Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Palliative care for Parkinson's disease (PD) is an emerging area of interest for clinicians, patients and families. Identifying the palliative care needs of caregivers is central to developing and implementing palliative services for families affected by PD. The objective of this paper was to elicit PD caregiver needs, salient concerns, and preferences for care using a palliative care framework.
Materials and Methods:
11 PD caregivers and one non-overlapping focus group (n = 4) recruited from an academic medical center and community support groups participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews. Interviews and focus group discussion were digitally recorded, transcribed and entered into ATLAS.ti for coding and analysis. We used inductive qualitative data analysis techniques to interpret responses.
Results:
Caregivers desired access to emotional support and education regarding the course of PD, how to handle emergent situations (e.g. falls and psychosis) and medications. Participants discussed the immediate impact of motor and non-motor symptoms as well as concerns about the future, including: finances, living situation, and caretaking challenges in advanced disease. Caregivers commented on the impact of PD on their social life and communication issues between themselves and patient. All participants expressed interest and openness to multidisciplinary approaches for addressing these needs.
Conclusions:
Caregivers of PD patients have considerable needs that may be met through a palliative care approach. Caregivers were receptive to the idea of multidisciplinary care in order to meet these needs. Future research efforts are needed to develop and test the clinical and cost effectiveness of palliative services for PD caregivers.
Introduction
T
One of the most well-replicated findings within health research is that support from family and friends is important in facilitating coping with a long-term illness. 1 Palliative care addresses medical, psychosocial, and spiritual issues and transcends the patient–physician dyad by addressing caregiver strain and offering support services to family members. 13 Interest in palliative care for PD patients and their families has been increasing over recent years.14–16 Previous studies specifically on the needs of PD caregivers report adverse effects of caregiving on not only their emotional and physical health but also with difficulty in accessing financial benefits and a lack of coordinated and continued care.3,17,18 The objective of the present study was to validate and build on this work by eliciting PD caregiver needs, salient concerns, and care preferences using a palliative care framework to guide qualitative interviews.19–21
Methods
Participants
This research was part of a broader study investigating the palliative care needs of patients and caregivers living with PD. 22 English-speaking patients who were more than age 40, met UK Brain Bank Criteria for probable PD, and were Hoehn and Yahr Stage 2 or higher23,24 and their informal caregivers were recruited for this study. We specifically included patients with dementia. Both patients and caregivers were recruited from the University of Colorado Hospital Movement Disorder Clinics, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Parkinson's Association of the Rockies events between January 2014 and July 2014. The protocol was approved by the Veterans Affairs Research & Design Committee and the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board. All participants provided written informed consent. The data in this study include only the caregiver perspectives.
Data collection
Of the 50 caregivers who completed the parent study questionnaires, 11 were selected for semistructured, in-depth interviews. We used maximum variance sampling of patients to ensure variety in terms of gender, age, home environment (e.g., urban, rural), PD severity, and cognitive status. 25 We also conducted one focus group (n = 4) that comprised an independent group of caregivers to enable interactive discussions and elicit perspectives across a small group sample.
An open-ended interview guide (Table 1) consistent with study goals was initially used and was revised during the study to better probe emerging themes and with the input from our multidisciplinary scientific advisory board (J.J., J.C., D.B., J.M., J.K.). The development of our interview guide and domains assessed was informed by the National Consensus Projects' model of palliative care, 19 by studies of palliative care in heart failure, 20 and proposed models of PD palliative care.20,21 Caregiver burden was assessed using the 12-item short form of the Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI), which produces results comparable to those of the full version. 26 Each question is scored on a five-point Likert scale ranging from “never” (0) to “nearly always” (4) with higher scores indicating worse levels of burden. A score of 17 or higher on the 12-item ZBI indicates high levels of burden. 26
PD, Parkinson's disease.
A research assistant (I.B.), who was not part of participants' medical care team, conducted both the interviews and the focus group. Interviews allowed for in-depth personal exploration of needs, salient concerns, and preferences for care of PD caregivers. Interviews and the focus group were digitally recorded, transcribed, and entered into ATLAS.ti 27 for coding and analysis.
Analysis
We used inductive qualitative data analysis techniques to interpret responses.25,28 A code list was initially developed by the core research team and was revised with continued data collection and with input from the multidisciplinary team. Text within and between codes was compared to develop themes. Investigator and methodological triangulation (using our multidisciplinary research team and data coding by more than one person), member checking (eliciting feedback on themes from subsamples of participants to confirm their accuracy), and the use of multiple qualitative methods (interviews and focus group) were used to increase the rigor of our approach.
Results
Participant characteristics and overview
Interviews were conducted with 11 informal caregivers (9 females, mean age = 65 ± 8.2) and one nonoverlapping focus group (n = 4). Participant and associated patient characteristics are presented in Table 2. The average reported length in the caregiver role was 63.5 months (range = 36–182 months). Scores on the ZBI were high (mean = 24.1, standard deviation = 9.6, range = 14–40), indicating that caregivers perceived caregiving as burdensome, which was consistent with caregivers' descriptions of their predominant emotions regarding caregiving as “frustrated” and “sad.” The following core themes emerged from the data: (1) the need for individual attention and support; (2) educational needs and helpful resources; (3) the consequences of motor and nonmotor symptoms; (4) concerns about the future; and (5) responses to palliative care. The results presented reflect these core themes with additional descriptive examples in Table 3.
ZBI (scores range from 0 to 48 with higher scores indicating worse levels of burden; >17 = high burden).
MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; SD, standard deviation; ZBI, Zarit Burden Inventory.
The need for individual attention and support
This theme described the need for caregivers to be treated by their partner's healthcare team and society at large as unique individuals with separate needs. Caregivers desired more individual attention and emotional support, including having their questions as caregivers addressed. One caregiver stated specifically that she needed support “at the beginning” (i.e., around the time of diagnosis) and another stated receiving a therapeutic effect simply by participating in the interviews associated with the current. Caregivers emphasized a need to be treated as individuals distinct from the patient. This included being properly greeted at office visits and for more questions to be directed at the patient. Some expressed frustration when physicians mainly aimed questions at them during appointments as they felt this put them in a role of simply being the spokesperson of the patient. They stressed it was important for physicians to recognize that they “are not the ones with the disease” and that it should not be assumed that caregivers would know everything that the patient experiences. Despite these concerns, caregivers felt attending neurology appointments with their partner was beneficial to them (i.e., note taking, asking questions, validating information).
This theme also became apparent in the context of social life—some participants discussed the necessity of boundaries in their role as an informal caregiver and reiterated the importance of maintaining their own social lives and involvement in hobbies despite PD. Caregivers also stated that their participation in social activities and spending time with friends and family was a major source of strength.
Education needs and helpful resources
This theme referred to caregiver-identified gaps in education and includes resources caregivers have found to be helpful in terms of understanding PD. Despite most caregivers understanding the individual variation in disease progression in PD, participants generally wanted more information about disease progression and what to expect in the future as well as medications and their side effects. Participants also felt unprepared to respond to emergency situations (i.e., falls, cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], psychosis). In general, the uncertainty of how their partner's PD might progress was a significant source of stress and anxiety for caregivers.
During interviews caregivers were asked, “From where have you received the most useful information about being a caregiver of someone with Parkinson's disease?” The most commonly cited “most useful” resource was caregiver support groups. Other commonly cited useful resources included the Parkinson's Association of the Rockies (local PD organization) and Internet websites and associated webinars (e.g., the Parkinson's Disease Foundation and Michael J. Fox Foundation sites). Some caregivers felt they had an instinctual understanding of what it took to be a caregiver, taking a more or less “learn as you go” approach. One caregiver stated receiving the “most useful” information about being a caregiver from her medical team. Caregivers often found strength in prayer and through spending time with friends and family.
The consequences of motor and nonmotor symptoms
This theme described the impact of symptoms on the caregiver's life. Cognitive dysfunction was challenging for many caregivers and negatively impacted their lives. For some participants, their partner's cognitive dysfunction had pushed them into taking on new roles and responsibilities (e.g., becoming the primary decision maker). In addition to cognitive dysfunction, relationship changes had an impact on caregiver's lives, including assuming a greater responsibility for household tasks, acting as a chaperone, and less time spent doing and planning recreational activities. Communication issues, including both voice and content, were also discussed and the majority of caregivers felt that communication could be improved between themselves and the patient. Caregivers also discussed the impact of sleep behavior disorders, bradykinesia, and tremor on their lives in terms of impact on their sleep, physical caregiving, and social embarrassment, respectively.
The majority of caregivers in this sample did not voice any concerns about their personal safety (e.g., emotional, physical, and sexual abuse). However, one caregiver did discuss concerns for her physical safety during a time period in which her partner was experiencing psychosis.
Concerns about the future
This theme described the concerns about the future from the caregiver's perspective in relation to PD. The most commonly cited concerns related to the following: (1) finances; (2) housing/living situation; and (3) taking care of their spouses in advanced disease. The majority of caregivers we interviewed had advanced directives in place but commented that they would have liked more involvement and guidance from their healthcare teams. Notably, the majority of concerns about the future brought up by caregivers were related to topics not covered in an advanced directive.
Responses to palliative care
At the end of interviews, participants were asked about their understanding of the term “palliative care.” Few had an accurate knowledge of palliative care, although the majority of participants stated being familiar with the term. When provided education on palliative care as a broad model of care that addressed suffering from multiple perspectives was not restricted to end-of-life care and that was inclusive of patients and families, all caregivers responded positively. Five participants expressed an immediate interest in outpatient palliative care services mentioning particular interest in the option for getting counseling and other resources for themselves and getting more guidance around behavioral issues and dementia. Five reported that while interested in the concept, they were not ready for it yet, reporting that they were satisfied with their current level of care and would be more interested if their partner was at a more advanced stage of the illness or requiring a higher level of care. Caregivers were especially supportive of models that provided individualized care in a team-based interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary clinic. Some concerns about this model of care included not wanting to add more clinicians to their healthcare team and more time with medical personnel.
Discussion
The present study highlights the unmet needs, salient concerns, and care preferences of caregivers of PD patients. The emotional burden on caregivers was high and many caregivers desired individual attention and support. Caregivers had several unmet educational needs, including wanting more information about disease progression, what to expect in the future, and questions about PD medications and their side effects. Caregivers were impacted by both motor and nonmotor symptoms and were particularly affected by cognitive dysfunction, communication issues, sleep behavior disorders, bradykinesia, and tremor. For some caregivers, these symptoms led to a significant and disruptive role and relationship changes. Concern about the future was a prevalent topic and related to finances, housing/living situations, and taking care of their partner in advanced disease. After being educated on palliative care concepts for patients and families, all caregivers responded positively and five caregivers wanted to be enrolled immediately in outpatient palliative care. Caregivers who did not want to be enrolled at the current time brought up relevant concerns, particularly the potential burden of adding clinicians to their team and time with medical personnel.
This study complements and builds on previous studies of palliative care in PD caregivers.3,13,17,18,29 Our findings regarding emotional burden is consistent with McLaughlin et al. 17 and Goy et al.3,18 Our data include caregivers with partners with varying disease severities and suggest that a palliative care approach may be applicable to caregivers early on in the disease. Despite this clear need for improved emotional support for PD caregivers, there is currently very limited evidence regarding which interventions are clinically and cost effective for PD caregivers. 30 The educational needs described by caregivers are similar to those found by McLaughlin et al. 17 and suggest that neurologists may be able to improve care by having discussions with caregivers regarding disease progression, possibilities for the future, and spending more time answering caregivers' questions about medications and their side effects. Notably, many of our caregivers' concerns about the future were associated with issues not addressed in advanced directives, including concerns regarding their future living situation and ability to afford a nursing home or other additional care. In a multidisciplinary setting, a social worker may be beneficial in addressing some of these needs as well as assist in connecting caregivers to support groups, which often have an educational component.
Palliative care, which aims to improve quality of life for both the patient and the family, appears to be an ideal approach to supporting caregivers of PD patients. While more research needs to be done on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and other psychosocial interventions aimed at PD caregivers, we encourage the appropriate assessment of caregivers by physicians or other team members who can then refer for appropriate support. Because of the uniqueness of each caregiver and his or her situation, it is important to assess each individual caregiver's needs, level of known information, and what information is desired. 30 Table 4 presents the recommended domains and constructs of caregiver assessment created by the Family Caregiver Alliance and provided by the National Guideline Clearinghouse, which may be useful for physicians, nurses, or social workers in triaging caregiver issues. 31
There are several limitations to this study. We had a small sample size and thus may have missed issues important to many caregivers. Participants were highly educated and largely recruited from an academic clinical setting and support groups and thus may not be representative of general community practice. Participation was also voluntary and respondents may differ in important ways from nonparticipants. Themes from qualitative research may reflect the biases of investigators. To minimize bias, we used several methods, including using a multidisciplinary analytic team.
This study is the first to assess PD caregiver interest in outpatient palliative care services. All caregivers responded positively to palliative care and half of the participants who discussed palliative care wanted to enroll immediately. Importantly, these data suggest ways in which care might be improved in the clinic both through primary palliative care approaches and specialty palliative care clinics. From a primary palliative care perspective, healthcare teams may consider placing more emphasis on the assessment and appropriate referral of caregivers to support services and focus on education regarding disease progression, how to handle emergent situations, and medication and side effects. This will be particularly relevant for patients with early to midstage illness where the addition of an interdisciplinary team may be impractical from a resource perspective and an unwanted increase in time spent with medical personnel for patients and caregivers. In addition, clinicians may want to pay particular attention to caregivers of PD patients with dementia as this and previous research highlight the negative impacts of dementia on caregivers.11,12 This approach should begin at the time of diagnosis, which can be a stressful time for both patients and caregivers. Overall, caregivers were open and enthusiastic about the addition of outpatient palliative care services to their partner's usual neurologic care. Further research on the development and implementation of palliative care services for caregivers of PD patients is merited.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We thank all participants for sharing personal and sensitive information. Study was funded by VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System Research in Care Coordination Pilot Grant Program, National Institutes of Aging (1 K07 AG030337-01A2), and Parkinson's Disease Foundation Summer Student Fellowship (PDF-SFW-1560).
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
