Abstract

Y
Jalil et al. 1 have reported on the medium-term quality of life outcomes of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair using a laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach and a validated, hernia-specific questionnaire. Although the reported prevalence of severe or disabling symptoms following TAPP inguinal hernia repair seems to be low, the numbers of patients reporting mild to moderate pain, movement limitations, and sensation of mesh are likely much higher than many of us care to admit.
Although some may argue that it is the use of mesh that is causing an increase in pain and discomfort following inguinal hernia repair, 2 it is most likely that until recently we have not had the tools or the desire to evaluate this potential problem. Newer validated hernia quality of life questionnaires such as the Carolinas Comfort Scale 3 and HerQles 4 have allowed surgeons to ask our hernia patients the right questions. Although recurrence will always be an important outcome measure for hernia repair, we are now becoming more in tune with the implications of hernia repair on our patient's quality of life. The work by Jalil et al. 1 and others is a huge first step in evaluating important quality of life outcomes in our hernia patients so that we can quantify the problem and hopefully find ways to impact it in a positive way.
