Abstract
The background of quinolone resistance was characterized in ciprofloxacin-resistant commensal Escherichia coli selected out of 3,551 isolates from slaughtered animals in Poland between 2009 and 2012. Plasmid-mediated determinants were suspected in 6.2% of the study group, ranging from 1.1% in cattle to 9.7% in turkeys. Polymerase chain reaction and sequencing identified up to four quinolone resistance-determining substitutions in gyrA (Ser83, Asp87) and parC (Ala56, Ser80). Plasmid-mediated mechanisms were identified as qnrS1 (or qnrS3, n=70, including six isolates with chromosomal mutations), qnrB19 (or qnrB10, n=19), and qnrB17 (n=1). All tested isolates were negative for qnrA, qnrC, qnrD, qepA, and aac(6′)-Ib-cr. Still, there were several E. coli suspected for both plasmid- and chromosome-mediated resistance with unrevealed genetic background of the phenomenon. Since all tested isolates showed diverse XbaI-PFGE profiles, chromosome-encoded quinolone resistance does not result from the spread of a single resistant clone, however, it is rather due to antimicrobial pressure leading to the selection of random gyr and par mutants. It also favors the selection and spread of plasmids carrying predominant qnr genes, since the same determinants were found in Salmonella, isolated from similar sources. The identification of carrier plasmids and mitigation of their spread might be essential for sustainable quinolone usage in animal husbandry and efficient protection of human health.
Introduction
T
Low dosage and favorable pharmacokinetics, resulted in wide usage of fluoroquinolones in humans and animals.4,9 Being excreted during treatment mostly as active compounds, their biological action is not limited to the therapeutic site, however, it is moved further as resistance selection pressure into the environment. 8 These feature interplays with the chromosomal mutations causing propagation and subsequent spread of quinolone-resistant bacteria. 4 Our previous study 20 has shown that antimicrobial resistance is an ever-evolving issue driven by pressure of antimicrobial usage in animals. Nonpathogenic Escherichia coli of animal origin may act as a reservoir of resistance genes for other bacteria, including pathogens. 3
Although no temporal trends were noted, the baseline study 20 indicated on the complex and multivariable nature of (fluoro)quinolone resistance in indicator E. coli and the need for knowledge on its genetic background. Therefore, to fulfill some of the identified knowledge gaps, the current study aimed at the detection and characterization of quinolone resistance mechanisms in a broad range of commensal E. coli, isolated from food animals in Poland.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial isolates
Antimicrobial resistance monitoring of indicator E. coli was implemented in broilers, laying hens, turkeys, cattle, and swine slaughtered in Poland between 2009 and 2012. The design of the monitoring scheme, animal populations, and methods was described previously. 20 Shortly, on the average, 178 (155–199) isolates were obtained yearly from each of the studied animal populations with classical bacteriological methods (direct streak of faecal material on MacConkey agar followed by biochemical identification). A total of 3,551 indicator E. coli were tested with the broth microdilution method (Sensititre®; TREK D. S.) to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 14 antimicrobials followed by interpretation according to the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing epidemiological cut-off values and clinical breakpoints. The current study was focused on nalidixic acid (Nal) and ciprofloxacin (Cip) results. Based on the MIC values (Table 1), two groups of isolates were selected for characterization of resistance mechanisms: the QRDR group consisting of 61 E. coli arbitrary chosen from 2011 isolates of all five animal production types and conferring a broad range of quinolone resistance (MICNal≥64 mg/L, MICCip 0.125–>8 mg/L) and thus suspected for QRDR alterations; the PMQR group gathering 121 PMQR-suspected E. coli with MICNal=4–32 mg/L and MICCip≥0.064 mg/L. 16 The recent group embraced most of 2009–2011 isolates from all five animal production types, but not the 2012 E. coli.
Epidemiological and clinical criteria were used to show prevalence of nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin nonwild-type populations (NWT) and ciprofloxacin resistance (R). Dark-shadowed zone designates isolates suspected for the presence of plasmid-mediated mechanisms (n=219, 6.2%); pale-shadowed frame embraces isolates suspected for QRDR alternations.
MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; QRDR, quinolone resistance determining region; S, ciprofloxacin susceptibility; WT, wild-type population.
Laboratory testing
MICNal and MICCip were reevaluated against epidemiological cut-offs and clinical breakpoints (Table 1) to reveal the prevalence of microbiological and clinical resistance (nonwild-type and R populations, respectively).
Plasmid-mediated mechanisms (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, qepA, and aac(6′)-Ib-cr) were tested in both groups of E. coli: suspected for PMQR and QRDR substitutions. Mutations of chromosomal genes (gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE) were tested in 52 isolates representing the latter category. Resistance determinants were identified with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in 25 μl mixtures consisting of Maxima® Hot Start PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific–Fermentas), primers (50 mM), and bacterial boiling lysate (1 μl). All but one primer pair as well as temperature profiles have already been reported and listed elsewhere. 19 A new primer pair was designed (59F: 5′-ATGGCTCTGGCACTCGTTG-3′ and 58R: 5′-CGATGCCTGGTAGTTGTCCA-3′) to differentiate between few inconclusive qnrB sequences. The relevant amplicons were sequenced (Oligo, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland). Reverse and forward nucleotide sequences were aligned with SeqMan Pro (DNAStar Lasergene), analyzed with MEGA5 software (Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics), and deposited in the GenBank (accession numbers: gyrA: KJ136263–KJ136314, parC: KJ136315–KJ136366, parE: KJ136367–KJ136418, qnrB10/B19: KJ136419–KJ136436, qnrB17: KJ136494, qnrS1/S3: KJ136437–KJ136493).
XbaI Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PulseNet protocol) was performed as described elsewhere 19 on a subset of 52 E. coli representing various QRDR alterations (n=27) or PMQR (n=25) mechanisms (Fig. 1).

Phylogenetic similarity of Escherichia coli (n=52) isolated from different animal production groups (Source) from various geographical settings (Area code), with diverse quinolone resistance mechanisms: PMQR, plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance; QRDR, amino-acid substitutions in the quinolone resistance determining region of topoisomerases encoding genes; WT, wild-type gene.
For basic statistical analysis χ2 test and 95% confidence intervals were applied.
Results
Clinical ciprofloxacin resistance was recorded in 19.2% of tested E. coli (Table 1), whereas nonwild-type populations accounted for 40.3% (Cip) and 35.7% (Nal). Up to 6.2% isolates with elevated MICCip but MICNal≤32 mg/L represented PMQR-suspected population. The prevalence of that resistance phenotype varied by source of isolation (χ2, p≤0.001, Table 2) reaching the lowest values in cattle (1.1%) and the highest in turkey isolates (9.7%). Although 75 out of 219 PMQR-suspected isolates (34.2%) were retrieved in 2012, the increase over the study period was not significant (χ2, p>0.05). Of 121 tested PMQR-suspected E. coli, 20 isolates carried qnrB (16.5%), 64 qnrS (52.9%), while the remaining 37 (30.6%) were found negative to all tested targets. Furthermore, seven (11.5%) qnrS-positive isolates were identified within the QRDR group (n=61). Sequencing of qnrS amplicons (n=70, including six from the QRDR group) identified the allele as qnrS1 (or qnrS3, the amplicon too short to differentiate). They were found in E. coli from all tested animal sources (cattle, n=2; pigs and layers, n=13 each; broilers and turkeys, n=21 each). In contrast, qnrB19 (or qnrB10; n=19) occurred only in poultry (4, 5, and 10 in broilers, turkeys, and layers, respectively) and single qnrB17 was found in the laying hen isolate. Few of those isolates have been reported previously. 16 None of the PMQR-suspected isolates conferred resistance to third-generation cephalosporin, although seven E. coli within the current study group 20 were positive for blaCTX-M (n=6) or blaCMY-2 (n=1) (data not shown).
PMQR, plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance.
Amplification and sequencing of QRDR revealed relevant substitutions of two amino acids in both GyrA and ParC subunits (Table 3). The most frequent alteration was observed in GyrA (Ser83→Leu, n=44). Asp87 of GyrA (n=30) and Ser80 in parC (n=28) were substituted with various amino acids, occasionally resulting from different codons. Finally, Ala56→Thr substitution in ParC was recorded in three isolates. Altogether 14 patterns comprising up to four substitutions resulted in MICCip shift. Two or more substitutions were observed in 26 out of 30 isolates showing clinically resistant MICCip values.
No substitutions were found in gyrB. Source of E. coli isolation (B, broilers; C, cattle; T, turkeys; L, laying hens; S, swine). Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (qnrS1/S3) presence was indicated.
TTG; bAAC; cGGC; dTAC; eAGA; fATC; gATT (outside the QRDR region); hGAA; iAGG; jATT (n=1T); kACC.
Each of the 52 tested E. coli carrying various plasmid- or/and chromosome-mediated quinolone resistance mechanisms showed unique XbaI-PFGE profile with phylogenetic similarity ranging from 60.0% to 90.9% (Fig. 1).
Discussion
The reports from various parts of the world indicate the significant scope of quinolone resistance in E. coli and point out differences depending on the source of isolation. Over the last decade, it was found in human and animal sources in countries as distant as Turkey 2 and South Korea, 12 or with a different approach to antimicrobial usage in animals such as the US 14 and Denmark. 1 In our previous report, its prevalence in Poland ranging from 3.5% in cattle up to 61.5% in turkey and 80.8% in broilers was explained with antimicrobial consumption and usage preferences. 20 Built on that, the current study identified multiple (fluoro)quinolone resistance backgrounds. A stepwise phenomenon, affecting intially gyrA and then parC genes as a secondary target to reach clinical ciprofloxacin resistance,12,14 was observed in most of the isolates. All the observed QRDR substitutions have already been reported with variable frequencies.1,2,6,12,14 The observed broad MICCip range in single mutants (i.e., Ser83→Leu), four E. coli with no mutations in QRDR, or quite a number of negative results in PMQR-suspected isolates indicate on undetected (i.e., unspecific oqxAB or qnrVC currently reported only in Vibrio) or still unrecognized mechanisms contributing to quinolone resistance.10,12–14
An international study showed the occurrence and dissemination of PMQR genes in several European countries. 16 Being considered of limited clinical impact, their high prevalence in human cases is striking.9,11,12 Retrospective surveys tend to identify the beginnings of the phenomenon, 7 but the temporal trends based on systematic survey similar to the one described in this study, have been thus far rarely assessed. The Korean studies revealed considerable occurrence of PMQR-positive E. coli in food animals 15 and higher and increasing frequency of that resistance phenotype in human clinical isolates.9,12 Current data confirmed Poland as a high PMQR prevalence country compared with the reports from other regions.1,2,6,16 Another important finding of the study is qnrS occurring in E. coli with chromosomal mutations at the same frequency as in the whole studied population (χ2, p>0.05). It proves that plasmid-mediated mechanisms spread independently from chromosomal mutations 15 under selection pressure of quinolones usage.11,20
Both predominant qnr alleles described in this study were the most prevalent also in other countries 16 with switch in time between both variants as described in clinical E. coli from the Republic of Korea. 9 Noteworthy, we have not found any other qnr or aac(6′)-Ib-cr occurring in as distinct geographical settings as Europe, Americas, and Far East, 7 and ranging from few food-producing isolates in Korea 15 up to 50% of PMQR-positive E. coli from companion animals in the US. 14 The gene was occasionally found in European animal-related isolates, 16 but its occurrence in human patients seems to be higher, reaching 14% in Denmark, 1 ranging in Italy from 11% at community level to 21% in hospitalized patients, 11 and up to 93% in Pakistan. 5 Homogeneity of qnr genes found in the current study might be explained with epidemics of certain plasmids 8 often carrying various resistance determinants such as the ones reported from China 10 and the Netherlands. 17 The concept is supported by finding of both predominant determinants at comparable frequencies in Salmonella collected from similar sources and time frame16,19 and other studies reporting basically the same PMQR mechanisms in various bacteria isolated in similar geographical settings.1,2,9 Plasmid spread might be enhanced with selection pressure due to fluoroquinolones usage in animals. 6 It selects also for topoisomerase gene mutants resulting in the observed variability of QRDR substitutions.9,14 The spread of single quinolone-resistant E. coli clones might be neglected, since similar to other studies, 5 we have found both low phylogenetic similarity of tested isolates and numerous codon variability and synonymous mutations observed in each of the sequenced chromosomal regions (GenBank accession Nos.: KJ136263–KJ136418) indicating an independent genetic event leading to quinolone resistance development.
Plasmid-mediated cephalosporin and quinolone co-resistance is often reported. Coexistence of numerous PMQR and blaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaCMY-2 genes on the same plasmids was elucidated in E. coli originating from companion and food animals as well as from humans.5,10,14,17 Although acquired extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance is quite often conferred by commensal E. coli in Poland, 18 none of PMQR-positive isolates tested in the current study, produced that type of enzymes.
Herewith, the variable background of quinolone resistance in commensal E. coli was revealed. The results clearly demonstrated the scale and complexity of the problem and pointed out on multifactorial ecological interactions occurring in animal production. The major knowledge gaps to be addressed in further research include identification of undetected mechanisms influencing quinolone MIC shifts, characterization of plasmids carrying predominant qnr genes, and measures for mitigation of their spread. Answering those questions is essential for further sustainable use of quinolones in animal husbandry and efficient protection of human health.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by governmental funding of the multi-annual research project “Protection of Animal and Human Health for the years 2008–2013” (Ministry of Council Resolution 244/2008 of October 28, 2008). I thank Magdalena Skarżyńska, Ilona Samcik, Anna Lalak, and Danuta Wnuk for technical assistance and Andrzej Hoszowski and Magdalena Zając for thoughtful discussion on the article.
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
