Abstract
Insufficient sleep, insomnia, and sleep-related problems are important health issues, as their overall prevalence accounts for about 30% of the general population. The aim of this study was to systematically review previous studies investigating the effects of orally administered single plant-derived extracts on sleep-related outcomes in humans. Data sources were PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. The data search was conducted in two steps: step 1, names of plants which have been studied as sleep aids in humans were searched and retrieved; and step 2, each ingredient listed in step 1 was then added into the search term. Only original articles or reviews were applicable to the scope of this review. Studies on human subjects, with or without sleep-related disorders, were included. Sleep-related disorders refer to not only insomnia or sleep behavior disorders but also diseases with sleep-related symptoms. Studies were considered eligible for this review when the plant extracts were administered orally. Outcome measures relevant to sleep quality, duration, or other sleep-related problems were included. Twenty-one plants were listed in the first step of the search as potential candidates for natural sleep aids. Seventy-nine articles using these single plant-derived natural products were included in the final review. Although valerian was most frequently studied, conflicting results were reported, possibly due to the various outcome measures of each study. Other plants were not as rigorously tested in human studies. There was limited evidence with inconclusive results regarding the effects of single plant-derived natural products on sleep, warranting further studies.
Introduction
T
About 37% of the responders from the national survey in the United States reported that they had fallen asleep during the day at least once in the previous 30 days due to insufficient sleep. 1 More seriously, 4.7% of the people had experienced nodding off or falling asleep while driving. 3 Sleep-related problems, including falling asleep during the day while working or driving, not only would be related to personal health issues but also could cause social burden related to higher risk of industrial or traffic accidents and disorders precipitated by sleep insufficiency.
Insomnia is characterized by dissatisfaction with sleep quality and/or quantity, with difficulties in sleep initiation or maintenance, or with early morning awakening (Box 1). A general concept of etiologic model which can be summarized as the interplay between genetic diathesis and environmental stress altering the neurobiological psychobehavioral processes is shown in Figure 1. 4 However, pathophysiologic mechanisms of insomnia disorder have not yet been fully elucidated and there is a lack of evidence supporting a universally accepted disease model; 4 insomnia has been treated with various medications clinically.

General concept of etiologic model of insomnia.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) Criteria for Insomnia Disorder
American Psychiatric Association. 76
However, the currently available and commonly used sleep aids are often related to adverse reactions such as daytime drowsiness, dependency, depression, and even suicidal thoughts/attempts. 5 To address this critical unmet need, alternative approaches are warranted. Consequently, availability of effective sleep aids with fewer adverse effects has been recognized as a clinically unmet need and developing new investigational drugs or dietary supplements are two potential approaches to meet these needs. Considering the historical use of plant-derived natural products as the source of new investigational drugs or dietary supplements, 6 –8 a systematic review of literature could further elucidate the current status and future directions of the research of plant-derived natural products as sleep aids.
Plants have historically been a source of numerous drugs and medicinal foods. Examples of medications widely used in medical treatments range from opiates (e.g., morphine) to antibiotics (e.g., quinine) and antineoplastic agents (e.g., vincristine and paclitaxel). Medicinal plants have also been used in the fields of traditional Chinese medicine or complementary and alternative medicine. Plant-derived natural products were noticed as potential sleep aids as some herbal teas or extracts have traditionally been used as sleep remedies. Adverse reactions of commonly used sleep aids such as antihistamines and benzodiazepines also necessitate the consideration of natural products as possible alternatives.
We aimed to perform a systematic review of original articles that investigated the effects of the single plant-derived extracts, which were administered orally, on sleep-related outcomes in humans. Detailed methods for systematic review- search strategies, flow charts, and participant characteristics of each study are presented in Supplementary Data (Supplementary Tables S1, Supplementary Table S2, and Supplementary Figure S1; Supplementary Data are available online at
Plant-Derived Natural Products for Sleep
Valerian
Valerian (Valeriana officinalis) is a perennial plant, which has been used as a sleep-promoting herb, and is currently available as a dietary supplement. 9 Bioactive compounds in this herb include valerenic acid, iridoids, including valepotriates, isovaleric acid, isovaleramide, alkaloids, gamma-aminobutyric acids (GABAs), flavanones, and 6-methylapigenin. 10 –12 Among these ingredients, valerenic acids and valepotriates have been presumed to be the main components which might be related to the sedating effects of the plant. Mechanism of action of valerian as a sleep remedy is still greatly unknown; however, evidence on the effects of increasing GABA concentrations in the synaptic cleft, either by promoting its secretion or by inhibiting its reuptake/degradation, was reported. 13 Although GABA is one of the active ingredients of valerian, it is still unknown whether GABA in valerian extract could pass across the blood–brain barrier to be used in the brain.
Valerian was studied in 17 human trials, all of which have been included in this review (Table 1). Nevertheless, these studies showed conflicting results, possibly due to the different sleep-related outcome measures used in the studies. Those were the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), 14 sleep diary, polysomnography (PSG), and wrist actigraphy. In addition, daily dosage varied from 225 to 1060 mg, usually before bedtime when administered once daily.
AUC, area under curve; BFI, brief fatigue inventory; BZDs, benzodiazepines; CGI, clinical global impression; ECG, electrocardiogram; EEG, electroencephalography; EMG, electromyogram; EOG, electrooculogram; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; FOSQ, functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire; GES, feeling of refreshment after sleep; LSEQ, Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire; MSQ, Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire; PSG, polysomnography; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; PSS, psychosomatic symptoms in the sleep phase; PSYE, psychic exhaustion in the evening; QUISI, ambulatory, sleep recording device; RCT, randomized control trial; REM, rapid eye movement; RLS, restless leg syndrome; SED, symptom experience diary; SF-B, Sleep Questionnaire (Schlaffragebogen)-B; SPT, single patient trial; SQ, sleep quality; ST, sleep time; SWR, slow wave ratio; SWS, slow wave sleep; TRME, dream recall; VAS, visual analog scale; WASO, wake after sleep onset.
Five studies, which scored the highest with scores of 5 points on the Jadad scale, 15 a scoring system that assesses the methodological quality of a clinical trial, reported that there were no benefits of valerian on sleep-related outcomes, PSQI, sleep logs, sleep diaries, or other types of self-rated assessments. Four out of five studies had small sample sizes: 16 elderly women with insomnia, 16 15 arthritis patients with mild sleep disturbance, 17 37 restless leg syndrome patients, 18 and 42 people with chronic insomnia. 19 Oxman et al. 20 reported that minimally important improvement in self-reported sleep quality was not different between valerian and control groups when treated with 600 mg daily dose of valerian for 14 days in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 405 insomnia patients. Significant differences were only found in the perceived sleep quality question in the global self-assessment questionnaires. 20
In two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with relatively large numbers of subjects, participants experienced insomnia as a postmenopausal symptom or cancer-related symptom. Taavoni et al. 21 conducted a triple-blind placebo-controlled RCT in 100 postmenopausal women. The PSQI scores were significantly lower in the valerian group when 530 mg twice daily dose of valerian was administered for 4 weeks. Subjective improvement of sleep quality (30% vs. 4%) were also presented in this study. 21 Results of Barton et al.'s 22 double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT in 119 cancer patients showed that once daily administration of 450 mg valerian before bedtime was not effective in improving sleep quality or fatigue in patients undergoing cancer treatments. The study by Ziegler et al. 23 was a double-blind RCT on 202 subjects with nonorganic insomnia. A daily dose of 600 mg valerian or 10 mg oxazepam was administered for 6 weeks, and effects on sleep were evaluated using the Sleep Questionnaire (Schlaffragebogen)-B (SF-B). 23 Sleep quality improved in both groups without a between-group difference, showing that valerian's efficacy was comparable to that of oxazepam. However, other objective measures of sleep quality or duration were not available in this study. The rest of the studies that were published before 2002 scored 2 or 3 points in the Jadad scale and performed in 10–20 subjects.
Our conclusion is in concordance with that of a systematic review on the efficacy and safety of valerian: it is safe but has insufficient evidence on its efficacy. 24
Lavender
Lavender compounds include linalyl acetate, linalool, 1,8-cineole, β-ocimene, and flavonoids. 25 Linalyl acetate and linalool are considered as the main ingredients, which could be related to the sleep-promoting effects of lavender, by modulating actions of glutamate and GABA in animal models. 26,27 However, individual ingredients did not seem to exert their effects if administered separately. 25 Although lavender has also been used as an agent in aromatherapy, we reviewed studies in which lavender extracts were administered orally. There is a commercially available Lavender oil product, in the form of a soft gelatin capsule, named Silexan (Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany).
Three RCTs and one open-label exploratory trial were included in our review (Table 2): one in postpartum women and three in patients with anxiety disorders. Chen and Chen 28 used lavender tea as an intervention while other studies 29 –31 utilized the commercial drug, Silexan. In the study by Chen and Chen 28 postpartum women with sleep problems were treated with lavender tea (2 g of dried lavender flower in 300 mg of water). Although there were no differences in sleep quality scores after 4 weeks of treatment, fatigue level significantly decreased. A study by Uehleke el al. 31 reported that 6 weeks of Silexan administration increased total sleep time and sleep efficiency and reduced waking-up frequencies, waking-up duration, and tiredness, while improving self-reported mood in the morning. However, it was an open-label exploratory trial in heterogenous groups of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder, neurasthenia, or somatization disorders without a proper control group. The remaining two trials which were performed in patients with anxiety disorders accompanied with sleep disturbances showed conflicting results, although the two studies were performed by the same investigator. 29,30
AVLE, Apocynum venetum leaf; FSS, Fatigue Severity Scale; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HRSD, Hamilton rating scale for depression; ISI, Insomnia Severity Scale; NNA, number of nocturnal awakenings; NREM, nonrapid eye movement; PFS, Postpartum Fatigue Scale; PSQS, Postpartum Sleep Quality Scale; SAM, state-activity-mood; SE, sleep efficiency; SL, sleep latency; SMHSQ, St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire; SO, sleep onset; SOL, sleep onset latency; STAI, state-trait anxiety inventory; SWA, slow wave activity; TCJ, tart cherry juice; TST, total sleep time.
Kava
Kava is a member of the pepper family and is native to the Pacific islands. Kava roots were used for relaxation in traditional rituals in this area (National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health [NCCIH] Clearinghouse,
Three studies on kava were eligible for this review (Table 2). Two out of three included articles that used kava in combination with or in parallel to valerian. Jacobs et al. 35 reported results from an RCT in 391 individuals with anxiety and insomnia symptoms. Effects of kava on the changes in the Insomnia Severity Index scores were examined in comparison to those of valerian and placebo. However, neither kava nor valerian significantly improved insomnia or anxiety. Wheatley 36 divided 24 subjects with stress-induced insomnia into kava-treated, kava followed by valerian-treated, and valerian followed by kava-treated experimental groups. This research was a nonrandomized, nonblinded, and placebo-uncontrolled study.
In an RCT by Lehrl 32 improvements in overall quality of sleep, measured using the SF-B, were more pronounced in the kava group than in the control group. A subscore of the SF-B on recuperative effects after sleep remained until the end of treatment and follow-up, while that in the control group returned to baseline after 2 weeks.
In conclusion, kava was reported to be effective for improving sleep in a small number of RCTs. A paucity of literature might be due to the fact that kava has been associated with liver damages. 37
St. John's Wort
The major ingredients of St. John's Wort or Hypericum perforatum related to its effects in sleep or other psychological conditions are hyperforin and adhyperforin. 38,39 These ingredients were considered to increase monoamine neurotransmitter concentrations, such as serotonin or noradrenaline, by inhibiting reuptake or degradation as reported in animal models. 40 –42 In contrast, there has also been conflicting evidence that ingredients of St. John's Wort may not affect monoamine neurotransmitter activities. 43,44
Three RCTs that were reviewed involved relatively small sample sizes (Table 2). One was performed in 21 healthy volunteers and reported that rapid eye movement sleep latency measured with home PSG was increased significantly with either 0.9 g or 1.8 g daily dose administered before bedtime. 45 Al-Akoum et al. 46 reported that 900 mg of St. John's Wort decreased scores of the Sleep Problem Scale in perimenopausal women after 12 weeks of oral administration. In contrast, Schulz and Jobert 47 RCT in 12 older adults showed that 900 mg/day increased mean percentage of slow-wave sleep without changing total sleep time.
Commercial names of drugs containing St. John's Wort extracts were Jarsin® and Kira™, used in Schulz and Jobert 47 and Sharpley et al., 45 respectively. Both were manufactured by a common manufacturer and considered to be identical. 44 Although St. John's Wort is considered a safe treatment, it should be considered that there was a notice regarding the possibility of developing serotonin syndrome, by the NCCIH. 48
Conclusion
Although plant-derived natural products have been used for sleep empirically, there was a paucity of evidence on the efficacy of each plant in RCTs and other types of human trials, warranting future investigations. 80,81 As this review did not retrieve all the ingredients of each plant, further efforts are needed to identify each ingredient from the plants and to pinpoint chemicals that are primarily responsible for their efficacy. However, before these steps are taken, robust supporting evidence for each specific plant's effectiveness for alleviating sleep-related problems is needed, because these procedures of identifying ingredients and pinpointing effective chemicals would require resources of funding and approval or clearance from the authorities.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through High Value-Added Food Technology Development Program, funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (116004-2), Fire Fighting Safety & 119 Rescue Technology Research and Development Program funded by the Ministry of Public Safety and Security (MPSS-Fire Fighting Safety-2016-86), and the Brain Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2015M3C7A1028376).
Author Disclosure Statement
J.E. Kim received research support from NeoCremar Inc. No competing financial interests exist for all other authors.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
