Abstract
We investigated the occurrence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), AmpC, and carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria isolated from 160 samples of fresh vegetables (n = 80) and ready-to-eat (RTE) prepacked salads (n = 80). Phenotypic and genotypic analyses were carried out on the isolates in terms of the species present and relative resistance. Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics was found in only 44 (24 from fresh vegetables and 20 from RTE salads) of a total of 312 Gram-negative strains (14.1%). The prevalence of ESBL-producing strains from fresh vegetables was 83.3% (20/24) and 16.7% (4/24) for AmpC. Among the 20 bacterial isolates from RTE salads, 80% (16/20) were identified as ESBL-producing strains and the remaining 20% (4/20) as MBL-producing strains. PCR and sequencing confirmed the presence of blaSHV-12, blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-15, blaRHAN-1, blaACC-1, blaDHA-1, blaVIM-1, and blaIMP-1. Seven different replicons were identified, where IncHI1, FIA, and I1 were the most representative types; when compared with the Inc types, isolates from fresh vegetables and RTE salads were similar. The location of genes on a conjugative plasmid was confirmed by positive results obtained with conjugation assays.
Our study has demonstrated the occurrence and distribution of ESBL/AmpC and MBL strains in fresh vegetables and RTE salads in Italy and possible public health risks associated with consumption of these fresh products.
Introduction
A
The microbiological hazard behind the consumption of ready-to-eat (RTE) food has emerged in recent years and several conspicuous international outbreaks of pathological microorganisms have highlighted the fact that fresh vegetables are potential vehicles of microorganisms responsible for foodborne diseases.
A handful of studies have underlined the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli in fruit and vegetables at retail sale. 7 More specifically, E. coli with CTX-M-14 or CTX-M-1 ESBLs were isolated from parsley and tomatoes, respectively, collected from markets in Tunisia. 8 However, in a larger study of 1,216 vegetables on retail sale in the Netherlands, ESBL-producing E. coli was isolated only from a single batch of blanched celery. 9
Fresh produce frequently harbors nonpathogenic environmental microorganisms. 10 During growth and harvesting, vegetables and fruits can also become contaminated with pathogenic and commensal bacteria from animals and humans.
This contamination can occur in the field by direct contact with the soil and by using manure and wastewater as biofertilizers.9,11 In addition, microorganisms of crops are subjected to a high selection pressure caused by exposure to antibiotic residues indirectly coming from manure and wastewater or directly from phytopharmaceutical agents.12–15 It has been proved that antimicrobial agents different from antibiotics have the ability to promote a co-selection process, indirectly selecting for antibiotic resistance. Heavy metal contaminations are widely spread, both in agriculture 16 and in aquaculture, contributing to that environmental burden. 17 Moreover, fresh produce, such as fruits and salads that are grown close to the soil, is often consumed raw, exposing consumers to the risk of infection by contaminating organisms.18,19 However, it should be noted that fresh produce might also be contaminated in stores, following the distribution process or by incorrect human manipulation.9,20
The use of antibiotics as growth promoters is forbidden in European countries since 2006 thanks to Regulation (EC) No. 1831/200320 of the European Parliament on additives for use in animal nutrition. Antibiotics are therefore used only for therapeutic or occasionally metaphylactic purposes. As a consequence, also raw food types, as fresh produce, can harbor significant populations of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and are now considered important vehicles for rapid transfer of antibiotic resistance determinants.21,22 Considering that fresh produce is usually consumed without applying a sanitization process (e.g., cooking), this can lead to the transfer of bacteria harboring antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the human gastrointestinal tract. 23
The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of ESBL, AmpC-type β-lactamase, and carbapenamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria isolated from fresh vegetables and RTE prepacked salads sold in the local markets of Modena (Italy).
Methods
Sampling of fresh vegetables and RTE salads
In this study, 80 different fresh vegetable samples, comprising carrot, spring onion, arugula, chicory, Batavia green lettuce, Batavia red lettuce, frisee salad, red chicory, and iceberg lettuce, as well as 80 RTE prepacked salads (mixed salads comprising 3 to 6 different types of the following vegetables: Batavia green lettuce, arugula, carrot, chicory, frisee salad, spring onion, Batavia red lettuce, and red chicory), were purchased from 20 local food markets in the city of Modena (Italy) from October 2015 to August 2016. All samples were produced in Italy.
Each sample (25 g) was placed in a sterile plastic bag together with 225 ml buffered peptone water (Scharlab, Milan, Italy) and then homogenized for 2 min in a laboratory blender Stomacher® 400 Circulator (Seward Ltd., Worthing, UK).
One hundred microliters of the appropriate dilutions was spread on plates of MacConkey agar (Scharlab) supplemented with cefotaxime (1 μg/ml) and, following incubation at 37°C for 24 hr, up to 3 colonies were selected and subcultured onto the same medium again at 37°C for 24 hr. The identification of species and testing of antimicrobial susceptibility were carried out using the Vitek 2 system and AST-GN041 card (bioMerieux, Florence, Italy).
Phenotypic identification of ESBLs and AmpC
ESBL production was tested by the double-disc synergy test (DDST), as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). 24 DDST was performed by placing discs of cefotaxime (CTX, 30 μg; Beckton, Dickinson and Company, Breda, The Netherlands), cefotaxime with clavulanic acid (CTX-CLA, 30/10 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 μg), and ceftazidime with clavulanic acid (CAZ-CLA, 30/10 μg) on plates of Mueller-Hinton agar (MH, Scharlab, Milan, Italy). ESBL production was considered positive when, following incubation at 37°C for 24 hr, the growth inhibitory zone, either around the CTX-CLA or the CAZ-CLA disc, increased by 5 mm or more compared with the diameter around the disc containing CTX or CAZ alone. The original DDST was further modified to detect AmpC producers using the double synergy differential test. 25 This test was performed using both CTX (30 μg) and CAZ (30 μg) discs alone and in combination with boronic acid (CTX-BA and CAZ-BA; 30 μg plus 10 μl of a 60-mg/ml solution of benzo(b)thiophene-2-boronic acid in dimethyl sulfoxide; Sigma, Milan, Italy). For detection of AmpC β-lactamase, results were interpreted based on an increase of the growth inhibitory zone by 5 mm or more around the CTX-BA and/or CAZ-BA discs compared with the diameter around the disc of the corresponding cephalosporin alone.
In Gram-negative organisms, DDST may not show positivity in the presence of AmpC together with ESBL since the AmpC type of β-lactamase inhibits the action of clavulanate. Hence, the synergistic effect of clavulanic acid and third-generation cephalosporins, which are used, is obscured. For this reason, detection of ESBLs was performed by applying the combination disc test, as recommended by EUCAST, 26 which utilized cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefepime with an amoxicillin–clavulanate disc. ESBL detection was considered positive when inhibition zones around any of the cephalosporin discs were augmented in the direction of the disc containing clavulanic acid.
Phenotypic identification of MBL and KPC
We applied a simple phenotypic method to detect and differentiate the production of metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), or MBL and KPC together. 27 More specifically, the test was performed by inoculating the Mueller-Hinton agar with the standard diffusion method and then preparing one disc of meropenem (MER, 10 μg) without any inhibitor and three discs containing 400 μg of phenylboronic acid (PBA; Sigma) or 292 μg of EDTA (Sigma) or both 400 μg of PBA and 292 μg of EDTA. The agar plates were incubated at 37°C overnight. The diameters of the growth inhibitory zone around the MER discs with inhibitors were compared with the plain MER disc.
Detection of ARGs
DNA was extracted from the samples using a standard heat lysis protocol. 28
ESBL genes (blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M), 29 plasmid-mediated AmpC-type genes (blaMOX blaCIT, blaDHA, blaACC, blaEBCM, and blaFOX),28,30 and carbapenamase genes (blaKPC; blaIMP, blaVIM, blaOXA-48, and blaNDM)30,31 were detected, as previously reported.
PCR-positive amplicons were purified by the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Milan, Italy) and directly sequenced using amplification primers on the 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystem, Milan, Italy). Purification and sequencing were carried out by Genex s.r.o. (CZ, Czech Republic). Sequence alignment and analysis were performed online using the BLAST program of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
Plasmid replicon typing
Plasmids were identified by PCR-based replicon typing, as previously described. 32 Plasmid DNA was amplified by five multiplex and three simplex PCRs using 18 pairs of primers that have been recognized as Inc replicon types: FIA, FIB, FIC, HI1, HI2, I1-Ic, L/M, N, P, W, T, A/C, K, B/O, X, Y, F, and FIIA. The resulting plasmid replicons were visualized by gel electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels and stained with GelRed™ (Biotum, Fremont, CA).
Conjugation assay
Transferability of ESBL/AmpC and MBL genes by conjugation was performed by matting out assays using E. coli J53-2 (met−, pro−, rif R) as the recipient strain. Transconjugants were selected on MacConkey agar containing cefotaxime (2 mg/L; Sigma), cefoxitin (32 mg/L; Sigma), or imipenem (2 mg/L) plus rifampicin (100 mg/L; Sigma). The means of the conjugation frequency (transconjugants/recipients) were evaluated. Gene transfer was confirmed by PCR and sequencing, as described above.
Statistical analysis
The prevalence of ESBL and AmpC from fresh vegetables and RTE salads was analyzed by performing the chi-square test using SPSS software (version 21.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The level of significance was set at a p-value under 0.05.
Results
A total of 312 Gram-negative strains were isolated and identified by means of their biochemical properties and subsequently confirmed with Vitek 2.
Of these, 160 isolates were recovered from fresh vegetables, with a high proportion of Citrobacter freundii (26%). The other strains identified were Enterobacter cloacae (22%), Pantoea agglomerans (16%), Rahnella aquatilis (12%), E. coli (10%), Hafnia alvei (5%), Enterobacter aerogenes (5%), and Pseudomonas fluorescens (4%).
The remaining 152 isolates were recovered from RTE salads, with a high prevalence of E. cloacae (26.3%) and E. coli (25%). The other strains identified were E. aerogenes (22.3%), P. fluorescens (7.9%), Klebsiella ozaenae (7.9%), P. agglomerans (5.3%), and C. freundii (5.3%).
In this study, only 44 (24 of fresh vegetables and 20 of RTE salads) of 312 (14.1%) isolates were considered for final analysis, following the results of the Vitek 2 Advanced Expert System (AES), which detected a phenotype of ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria; no bacterial strains with a phenotype for intrinsic β-lactam antibiotic resistance were included. Moreover, these strains were successively screened by phenotypic tests (Table 1).
AM, ampicillin; AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CAZ, ceftazidime; CTX, cefotaxime; DSDT, double synergy differential test; ERT, ertapenem; FEP, cefepime; FOX, cefoxitin; IMP, imipenem; MER, meropenem; SYN-BA, synergy with boronic acid; SYN-CLA, synergy with clavulanic acid; SYN-EDTA, synergy with EDTA; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam.
Among the 24 isolates from fresh vegetables, 20 showed an increase (>5 mm) in the inhibition zone diameter for cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and/or cefepime in the presence of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC), which was indicative of ESBL production, while four isolates showed enlargement of the inhibition zone in the presence of boronate and were classified as AmpC producers; (Table 1). The ESBL/AmpC-producing isolates belonged to the following genes (species/number of isolates): blaCTX-M-15 (C. freundii/4; E. coli/1; P. agglomerans/6), blaSHV-12 (E. coli/3), blaRAHN-1 (R. aquatilis/4), blaCTX-M-1 (E. cloacae/2), and blaDHA-1 (E. cloacae/2) (Table 2). Among all 24 microbial strains, we identified two H. alvei harboring a blaACC gene. In this microbial species, the blaACC gene is located on the chromosome, 33 thus it was not further characterized.
Numbers in parentheses ( ) refer to the number of isolates.
ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; MBL, metallo β-lactamase; ND, not determined.
Sixteen of 20 RTE salad isolates displayed an ESBL phenotype and four strains were positive for the combined disc with EDTA, suggesting production of the MBL-type enzyme (Table 1). Among the four E. coli isolated, two carried a blaSHV-12 and two a blaCTX-M-15. The gene blaCTX-M-1 was detected in C. freundii (n = 2) as well as in K. ozaenae (n = 4) and E. cloacae (n = 2). Moreover, two C. freundii and two P. agglomerans harbored a blaCTX-M-15 gene. The MBL genes, identified only in four strains of P. fluorescens, were as follows: two blaVIM-1 and two blaIMP-1 (Table 2).
A summary of replicons detected among the 42 isolates is given in Table 2. Overall, seven different replicons were identified, where IncHI1, FIA, and I1 were the most representative types; other Inc groups included HI, L/M, A/C, and N.
When compared with the Inc types, isolates from fresh vegetables and RTE salads were similar among each other. The FIA and I1 plasmids were detected in all E. coli strains; HI, FIA, and HI1 for the ACC-1 gene were found in C. freundii; A/C replicons were detected in all P. agglomerans strains; HI1 and L/M plasmids were found in E. cloacae; and N plasmids were identified in K. ozaenae (Table 2).
The four R. aquatilis and two H. alvei harboring chromosomal level blaRAHN-1 and blaACC genes, respectively, were not characterized by the conjugation assay.33,34 Thirty-eight bacterial strains were able to transfer genes encoding ESBL/AmpC and MBL by conjugation. The transfer frequency for these strains was of ∼10−5 for recipient cell. PCR and sequencing confirmed that transconjugants carried the SHV-12, CTX-M-15, CTX-1, DHA-1, VIM-1, and IMP-1 genes. The high transfer frequency highlights the plasmid potential of diffusion and dissemination among susceptible isolates, also of different species.
Finally, a significant difference (χ2 = 8.97, p < 0.05) emerged when analyzing sample type (fresh vegetables vs. RTE prepacked salads) with respect to different types of ESBL, AmpC, and MBL determinants.
Discussion
The current study has demonstrated the higher occurrence of ESBL and AmpC-producing strains in bacteria from fresh vegetables than RTE salads. Our results correlate with other studies indicating vegetables as a possible route for the dissemination of resistant genes in the community.12,13,23,35
Pathogen contamination of fresh and RTE vegetables has been widely described, and in recent years, outbreaks linked to these foods have been reported. The production and processing practices applied to fresh and RTE vegetables are not sufficient to ensure complete microbial safety, and human pathogens can be associated with this type of produce. Many causes may be involved in this issue, such as preharvest contamination (soil, wild or domestic animals, field workers, harvesting equipment, manure and soil amendments, and irrigation water etc.). Improper handling during processing (cutting, washing/sanitizing, and packaging/storing) can also compromise the safety of a product and can provide many opportunities for microbial cross-contamination. 36
In recent years, there has been a strong expansion of scientific research applied to food safety. Epidemiological investigations have demonstrated the increasing crucial role of food types in the etiology of specific infectious diseases to the extent of placing them within a large group of syndromes called foodborne diseases. 37 These diseases have become an important problem for public health not only in underdeveloped countries but also in high-performing socioeconomic developed countries, where microbial contamination is frequent and difficult to control. 38 Contamination of fresh produce by pathogenic or opportunistic microorganisms is now emerging as a major food safety problem and the presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria can represent an additional risk factor, in particular for old and immunocompromised people. The microbiological quality of food remains one of the most important factors to keep under control as foodborne illnesses are both one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality and an economic damage for food companies.
In our bacterial isolates, the resistant genes present in vegetables mainly belonged to the CTX-M family, and more specifically, CTX-M-15 was found both in fresh vegetables and in RTE salads. CTX-M-15 has been identified as the most common type of ESBL Gram-negative bacteria in Europe and has been increasingly described in community isolates.39–44 We could hypothesize that contamination by ESBL/AmpC or carbapenemase of vegetable samples and farm environments could be mainly of human source. For example, fecal carriage of CTX-M-producing E. coli in nursing homes in Bavaria was reported by Valenza et al., and the same authors also demonstrated by PFGE typing that a person-to-person transmission or a common source of infection for ESBL-producing microorganisms may occur. 45 Similarly, cross-contamination during handling by colonized workers is an event that has to be taken into consideration.
Previous studies have reported the isolation of Enterobacteriaceae harboring CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-15 ESBL in fresh culinary herbs from Southeast Asia, highlighting the potential human health risk associated with their consumption. 46 In addition, another study carried out in fresh vegetables refers the detection of the same ESBL variants (CTX-M-15, CTX-M-14, CTX-M-1, SHV-12, and RAHN-1) as the one detected in our study.8,18,38,47,48 DHA-1 AmpC β-lactamases have also been reported in E. cloacae by previous findings. 49 The link between antibiotic use in animal production and human health has been widely described, 50 and livestock, in particular, is considered to be an important reservoir for ESBL/AmpC or, to a lesser extent, carbapenemase-producing strains transferred to humans through the food chain. The potential implication of wastewater used for irrigation cannot be discarded as a route for dissemination of these antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and recent studies also suggest that irrigation groundwater constitutes a source of antibiotic-resistant human pathogens, that may enter the food chain through vegetable ingestion. 51 Additionally, an increase in the carriage of ARGs in soil along the years 52 has been reported, highlighting the role of this element as a reservoir of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes. Last, given that the community could also be a reservoir of these microorganisms, 53 postharvest contamination may also occur in fresh vegetables and RTE salads, a particularly handled and processed food.
We also found two strains of R. aquatilis with chromosomal ESBL genes; human infections caused by these bacteria have already been described, mainly in immunocompromised patients.54,55 The main risk associated with these species of Enterobacteriaceae, once they have been ingested with contaminated food, is that although they are not pathogenic strains, they may facilitate the dissemination of ESBL genes to Gram-negative opportunistic pathogens (e.g., by conjugation) during their (temporary) transit in the human intestine. 12 This claim is corroborated by our results of conjugation assays that reported a high transfer frequency of plasmids harboring ESBL and other resistant genes. Accordingly, these genes can spread within a bacterial population and from one environment to another, such as food and human gut microbiota, by exchanging genetic information.
The isolation of carbapenemase-producing microorganisms in RTE salads is alarming and constitutes a food safety issue. In the present study, we detected P. fluorescens MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria in RTE salads for the first time. Although this organism may not be considered a pathogen, its contribution to the resistome and potential for lateral gene transfer also to clinically relevant bacteria is certainly a cause for concern.
Previous findings8,34 have demonstrated that ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) carried several different plasmids, some of which were also found in Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated here from fresh vegetables and RTE salads.
Transfer of the blaCTX-M-1 gene in E. coli strains was associated with acquisition of the IncI1 replicon plasmid, as has already been reported by other authors in E. coli isolates of human and animal origins.47,56,57 The variation and distribution of plasmids and genes found in the present investigation are consistent with the findings of Carattoli et al. 32
The impact of food processing on the transfer of antimicrobial resistance to humans is widely reported 58 and, in this context, the possible link between microbiological hygiene parameters and occurrence of ESBL bacteria could be also considered. As previously reported, fresh produce can be contaminated in several ways before, during, and after food processing. Environmental postcontamination and cross-contamination with other foods and during human handling represent important sources of pathogenic bacteria, also endowed with antimicrobial resistance features. 23 In particular, fresh fruit and vegetables are more perishable than other types of foods and, usually, customers touch them to determine maturity. These raw products may be ingested without any prior processing or preservation treatment, and the increasing demand for raw and minimally processed food contributes to the possibility of introducing multiresistant pathogenic bacteria. Therefore, minimal processing technologies can lead to stressed and/or sublethally damaged cells, and several studies have demonstrated that stress may also impact the phenotypic antimicrobial resistance of microorganisms, increasing horizontal transmission of plasmids containing antimicrobial resistance genes by conjugation.59,60 These bacteria can also survive the ingestion process and may contribute to the spread of ARGs to the resident bacterial colonizing the intestinal tract. Last, the occurrence of biofilms in the food industry is largely involved in the antimicrobial resistance problem. This ecosystem represents an evolutionary advantage for microorganisms because it grants protection from different adverse conditions and the sessile life in community also confers an ideal state for resistance transfer. In conclusion, surveillance remains the key factor to address the issue of antibiotic resistance in fresh vegetables, fruits, and salads and should be employed at all levels of food processing in compliance, applying the community safety rules. Even for this criticism, the application of good hygiene and manufacturing practices, based on Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles, should be implemented to contribute to achieving food safety.
Footnotes
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
