Abstract
Background:
Alcohol use is an extremely prevalent but preventable risk factor among women seeking to become pregnant. Many women continue to use alcohol in the early stages of pregnancy before they are aware they are pregnant. Research is unclear about the role of maternal alcohol use during pregnancy and congenital cardiac defects, one of the leading types of birth defects in the United States.
Methods:
Data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey (PRAMS) were used to examine maternal alcohol use and its association with congenital cardiac defects. Various measures of alcohol use in the 3 months prior to pregnancy, as well as smoking and other risk factors for congenital cardiac defects, were linked to birth certificate data for nine states over a 10-year period (1996–2005). In this case-control study, cases included infants with a congenital cardiac defect indicated on the birth certificate, and the control group consisted of healthy, normal weight infants with no indication of a congenital abnormality on their birth certificate. Complex samples logistic regression models were used to study the relationships between several measures of alcohol use, including binge drinking and binge drinking on more than once occasion, and the interaction between alcohol use and smoking with the odds of congenital cardiac defects.
Results:
A significant increase in congenital cardiac defects was found among mothers who reported binge drinking more than once in the 3 months prior to pregnancy compared to mothers who did not report binge drinking (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-7.51). There was a significant interaction between any binge drinking or binge drinking more than once and cigarette use, which corresponded to a substancial increase in congenital cardiac defects (aOR 12.65, 95% CI 3.54-45.25 and aOR 9.45, 95% CI 2.53-35.31, respectively).
Conclusions:
Multiple episodes of maternal binge drinking in early pregnancy may increase the odds of congenital cardiac defects, and we found this relationship was more dramatic when combined with maternal smoking.
Introduction
The use of alcohol among pregnant women continues to be a significant public health problem, with alcohol use during pregnancy linked to higher rates of numerous adverse infant health indices, including higher rates of infant morbidity and infant mortality and the associated heightened healthcare costs. 1 –5
In 2006, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health found that 53% of US women of childbearing age were current alcohol users (defined as at least one drink in the past 30 days), 24% were binge drinkers (defined as five or more drinks on the same occasion in the past 30 days), and 5% were heavy drinkers (defined as five or more drinks on the same occasion on five or more days of the past 30 days). The same study reported that among pregnant women, 11.8% were current alcohol users, 2.9% were binge drinkers, and 0.7 % were heavy drinkers. 6 Because alcohol and other substance use during the early stages of pregnancy, primarily before pregnancy recognition, is harmful to fetal development, these high rates of alcohol use and binge drinking among women of childbearing age are particularly troubling.
A number of studies have examined the role of alcohol use on the outcome of congenital cardiac defects, a group of anomalies that are among the most frequently occurring types of birth defects. To date, these studies have had conflicting findings. 1 –3 Many smaller case-control studies have not reported a significant association between maternal alcohol use or binge drinking in early pregnancy and congenital cardiac defects 7 –15 ; however, in a relatively large case-control study in Spain, a significant association was reported between women who were reported alcoholics and heavy drinkers (daily consumption of 500 mL or more of wine or 1000 mL or more of beer) and an increase in congenital cardiac defects (odds ratio [OR] 11.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-246.). 16 In addition, a prospective cohort study from Hungary of 24,732 births reported a significant association between regular alcohol use during pregnancy and congenital heart defects (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.3-5.3). 17
The purpose of this case-control study was to assess the association between various definitions of maternal alcohol use (i.e., amount of alcohol consumed, frequency of alcohol consumption, and episodes of binge drinking) around the time of early pregnancy/conception and the odds of congenital cardiac defects. In addition, as cigarette use is an established risk factor for alcohol use during pregnancy, we were particularly interested in examining the moderating effect of concurrent alcohol use and cigarette use during pregnancy and the outcome of congenital cardiac defects. 18 –22
Materials and Methods
Data collection
This study used data from multiple years of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), a large representative national dataset of behaviors before and during pregnancy administered to randomly selected mothers. Surveys are typically completed 3–6 months after birth. The 1996–2005 PRAMs data were linked to state birth certificates to obtain more specific pregnancy outcome information, primarily the outcomes of cardiac and other birth defects, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight. Detailed PRAMS methodology is described elsewhere; these data have been used extensively to measure behaviors among pregnant women and to examine the role of various behaviors and exposures on maternal and infant health. 23,24
In this study, state selection for inclusion was based on participation in PRAMS, an adequate state-specific PRAMS sample size requirement, and the estimated state-specific prevalence of congenital cardiac defects. The nine states included in this study were Rhode Island, Nebraska, Alaska, Illinois, South Carolina, Utah, Maine, Colorado, and Arkansas, given their ongoing, successful participation in PRAMS and the agreed contribution of state birth certificate data. Because PRAMS employs a systematic stratified and oversampling design, these data were weighted and adjusted for sample size, nonresponsiveness, and omissions per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-provided weighting methods. 25 A total of 129,153 linked PRAMS surveys and birth certificates from the 10-year period (1996–2005) were used to select the cases and controls for this study and to obtain the PRAMS-based alcohol and other risk factor information.
We used PRAMS survey items that measured alcohol use in the 3 months prior to pregnancy. These measures were used as a proxy for early pregnancy alcohol use; this strategy is consistent with previous research. 3,26,27 For this analysis, self-reported alcohol from PRAMS was used to create dichotomous variables to classify the frequency and intensity of alcohol use. For each of these, a response of “No” was considered the reference group. Any alcohol use (yes/no) was defined as self-reported alcohol use of 1 drink per week to 14 or more drinks per week; frequent drinking (yes/no) was defined as a self-reported average of 7 or more drinks per week; any binge drinking (yes/no) was defined as 5 alcoholic drinks or more in one setting; binge drinking more than once (yes/no) was defined as 5 alcoholic drinks or more in one setting that occurred more than once during the 3 months prior to pregnancy. Binge drinking and frequent drinking are subsets of any alcohol use, and binge drinking more than once is a subset of any binge drinking. Frequent drinking and binge drinking are not mutually exclusive but may point to differences in effects associated with frequency of alcohol use vs. effects associated with intensity of alcohol use.
The outcome of interest, congenital cardiac defects without mention of Down syndrome, was obtained from the state birth certificate data. Anomalies coded as heart malformations on the 1989 revision of the U.S. Birth Certificate and cyanotic congenital heart disease on the 2003 revision of the U.S. Birth Certificate were aggregated into one category of congenital cardiac defects. Although heterogeneous aggregation is not the optimal method of classification for a diverse range of cadiac defects, this is the approach most commonly used, given the relatively small number of events within each cardiac defect category. 9 –13,15,16 A total of 237 cases of congenital cardiac defects were selected for inclusion in this study.
The control group was selected randomly using the state birth certificate data, with eligible controls defined as normal weight (≥2500 g) live births with no indication of any congenital defects. For example, infants with any recorded birth defects, low birth weight (<2500 g), or preterm delivery (<37 weeks completed gestation) reported on the birth certificate were not eligible for selection into the control group. In this study, four controls were selected for each case, by state and year of birth. A total of 948 controls were selected for this study. Only singleton deliveries were included in both the case and control groups.
Potential confounders in this analysis that were collected in PRAMS include maternal age, race, ethnicity, marital status, socioeconomic status (SES), maternal psychosocial variables, and maternal reproductive health variables. SES was assessed using highest level of education as reported in PRAMS and reported insurance status before pregnancy (Medicaid, private, or neither). Mother's psychosocial state included measures of reported stress and pregnancy intention. Stress was assessed using a 13-item stressful life events inventory. 28 Pregnancy intention was measured by the self-reported response to: Thinking back to just before you got pregnant, how did you feel about becoming pregnant? A dichotomous classification of stress group (low, high) was used in the final models, and these groups were based on the median value of stress score (roughly 50% of the study sample had less than two stressors, and 50% had two or more stressors). Mother's reproductive health was assessed by gravidity and the number of previous terminations reported in PRAMS. Reported diabetes or hypertension during pregnancy and prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) were used as an assessment of maternal health. Infant gender was also included as a potential confounder. Gestational age and birth weight were not included in the multivariable models, as they were exclusion criteria for the control group.
The primary effect modifier of interest was reported maternal cigarette use. A number of studies have found an association between maternal smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy. 19 –21 Similar to reported alcohol use, reported cigarette use in the 3 months prior to pregnancy, as collected in PRAMS, was used as the dichotomous assessment of cigarette use during early pregnancy (yes/no).
Statistical methods
Because PRAMS employs a systematic stratified sampling design, the data were weighted. Each variable was examined in the unweighted dataset for missing data with a 10% criterion set for exclusion. None of the variables contained missing data at a frequency of >10%.
Demographics (maternal age, maternal race/ethnicity, marital status), SES (educational attainment in years, insurance status before pregnancy), maternal psychosocial state (pregnancy intention, stress level), maternal reproductive history (gravidity, previous terminations), and maternal health variables (smoking, diabetes, hypertension, BMI) found to be related to congenital cardiac defects in the univariate were entered into a binomial logistic regression model to examine the independent relationship between various measures of alcohol use and congenital cardiac defects. Logistic regression models were constructed separately for each of the alcohol use measures with a priori independent variables of interest (maternal age, race, ethnicity, and marital status). All variables entered into initial main effects binary logistic regression models were examined for relative importance and whether any of the variables were multicollinear. Changes of <10% in the coefficients were deemed to be insignificant, and, therefore, removal of the variable was appropriate. If coefficients varied by >10%, the variable was retained in the model because of its possible effect on other variables in the model. A test for the interaction between alcohol use and smoking in the 3 months prior to pregnancy was completed in an adjusted logistic regression model, and after a significant interaction, a stratified analysis by smoking/nonsmoking status controlling for maternal age was conducted to determine the odds of congenital cardiac defect, given this behavioral interaction. SPSS 16.0 Complex Samples was used to perform the weighted data analyses.
Results
In the unadjusted models, self-reported alcohol use in the 3 months prior to pregnancy was not related to the odds of congenital cardiac defects. No significant differences between cases of congenital cardiac defects and healthy controls were noted for the measures of alcohol use in the 3 months prior to pregnancy (yes/no), binge drinking in the 3 months prior to pregnancy (yes/no), binge drinking more than once in the 3 months prior to pregnancy (yes/no), or frequent drinking in the three months prior to pregnancy (yes/no) (Table 1). In addition, as shown in Table 1, none of the potential risk factors were significantly different between the case and control groups, including reported cigarette use.
BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference.
Although any binge drinking during the 3 months prior to pregnancy was not independently related to the odds of congenital cardiac defect in the adjusted models, there was a significant interaction between any reported binge drinking and reported smoking (p<0.01) in the final adjusted model (Table 2). This final model adjusted for maternal age, maternal race, ethnicity, marital status, insurance status, and maternal stress. Smoking was not independently related to congenital cardiac defects in this model.
Smoking and binge drinking (in the 3 months prior to pregnancy).
Model includes any binge drinking, smoking, maternal age, maternal race, maternal ethnicity, maternal marital status, insurance, and stress.
Model includes any binge drinking and smoking interaction term, maternal age, maternal race, maternal ethnicity, maternal marital status, insurance, and stress.
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; uOR, unadjusted odds ratio.
Stratifying by reported smoking status revealed very interesting findings. A significant odds of congenital cardiac defects was found among mothers who reported both cigarette smoking and any binge drinking in the 3 months prior to pregnancy compared to those mothers who only smoked but did not binge drink in the 3 months prior to pregnancy (OR 12.65, 95% CI 3.54-45.25) (Table 3). Among mothers who did not smoke, we did not find an increase in congenital cardiac defects.
Adjusted for maternal age.
Smoking and binge drinking (in the 3 months prior to pregnancy).
When examining multiple episodes of binge drinking, the odds of congenital cardiac defects among women reporting binge drinking more than once in the 3 months prior to pregnancy was significant in the adjusted model (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.19-7.51) (Table 4). A significant interaction between smoking and binge drinking more than once was also noted in this adjusted model (p<0.01). Surprisingly, the odds of congenital cardiac defects among women reporting smoking was protective in the final multivariate model (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.84) (Table 4).
Smoking and binge drinking more than once (in the 3 months prior to pregnancy).
Model includes any binge drinking more than once, smoking, maternal age, maternal race, maternal ethnicity, maternal marital status, insurance, and stress.
Model includes any binge drinking more than once and smoking interaction term, maternal age, maternal race, maternal ethnicity, maternal marital status, insurance, and stress.
The analysis stratifying by reported smoking status and controlling for maternal age continued to revealed a significantly increased odds of congenital cardiac defects among mothers who reported both smoking and binge drinking more than once in the 3 months prior to pregnancy compared to mothers who only reported smoking in the 3 months prior to pregnancy (OR 9.45, 95% CI 2.53-35.31) (Table 5). Among mothers who did not smoke, there were no significantly increased odds of congenital cardiac defects.
Adjusted for maternal age.
Smoking and binge drinking more than once in the 3 months prior to pregnancy.
Discussion
Using multiple years of a large, nationally representative sample of reproductive-age women, we found a significant association between multiple episodes of binge drinking in the 3 months prior to pregnancy and congenital cardiac defects, with a 3-fold increase in congenital cardiac defect cases among women who binge drink multiple times during early pregnancy. Additionally, we found a substantial interaction between women who binge drink and use cigarettes early in pregnancy, with a >12 fold increased odds of congenital cardiac defects among mothers who report any binge drinking and concurrent smoking and a >9-fold increased odds of congenital cardiac defects among mothers who report multiple episodes of binge drinking and concurrent smoking during early pregnancy. These findings point to a potential relationship between binge drinking and, most importantly, binge drinking and concurrent smoking during the early stages of pregnancy and congenital cardiac defects.
The interaction between binge drinking and cigarette use in early pregnancy is synergistic and biologically plausible, illustrating the harmful relationship between frequent exposures to multiple carcinogens and teratogens (i.e., alcohol and cigarette use) during critical periods of early fetal development and the potential risk of congenital cardiac defects. 29 –32 This interactive effect was not found among any alcohol use alone, which points to the particular relationship between high, intermittent amounts of alcohol use, characteristic of binge drinking, and concurrent tobacco use in early pregnancy on the development of congenital cardiac defects. Potentially, a threshold exists in the first few weeks of fetal life in which exposure to alcohol in high levels in combination with cigarettes may inhibit or alter crucial biologic processes necessary for proper cardiac and circulatory development. 33 –35
Limited studies have examined the role of binge drinking on other adverse pregnancy or child health outcomes. A longitudinal study of maternal binge drinking in the period before pregnancy found an increase in infant neurobehavior deficits. 36 In other studies, binge drinking has been associated with developmental changes in infant electroencephalograms, 37 longer infant hospital stays, 38 and decreased infant head circumference, 39 but a study of occasional binge drinking among moderate drinkers found no association between binge drinking and infant birth weight, length, head circumference, gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction, or Apgar scores. 39 Another study found that alcohol use at higher levels, particularly heavy use and binge drinking, was associated with increased risk of preterm birth even when drinking is stopped before the second trimester. 40 Among childhood outcomes, the effect of binge drinking independent of average alcohol intake has been found to be associated with learning disabilities, deficits in attention and memory, and problem solving at age 7 years, 41,42 but most studies have shown little or no effect of binge drinking on other health outcomes. 43 –46 Much of these null or inconsistent findings may be related to the reported timing of binge drinking exposure, with the information on binge drinking not measuring alcohol use during the highly susceptible period of early pregnancy. 34,47
In this study, we did not find reported smoking to be a significant, independent risk factor for congenital cardiac defects; however, others have noted a positive relationship. Alverson et al. 29 reported positive associations between first trimester maternal cigarette consumption and the risk of asecundum-type atrial setal defects (OR 1.36, CI 1.04-1.78), right ventricular outflow tract defects (OR 1.35, CI 1.05-1.74), truncus arteriosus (OR 1.90, CI 1.04-3.45), and levo transmission of the great arteries (OR 1.79, CI 1.04-3.10). Malik et al. 18 found heavy maternal smoking (25 or more cigarettes per day) during pregnancy was associated with both septal and right-sided obstructive defects (OR 2.06, CI 1.20-3.45 and OR 2.35, CI 1.21-4.53, respectively). Kuciene and Dulskiene, 48 reviewing studies from Ferencz et al. 49 and Torfs and Christianson 50 of risk factors for congenital cardiac defects, found smoking to be associated with several isolated cardiac defects—pulmonic stenosis (OR 12.5, CI 3.2-49.4), transposition with ventricular septal defect (OR 2.1, CI 1.2-3.9), atrioventricular canal defects (OR 2.3, CI 1.2-4.5), and atrial septal defects (CI 2.2, CI 1.1-4.3). To date, however, the evidence supporting an independent, causal relationship between smoking and congenital cardiac defects is still limited. In this study, positive report of smoking was defined as any smoking in the 3 months prior to pregnancy, and early prenatal exposure to cigarette smoking was inferred using this question. In future studies, the intensity, duration, and frequency of smoking both before and during early pregnancy should be measured. It is possible that a more valid assessment of prenatal smoking behavior in future studies may reveal a threshold or independent dose-response relationship with congenital cardiac defects.
Potential limitations exist in this study related to the use of birth certificates for case ascertainment and to the measurement of alcohol use, binge drinking, and smoking using PRAMS data. The reliability and validity of birth certificates may vary by state, but the extent of this variation is not known. However, we believe that the cases identified through birth certificates include the most severe cases of congenital cardiac defects and represent the cases with the highest rate of subsequent morbidity and mortality.
The reliance on self-report to classify frequency of alcohol use, binge drinking, and smoking among pregnant women may influence the study findings. Whitehead and Lipscomb 3 used PRAMS alcohol use data in a study of small for gestational age (SGA) births and found that respondents' interpretation of the PRAMS alcohol use questions varied. When asked about average drinks per week, women may have reported the number of drinks they often consumed on a daily basis rather than the mean number of drinks per week. The authors also noted that women were sometimes confused about the time frame for the 3 months prior to pregnancy. Some women interpreted this time period as the 3 months before conception, whereas other women interpreted this as the 3 months prior to pregnancy recognition. We hypothesize that reliance on self-report to classify alcohol use and binge drinking in this study may cause a nondifferential underestimate of binge drinking in both the case and control groups and subsequently diminish the true relationship between binge drinking and congenital cardiac defects. As we found a significant increase in cardiac defects given reported binge drinking during multiple occasions in the early parts of pregnancy, we posit that these findings are an underestimate of the true relationship between binge drinking and congenital cardiac defects. In the future, studies that use data incorporating a more refined classification of alcohol use and binge drinking and biologic confirmation of alcohol use through urine samples will generate a more precise evaluation of the role of binge drinking in congenital cardiac defects.
The quantification of alcohol use and binge drinking in this study may be subject to recall bias, with women with infants with congenital cardiac defects and the control group differentially recalling their reported use of alcohol and binge drinking during early pregnancy. Recall bias is a limitation that often accompanies case-control studies, particularly case-control studies that rely primarily on self-report to classify exposure. In this situation, women with infants with congenital cardiac defects may be less likely to report their alcohol use or binge drinking, given the stigma related to alcohol use during pregnancy. If this type of differential recall bias did exist, an underreporting of alcohol use and binge drinking in the case group would occur, resulting in an underreporting of the true odds ratio. Thus, our significant findings of a positive relationship between binge drinking and congenital cardiac defects may be an underrepresentation of the true relationship. In contrast, if the cases in this study are more likely to overreport their binge drinking or the controls are less likely to report their binge drinking, the study findings may overrepresent the true relationship between binge drinking and congenital cardiac defects. We believe, given the biologic plausibility of the relationship between early pregnancy exposure to binge drinking and cardiac defects and the recent findings from other studies recognizing the role of binge drinking in other adverse pregnancy and child health outcomes, the overreporting of binge drinking in the case group or the underreporting of binge drinking in the control group is minimal.
The PRAMS survey collects information on alcohol use, binge drinking, and cigarette use during the 3 months prior to pregnancy and during the last 3 months of pregnancy. Because we were interested in examining the outcome of congenital cardiac defects, which occur during embryogenesis, we used responses to questions about the 3 months prior to pregnancy as a proxy for early pregnancy exposure to binge drinking and smoking. Thus, the results of this study are limited to the extent to which behaviors of early pregnancy mirror those occurring before pregnancy recognition. Others have used these same PRAMS questions to estimate early pregnancy exposures. 3 As many episodes of binge drinking during early pregnancy occur before recognition of pregnancy, these questions may be a very accurate approximation of reported binge drinking and smoking in the earliest stages of pregnancy. Finally, as PRAMS data do not differentiate between the types of alcoholic beverage consumed (beer, wine, or liquor), we were unable to determine if different types of alcohol may have produced different effects on the odds of congenital cardiac defects.
These findings, which point to an increased odds of congenital cardiac defects among women who binge drink during the early periods of pregnancy, may be a function of other factors that coexist with binge drinking during early pregnancy, such as poor maternal health, dietary deficiencies, or other types of substance use. Future studies examining the early pregnancy contributors to congenital cardiac defects should examine the contribution of these other factors during early pregnancy.
In conclusion, the present study used a large sample of nationally representative PRAMS data from nine U.S. states during the years1996–2005 to assess the possible association among alcohol consumption, binge drinking during early pregnancy, and congenital cardiac defects. The findings indicate an increased odds of congenital cardiac defects among women who report multiple episodes of binge drinking in the early stages of pregnancy and a highly significant increase in congenital cardiac defects among women reporting multiple episodes of binge drinking and concurrent smoking during early pregnancy. The results indicate that binge drinking and smoking may act synergistically to increase the odds of congenital heart defects. Over the years, the public health community has made strides in educating women of childbearing age about the hazards of smoking during pregnancy, but further education highlighting the prevalence of binge drinking among women of childbearing age and the risks associated with binge drinking alone or binge drinking in combination with cigarette smoking needs to be developed.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The PRAMS Working Group was instrumental in reviewing the original proposal and providing suggestions for refining the study.
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
