Abstract
Background:
Guidelines recommend that pulmonary clinicians involve palliative care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, integration before advanced stage, that is, early palliative care, is rare.
Objective:
To explore and compare pulmonary and palliative care clinician perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and potential referral criteria for early palliative care in COPD.
Design:
Qualitative descriptive formative evaluation study.
Setting/Subjects:
Pulmonary and palliative care clinicians at a tertiary academic medical center.
Measurements:
Transcribed interviews were thematically analyzed by specialty to identify within- and across-specialty perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and referral criteria.
Results:
Twelve clinicians (n = 6 pulmonary, n = 6 palliative care) participated. Clinicians from both specialties agreed that early palliative care could add value to disease-focused COPD care. Perspectives on many barriers and facilitators were shared between specialties along broad educational, clinical, and operational categories. Pulmonary and palliative care clinicians shared concerns about the misconception that palliative care was synonymous to end-of-life care. Pulmonologists were particularly concerned about the potential risks of opioids and benzodiazepines in COPD. Both specialties stressed the need for clearly defined roles, consensus referral criteria, and novel delivery models. Although no single referral criterion was discussed by all, frequent hospitalizations and emotional symptoms were raised by most across disciplines. Multimorbidity and poor prognosis were discussed only by palliative care clinicians, whereas medication adherence was discussed only by pulmonary clinicians.
Conclusions:
Pulmonary and palliative care clinicians supported early palliative care in COPD. Continued needs include addressing pulmonologists' misconceptions of palliative care, establishing consensus referral criteria, and implementing novel early palliative care models.
Introduction
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects 15 million Americans and is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. 1 International guidelines from the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease call for integration of palliative care for symptom relief in advanced COPD but do not provide guidance regarding the role of palliative care for COPD patients and their family caregivers before end stage, that is, early palliative care. 2 Descriptive studies demonstrate that COPD patients and their family caregivers have significant palliative care needs before the disease progresses to more advanced stages, yet rarely receive timely palliative care.3–6 Thus, individuals with COPD seldom have access to its demonstrated benefits until end-of-life nears.7–9
There are limited data on barriers and facilitators to implementing early palliative care in COPD from the perspective of clinicians across disciplines.10–12 Existing data have mainly been drawn from European clinician samples where single-payer health care systems differ greatly compared with the United States. 13 Although some have used the phrase “early palliative care,” studies focus predominately on end-stage COPD. 14 Data have also demonstrated that pulmonary clinicians support palliative care in COPD; however, there is a lack of consensus on the appropriate timing to introduce palliative care.15–17
Within a broader framework for intervention development, we compared pulmonary and palliative care clinicians' perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and potential referral criteria for early palliative care in COPD. We wanted to understand how the two disciplines perceive early palliative care in COPD to guide the development of an early palliative care program that would be acceptable and relevant to COPD patients and clinicians across specialties.
Methods
Design
We conducted a qualitative descriptive formative evaluation study using the Medical Research Council Framework for the Development of Complex Interventions to develop an early palliative care intervention in COPD.18–22 We recruited a purposive sample of pulmonary and palliative care clinicians (physicians and nurse practitioners) between March 2017 and August 2017 from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), the largest tertiary referral center in Alabama serving urban and rural areas. 22 The interviewer, a male pulmonologist and experienced qualitative researcher, conducted individual, semi-structured interviews in participants' private offices.
Semi-structured interviews
We conducted interviews using an interview guide based on literature review and our previous research (Table 1).5,19,23 We sought participant responses to a standardized definition of early palliative care from National Consensus Project guidelines.5,24 Following this, we explored pulmonary and palliative care clinicians' perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and potential referral criteria for early palliative care in COPD. We employed member checking by asking participants their perspectives on what previous participants had said (e.g., “Other participants have said X. What do you think about that?”). We adhered to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies guidelines for reporting qualitative studies. 25 The UAB Institutional Review Board approved the study. Given the study's low risk, clinician participants provided verbal informed consent after being provided an information sheet.
Interview Guide Domains and Sample Questions
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Data analysis
All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription service. Using NVivo Software (QSR International), the PI (A.S.I.) open coded the transcripts concurrent with the interviews, developed a preliminary list of codes related to the research questions, and reviewed the codes with another member of the study team (M.A.B., a leading expert in qualitative research in palliative care). Two members of the study team (A.S.I. and M.A.B.) used constant comparison to refine the codebook and developed multiple themes through iterative discussions and frequent meetings. 26 We identified themes by participant, grouped themes into broader categories, and compared perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and referral criteria between specialties. We reached thematic saturation at 10 clinicians and recruited two additional participants to confirm this conclusion. Determination of thematic saturation was guided by theoretical and inductive approaches, operationally defined as the point at which interview revealed no new codes or themes relative to previous interviews.21,22,27
Results
We recruited 12 clinicians (n = 6 pulmonary and n = 6 palliative care) (Table 2). Ten (83.3%) participants were physicians, and two (16.7%) were nurse practitioners. Interviews lasted on average 52 minutes (range 34–72). After being provided a standardized definition of early palliative care, all participants believed there was a potential value for early introduction of palliative care to augment comprehensive COPD care for patients.
Participant Characteristics (n = 12)
SD, standard deviation.
Barriers to early palliative care in COPD
Several themes of barriers to early palliative care in COPD emerged within broad educational, clinical, and operational categories (Table 3). Within the category of educational barriers, a common theme was “misconceptions of palliative care.” Many pulmonary clinicians viewed palliative care as tantamount to end-of-life care and even interchanged the words “palliative care” and “hospice,” whereas some pulmonologists recognized the misconceptions from within their own specialty. Some pulmonary clinicians reflected beliefs that palliative care could provide comprehensive symptom management to improve quality of life before the end of life, whereas others believed palliative care was strictly end-of-life care. In comparison, multiple palliative care clinicians expressed beliefs that these misconceptions could stem from a public misunderstanding of the term “palliative care,” which in turn manifested in what COPD patients believe.
Pulmonary and Palliative Care Clinicians Perspectives on Barriers to Early Palliative Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
DNR, do not resuscitate; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Themes within the category of clinical barriers centered on concerns about symptom management in COPD, particularly the management of dyspnea with opioids and benzodiazepines. Pulmonary clinicians expressed serious concerns that palliative care clinicians would be quick to prescribe these medications to COPD patients, and this concern hindered their referral to specialty palliative care. Likewise, palliative care clinicians recognized this as a potential barrier to referral for COPD patients. A second major theme in this category centered around unclear timing and was a shared concern among pulmonary and palliative care clinicians. Pulmonary clinicians seemed supportive of early palliative care but were unsure when to refer. Palliative care clinicians also raised concerns about how to frame a palliative approach and have early discussions about preferences for end of life in the setting of an unpredictable illness trajectory with frequent hospitalizations (Table 3).
Themes within the category of operational barriers focused on practical considerations to integrating early palliative care in the ambulatory setting. Pulmonary and palliative care clinicians were concerned about whether ambulatory palliative care clinics could handle a large influx of COPD patients who may need palliative care if referral were to increase. Clinicians from both disciplines shared concerns about insufficient time in clinic to conduct comprehensive palliative care for patients, palliative care workforce shortages, and the low financial reimbursement for pulmonologists who might integrate a primary palliative care approach within their practice (Table 3).
Facilitators of early palliative care in COPD
Table 4 compares multidisciplinary perspectives on potential facilitators for early palliative care in COPD. Themes on facilitators for early palliative care were also organized into broad educational, clinical, and operational categories. Within the category of educational facilitators, pulmonary and palliative care clinicians emphasized the need for clearer role definition from the onset of referral and improved education in primary palliative care in pulmonary medicine. Clinical facilitators included the development of consensus referral criteria and more training in how to prognosticate based on COPD patients' values and preferences. Finally, both disciplines described potential operational facilitators focused on novel delivery models such as nurse-led, telehealth, home-based, and embedded programs where palliative care clinicians see patients in pulmonary clinic (Table 4).
Pulmonary and Palliative Care Clinician Perspectives on Facilitators of Early Palliative Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
CBT, cognitive behavioral therapy.
Potential referral criteria for early palliative care in COPD
As given in Table 5, pulmonary and palliative care clinicians shared several priority referral criteria for early palliative care in COPD. Although no single referral criterion was discussed by all, frequent hospitalizations and emotional symptoms were discussed by many clinicians from both disciplines. Other shared priority referral criteria included poor nutritional status, declining functional status, severe dyspnea, and continuous oxygen. Multimorbidity and poor prognosis were discussed as potential criteria by only palliative care clinicians, whereas medication adherence was only discussed by pulmonary clinicians.
Pulmonary and Palliative Care Clinician Perspectives on Referral Criteria for Early Palliative Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
ICU, intensive care unit; PFTs, pulmonary function tests.
Discussion
We conducted a qualitative descriptive study to elicit pulmonary and palliative care clinicians' (n = 12) perspectives on early palliative care in COPD, including barriers, facilitators, and referral criteria. This multidisciplinary cohort agreed in principle that early palliative care could be beneficial for patients with COPD. However, participants shared several educational, clinical, and operational barriers that would need to be addressed to improve early palliative care access and delivery in COPD. The most important were educational barriers on misconceptions of the role of palliative care, clinical barriers to comprehensive symptom management, particularly using benzodiazepines and opioids in COPD, outlook planning in the setting of an unpredictable illness trajectory, and workforce limitations. Potential referral criteria for early palliative care described by clinicians spanned both pulmonary and nonpulmonary domains, with frequent hospitalizations and emotional symptoms shared as high priority referral criteria between disciplines. The results from this study can guide development of acceptable early palliative care programs and interventions for COPD patients and their family caregivers that cross both disciplines.
Findings from this study are consistent with national data on barriers to implementation of palliative care in serious illness. Aldridge et al. identified barriers to implementation of specialist palliative care along education, implementation, and policy domains. 28 Educational efforts on palliative care for clinicians caring for COPD patients may dispel the misconception that palliative care is only equivalent to end-of-life care. This theme was frequently described by pulmonary clinicians in our cohort and may in part be owing to pulmonologists' experiences as intensivists who often interact with a palliative care team at a patient's end of life in the intensive care unit. However, there may be a potential role for consistent primary palliative care education integrated into the training curriculum for pulmonary clinicians and applicable to the ambulatory setting. Several formal programs in primary palliative care exist in the United States. 29 To reach a broad audience of pulmonologists, organizations such as the American Thoracic Society and the American College of Chest Physicians may wish to invest in the development, dissemination, and assessment of impact of these educational programs.
A priority clinical barrier that emerged in our study centered on comprehensive symptom management in COPD, particularly the perceived tension on the part of pulmonologists toward the role of opioids and benzodiazepines in COPD. This major barrier to holistic management of dyspnea and emotional symptoms in COPD has persisted for the past decade, and fears of using these medications in COPD have been echoed by patients, caregivers, and clinicians from multiple disciplines, including general practitioners and respiratory therapists.30–33 Refractory dyspnea and severe anxiety symptoms in COPD can be more severe than those experienced in advanced cancer and could serve as ideal triggers for palliative care. 34 However, pulmonary clinicians in our study expressed a fear of overmedication with opioids and benzodiazepines leading to potential respiratory suppression in chronic respiratory failure. Previous data reveal only moderate quality of evidence in support of opioids for dyspnea in COPD, 35 whereas retrospective and case–control studies highlight potential adverse events when benzodiazepines and opioids are used in older adults with COPD,36,37 which likely contribute to the concerns raised by pulmonologists in our study. Opioids are commonly used in the palliation of refractory dyspnea, and mixed methods research data in small samples support its potential benefits in COPD. 38 Although awaiting a prospective clinical trial on opioids in the relief of refractory dyspnea in COPD, collaborative efforts between pulmonary and palliative care clinicians are needed to address this clinical dilemma to balance dyspnea relief with the potential for respiratory suppression in COPD.
Working with patients and their family caregivers to develop prognostic awareness before the end of life is a pinnacle of early palliative care that has been associated with improved quality of care in COPD.39,40 Palliative care clinicians in our cohort acknowledged the importance of having early value-based discussions in COPD. However, advanced care planning is rare in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. 41 Clinicians from both disciplines in our cohort noted a lack of consensus referral criteria and an unpredictable illness trajectory as major barriers to having proactive discussions about end-of-life care in COPD. Our data push forward the research on this topic and can be used to guide timing of early outlook planning in COPD. For instance, clinicians in our cohort acknowledged the potential disconnect between severity of airflow limitation on spirometry and symptom burden. COPD patients may suffer from high symptom burden regardless of the severity of airflow limitation, so it would be important to routinely measure symptoms as indicated in guidelines.2,42,43 Exemplary quotes in our study revealed that pulmonary and palliative care clinicians recognized that some patients with less severe airflow obstruction may have high symptom burden that could warrant early palliative care. However, some seemed reluctant to refer a patient to early palliative care before progression to more severe stages. Limiting palliative care access to more advanced COPD on spirometry instead of earlier in the disease trajectory based on symptoms misses a clear opportunity to improve quality of life and to have earlier discussions about values and preferences before the end of life. 44 Furthermore, quality of life is not inextricably linked to lung function by spirometry, and qualitative data reveal that training in successful coping, a hallmark of early palliative care interventions, moderates this experience.45,46
Our cohort described frequent hospitalizations and emotional symptoms as two priority referral criteria discussed by many clinicians across specialties. The criteria of frequent hospitalizations has been used to identify potential older adults who may qualify as having serious illness and is a strong predictor of mortality in COPD.47,48 Furthermore, in one study of clinicians caring for COPD patients posthospitalization, using the surprise question (“Would you be surprised if this patient died within 12 months?”) accurately identified COPD patients who may benefit from palliative care and was raised as a potential referral criteria by palliative care clinicians in our cohort. 49 The second priority referral criterion discussed by many clinicians in our cohort was emotional symptoms. Emotional symptoms negatively impact many outcomes in COPD and are routinely managed as a pillar of early palliative care.50,51 We have previously demonstrated that emotional symptoms are associated with hospital readmissions, and the presence of clinically elevated emotional symptoms are not just limited to end-stage COPD, where traditional palliative care trials are focused.50,52 However, without proper training, many pulmonologists do not routinely screen for emotional symptoms, and emotional symptoms are not readily recorded in the electronic medical record. Thus, the use of emotional symptoms as a criterion for referral may be challenging to implement on a wider scale. In a previous analysis, we demonstrated that African Americans, men, and the uninsured have the greatest risk for having unmet mental health care needs in COPD, 52 which may be useful in guiding risk stratification for emotional symptoms measurement.
As educational opportunities are increasingly available to pulmonologists and consensus referral criteria are established, operational barriers still exist. In our cohort, participants identified several potential operational barriers to integrating early palliative care in COPD. These practical concerns centered around insufficient time to conduct comprehensive palliative care in busy pulmonary clinics, inadequate financial reimbursement for providing palliative care, and limited access to specialist palliative care. These barriers will only be magnified in the setting of a rapidly growing population of older COPD patients outpacing the limited palliative care workforce. 53 This is particularly concerning in rural areas where COPD is prevalent, and palliative care access is limited.54,55 Our cohort raised potential facilitators to address these concerns that included investing in novel models for palliative care delivery such as telehealth palliative care, expanding the workforce of pulmonary nurses trained in palliative care, and embedding palliative care specialists in clinic with pulmonary clinicians. Embedded models of palliative care are feasible and have been shown to improve outcomes for patients with advanced cancer and heart failure, although may not be feasible in rural areas.56–59 As part of the broader formative evaluation goal of our work, the data from this study informed the development of a nurse-led early palliative care intervention that could address many of the identified barriers and would be feasible across multiple settings. Nurse-led early palliative care models improved quality of life, mood, and survival in advanced cancer.9,60 These types of palliative care models directly align with the shift to value-based payment and are tangible facilitators on which to focus policy efforts.
Several limitations of this study are acknowledged. Although thematic saturation was achieved, the number of participants in this study is small and limited to clinicians practicing in the southeast. Further research exploring diverse samples of clinicians by race and gender nationwide is warranted. Finally, a survey strategy may have helped to better identify potential referral criteria for early palliative care in COPD, much as Duenk et al. conducted in a cohort of pulmonologists from the Netherlands. 15 However, that study left the objective of defining referral criteria unfulfilled, whereas our in-depth interviews identified priority criteria that could guide future research efforts.
Conclusion
Pulmonary and palliative care clinicians support early palliative care in COPD; however, educational, clinical, and operational barriers hinder implementation. The misconception by pulmonologists that palliative care is tantamount to end-of-life care, the concerns about opioids and benzodiazepines in COPD, and the difficulty in establishing prognostic awareness were significant barriers that could be addressed by broader educational efforts and expanded primary palliative care training in pulmonary medicine. We identified several facilitators, including innovative palliative care delivery models, which could improve early palliative care access in COPD. Finally, we identified several potential priority early palliative care referral criteria that could guide future research. The data from this study have guided the development of a nurse-led early palliative care intervention in COPD. 5
Footnotes
Funding Information
This research was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, which did not directly contribute to the study.
A.S.I. is supported by a University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Patient Centered Outcomes Research K12 (K12HS023009) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, a Palliative Research Enhancement Project pilot award from the UAB Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, and other support from the UAB Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education. J.N.D.O. is funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research (R00NR015903). C.J.B. is supported in part by a VA Rehabilitation R&D Scientific Merit Award (1I01RX001995). M.T.D. is supported by grants from NIH (1K24HL140108), Department of Defense, American Lung Association, contracted clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, PneumRx/BTG, Pulmonx, and reports consulting from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Mereo, and PneumRx/BTG. M.A.B. receives support from NR013665-01A1, NR011871-01, PCORI PLC-1609-36381, PLC-1609-36714.
Author Disclosure Statement
D.M.K., L.O.H., and R.O.T. have no conflicts to report.
