. Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001; 76:235–243.

44.

Newcomb

, McGee

. Influence of sensation seeking on general deviance and specific problem behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 61:614–628.

45.

Zuckerman

, Ball

, Black

. Influences of sensation seeking, gender, risk appraisal, and situational motivation on smoking. Addict Behav. 1990; 15:209–220.

46.

Soeken

, Bausell

. Alcohol use and its relationship to other addictive and preventive behaviors. Addict Behav. 1989; 14:459–464.

47.

Green

, Myerson

, Oliveira

, Chang

. Delay discounting of monetary rewards over a wide range of amounts. J Exp Anal Behav. 2013; 100:269–281.

48.

Conigrave

, Hall

, Saunders

. The AUDIT questionnaire: choosing a cut-off score. Addiction. 1995; 90:1349–1356.

49.

Johnson

, Bickel

. Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002; 77:129–146.

50.

Lagorio

, Madden

. Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behav Processes. 2005; 69:173–187.

51.

Peacock

, Pennay

, Droste

, Bruno

, Lubman

. “High” risk? A systematic review of the acute outcomes of mixing alcohol with energy drinks. Addiction. 2014; 109:1612–1633.

52.

Amlung

, Few

, Howland

, Rohsenow

, Metrik

, MacKillop

. Impulsivity and alcohol demand in relation to combined alcohol and caffeine use. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013; 21:467–474.

53.

Kendler

, Myers

, O Gardner

. Caffeine intake, toxicity and dependence and lifetime risk for psychiatric and substance use disorders: an epidemiologic and co-twin control analysis. Psychol Med. 2006; 36:1717–1725.

54.

Svikis

, Dillon

, Thacker

, et al. Coffee and energy drink use in college freshmen: is trouble brewing?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015; 146:e112–e113.

55.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.. Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings; 2012. Available at http://archive.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k11Results/NSDUHresults2011.pdf (accessed September 14, 2015).

56.

Weinstock

, Berman

, Cates

. Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004; 36:6–10.