Abstract
Abstract
Background and Aims:
Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy in patients undergoing bariatric surgery is controversial. It is recommended routinely by some authors to detect benign or malignant pathology that mostly remains asymptomatic. Others recommend selective use, suggesting not much impact on surgical management of detected pathology, especially in asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and impact of pathological findings on routine UGI endoscopy before bariatric surgery in a cohort of morbidly obese Indian patients.
Materials and Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed preoperative screening UGI endoscopy reports of 283 patients who underwent bariatric surgery from February 2012 to August 2014. Data were collected on clinical information, UGI endoscopic findings, Helicobacter pylori testing, and management.
Results:
Ten patients gave a history of gastroesophageal reflux, and the rest had no specific UGI complaints. Fifty-four had no abnormal findings. One hundred ninety-six had a lax lower esophageal hiatus, hiatal hernias of <5 cm, Grade I–II esophagitis, or mild to moderate gastritis or duodenitis that did not have an impact on surgery. Thirty-one had severe erosive gastritis or duodenitis, or polyposis that delayed surgery for treatment and review of biopsies. A large hiatal hernia >5 cm changed surgical plan to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from a sleeve gastrectomy in 2 cases. None had varices or malignancy.
Conclusions:
Preoperative UGI endoscopy yielded a high proportion of endoscopic abnormalities even in asymptomatic patients. Surgery was delayed to treat severe mucosal lesions and to investigate polypoidal findings in the majority. A change in surgical approach and surveillance for malignancy was needed in a few cases.
Introduction
R
However, some authors have pointed out that most pathological findings discovered on routine UGI endoscopy will have a low impact on surgical management, especially in asymptomatic patients, and may lead to unnecessary work-up prompted by endoscopic findings adding on to cost. 2
With this study we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical implications of pathological findings on routine UGI endoscopy before bariatric surgery in a cohort of morbidly obese Indian patients.
Materials and Methods
Study population
A retrospective review of preoperative screening UGI endoscopy reports of 283 patients who underwent bariatric surgery from February 2012 to August 2014 was performed. As this was a retrospective study, consent of the hospital ethics committee was not required.
Surgical procedures
At our institution all patients selected for bariatric surgery are required to meet National Institutes of Health guidelines for eligibility for bariatric surgery: have a body mass index of >40 kg/m2 or >35 kg/m2 with comorbidities, report unsuccessful attempts of weight loss or maintenance, show continued motivation to lose weight, have a realistic weight loss goal postsurgery, and understand the risks, benefits, and expected weight loss from the surgery and the importance of careful postoperative follow-up. Surgical weight loss operations were carried out by the laparoscopic approach in all patients. The bariatric surgeries included in this study were the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the sleeve gastrectomy.
Endoscopy
UGI endoscopy was performed by experienced endoscopists without or with sedation if requested by the patient. If pathological findings were identified, a biopsy specimen was taken from the suspicious area for histological examination. Tissue biopsy specimens were systematically taken from the corpus and antrum to determine Helicobacter pylori status using a commercial available urease test kit for H. pylori in all patients.
Data collection
Data were collected by reviewing medical records. Preoperative data collected included age, gender, anthropometrics, UGI symptoms, endoscopic findings, and result of H. pylori testing.
Endoscopic data classification based on clinical implications
Findings were reviewed by experienced endoscopists and classified into four groups based on clinical implications as previously described by Sharaf et al. 6 except for a few modifications as detailed below.
Lax esophageal hiatus or a hiatal hernia of <5 cm was included in Group 1. No specific intervention or change in approach was advised for the former finding, and the presence of the latter finding changed our surgical approach to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (in the original study hiatal hernias of any size were included in Group 2). Here hiatal hernias of >5 cm were included in Group 2.
Classification
1. Group 0: no findings, normal study.
2. Group 1: abnormal findings that do not change the surgical approach or postpone surgery, such as mild esophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis, esophageal web, lax esophageal hiatus, or a hiatal hernia of <5 cm.
3. Group 2: abnormal findings that change the surgical approach or postpone surgery, such as severe erosive esophagitis, gastritis, and duodenitis, peptic ulcers, polyps, Barrett's esophagus, peptic stricture, esophageal diverticula, arteriovenous malformation, or hiatal hernias of >5 cm.
4. Group 3: absolute contraindications to surgery, such as UGI cancers and varices.
Results
The patients included in this study included 164 females and 119 males, with a mean age of 42.30±12.49 years (range, 14–75 years) and mean body mass index of 43.80±8.5 kg/m2. There were 209 sleeve gastrectomies and 74 Roux-en-Y bypasses performed.
Symptomatology
The majority of the patients were asymptomatic, having no specific UGI symptoms. Ten patients gave a history of gastroesophageal reflux.
Endoscopic findings
Endoscopic findings were reported as normal in 54 patients. In the rest of the 230 patients (81%), abnormal findings on endoscopy were detected as listed in Table 1.
H. pylori status
H. pylori status was determined in all patients, and 61 patients (21%) tested positive. Among those with a positive test, UGI endoscopy was reported as normal in 11 patients (18%) and abnormal in 50 patients (82%). All patients were treated with H. pylori eradication. The success of H. pylori eradication was not reassessed.
Clinical implications of abnormal findings
Group 0 or 1
One hundred ninety-six patients had Group 1 endoscopic findings that did not change surgical approach or postpone surgery. These included lax lower esophageal sphincters, hiatal hernias of <5 cm, Grade I–II esophagitis, and mild to moderate gastritis or duodenitis.
Group 2
Thirty-three patients had Group 2 endoscopic findings that postponed surgery or changed the surgical approach. These included 19 with severe erosive gastritis, 9 with severe erosive duodenitis, 9 with gastric polyposis, and 1 with duodenal polyps that delayed surgery for treatment and review of biopsies. Two patients had a large hiatal hernia of >5 cm with gastroesophageal reflux, and 1 patient had Barrett's esophagus with gastroesophageal reflux that changed the surgical plan to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from a sleeve gastrectomy.
All patients with severe erosive gastritis or duodenitis were treated with a 2-week therapy of proton pump inhibitors. Healing was not reassessed endoscopically (which was routinely done only for gastroduodenal peptic ulcers).
Ten patients were found to have polyposis. One patient with two duodenal polyps on endoscopy was found to have a carcinoid tumor on biopsy. The tumor was excised completely endoscopically. Chromogranin and gastrin levels were normal. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan and edotreotide (DOTATOC) scan showed no lymph nodal or distal spread confirmed intraoperatively. The patient has been kept under a surveillance program. One patient had a single gastric polyp that was diagnosed as a benign hyperplastic polyp after being excised completely endoscopically. The remaining 8 patients were found to have benign fundic polyps. They were excised along with the specimen if a sleeve gastrectomy was performed and left in situ in bypass patients.
Group 3
No patient had Group 3 findings of varices or malignancy contraindicating surgery.
H. plyori status
In all H. pylori–positive patients with mucosal lesions (Group1 and Group 2), clinical implications were decided based on endoscopic findings. All were prescribed a 7-day eradication therapy (amoxicillin, 750 mg twice a day; clarithromycin, 500 mg twice a day; and omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily/pantoprazole, 40 mg twice daily).
Discussion
The rationale for performing an UGI endoscopy before bariatric surgery is to detect and treat UGI lesions that might cause symptoms or complications in the postoperative period or to detect lesions that may need a change in bariatric procedure performed. Our institutional policy is to perform routine preoperative UGI endoscopy in all patients prior to bariatric surgery. Some suggest symptom-directed UGI endoscopy as in the general population.1,2 However, no correlation has been shown in the occurrence of symptoms and significant pathological findings on endoscopy in a number of observational studies on routine endoscopy before bariatric surgery. The majority of lesions occur in asymptomatic patients, as were the finding in our study also.3–6 This high incidence of UGI lesions (81% in our series) that lacks correlation with symptoms has been the basis of most guidelines suggesting routine endoscopy and screening preoperatively in bariatric surgery patients.9,10 However, some authors have pointed out that pathological findings discovered will have a low impact on surgical management, especially in asymptomatic patients, and may lead to secondary unnecessary work-up adding on to cost. 2
In this study patients with normal findings or milder mucosal inflammatory lesions (mild to moderate esophagitis, gastritis, or duodenitis) or mild anatomical abnormalities (lax lower esophageal sphincter, hiatal hernias of <5 cm) proceeded with surgery as previously planned. Patients with severe erosive gastritis or duodenitis were treated with proton pump inhibitors for 2 weeks, needing delay of surgery. There were no gastroduodenal ulcers detected in this series. If present, these require treatment with proton pump inhibitors for 4 weeks with reassessment by UGI endoscopy to confirm mucosal healing. We diagnosed 1 case of Barrett's esophagus in this series in whom surgical approach was changed to Roux-en-Y bypass with enrollment into a screening program as reported in other studies also. 2 Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most effective and advantageous treatment option for gastroesophageal reflux disease and hence Barrett's esophagus in the morbidly obese patients because it treats gastroesophageal reflux disease effectively and provides the additional benefit of weight loss. 11
All patients with polyposis in this series were biopsied for histopathological confirmation of diagnosis. Eight were found to have benign fundic polyposis. These polyps were excised along with the specimen if a sleeve gastrectomy was performed and left in situ in bypass patients. Gastric fundic gland polyps that are nonfamilial are associated with a very low or no risk of malignancy and hence are not usually resected. 12 Azagury et al. 2 performed subtotal gastrectomy if a Roux-en-Y bypass was planned as the fundic polyposis lesion would be without surveillance in a bypassed stomach, but there are no data to support this radical strategy. It may be advisable in polyps with greater risk of malignant degeneration (e.g., adenomatous, hamartomatous polyps, etc.). One patient having two duodenal polyps was found to have a carcinoid tumor on biopsy. The tumor was excised completely endoscopically, and the patient has been kept on a surveillance program after sleeve gastrectomy. Although rare, carcinoid tumors appear to be more frequent among obese patients. Keshishian et al. 13 and Mottin et al. 14 noticed a high incidence of carcinoid in obese patients (1.5%) compared with the general population, a finding underling the importance of screening endoscopy. Obesity has been implicated in the pathogenesis of these tumors. Some series have reported detection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, which may be excised at the time of the bariatric procedure with adequate margins. 15 Malignancy may be uncommon but if suspected needs additional evaluation. 16
Performance of a sleeve gastrectomy in the presence of a hiatal hernia and/or gastroesophageal reflux is controversial. Some studies have reported exacerbation of gastroesophageal reflux disease in some or de novo reflux in others, whereas some have reported not much influence on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Some authors have suggested that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the best bariatric surgical procedure for obese patients with hiatal hernia. Others have suggested that patients can also be safely offered sleeve gastrectomy if combined with a simultaneous hiatus hernia repair. 17 Large hiatal hernias found at endoscopy may thus need the addition of hiatal hernia repair at sleeve gastrectomy or change of the surgical approach to a Roux-en-Y bypass,17,18 with the latter done in 2 patients in this series.
All patients positive for H. pylori were treated with eradication and therapy with proton pump inhibitors. The prevalence of H. pylori in the Indian subcontinent can be as high as 80%, especially in rural areas. 19 The pathogen most commonly manifests as peptic ulcer disease. It may contribute to marginal ulcers after surgery, but its role is still unclear. 20 Studies not routinely eradicating H. pylori infections prior to surgery have reported an increased incidence and association of this infection with early postoperative foregut symptoms. 21 Also, several epidemiological studies in India have shown a high incidence of gastric cancer in South India compared with North India with a definite association between H. pylori and gastric cancer in approximately 50% of patients.22,23 In the rest it may still play a role by acting as a cocarcinogen. 24 Atrophic pangastritis in these infected patients is the main precursor lesion associated with gastric cancer. 25 This increased risk of gastric cancer may be of further concern in the stomach remnant of the gastric bypass as this would not be accessible for screening. We routinely eradicate H. pylori infection in all patients prior to bariatric surgery because of concerns of peptic ulceration and gastric cancer as seen in the general Indian population after chronic infection, although supporting data are lacking in the literature.
In conclusion, preoperative routine UGI endoscopy yielded a high proportion of endoscopic abnormalities. In a few of these cases, findings led to a change in surgical approach. In the majority, however, these findings did not affect the actual operative management, although medical management was required, without which these lesions could have potentially led to postoperative symptoms and complications. In a few cases, postoperative surveillance for malignancy was recommended. Preoperative UGI endoscopy in all patients before bariatric surgery should be performed regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms, and pathological findings have an impact on the course of management.
Footnotes
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
