Abstract
Background:
Dietary fish oil supplements are increasingly used as an alternative to prescription-grade omega-3 fatty acids (P-OM3) for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia. The content of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in these supplement products varies widely and may result in a suboptimal response. The aim of this study was to review marketed fish oil supplements and to develop a reference for clinicians to compare products.
Methods:
The National Library of Medicine Herbal Supplement Database was systematically searched using fish oil, EPA, DHA, and omega-3 fatty acid as search terms. Daily doses needed to achieve the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dose (RxDose) (3,360 mg of combined EPA and DHA) were calculated from the milligrams of EPA and DHA per serving, and suggested retail prices were used to calculate monthly cost of each product. A “usage criteria” was set to highlight products at the RxDose with a monthly cost of <$50, daily servings <8, daily amount of vitamins A and D less than or equal to the U.S. Dietary Reference Intake upper limit defined as 10,000 and 4,000 IU, respectively, and if the product was U.S. Pharmacopeia verified.
Results:
A total of 163 products were identified, and 102 nonliquid and liquid products met our entry criteria. The median amount of EPA and DHA per serving in the nonliquid products was 216 mg and 200 mg, respectively, and the median number of servings at the RxDose was 11.2 at a median monthly cost of $63.49. The median amount of EPA (460 mg) and DHA (400 mg) per serving in the liquid products was higher than the nonliquid products. Thus, the median number of servings at the RxDose was only 3.6 teaspoons and the median monthly cost of $13.60. Only 22% of products met our “usage criteria.”
Conclusions:
The amount of EPA and DHA per recommended serving in these products was highly variable. Clinicians should heighten their scrutiny in terms of selection of the appropriate product.
Introduction
According to a recent report of a survey of 6,012 responders that was gathered by consumerlab.com, fish oil or omega-3 fatty acid (omega-3 FA) is now the top dietary supplement among those people who use multiple dietary supplements. Seventy four percent of responders to this survey indicated that they use fish oil supplements. 4 Consumers are spending more than $13 billion worldwide on omega-3 FA dietary supplements, 5 likely due to the substantial benefits reported in both the medical and lay literature, particularly related to diseases of the cardiovascular system 6 –15 and reduction in serum triglycerides levels, 16 –19 as well as their recommended use in published guidelines. 20,21 A 30-year follow-up analysis of the Chicago Western Electric Study reported favorable effects of fish oil consumption for subjects who consumed 35 grams of fatty fish compared to those who consumed none. Patients who consumed fish had a 0.62 and 0.56 relative risk estimate of death from coronary heart disease (CHD) and nonsudden death from myocardial infarction, respectively. 6 Other epidemiologic studies have shown a 50% lower mortality rate among those who consume at least 30 g of fish per day. 7
The effect of omega-3 FA in relation to reduction of CHD was investigated in four large randomized trials. The first controlled trial of dietary fish consumption, the Diet and Reinfarction Trial (DART), randomized men who had a myocardial infarction to receive or not to receive dietary advice, including an increase consumption of fatty fish. A 29% decrease in all-cause mortality was reported in patients who consumed fatty fish twice per week (corresponding to about 300 grams of fatty fish every week). 8 The GISSI Prevenzione study, a large randomized secondary prevention interventions trial, randomized 11,324 patients following a recent myocardial infarction to 1 gram daily of n-3-polyunsaturated fatty acid, 300 mg daily of vitamin E, both, or none for 3.5 years. Treatment with n-3-polyunsaturated fatty acid, but not vitamin E, significantly lowered the risk of sudden death. 9 Moreover, the GISSI-HF trial 10 demonstrated beneficial effects of 1,000 mg of n-3-polyunsaturated fatty acid compared to placebo on mortality and hospital admissions for cardiovascular reasons in chronic heart failure patients (New York Heart Association class II–IV). In the Japan Eicosapentaenoic Acid Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS), 18,645 patients with previous history of hypercholesterolemia were randomly assigned to receive either 1,800 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) daily with a statin or statin only for a median follow-up of 4.6 years. Patients randomized to EPA plus a statin had a 19% relative risk reduction in major coronary events compared to the statin-only group. 11 In contrast, the Alpha Omega Trial showed no difference in major cardiovascular events between patients with a previous myocardial infarction randomized to four trial margarines supplemented with low doses of either EPA and docosahexanoic acid (DHA) (approximately 400 mg combined); α-linolenic acid (ALA) alone (2 grams); EPA, DHA, and ALA combined; or placebo that were also receiving state-of-the-art antihypertensive, antithrombotic, and lipid-lowering therapy. 12 The authors conjecture that the lack of benefit seen in these patients with omega-3 FA supplementation might have been obscured by the high prevalence (>85%) of concomitant “life-saving” cardiovascular pharmacotherapy and or that the doses of omega-3 FA were too low. However, this speculation that the dose of omega-3 FA was too low was expunged by the finding from the OMEGA study, which showed no benefit of 1,000 mg of omega-3 FA esters compared to placebo in postmyocardial infarction patients treated for 1 year. 13
The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends that patients without any documented history of CHD consume at least two servings of fatty fish per week, and patients with a history of or documented CHD to consume at least 1 gram daily of EPA and DHA, preferably from a fatty fish source, and if necessary to consider EPA plus DHA supplementation with a physician's supervision. There are numerous clinical trials that demonstrate that large doses (>2 grams/day) of combined EPA and DHA significantly lower serum triglycerides. The percent reduction is chiefly dependent on the baseline triglyceride level, with larger reductions seen with higher baseline levels. Thus, the AHA advocates that patients who have high triglycerides consume 2–4 grams daily of EPA and DHA supplementation with physician supervision. 20 The United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) secondary prevention guidelines also recommend the consumption of at least 7 grams of omega-3 FA from fatty fish or 1 gram of per week of omega-3 FA ethyl ester treatment if within 3 months of a myocardial infarction. 21
ALA, an omega-3 FA, cannot be synthesized by humans and therefore is considered an essential fatty acid and must be obtained from dietary sources. ALA is found mainly in plant-based foods such as walnuts, flaxseed, and olive oils. However, in humans, the conversion of ALA to EPA and EPA to DHA is minimal and estimated to range from 5–10% and 2–5%, respectively. 14 Moreover, the beneficial effects of ALA on cardiovascular diseases is yet to be defined. Thus, ALA should not be used as a substitute for EPA and DHA when treating hypertriglyceridemia. 15
Lovaza®, prescription omega-3 FA (P-OM3) is a combination of highly concentrated purified ethyl esters of omega-3 FA, principally EPA and DHA, that is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for treatment of hypertriglyceridemia (>500 mg/dL) as an adjunct to diet. 22 The daily dose is 4 grams/day taken as a single 4-gram dose or as two 2-gram doses. Each 1-gram capsule provides 465 mg of EPA and 375 mg of DHA. Randomized clinical trials of P-OM3 have demonstrated reductions in serum triglycerides up to 45% at the FDA-approved dose.
As mentioned above, fish oil or omega-3 FA is now the top dietary supplement among those people who use multiple dietary supplements. There are also many different herbal supplements that are labeled to contain omega-3 FA, EPA and DHA, or fish oil, but there is a controversy regarding the validity of the claimed label in terms of the amount of EPA and DHA because these products are not regulated by the FDA with the same standards as prescription drug products. The amount of EPA and DHA in a 1-gram capsule of fish oil supplements can vary widely 15 from product to product. This variation ultimately impacts the total number of capsules that must be taken daily to obtain sufficient amounts of EPA and DHA for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia as well as the total daily cost to the consumer. Lower-potency products necessitate higher capsule burden, which could affect adherence 23 as well as the incidence of side effects. In addition, higher capsule burden results in enhanced calories and fat intake, and some products also contain fat-soluble vitamins, which raises another concern. If the consumer is not educated about the amount of EPA and DHA in each gram of fish oil, this might result in suboptimal triglyceride lowering. Also, the existence of environmental contaminants such as dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls, and methyl mercury in the fish oil supplements can offset the benefits from taking fish oil supplements.
Currently, many health-care organizations and third-party payers have limited Lovaza® to their nonformulary list of medications, and the rationale that they use for prescribers is that many herbal supplement fish oil products exist at a lower costs. Unfortunately, the information that is offered to prescribers and patients is often incomplete as to which product(s) the Formulary Committee are recommending and the number of capsules that should be taken based on the labeled content of EPA and DHA. 24
The purpose of this review was to conduct a search of dietary fish oil supplements and develop a reference for clinicians to compare different products in terms of EPA- and DHA-labeled content, to determine the daily doses of each product needed to achieve the FDA-approved dose (3,360 mg) of combined EPA and DHA in P-OM3, and to calculate the consequential monthly cost, saturated fat, cholesterol, and vitamin intake at this daily dose.
Methodology
Identification of products
The United States National Library of Medicine Dietary Supplements Labels Database (USNLADSLD) 25 was used to search for information about labeled ingredients of fish oil and or omega-3 FA dietary supplements. This database contains information on the ingredients of over 4,000 dietary supplement products sold in the United States. The database can be searched by brand name, uses noted on product label, specific active ingredients, and the manufacturer. Data were extracted between October 18, 2009, and January 15, 2010, using the following search terms: Fish oil, omega-3 FA, omega, EPA, DHA, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid. The data that were collected and summarized include: Manufacturer/distributer, product name, dosage form, serving size, calories, saturated fat, cholesterol, EPA, DHA, and vitamins A, C, D, and E per serving. Only products containing both EPA and DHA were evaluated. To reduce the potential for bias, we excluded products likely not intended for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia by limiting products to those with EPA, DHA, fish oil, omega-3 FA, omega, cardio, or krill oil as part of the product name on the label.
Data extraction and analysis
Products were stratified and evaluated on the basis of the dosage formulation (liquid vs. nonliquid). The amount in milligrams of EPA and DHA in each product was used to calculate the serving size per day that would be needed to achieve approximately 3,360 mg of omega-3 FA, which is the FDA-approved dose (RxDose) of prescription grade omega-3 FA ester for the treatment of high serum triglyceride levels. The suggested retail price per day for each product was obtained from websites of the individual manufacture or the supplier website and was used to calculate the monthly cost for each product at the RxDose. Calories, saturated fat, cholesterol, and vitamins D, E, C, and A were evaluated on the basis of the daily dosage of each product to achieve the RxDose of combined EPA and DHA. The ratio of DHA/EPA was also summarized for each product. The products that were United States Pharmacopeia (USP) verified were identified using the USP website. 26 Any USP-verified products can claim that what is on the label is in fact in the bottle with all the listed ingredients in the declared amount, the supplement does not contain harmful levels of contaminants, the supplement will break down and release ingredients in the body, and the supplement has been made under good manufacturing practices.
A predefined “usage criteria” was set to highlight products at the RxDose with a monthly cost of <$50, number of daily servings <8 (twice the capsule burden of P-OM3), and daily amount of vitamin A and D less than or equal to the United States Dietary Reference Intake upper limit (USDRIUL) defined as 10,000 and 4,000 IU, respectively. 27 We assumed the product did not contain vitamin A or D if it was not indicated on the product label. The monthly cost of $50 was selected because it appears to be within the middle of the range for third-tier co-payments for cardiovascular medication by several major Pharmacy Benefit Manager 28,29 and Preferred Provider Organizations. 30 The number of daily servings was <8 because studies have documented a reduction in medication adherence with an increase in pill burden. 31 Vitamins A and D were included in the usage criteria because these two vitamins are the vitamins for which there is the greatest likelihood of exceeding the USDRIUL. Finally, we defined a second tier “usage criteria” for products that were USP verified.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were performed using SigmaPlot (Systat Software, Inc, San Jose, CA) for Windows version 11.2. Medians [25%–75% percentile] were reported for values not considered normally distributed. All other values are reported as mean±standard deviation (SD).
Results
A total of 163 products were identified using the predefined search terms. Of these, 124 products contained both DHA and EPA that were than stratified to liquid (n=14) and nonliquid (n=110) products (consisting of softgels, powder packets, and gummy bears dosage forms). Three nonliquid products were earlier versions of an existing product and were excluded from analysis, thus leaving 107 products. Finally, one liquid product and 19 nonliquid products were excluded from analysis because the product label did not include EPA, DHA, fish oil, omega-3 FA, omega, cardio, or krill oil, leaving a final sample size of 13 liquid and 88 nonliquid products.
Each product, manufacturer, bottle size (milliliters or number of doses), suggested retail price, recommended serving size, amount of EPA and DHA in milligram per serving size, the calculated number of teaspoons or doses needed to equal the RxDose, the calculated monthly cost, calories per day, saturated fats per day, cholesterol per day, vitamins D and A per day at the RxDose, and USP verification are listed in Table 1 (nonliquid) and Table 2 (liquid). The products that met the predefined “usage criteria” are shaded. Only 16% (14 of 88) of the nonliquid products met our “usage criteria,” and none of the products was USP verified. Sixty three percent (5 of 8) of the nonliquid products with reported amounts of vitamins contained greater than or equal to the USDRIUL of vitamin A or D at the RxDose. Sixty nine percent (9 of 13) of the liquid products met our “usage criteria,” and none of these products was USP verified. Thirty three percent (2 of 6) of the liquid products with reported amount of vitamins contained greater than or equal to the USDRIUL of vitamin A or D at the RxDose. Only one of 101 products included in this review was USP verified.
Products are sorted from low to high EPA content. Shading indicates product meets predefined “usage criteria.”
SRP, suggested retail price; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; USP, United States Pharmacopeia.
Products are sorted from low to high EPA content. Shading indicates product meets predefined “usage criteria.”
SRP, suggested retail price. EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; USP, United States Pharmacopeia.
The mean±SD or medians [25%–75% percentile] for the serving size of the products, amount of EPA and DHA per serving, ratio of DHA to EPA, the RxDose, suggested retail price, monthly costs at the RxDose, and calories, saturated fats, cholesterol, and vitamin content per RxDose are listed in Tables 3 and 4 for liquid and nonliquid formulations, respectively. The median amount of EPA and DHA per serving in the nonliquid products was 216 mg and 200 mg, respectively. Thus, the median number of servings needed to achieve the RxDose was 11.2, and the corresponding median monthly cost at this dose was $63.49. At the RxDose, the median additional cholesterol and calories that would be consumed per day was 45 mg and 140, respectively. A limited number of product labels listed the vitamin content, and these amounts were highly variable between products. The mean±SD amount of vitamin D was 1,568±1,122 IU and the median (25%–75% percentile) amount of vitamin A was 14,167 IU (3,957–28,479) at the RxDose, respectively. The median amounts of EPA (460 mg) and DHA (400 mg) per serving in the liquid products were numerically higher than the nonliquid products. Thus, the median number of servings needed of the nonliquid products to obtain the RxDose was only 3.6 teaspoons, and the corresponding median monthly cost at this dose was only $13.60. At the RxDose, the median additional cholesterol (55 mg) and calories (132) that would be consumed per day were numerically similar to the nonliquid formulations. The median vitamins A and D content at the RxDose was below the USDRIUL. The median ratio of DHA/EPA for liquid and nonliquid formulations was 0.67 (0.81 for P-OM3).
Combined milligrams of EPA and DHA per dosage unit ranged from 30 mg to 1,200 mg.
Sample size varies due to differences in product content or the suggested retail price was not available.
SD, standard deviation; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid.
Sample size varies due to differences in product content or the suggested retail price was not available.
SD, standard deviation; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid.
Discussion
On June 25, 2007, the FDA published dietary supplement Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP), which require that proper controls be in place by dietary supplement companies to ensure products are manufactured and processed in a consistent manner and produce high-quality products that are not adulterated with impurities or contaminants (such as natural toxins, heavy metals, glass, microbes, and pesticides) and that they are accurately labeled. Other major requirements are that these companies provide a phone number on the product label for consumers to call to report adverse events and complaints and that each company maintain records of these reports for 6 years and contact the FDA through MedWatch within 15 days of any serious adverse effects that are reported. In an effort to limit any disruption for dietary supplements produced by small companies, the FDA staggered these rules with a 3-year phase-in for small companies. The final cGMP was effective in June, 2008, for large companies; the cGMP for companies with less than 500 employees was effective in June, 2009, and these regulation became effective June, 2010, for companies with fewer than 20 employees. 32 These updated FDA regulations should add an additional level of confidence for the consumer and practitioners. However, the assumption is that the FDA has the appropriate resources to enforce these regulations. In addition, dietary supplement products are not reviewed by the FDA before they are marketed, unlike prescription medications. The FDA is responsible to take action against any unsafe dietary supplement product that is marketed or product claims are false and misleading. 33
The benefit of omega-3-FA in regard to treatment of high triglycerides is well documented. 34 On the basis of the AHA, the recommended dose of combined EPA and DHA for hypertriglyceridemia is 2–4 grams and should be used under a physician's care to monitor for safety and efficacy. Currently, Lovaza® is the only FDA-approved P-OM3 product for treating hypertriglyceridemia. Although we do not routinely advocate this, dietary fish oil supplements are commonly recommended as an alternative to P-OM3 for treatment of hypertriglyceridemia. 15 In situations where P-OM3 is not an option for patients with hypertriglyceridemia, products such as those meeting our “usage criteria” could be recommended.
This is the first review of omega-3-FA dietary supplements that includes a breakdown of the product content on the basis of the product label, calculations of the daily dose of each product needed to achieve the RxDose of P-OM3 FA, the consequential monthly cost, and saturated fat, cholesterol, and vitamin intake at this daily dose. This review was conducted to provide a resource for clinicians when selecting dietary supplements of omega-3 FA as a substitute for P-OM3. The data in this review will help the patient select the most appropriate product and dose. Our review assumes that the manufacturers are in compliance with FDA cGMP regulations and that the labeled contents are accurate.
We found that there is a wide variation of EPA and DHA content, cost, type of dosage formulations, vitamin content, cholesterol, and other fats in these herbal supplement products. The EPA and DHA per serving size ranged from 18 mg and 12 mg, respectively, up to 900 mg of EPA and 552 mg of DHA per serving size for the nonliquid supplements. Thus, the number of servings needed per day to achieve the RxDose would range from as little as three and up to 112 and the consequential monthly cost ranged from $15 to $700. This provides a challenge for the untrained consumer and potential barriers to adequate lipid reductions and adherence to therapy. Adherence to treatment is the most important key of success of any drug therapy. The number of tablets and the cost of medication may be the top two concerns of patients. Increase in number of pills is highly associated with low adherence, and low adherence is associated with a broad range of adverse outcomes. 35,36 Because the median amounts of EPA and DHA per recommended serving of the liquid formulations were higher than the nonliquid formulation, the median number of servings to reach the RxDose was only 3.6 teaspoons. Therefore, the median cost per month at the RxDose was less that the nonliquid formulations. However, oxidation of the fatty acids (reduce shelf-life) could be more of an issue with the liquid formulations, unless the manufacturer has taken appropriate measures to reduce this. Also dysgeusia (distortion of the sense of taste) and “fish burp” are more common with liquid products.
This review provides practitioners with a reference for various products that have met our predefined “usage criteria” with a monthly cost of <$50, number of daily servings <8, and daily amount of vitamins A and D greater than or equal to the USDRIUL defined as 10,000 and 4,000 IU, respectively. Fourteen of the nonliquid products and nine of the liquid products met these criteria. However, none of these products was verified by the USP.
Several of the products included in this review indicated their vitamin content. The median (14,167 IU) amount of vitamin A that would be consumed per day at the RxDose of the nonliquid formulations exceeded the USDRIUL. Five of the eight nonliquid products and two of the six liquid products that listed their vitamin A content would exceed 10,000 IU daily if consumed at the RxDose for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia. This should be an important factor when selecting one of these products.
Our review has several limitations. Only omega-3 FA or fish oil supplements within the USNLADSLD were included. This potentially would exclude other available products, but using a single database does allow our findings to be reproduced. Also more products may have been registered or updated since January 15th, 2010, the last day at which these data were uploaded. We used the manufacturer's suggested retail price when calculating the consequential monthly cost of each product. The actual cost consumers pay for these products could be considerably lower. Also, the suggested retail price was not available for some products, which excluded them from evaluation based on our “usage criteria.” Finally, the accuracy of the label content within each product is solely dependent on the manufacturer.
Conclusion
The amount of EPA and DHA per recommended serving in the products reviewed in this study was highly variable. Thus, products with lower content require larger daily doses, which may impact monthly cost, fat-soluble vitamin intake, calories, fat, and cholesterol intake, and possibly an increase intake of environmental contaminants. Only one of 101 of evaluated products in this review was USP verified. These considerations should compel both clinicians and patients to heighten their scrutiny in terms of selection of the appropriate product.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
