Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Traumatic Brain Injury and Subconcussive Hits: A Systematic Review and Meta

Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive technique used to study metabolites in the brain. MRS findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subconcussive hit literature have been mixed. The most common observation is a decrease in N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), traditionally considered a marker of neuronal integrity. Other metabolites, however, such as creatine (Cr), choline (Cho), glutamate+glutamine (Glx) and myo-inositol (mI) have shown inconsistent changes in these populations. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize MRS literature in brain injury and explore factors (biological factors such as brain region, injury severity, time since injury, demographics and technical methodological factors such as field strength, acquisition parameters, analysis approach) that may contribute to differential findings. One hundred and thirty-eight studies met inclusion criteria for the systematic review and of those, 62 NAA, 24 Cr, 49 Cho, 18 Glx, and 21 mI studies met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses with brain region as a subgroup for each of the five metabolites studied. Meta-regression was used to examine the influence of potential moderators including injury severity, time since injury, age, sex, tissue composition, and methodological factors. In this analysis of 1428 unique brain-injured subjects and 1132 controls, the corpus callosum was identified as a brain region highly susceptible to metabolite alteration. NAA was consistently decreased in TBI of all severities, but not in subconcussive hits. Cho and mI were found to be increased in moderate-to-severe TBI but not in mild TBI. Glx and Cr were largely unaffected, but did show alterations in certain conditions.

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a heterogeneous injury with both immediate and long-term consequences.¹ TBI severity is often characterized as mild, moderate, or severe.² Common symptoms of mild TBI include a combination of headache, dizziness, sleep disturbance, cognitive impairment, fatigue, irritability, anxiety, and depression,^3,4 while more severe injuries typically present with additional complications such as coma, seizures, severe loss of coordination, behavioral changes, disorientation, and long-term physical and cognitive disability.^5
-7 The differentiation of severity is usually based on immediate clinical presentation,⁸ duration of loss of consciousness, and post-traumatic amnesia, as well as findings on computed tomography and/or structural magnetic resonance imaging.² Although some differentiate concussion as a form of mild TBI,⁹ these two terms are often used interchangeably, as will be the convention in this text. A final category of head trauma with increasing recognition is subconcussive hits, with the expectation that repetitive subconcussive hits have an additive effect on brain health, particularly in the long term.^10
–12

Research to best understand the full continuum of brain injury is expanding with increasing use of magnetic resonance imaging to understand brain injury as well as to predict outcomes and inform treatments.^13
–15 Included in this approach is magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), which provides neurochemical information about brain tissue. Briefly, MRS uses a typical magnetic resonance imaging scanner to quantify concentrations of specific metabolites. On the spectrum, each metabolite has a unique chemical signature with peak(s) at specific frequencies used for metabolite identification. The area under the peak(s) is proportional to the concentration of a particular metabolite.

A detailed review of MRS methodology is beyond the scope of this article and readers are directed to several literature resources.^16

–19 More detailed information on terminology can be found in the article by Kreis and coworkers.²⁰ A number of relevant metabolites can be quantified using MRS. This article will focus on metabolites most commonly studied: N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), choline (Cho), glutamate (Glu), and glutamine (Gln), which are often reported as Glx = Glu+Gln, and myo-inositol (mI). In Table 1, we summarize the signal characteristics of these metabolites, including their composite signals and primary reactions.

Table 1.

A Summary of Primary Brain Metabolites Studied in Brain Injury that Can Be Quantified Using ¹H MRS

Typical in vivo concentration in the human brain, peak description, resonant frequencies, and key roles and relevant reactions are described for each metabolite. A comprehensive review of metabolite roles and pathways can be found in Rae.¹⁵⁴ Further details on chemical shift and concentration are described by Govindaraju and coworkers.⁸⁹ ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; Cho, choline; Cr, creatine; GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; Glx, glutamate + glutamine; NAA, N-acetyl-aspartate; NAAG, N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate; PCr, phosphocreatine; ppm, parts per million; TCA cycle, citric acid cycle.

The goal of this article was to comprehensively synthesize MRS research across all severities of brain injury and include consideration of the main factors that may impact MRS findings; specifically, brain region studied, injury severity, time since injury, age, sex and methodological factors (echo time, field strength, quantification approach) associated with acquisition and analysis. We performed independent meta-analyses to investigate NAA, Cr, Cho, Glx, and mI, all of which have been studied in TBI and have provided new insight into the consequences of brain injury. Metabolite levels in brain-injured subjects were compared with controls, and follow-up meta-regression analyses were performed to examine factors that may influence results.

Methods

Literature search and systematic review selection criteria

A comprehensive literature search of five databases (MEDLINE®, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and SportDiscus) was performed on January 31, 2020, to identify studies that met the following inclusion criteria:

Subjects had TBI or subconcussive hits/repetitive head impacts

Any type of MRS (single-voxel or magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging)

All ages, males and/or female subjects

Any field strength

Manuscripts were in the English language

Studies were excluded if subjects were diagnosed with traumatic encephalopathy syndrome, as this is a distinct diagnosis.¹²¹ Additionally, review articles and gray literature (e.g., conference abstracts, government publications, unpublished trial data, dissertations/theses, letters, or editorials) were excluded. For complete search details, please see Supplementary Tables S1–S5.

Two independent reviewers (J.M.J. and P.L.L.) completed all abstract and full-text screening using the Covidence platform.²² Discrepancies were resolved by a third, independent reviewer (A.D.H.). The protocol for our systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; registration CRD42020167259). This article was written in accordance with the most recent 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

Meta-analysis selection criteria

The meta-analyses were performed on NAA, Cho, Cr, Glx, and mI, as there is an abundance of ¹H MRS and ¹H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) literature for these metabolites in TBI. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they met inclusion criteria for the systematic review, had a control group, and reported either water- or creatine-referenced (Cr-referenced) metabolite levels or fully quantified metabolite levels. Details on quantification approach criteria can be found in the Data extraction section.

Studies that examined only the less commonly studied nuclei (31P, 13C) and other metabolites available in ¹H spectroscopy were excluded from meta-analyses. Studies that lacked consistent, anatomically defined regions of interest for voxel placement (i.e., were placed in a lesion), case series (n < 5 in control or TBI group) and studies that had metabolite values that were either not reported or unextractable, were also excluded. For studies that were identifiably from the same study sample, only the study with the largest sample size was included in the meta-analysis.

Data extraction

Reviewers J.M.J. and P.L.L. independently extracted all data from the included studies using a customized data extraction form (see Supplementary Table S6). If studies reported metabolite values in a table or in the text, values were extracted directly. For studies that did not report metabolite values but included bar graphs that displayed the metabolite mean and standard deviation or scatter plots, WebPlotDigitizer²³ was used to manually extract data. Some studies subdivided TBI groups by good and poor health outcomes or other clinical measures. In such cases, we combined the mean and standard deviation of TBI subgroups for comparison with controls using the formula described in the most recent edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. ²⁴ A comprehensive list of all variables extracted is reported in Table S6. Often, Glu and Gln are reported as a combined Glx signal because the signals are highly overlapped, although it is known that Glu is more concentrated and dominates the Glx signal (see Table 1). The majority of studies reported Glx; however, if data were reported for Glu alone, this was included in the Glx meta-analysis.

Brain injury severity was classified based on the severity description reported in the original research articles; subconcussive hits (subconcussive hits + repetitive head impacts), mild TBI, moderate/severe TBI, and mixed TBI (mild + moderate/severe TBI). As MRS studies often combined moderate and severe TBI data, these categories were merged into a single moderate/severe TBI group. If severity was not specifically indicated, it was defined using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (mild = GCS 13–15, moderate = GCS 9–12, severe TBI = GCS <9).⁸ Time since injury was defined as the mean time since injury to MRS scan as reported by the study. We further categorized data into hyperacute (within 72 h), acute (> 72 h–2 weeks), subacute (> 2 weeks–3 months) and chronic (> 3 months) phases. Age was defined as the mean age of the sample. Sex was defined as the percentage of males within the study. Brain regions and tissue composition (white matter dominant, gray matter dominant, or mixed white+gray matter) were defined by the description provided in the original research articles. If no description was explicitly provided, brain regions and tissue composition were categorized by visually inspecting figures with voxel placements and comparison with similar voxel placements from other articles. Generally, one of three quantification approaches were used across the studies included in the meta-analysis including: (1) Cr-referencing, (2) water-referencing assuming constant parameters in the voxel, thus reporting metabolite levels in institutional units (i.u.), in this article, which will be referred to as relative water-referenced data, and (3) complete tissue correction, which includes accounting for differential T1, T2, and water density in white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), here referred to as absolute (Abs) quantification. Another quantification method is to use an external solution reference, in which a phantom solution that contains metabolites with known concentration is scanned and used as a reference for metabolite quantification. Because of the challenges associated with this approach,¹⁷ only one study⁵⁴ included in this review had used this approach. See the consensus paper by Near and coworkers for additional details on complete tissue correction and external solution references.¹⁷

Statistical analysis

Our primary analyses were quantitative comparisons of metabolite levels in brain-injured subjects relative to controls, with brain region as a subgroup. Nine brain regions were defined: frontal, frontoparietal, parietal, parietooccipital, occipital, temporal, subcortical, corpus callosum, and cerebellum. We used five distinct random-effects models (restricted maximum likelihood method) to generate the mean effect size (Hedges' g and 95% confidence interval [CI]) of brain injury on NAA, Cho, Cr, Glx, and mI levels in each brain region of interest and across all brain regions. Whole-brain MRSI metabolite measures were not evaluated as a subgroup in our regional analysis, as our primary interest was to explore whether metabolite alterations in brain injury differ by brain region.

Between-study heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for each metabolite using the leave-one-out method. Small study effects were examined using Egger's test and through visual inspection of funnel plots.

Univariate meta-regression was used to assess other potential moderators of metabolite levels including injury severity, time since injury, age, sex, tissue type (white matter dominant, gray matter dominant, mixed tissue), field strength, echo time (TE), quantification approach (absolute compared with relative water-referencing or Cr-referencing), and year of publication. Studies that did not report a moderator of interest were excluded from that specific moderator analysis. In the moderator analyses, we tested whether a moderator impacted the detection of group differences. The exception was for the quantification approach. As absolute quantification is generally recommended,¹⁷ this moderator analysis compared whether relative water- and Cr-referencing results showed different effects than absolute quantification (basis of comparison). A common study design included multiple time point measurements for the brain-injured group (i.e., longitudinal) and a single measurement for the controls. When this study design was used, we used only the time point of the brain-injured group with the largest sample size to avoid repeated sampling of the control group in moderator analyses. However, for the time since injury meta-regression, the concern of repeated sampling was outweighed by the bias toward larger sample sizes at more acute visits and the desire to have as much data across time points as possible. Therefore, we included all time points to avoid undue sampling bias toward more acute visits that were less likely to have dropouts. Following standard practice for both the primary and moderator analyses, subgroups with fewer than two metabolite measurements were excluded. All statistical analyses were performed in STATA/BE 17.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX).

Risk of bias assessment

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies was used to assess the risk of bias of all studies included in meta-analyses. This tool is composed of 14 yes/no questions designed to assess the risk of bias. The quality rating was assigned as good/fair/poor and was completed by two independent reviewers (J.M.J. and P.L.L.) and conflicts were resolved by a third individual (A.D.H). Assessment of the quality of data was based on current standards in the field.^17,18

Results

One hundred and thirty-eight studies met inclusion criteria for the systematic review^{25

–163} and of those, 62 NAA, 24 Cr, 49 Cho, 18 Glx, and 21 mI studies met inclusion criteria for meta–analysis (see Fig. 1). Most studies included in the systematic review used a conventional PRESS acquisition sequence (83 studies) of which 54 were single voxel studies. The remaining single-voxel studies used STEAM (25 studies), MEGA-PRESS (7 studies), and other less frequently used sequences including EPSI, L-COSY, DRESS, SPECIAL, and TSI (28 studies total). Eighty studies examined special populations: 34 studies examined exclusively pediatric cohorts defined as participants <18 years of age, 24 studies were of athletes (either varsity or professional), 16 studies were of sports-related concussion (specifically non-varsity, or professional athletes), and 6 studies were of military cohorts. Of all brain injury severities, mild TBI was the most studied (59 studies). Many studies have been conducted on moderate/severe TBI subjects (47 studies), with fewer studies of subconcussive hits and mixed severities (13 and 26 respectively). Fifty-five studies examined chronic TBI (> 3 months post-injury), 46 studies were of acute TBI (72 h-2 weeks post-injury) and 40 were of subacute TBI (2 weeks-3 months post-injury), while only 25 studies examined the hyperacute time point (< 72 h post-injury).

FIG. 1.

An overview of study selection and reasons for exclusion.

The following sections report results from the five meta-analyses; abbreviated forest plots of all meta-analyses are in Figure 2. Metabolite results across different brain regions can be found in Figure 3. Detailed forest plots for each metabolite are reported in Supplementary Figure S1a–e, which depict the classification of injury severity, time since injury, and brain region for each study included.

FIG. 2.

Metabolite effect sizes (Hedge's g) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) stratified by brain region studied for (A) NAA, (B) Cr, (C) Cho, (D) Glx and (E) mI. Total number of brain-injured participants (n_TBI ) and non-brain-injured controls (n_Cont ) included in each brain region analysis are presented. The overall n represents the total number of participants included in each metabolite meta-analysis (participants from studies that measured metabolites in multiple regions of interest were only counted once).

FIG. 3.

Schematic of the regional metabolite meta-analyses (nine regions defined: frontal [pink], frontoparietal, parietal [light blue], parieto-occipital, occipital [violet], temporal, subcortical [yellow], corpus callosum [green], and cerebellar regions [dark blue]). Brain regions were defined by the description provided in the original research articles. If no description was explicitly provided, brain regions were categorized by visually inspecting figures depicting voxel placement and comparison with similar voxel placements from other articles. Regional delineations can be seen for the frontal, parietal, occipital, subcortical, corpus callosum, and cerebellar regions. The frontoparietal cortex (not explicitly shown in the figure) was defined as a region transecting the central sulcus that was composed of both the frontal and parietal lobes. Similarly, the parieto-occipital cortex was defined as a region transecting the parieto-occipital sulcus, and was composed of both the parietal and occipital lobes. Although not shown here, the temporal lobe was delineated by the Sylvian fissure and the pre-occipital notch. Metabolites that were found to be significantly altered in brain-injured subjects relative to controls are indicated. ↑ = Metabolite significantly increased in brain-injured subjects. ↓ = Metabolite significantly decreased in brain-injured subjects. * = Metabolite alterations that approached statistical significance.

NAA

Sixty-two studies (n_{Brain-Injured} = 1275; n_Control = 1030) met inclusion criteria for the NAA meta-analysis. NAA was lower in the brain injury group, with an overall medium effect size (g = -0.60, CI: -0.78, -0.43). Brain region was a statistically significant factor (Qb[8] = 19.50, p = 0.01). The following brain regions had significantly lower NAA: frontal (g = -1.00, CI: -1.40, -0.60), parietal (g = -0.47, CI: -0.80, -0.13), parietooccipital (g = -0.84, CI: -1.16, -0.52), and the corpus callosum (g = -1.07, CI: -1.71, -0.43). No region showed increased NAA with brain injury. The detailed NAA forest plot can be found in Figure S1a.

Age was a statistically significant moderator of NAA effects, with more pronounced NAA reductions in older cohorts. Mild, moderate/severe, and mixed TBI groups (but not subconcussive hits) showed decreased NAA with comparable effect sizes. NAA was decreased at all time points studied, and reductions were greatest at the hyperacute time point. Reductions in NAA were found in gray matter dominant, white matter dominant, and mixed tissue brain regions. Statistically significant reductions in NAA were seen at both 1.5T and 3T, with a greater decrease in NAA at the lower field strength; no NAA reductions were seen at 7T. Larger NAA decreases were seen with relative water-referencing and Cr-referencing than with absolute quantification. TE was a statistically significant moderator of NAA effect sizes with studies of TE = 30 ms, 60 ms, and ≥100 ms having statistically significant effects. NAA effect sizes had a statistically significant relationship with publication year, with smaller effect sizes found in more recent studies. Lastly, sex was not a statistically significant moderator. NAA moderator analyses are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

NAA Moderator Analysis Summary

Moderator	n	β	SE	z	95% CI		p	I² (%)
Injury severity	62							89.83
Subconcussive	4	-0.156	0.325	-0.48	-0.794	0.480	0.630	-
Mild TBI	25	-0.581	0.108	-5.39	-0.793	-0.370	0.000	-
Mixed TBI	13	-0.545	0.183	-2.97	-0.905	-0.185	0.003	-
Moderate-to-severe TBI	20	-0.665	0.127	-5.22	-0.914	-0.415	0.000	-
Time since injury	55							90.91
Hyperacute (< 72 h)	6	-0.940	0.276	-3.40	-1.48	-0.399	0.001	-
Acute (72 h-2 weeks)	11	-0.551	0.190	-2.90	-0.924	-0.179	0.004	-
Subacute (2 weeks-3 months)	12	-0.591	0.159	-3.72	-0.902	-0.279	0.000	-
Chronic (> 3 months)	26	-0.502	0.119	-4.20	-0.737	-0.268	0.000	-
Age (Years)	52	-0.026	0.007	-3.58	-0.041	-0.012	0.000	88.80
Sex (% Male)	45	0.003	0.005	0.65	-0.007	0.014	0.516	90.64
Tissue type	62							89.47
Gray matter dominant	15	-0.591	0.143	-4.12	-0.872	-0.309	0.000	-
White matter dominant	25	-0.734	0.106	-6.92	-0.942	-0.526	0.000	-
Mixed	22	-0.321	0.135	-2.38	-0.587	-0.056	0.017	-
Field strength	61							88.12
1.5T	25	-0.870	0.109	-7.95	-1.085	-0.656	0.000	-
2T	2	-1.011	0.579	-1.75	-2.147	0.123	0.081	-
3T	33	-0.318	0.091	-3.52	-0.495	-0.141	0.000	-
7T	1	-0.275	0.680	-0.41	-1.608	1.057	0.685	-
Echo time	58							90.31
20ms	4	-0.663	0.343	-1.94	-1.33	0.008	0.053	-
30ms	12	-0.448	0.179	-2.51	-0.798	-0.098	0.012	-
35ms	5	-0.478	0.291	-1.64	-1.05	0.093	0.101	-
40ms	5	-0.158	0.326	-0.48	-0.798	0.482	0.628	-
60ms	2	-1.23	0.466	-2.64	-2.15	-0.319	0.008	-
70ms	4	-0.343	0.178	-1.93	-0.692	0.006	0.054	-
≥100ms	26	-0.685	0.119	-5.76	-0.918	-0.452	0.000	-
Quantification approach	62							90.11
Absolute water referenced (basis of comparison)	15							-
Relative water-referenced	15	-0.762	0.154	-4.95	-1.064	-0.460	0.000	-
Cr-referenced	32	-0.566	0.101	-5.60	-0.764	-0.368	0.000	-
Publication year	62	0.051	0.010	4.72	0.030	0.072	0.000	88.45

For quantification approach, the analysis used absolute units (Abs) as the basis of comparison for the other metabolite approaches (i.e., relative water-referencing and Cr-referencing). n = number of included studies (in all cases where n = 1 study, > 1 regional measurement was included in the analysis, conforming to inclusion methods). p-values of statistically significant results are bolded. NAA, N-acetyl-aspartate; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

Cr

Twenty-four studies (n_{Brain-Injured} = 431; n_Control = 325) met inclusion criteria for the Cr meta-analysis. There was no overall effect (g = -0.06, CI: -0.18, 0.06) of brain injury on Cr, nor did effect sizes differ across brain regions (Qb[5] = 3.78, p = 0.58). The detailed Cr forest plot is in Figure S1b.

For the Cr moderator analyses, time since injury was a statistically significant factor. Acutely post-injury Cr was increased while in the chronic phase, Cr was decreased relative to controls. No Cr differences were found at the hyperacute or subacute time points. TE was a statistically significant moderator, with studies of TE = 20 ms, 40 ms, and 135 ms having statistically significant effects. Cr was not moderated by field strength, injury severity, quantification approach, age, sex, tissue type, or publication year. Cr moderator analyses are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Cr Moderator Analysis Summary

Moderator	n	β	SE	z	95% CI		p	I² (%)
Injury severity	24							43.29
Subconcussive	4	0.046	0.193	0.24	-0.332	0.426	0.808	-
Mild TBI	9	0.023	0.108	0.22	-0.189	0.236	0.829	-
Mixed TBI	2	-0.139	0.235	-0.59	-0.601	0.322	0.554	-
Moderate-to-severe TBI	9	-0.027	0.129	-0.21	-0.280	0.225	0.832	-
Time since injury	19							25.00
Hyperacute (< 72 h)	1	-0.216	0.361	-0.60	-0.925	0.492	0.550	-
Acute (72 h-2 weeks)	4	0.370	0.166	2.23	0.044	0.696	0.026	-
Subacute (2 weeks-3 months)	7	0.126	0.098	1.28	-0.07	0.320	0.202	-
Chronic (> 3 months)	7	-0.362	0.128	-2.81	-0.615	-0.110	0.005	-
Age (Years)	20	-0.001	0.008	-0.16	-0.017	.0145	0.876	38.39
Sex (% Male)	16	-0.000	0.005	-0.05	-0.010	0.009	0.959	44.71
Tissue type	24							40.93
Gray matter dominant	3	0.007	0.134	0.05	-0.255	0.270	0.958	-
White matter dominant	14	0.057	0.108	0.54	-0.154	0.269	0.592	-
Mixed	7	-0.111	0.134	-0.83	-0.374	0.151	0.404	-
Field strength	24							41.57
1.5T	9	-0.091	0.117	-0.78	-0.321	0.138	0.436	-
2T	1	-0.249	0.548	-0.46	-1.324	0.825	0.649	-
3T	14	0.055	0.091	0.60	-0.124	0.234	0.546	-
Quantification approach	23							40.07
Abs (basis of comparison)	13							-
Relative water-referenced	10	-0.094	0.117	-0.80	-0.325	0.137	0.425	-
Echo time	23							14.96
20ms	2	0.5	0.194	2.58	0.12	0.88	0.01	-
30ms	7	-0.097	0.116	-0.84	-0.324	0.129	0.399	-
35ms	5	0.032	0.107	0.3	-0.179	0.242	0.767	-
40ms	4	0.303	0.145	2.09	0.018	0.588	0.037	-
60ms	1	0.081	0.283	0.29	-0.473	0.635	0.774	-
135ms	4	-0.706	0.194	-3.64	-1.09	-0.326	0.000	-
Publication year	24	0.007	0.009	0.71	-0.012	0.026	0.475	40.58

For quantification approach, the analysis used absolute units (Abs) as the basis of comparison for the other metabolite quantification approach (i.e., relative water-referencing). n = number of included studies (in all cases where n = 1 study, >1 regional measurement was included in the analysis, conforming to inclusion methods). p-values of statistically significant results are bolded. Cr, Creatine; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

Cho

Forty-nine studies (n_{Brain-injured} = 1106; n_Control = 795) met inclusion criteria for the Cho meta-analysis. Compared with controls, brain-injured subjects showed an overall increase in Cho with a medium effect size (g = 0.55; CI: 0.29, 0.80), and brain region was a statistically significant factor (Q_b[8] = 16.93, p = 0.03). The corpus callosum (g = 1.16; CI: 0.39, 1.94), parietal (g = 0.88; CI: 0.18, 1.58), parietooccipital (g = 0.67; CI: 0.32, 1.02), and occipital (g = 1.08; CI: 0.46, 1.70) regions showed statistically significant increases in Cho in brain-injured individuals compared with controls. The detailed Cho forest plot can be found in Figure S1c.

Injury severity was a statistically significant moderator of effect size, with only the moderate-to-severe TBI group showing statistically significant increases in Cho. TBI subjects in the subacute and chronic phase post-injury, but not the hyperacute or acute phase, were found to have elevated Cho. Age had an influence on Cho effect sizes, with younger age groups showing larger Cho differences. TE was a statistically significant moderator of Cho effect sizes with studies of TE = 30 ms and 70 ms having statistically significant effects. Relative water-referenced, but not Cr-referenced, data differed significantly from absolute quantification. Only mixed tissue regions (not white matter dominant or gray matter dominant tissue regions) and field strength of 3T showed statistically significant Cho increases. Sex and publication year did not significantly impact Cho effect sizes. Cho moderator analyses are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4.

Cho Moderator Analysis Summary

Moderator	n	β	SE	z	95% CI		p	I² (%)
Injury severity	49							91.91
Subconcussive	3	0.157	0.561	0.28	-0.942	1.26	0.780	-
Mild TBI	21	0.126	0.148	0.86	-0.163	0.416	0.393	-
Mixed TBI	10	0.093	0.266	0.35	-0.428	0.613	0.727	-
Moderate-to-severe TBI	15	1.490	0.234	6.38	1.033	1.949	<0.001	-
Time since injury	44							92.94
Hyperacute (< 72 h)	6	0.449	0.352	1.27	-0.241	1.139	0.202	-
Acute (72 h-2 weeks)	8	0.016	0.253	0.06	-0.480	0.513	0.948	-
Subacute (2 weeks-3 months)	10	0.452	0.197	2.29	0.066	0.838	0.022	-
Chronic (> 3 months)	20	0.532	0.163	3.27	0.213	0.851	0.001	-
Age (Years)	43	-0.030	0.013	-2.32	-0.055	-0.005	0.020	93.02
Sex (% Male)	36	0.003	0.009	0.34	-0.015	0.022	0.737	94.44
Tissue type	49							93.19
Gray matter dominant	12	0.394	0.231	1.70	-0.059	0.848	0.088	-
White matter dominant	24	0.292	0.171	1.70	-0.044	0.628	0.088	-
Mixed	13	0.763	0.249	3.06	0.273	1.252	0.002	-
Field strength	46							93.32
1.5T	20	0.330	0.183	1.80	-0.029	0.690	0.072	-
3T	26	0.501	0.166	3.02	0.176	0.827	0.003	-
Quantification approach	49							91.74
Abs (basis of comparison)	13							-
Relative water-referenced	14	1.380	0.207	6.67	0.975	1.786	<0.001	-
Cr-referenced	22	-0.017	0.159	-0.11	-0.330	0.295	0.914	-
Echo time	47							91.25
20ms	4	0.622	0.488	1.27	-0.335	1.58	0.203	-
30ms	9	0.785	0.323	2.43	0.153	1.42	0.015	-
35ms	5	0.266	0.319	0.83	-3.60	0.892	0.406	-
40ms	3	0.130	0.451	0.29	-0.753	1.01	0.772	-
60ms	2	0.675	0.503	1.34	-0.311	1.66	0.18	-
70ms	3	1.66	0.239	6.95	1.19	2.13	0.000	-
100ms+	21	-0.141	0.177	-0.80	-0.488	0.205	0.424	-
Publication year	49	0.015	0.020	0.75	-0.025	0.056	0.451	93.27

For quantification approach, the analysis used absolute units (Abs) as the basis of comparison for the other metabolite approaches (i.e., relative water-referencing and Cr-referencing). n = number of included studies (in all cases where n = 1 study, > 1 regional measurement was included in the analysis, conforming to inclusion methods). p-values of statistically significant results are bolded. Cho, Choline; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

Glu + Gln, Glx

Eighteen studies (n_{Brain-injured} = 416; n_Control = 246) met inclusion criteria for the Glx meta-analysis. There was no overall effect of brain injury on Glx (g = 0.01; CI: -0.31, 0.33). However, effect sizes differed significantly across brain regions (Q_b[6] = 29.91, p < 0.01). Relative to controls, Glx was significantly higher in the corpus callosum (g = 0.71; CI: 0.40, 1.02), occipital (g = 0.73; CI: 0.32, 1.15), and subcortical regions (g = 0.46; CI: 0.18, 0.74) in brain-injured individuals. In contrast, Glx was significantly lower in the temporal lobe (g = -0.79; CI: -1.38, -0.20) and approached statistical significance in the frontal region (g = -0.67; CI: -1.44, 0.10). The detailed Glx forest plot can be found in Figure S1d.

Age and tissue type were statistically significant moderators of effect size. Adolescent and young adult brain-injured groups had lower Glx than controls, whereas adults (> 25 years) tended to show higher Glx. Increased Glx was found in white matter dominant, but not gray matter dominant or mixed tissue. Glx was increased at 1.5T but not at 3T. Sex, publication year, and TE were not statistically significant moderators of Glx. Glx moderator analyses are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5.

Glx Moderator Analysis Summary

Moderator	n	β	SE	z	95% CI		p	I² (%)
Injury severity	18							80.38
Subconcussive	4	-0.146	0.311	-0.47	-0.755	0.463	0.639	-
Mild TBI	9	-0.204	0.183	-1.11	-0.561	0.154	0.265	-
Mixed TBI	2	0.596	0.296	2.01	0.015	1.178	0.044	-
Moderate-to-severe TBI	3	0.253	0.376	0.67	-0.483	0.991	0.500	-
Time since injury	14							83.45
Hyperacute (< 72 h)	4	-0.098	0.353	-0.28	-0.790	0.595	0.782	-
Acute (72 h-2 weeks)	4	-0.242	0.253	-0.96	-0.737	0.253	0.338	-
Subacute (2 weeks-3 months)	3	0.384	0.276	1.39	-0.156	0.925	0.164	-
Chronic (> 3 months)	3	0.157	0.281	0.56	-0.395	0.708	0.578	-
Age (Years)	15	-0.035	0.013	2.66	0.009	0.060	0.008	53.69
Sex (% Male)	13	0.001	0.006	0.23	-0.011	0.013	0.818	64.59
Tissue type	18							80.08
Gray matter dominant	2	-0.063	0.247	-0.25	-0.547	0.421	0.800	-
White matter dominant	8	0.482	0.231	2.09	0.030	0.934	0.037	-
Mixed	8	-0.285	0.202	-1.41	-0.681	0.111	0.158	-
Field strength	18							76.65
1.5T	3	0.800	0.274	2.91	0.261	1.337	0.004	-
3T	15	-0.153	0.133	-1.15	-0.414	0.108	0.249	-
Quantification approach	18							82.72
Abs (basis of comparison)	8							-
Relative water-referenced	6	0.210	0.250	0.84	-0.281	0.701	0.401	-
Cr-referenced	4	-0.103	0.267	-0.39	-0.627	0.421	0.700	-
Echo time	17							87.56
20 ms	2	0.842	0.509	1.65	-0.155	1.840	0.098	-
30 ms	5	-0.527	0.291	-1.81	-1.096	0.043	0.070	-
35 ms	2	-0.071	0.320	-0.22	-0.698	0.556	0.824	-
40 ms	4	-0.115	0.362	-0.32	-0.824	0.594	0.751	-
> 40 ms	4	0.026	0.420	0.06	-0.797	0.849	0.951	-
Publication year	18	-0.044	0.029	-1.53	-0.100	0.012	0.126	81.59

For quantification approach, the analysis used absolute units (Abs) as the basis of comparison for the other metabolite approaches (i.e., relative water-referencing and Cr-referencing). n = number of included studies (in all cases where n = 1 study, > 1 regional measurement was included in the analysis, conforming to inclusion methods). p-values of statistically significant results are bolded. Glx, glutamate + glutamine; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

mI

Twenty-one studies (n_{Brain-Injured} = 420; n_Control = 273) met inclusion criteria for the mI meta-analysis. There was an overall positive effect (g = 0.25, CI: 0.02, 0.47), indicating that when pooling data across all regions, mI is increased with brain injury. mI effects were not significantly different across brain regions (Qb[7] = 9.01, p = 0.25); that is, in no case did one region show a significantly different effect from another region. The detailed mI forest plot can be found in Figure S1e.

Age, time point, severity, field strength, TE, and publication year were all statistically significant moderators of mI effect size. Age had a positive relationship with mI, indicating a larger mI increase in older subjects with brain injury. mI was unaffected in the hyperacute and acute phase post-injury but was significantly increased at subacute and chronic time points. Severity was a moderator of effect size, with only the moderate/severe TBI group exhibiting statistically significant increases in mI. mI was significantly increased at 1.5T but not at 3T, and mI effect sizes were smaller in studies that were published more recently. TE was a statistically significant moderator of mI effect sizes, with studies of TE = 35 ms data showing statistically significant mI increases. Sex and tissue type did not moderate effect sizes. mI moderator analyses are summarized in Table 6.

Table 6.

mI Moderator Analysis Summary

Moderator	n	β	SE	z	95% CI		p	I² (%)
Injury severity	21							62.22
Subconcussive	3	0.308	0.209	1.47	-0.101	0.717	0.140	-
Mild TBI	9	-0.092	0.115	-0.81	-0.318	0.132	0.420	-
Mixed TBI	3	0.177	0.237	0.75	-0.288	0.642	0.455	-
Moderate-to-severe TBI	6	0.529	0.132	3.99	0.269	0.789	0.000	-
Time since injury	17							64.84
Hyperacute (< 72 h)	1	0.268	0.272	0.99	-0.265	0.803	0.324	-
Acute (72 h-2 weeks)	3	-0.308	0.188	-1.64	-0.678	0.060	0.102	-
Subacute (2 weeks-3 months)	5	0.369	0.146	2.52	0.082	0.657	0.012	-
Chronic (> 3 months)	8	0.326	0.144	2.26	0.042	0.609	0.024	-
Age (Years)	15	0.025	0.009	2.70	0.007	0.044	0.007	50.60
Sex (% Male)	13	0.003	0.005	0.61	-0.007	0.014	0.545	39.03
Tissue type	21							68.00
Gray matter dominant	5	0.247	0.155	1.59	-0.057	0.552	0.112	-
White matter dominant	7	0.200	0.138	1.45	-0.070	0.470	0.147	-
Mixed	9	0.143	0.136	1.05	-0.124	0.411	0.295	-
Field strength	21							64.20
1.5T	8	0.431	0.121	3.56	0.194	0.668	0.000	-
3T	13	0.023	0.101	0.24	-0.175	0.223	0.814	-
Quantification approach	21							69.92
Abs (basis of comparison)	7							-
Relative water-referenced	7	0.238	0.181	1.31	-0.117	0.595	0.189	-
Cr-referenced	7	0.060	0.151	0.40	-0.235	0.357	0.688	-
Echo time (ms)	19							66.05
20	3	0.107	0.192	0.56	-0.269	0.484	0.576	-
30	9	0.150	0.116	1.29	-0.078	0.378	0.197	-
35	5	0.452	0.173	2.61	0.112	0.792	0.009	-
40	1	-0.381	0.446	-0.85	-1.256	0.494	0.394	-
144	1	0.570	0.338	1.68	-0.093	1.234	0.092	-
Publication year	21	-0.030	0.010	-2.79	-0.052	-0.009	0.005	63.85

For quantification approach, the analysis used absolute units (Abs) as the basis of comparison for the other metabolite approaches (i.e., relative water-referencing and Cr-referencing). n = number of included studies (in all cases where n = 1 study, > 1 regional measurement was included in the analysis, conforming to inclusion methods). p-values of statistically significant results are bolded. mI, myo-inositol; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

Risk of bias assessment

Overall, studies clearly stated their research question and goals. Inclusion/exclusion criteria was specified for a large majority of studies, but were often broad and captured heterogeneous cohorts. Only ∼30% of studies clearly defined their study population and controlled for confounding variables. Studies rarely justified their sample size and did not report the participation rate of eligible participants. Typically, assessors were not blinded to participant group. As there were few longitudinal studies, loss to follow-up after baseline was largely not applicable. Results from the risk of bias assessment are summarized in Supplementary Figure S2.

Sensitivity analyses

Visual inspection of funnel plots revealed evidence of asymmetry in some metabolites included in meta-analyses. Funnel plots of Cho and Cr were visually symmetric, but Glx, NAA and mI had a skew of varying magnitude. Funnel plots can be found in Supplementary Figure S3.

Egger's test indicated that NAA and Glx showed larger negative effect sizes in studies with smaller sample sizes. Egger's test was repeated while accounting for our primary moderator of interest (brain region). When the variance caused by brain region was included in Egger's test, NAA and Glx continued to be biased by small studies. Cho and mI also showed small-study effects; however, for these metabolites, larger positive effect sizes were associated with smaller sample sizes when accounting for brain region. Cr did not have small-study effects regardless of whether brain region was included in the analysis. Egger's test results are reported in Supplementary Table S7.

The results of the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis are reported in Supplementary Figure S4a–e and show that no single study had a disproportionate effect on the overall effect size for NAA, Cho, Cr, or Glx. mI had differing results depending on the study removed in the leave-one-out analysis; several studies changed the mI result from being statistically significant to a non-statistically significant trend.

Discussion

The purpose of this review was to synthesize the literature on MRS findings in brain-injured subjects to better understand the effect of brain injury on brain metabolites. To date, this is the largest meta-analysis synthesizing the effect of brain injury on metabolites with 1428 unique brain-injured subjects. We examined the effect of brain injury on five frequently studied metabolites using MRS (NAA, Cr, Cho, Glx, and mI). NAA was consistently decreased across different brain regions, TBI of all severities, and time since injury (early after injury and in the subsequent weeks and months). Cho and mI were increased with TBI, although alterations were less consistent than NAA and were moderated by various injury characteristics and demographic factors. Glx and Cr were largely unchanged, but did exhibit some alterations.

Brain region and tissue composition

Certain brain regions appear to be more prone to metabolite changes, and this vulnerability varied by metabolite. Interestingly, although the frontal lobe was the most studied region, only NAA showed a statistically significant alteration (reduction) in this region. The frontal lobe has functional relevance to brain injury given its important roles in cognition¹⁶⁴ and emotional regulation,¹⁶⁵ likely contributing to the frequent selection of this region of interest, particularly for studies of mild TBI. As Cho and mI were not altered in mild TBI but overall were changed in moderate/severe TBI, the lack of statistically significant alterations of these metabolites may be related to injury severity rather than the measurement region.

The high incidence of metabolite differences in the corpus callosum was common across metabolites. Diffuse axonal injuries are often considered a result of shear-strain deformation of the brain at gray and white matter interfaces.¹⁶⁶ Local metabolic disturbance is also thought to contribute to axonal injury, particularly with respect to delayed axonal swelling.¹⁶⁷ Because the corpus callosum is a critical bridge between cerebral hemispheres, it has been proposed that damage to it may contribute to interhemispheric disconnection and circuit disruption seen in functional MRI studies after TBI.¹⁶⁸ Consistent with the reported vulnerability of the corpus callosum to microstructural damage in brain injury,¹⁶⁹ our data show that this area is also susceptible to metabolic alteration.

Related to the regional analysis is the effect of tissue type. Whereas many studies included in our meta-analyses examined mixed white and gray matter regions, some studies targeted white matter dominant or gray matter dominant regions specifically. Given the differential distributions of some metabolites between white and gray matter,^170,171,174 we aimed to determine whether metabolite alterations were impacted by tissue type. Metabolite effect sizes in white matter dominant and gray matter dominant tissue were largely similar for all metabolites except for Glx. Relative to controls, Glx was higher following brain injury only in white matter dominant tissue, and Glx was the only metabolite that was increased or decreased depending on brain region (increased in corpus callosum, occipital, and subcortical regions; decreased in temporal lobe; trend of decrease in frontal lobe). Glu is reportedly higher in gray matter than in white matter,^{120,170

–173} whereas Gln is higher in white matter than in gray matter.¹⁷⁴ As Glu and Gln have distinct roles (see Table 1), they may respond differently to brain injury, which may contribute to varied Glx results across regions. It is well known that Glu is more abundant than Gln, and that therefore Glx is often interpreted as Glu. The convention of reporting Glx is also a result of the difficulty in reliably separating Glu from Gln, as they are highly overlapped on the ¹H MRS spectrum.¹⁷⁵ As the number of studies that examined Glu alone are limited, we did not compare Glu and Glx results in this meta-analysis. However, the possibility of differing Glu and Gln effects raises an important question to be explored in future work, possibly with customized approaches or ultra-high field.¹⁷⁵ Another limitation, discussed in detail subsequently, is the inability to specifically differentiate the effects of region compared with tissue type with the univariate approaches used here.

Injury severity

NAA was consistently decreased across TBI of all severities but did not exhibit differences in subconcussive hits. Compared with the other metabolites, NAA appears to be the most sensitive to brain injury. Cho and mI were elevated only in moderate-to-severe TBI, whereas Glx and Cr did not appear to be mediated by injury severity. Interestingly, NAA reductions were not larger with more severe TBI.

NAA has been traditionally considered as a marker of neuronal integrity¹¹⁷; however, NAA has many roles as described in Table 1. Decreased NAA in moderate-to-severe TBI has been suggested to be related to neuronal loss along with tissue loss. However, it must be noted that Cho and mI are increased in moderate-to-severe TBI, suggesting that tissue loss alone does not explain alterations in brain metabolites. Decreased NAA in moderate-to-severe TBI may instead reflect a combination of neuronal dysfunction and tissue loss. Similarly, reductions in NAA following mild TBI may reflect a transient state of poor neuronal health or energy impairment, as NAA levels have been seen to increase with recovery.^176,177 The lack of statistically significant NAA reductions in subconcussive hits may indicate that NAA alterations may be too subtle to detect, or it may be that the injury is not severe enough to elicit a lasting change in NAA. Currently there is limited MRS literature on subconcussive hits; therefore, the topic warrants further study to obtain a better understanding of the cumulative effect of head impacts on brain metabolites.

Time since injury

Immediately post-TBI, the brain is in a state of ionic and energetic flux,¹⁷⁸ and long-term consequences are less well known. The largest NAA reductions were detected during the hyperacute phase post-injury, which is widely acknowledged as a period of metabolic disturbance¹⁷⁹ with high risk of re-injury.¹⁶⁶ NAA alterations lasting beyond the hyperacute period may be related to severity of initial injury or the capacity to recover from injury. Cho and mI alterations were only found in the subacute and chronic phases post-injury. Clinical studies and histopathological work have provided evidence of prolonged neuroinflammation following TBI,^181,182 particularly in moderate-to-severe TBI, which may explain Cho and mI increases. Alternatively, Cho and mI increases may reflect membrane remodeling during recovery.

Age and sex

Clinically, the relationship between age and TBI is complicated. Central nervous system anatomy and physiology differ between children and adults, which results in different outcomes following initial head impact as well as in response to treatment interventions.¹⁸³ Differences between pediatric and adult TBI are reviewed in detail by Figaji and coworkers.¹⁸³ In the present meta-analysis, weaker NAA effects were found in younger populations, suggesting that older individuals are more susceptible to damage resulting in lower NAA following injury. It may be that the more plastic pediatric brain is more adaptable and/or resilient, resulting in a smaller change in NAA. This interpretation, however, is complicated by the fact that NAA increases with development.¹⁸⁴ In contrast, larger Cho effects were seen in younger cohorts. Typically, Cho concentrations are higher in white matter than in gray matter,^{174,185
–187} and white matter proliferation and maturation are characteristic of early brain development.^188,189 As previously discussed, white matter is also highly susceptible to brain injury.¹⁹⁰ Brain injury during this crucial developmental period may result in larger Cho increases than in adulthood.¹⁸⁴ Alternatively, because the brain is highly plastic in early life,¹⁹¹ more pronounced elevations in Cho seen in younger ages may reflect a greater ability of the brain to respond and recover from damage to neural membranes. Overall, the results of our meta-analyses support the proposal that adult MRS TBI results do not extend to the pediatric population.

Sex differences in TBI pathophysiology and symptomology are not clearly defined.¹⁹² It is widely reported that women have worse outcomes than men following TBI.^193

–196 However, there is also research to suggest that these outcomes differ by symptom¹⁹⁷ and may be influenced by TBI severity.¹⁹² Here, we did not find sex to be a statistically significant moderator of metabolite effect sizes. Sex was operationally defined as the percentage of males of each study. Although this approach is common in meta-analyses,^{198

–203} it does not capture differences in sex distributions between groups, and it is possible that the influence of sex on metabolite alterations is masked in this analysis. Although we did not find a relationship between sex and metabolite effect sizes, we acknowledge that this area of research merits further investigation.

Control groups

A source of variability across studies was the definition of controls used for comparison with brain-injured subjects. In some studies, broad inclusion criteria were used for the control group with the only specification being that controls were “healthy.”^67,78,92 Other studies excluded controls with any previous brain injury history.^55,56,84 Studies of contact sport athletes often recruited a non-contact athlete control group to account for the biological and psychosocial effects of participation in sports.^{36,48,63,90,95,118,163} Similarly, orthopedic injury controls are becoming increasingly common, as they share a common trauma experience to brain-injured subjects.^{97,113,151,204} The selection of controls is an important consideration, as a recent imaging study comparing children and adolescents with mild TBI, those with orthopedic injury, and uninjured controls found that the structural connectome of the mild TBI and orthopedic injury groups did not significantly differ, but that both groups were significantly different from the uninjured group.¹⁹⁹ This finding suggests that differences in brain imaging are related to injury experience, rather than specifically to brain injury. Therefore, the selection of controls for MRS studies may also have statistically significant effects on outcomes.

Technical moderators

Early MRI systems were typically field strengths of 1.5T, whereas increasing adoption and widespread use of 3T and higher field strengths are now more common. Acquisition and analysis methods have also improved with the development of more advanced hardware and software, including but not limited to: water suppression, shimming, and post-processing (coil combination and retrospective frequency correction).²⁰⁶ Our analyses found that NAA and mI effect sizes were larger in earlier studies, with weaker effects found in more recent years. This may reflect an insensitivity of measurement methods to detect subtle changes in metabolites in earlier work and a lack of publication of null results. Alternatively, although still meeting the criteria for mild, moderate, or severe TBI, the injuries themselves may have been more severe in older literature. Indeed, there is some evidence that as information and knowledge about concussion are more widespread, there is increased presentation of mild TBI to clinicians.²⁰⁷ Interestingly, Cho effects were statistically significant at 3T but not 1.5T, which may be related to an increased ability to detect changes with improved methods. As stated earlier with the statistically significant effects of moderate/severe TBI in Cho, it would be interesting to explore how severity, field strength, and publication year impact these results, as there appears to be sampling bias toward more severe TBI being studied earlier and at 1.5T, compared with more recent work at 3T, with a larger focus on mild TBI.

Quantification approaches have also been refined over time. Specifically investigated here was the contrast between Cr-referencing (often used in earlier literature), relative water-referencing, and absolute quantification. Our findings suggest that Cr-referenced and relative water-referenced data had larger metabolite effect sizes than absolute quantification (relative water-referenced and Cr-referenced data showed larger NAA deficits than absolute quantification; relative water-referenced data detected larger increases in Cho than absolute quantification). Generally, absolute quantification is now the recommended approach,¹⁷ however, Cr-referencing may be preferred in some cases where the water signal differs. For example, Cr-referencing may reduce inter-site variability.^206,208

Sensitivity analyses

Our sensitivity analyses found that there are small study effects present in the included data, which suggests the presence of publication bias in the field. All the metabolites included in our meta-analyses can be acquired in a single conventional spectroscopy acquisition, yet we noted a much higher prevalence of studies that examined NAA than that examined Cho, Cr, Glx, or mI. This observation may reflect a reporting bias as well as technical specifications of MRS sequences. Early MRS work favored long TEs, which minimizes the spectral baseline and macromolecule contamination. However, metabolites such as Glx and mI have a short T2 relaxation time limiting their quantification at long TEs,²⁰⁹ which likely contributes to the relative paucity of studies on Glx and mI. As Cr is commonly used as a quantification reference, Cr data are also limited.

Limitations

High heterogeneity was found in studies included in our review and was expected given the nature of brain injury. We explored this heterogeneity through univariate moderator analyses and have identified specific factors (brain region, tissue type, age, injury severity, time since injury, field strength, TE, quantification approach, and publication year) that contribute to variability in metabolite results. However, we also found that individual studies often included cohorts with highly diverse demographic and injury characteristics, which added a degree of uncertainty to the relationships found with different moderators. For example, studies often did not target specific TBI severities,^40,43,65,82 age ranges,^125,155,156 or time periods post-injury.^40,43,82,125 Future work can help limit this within-study heterogeneity by implementing clear, specific inclusion and exclusion criteria for participant recruitment.

Even with clearly defined cohorts, there are limitations to univariate approaches. In particular, univariate approaches do not explore the relationships between moderators. The importance of such interactions is illustrated by considering the influence of age on metabolite alteration following brain injury. For example, NAA and N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAG) are distinct with respect to their regional developmental changes.²¹⁰ Specifically, NAA in gray matter increases in child development; whereas NAA levels in white matter remain constant. In contrast, the opposite has been reported for NAAG.²¹⁰ Therefore, whereas total NAA (NAA + NAAG) increases in childhood and early adolescence, the underlying metabolites contributing to this change differ by tissue. Further, structural development is not uniform across the brain and has been shown to vary with tissue and region.²¹¹ As such, the age and tissue relationship becomes important to consider when interpreting whether children or adults are more susceptible to metabolite alteration following brain injury. Another example of interacting relationships between moderators is the tissue type and regional analyses. Some regions are dominated by white matter or gray matter, whereas other regions are more mixed, and, specifically, differentiating differences that are driven by location and those driven by tissue type are beyond the scope of the univariate approaches used in this meta-analysis. Further, only the frontal lobe has sufficient data across all metabolites for performing this type of analysis, but this would impart a different type of regional bias to the analysis. Here, interpretation of the tissue-type and regional results must consider these inter-related effects. Multivariate approaches for moderator analyses can help capture interactions among different biological and technical factors to further tease apart their influence on metabolism following brain injury.

Consistent with other MRS systematic reviews,^212
–214 we have used an inclusive requirement for subgroup definitions (a minimum of two MRS measurements per subgroup) rather than selectively omitting studies or features less reported in the literature. This results in the consensus of these smaller subgroup analyses being less compelling than those with multiple studies and measures included; however, given that a goal of this review was to provide an overview and synthesis of all the literature as well as to identify future opportunities, this approach seemed most appropriate here. The limitation resulting from this definition is an imbalance in the number or studies, measures, and participants in different moderator analyses and subgroups. For example, in our regional analysis, some brain regions were less frequently studied than others. Only two studies that included a total of 55 participants (23 brain injured and 22 controls) were included in the Glx temporal lobe analysis, whereas nine studies that included a total of 369 participants (221 brain injured and 148 controls) were included in the frontal lobe analysis. Analyses of smaller subgroups carry a different level of confidence than larger samples and the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis does not enable comparing the levels of confidence between the different moderator analyses. Readers are therefore encouraged to consider the number of studies and study sample size included in each subgroup (see Fig. 2) when interpreting each analysis.

Areas for future research

We have identified several areas of research that were beyond the scope of this review, but that offer opportunities for future syntheses. First, we observed that studies frequently examined metabolite levels in relation to TBI symptom and neuropsychological outcomes.^{27,38
–40,53,55,61,64,68,69,71,79,82,86,90,95,97,116,117,151,152,154,159,160} For example, many studies reported a relationship between low NAA levels and worse symptom or neuropsychological outcome.^{39,40,55,61,62,64,79,82,97,117,151,152,160} Although symptom associations with other metabolites were identified, findings were less consistent.^{27,38,40,53,55,62,64,68,69,75,79,82,90,95,116,117,151,159,160} Determining the consistency of metabolite-symptom relationships across the whole brain and across TBI severities is an opportunity. It is also ambiguous whether symptom resolution precedes or follows metabolic recovery. A clearer picture of the relationship between symptoms and metabolites may serve to inform treatment and hasten recovery.

Second, although less often examined, other metabolites such as lactate,^{31,50,78,92,100,104,114,121,140,143,153} γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA),^{3,86,95,143,154,158} glutathione,^27,64,90 and aspartate^109,130,143 have been measured using ¹H MRS in brain injury. As many of these metabolites are present in low concentrations and some have complex signal patterns, reliable quantification requires advanced MRS methods, typically spectral editing. Similarly, TBI studies using ³¹P MRS^{67,122,134,138,139} are rare, but some studies are present in the literature. Although the technical requirements for acquisition of these metabolites are more complex, they offer important insights into cortical metabolism. As such, it would be valuable to synthesize and explore the existing literature on these less frequently studied metabolites either alone or in combination with other metabolite results.

Conclusion

This review identified 138 studies that have used MRS in brain-injured individuals. Our meta-analyses of 1428 unique brain-injured subjects show that TBI affects brain metabolites across widespread regions, with the corpus callosum showing high susceptibility to metabolite alteration. NAA was the most consistent marker of brain injury and was found to be decreased in TBI of all severities, but not in subconcussive hits. Cho and mI were altered only in moderate-to-severe TBI. Glx and Cr were less commonly affected but did exhibit alterations under specific conditions. Moderator variables, including time since injury, age, tissue type, and metabolite referencing method, were all found to influence effect sizes and should be considered in analyses. Collectively, this review synthesizes the large body of MRS work in brain injury and raises questions to help tease apart some of the finer aspects of injury sequelae in future studies.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

We thank the University of Calgary Health Sciences Librarians, including Nicole Dunnewold, for guidance and assistance with the literature search strategies.

Authors' Contributions

Julie M. Joyce was responsible for the conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, and visualization; Parker L. La was responsible for the conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, and visualization; Robyn Walker was responsible for investigation, formal analysis, writing – review & editing, visualization; Ashley D. Harris was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition.

Funding Information

Support was provided by the Hotchkiss Brain Institute and the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute. A.D.H. holds a Canada Research Chair in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Brain Injury.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure S1

Supplementary Figure S2

Supplementary Figure S3

Supplementary Figure S4

Supplementary Table S1

Supplementary Table S2

Supplementary Table S3

Supplementary Table S4

Supplementary Table S5

Supplementary Table S6

Supplementary Table S7

References

Bramlett

, Dietrich

. Long-term consequences of traumatic brain injury: Current status of potential mechanisms of injury and neurological outcomes. J Neurotrauma, 2015; 32(23):1834-1848; doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3352.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Report to Congress on traumatic brain injury in the United States: Epidemiology and rehabilitation. Atlanta (GA): National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention; 2015.

Calvillo

, Irimia

Neuroimaging and psychometric assessment of mild cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury. Front Psychol 2020;11(1423); doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01423.

Silverberg

, Iaccarino

, Panenka

, et al. Management of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury: A synthesis of practice guidelines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2020; 101(2):382-393; doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.179.

Andelic

, Howe

, Hellstrøm

, et al. Disability and quality of life 20 years after traumatic brain injury. Brain Behav, 2018; 8(7):e01018; doi:10.1002/brb3.1018.

Popernack

, Gray

, Reuter-Rice

. Moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury in children: Complications and rehabilitation strategies. J Pediatr Health Care, 2015; 29(3):e1-e7; doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2014.09.003.

Eapen

, Allred

, O'Rourke

, et al. Rehabilitation of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Semin Neurol, 2015; 35(1):e1-3; doi:10.1055/s-0035-1549094.

Teasdale

, Jennett

. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 1974; 2(7872):81-84; doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0.

King

NS.

‘Mild Traumatic Brain Injury’ and ‘Sport-related Concussion’: Different languages and mixed messages?. Brain Injury, 2019; 33(12):1556-1563; doi:10.1080/02699052.2019.1655794.

10.

Asken

, Rabinovici

. Identifying degenerative effects of repetitive head trauma with neuroimaging: a clinically-oriented review. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 2021; 9(1):96; doi:10.1186/s40478-021-01197-4.

11.

Koerte

, Lin

, Willems

, et al. A review of neuroimaging findings in repetitive brain trauma. Brain Pathol, 2015; 25(3):318-349; doi:10.1111/bpa.12249.

12.

McKee

, Alosco

, Huber

. Repetitive head impacts and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2016; 27(4):529-535; doi:10.1016/j.nec.2016.05.009.

13.

, Yang

, Jin

, et al. Advanced neuroimaging role in traumatic brain injury: A narrative review. Front Neurosci 2022;16(872609; doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.872609.

14.

Koerte

, Lin

, Willems

, et al. A review of neuroimaging findings in repetitive brain trauma. Brain Pathol, 2015; 25(3):318-349; doi:10.1111/bpa.12249.

15.

Smith

LGF

, Milliron

, Ho

M-L

, et al. Advanced neuroimaging in traumatic brain injury: an overview. Neurosurg Focus, 2019; 47(6):E17; doi:10.3171/2019.9.focus19652.

16.

Bartnik-Olson

, Alger

, Babikian

, et al. The clinical utility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the ENIGMA MRS working group. Brain Imaging Behav, 2021; 15(2):504-525; doi:10.1007/s11682-020-00330-6.

17.

Near

, Harris

, Juchem

, et al. Preprocessing, analysis and quantification in single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy: experts' consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed, 2021; 34(5):e4257; doi:10.1002/nbm.4257.

18.

Maudsley

, Andronesi

, Barker

, et al. Advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopic neuroimaging: Experts' consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed, 2021; 34(5):e4309; doi:10.1002/nbm.4309.

19.

De Graaf

. In vivo NMR spectroscopy: Principles and techniques. 3rd edition ed. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ; 2019.

20.

Kreis

, Boer

, Choi

, et al. Terminology and concepts for the characterization of in vivo MR spectroscopy methods and MR spectra: Background and experts' consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed, 2021; 34(5):e4347; doi:10.1002/nbm.4347.

21.

Katz

, Bernick

, Dodick

, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke consensus diagnostic criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome. Neurology, 2021; 96(18):848; doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000011850.

22.

Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia; Available from: www.covidence.org/. [Last accessed: 03/15/2021].

23.

Rohatgi

WebPlotDigitizer. Available from: https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer. [Last accessed: 03/15/2021].

24.

Higgins

JPT

, Li

, Deeks

. Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. eds.) Cochrane: London, UK; 2021.

25.

Cohen

, Inglese

, Rusinek

, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy and MRI-volumetry in mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Neuroradiol, 2007; 28(5):907-913.

26.

Aaen

, Holshouser

, Sheridan

, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy predicts outcomes for children with nonaccidental trauma. Pediatrics, 2010; 125(2):295-303; doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3312.

27.

Alosco

, Tripodis

, Rowland

, et al. A magnetic resonance spectroscopy investigation in symptomatic former NFL players. Brain Imaging Behav, 2019; 14(5):1419-1429; doi:10.1007/s11682-019-00060-4.

28.

Ariza

, Junqué

, Mataró

, et al. Neuropsychological correlates of basal ganglia and medial temporal lobe NAA/Cho reductions in traumatic brain injury. Arch Neurol, 2004; 61(4):541-544; doi:10.1001/archneur.61.4.541.

29.

Ashwal

, Holshouser

, Tong

, et al. Proton spectroscopy detected myoinositol in children with traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Res, 2004; 56(4):630-638; doi:10.1203/01.PDR.0000139928.60530.7D.

30.

Ashwal

, Holshouser

, Tong

, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy detected glutamate/glutamine is increased in children with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2004; 21(11):1539-1552; doi:10.1089/neu.2004.21.1539.

31.

Ashwal

, Holshouser

, Shu

, et al. Predictive value of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in pediatric closed head injury. Pediatr Neurol, 2000; 23(2):114-125; doi:10.1016/S0887-8994(00)00176-4.

32.

Babikian

, Alger

, Ellis-Blied

, et al. Whole brain magnetic resonance spectroscopic determinants of functional outcomes in pediatric moderate/severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2018; 35(14):1637-1645; doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5366.

33.

Babikian

, Freier

, Ashwal

, et al. MR spectroscopy: predicting long-term neuropsychological outcome following pediatric TBI. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2006; 24(4):801-811; doi:10.1002/jmri.20696.

34.

Babikian

, Freier

, Tong

, et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging: Neuropsychologic outcome and pediatric head injury. Pediatr Neurol, 2005; 33(3):184-194; doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.03.015.

35.

Babikian

, Marion

, Copeland

, et al. Metabolic levels in the corpus callosum and their structural and behavioral correlates after moderate to severe pediatric TBI. J Neurotrauma, 2010; 27(3):473-481; doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1058.

36.

Bari

, Svaldi

, Jang

, et al. Dependence on subconcussive impacts of brain metabolism in collision sport athletes: an MR spectroscopic study. Brain Imaging Behav, 2019; 13(3):735-749; doi:10.1007/s11682-018-9861-9.

37.

Bartnik-Olson

, Holshouser

, Wang

, et al. Impaired neurovascular unit function contributes to persistent symptoms after concussion: a pilot study. J Neurotrauma, 2014; 31(17):1497-1506; doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3213.

38.

Brenner

, Freier

, Holshouser

, et al. Predicting neuropsychologic outcome after traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatr Neurol, 2003; 28(2):104-114; doi:10.1016/S0887-8994(02)00491-5.

39.

Brooks

, Stidley

, Petropoulos

, et al. Metabolic and cognitive response to human traumatic brain injury: A quantitative proton magnetic resonance study. J Neurotrauma, 2000; 17(8):629-640; doi:10.1089/089771500415382.

40.

Capizzano

, Jorge

, Robinson

. Limbic metabolic abnormalities in remote traumatic brain injury and correlation with psychiatric morbidity and social functioning. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2010; 22(4):370-377; doi:10.1176/jnp.2010.22.4.370.

41.

Carpentier

, Galanaud

, Puybasset

, et al. Early morphologic and spectroscopic magnetic resonance in severe traumatic brain injuries can detect "invisible brain stem damage" and predict "vegetative states". J Neurotrauma, 2006; 23(5):674-685; doi:10.1089/neu.2006.23.674.

42.

Cartwright

, Perkins

, Wilson

, et al. Analysis of magnetic resonance spectroscopy relative metabolite ratios in mild traumatic brain injury and normative controls. Undersea Hyperb Med, 2019; 46(3):291-297.

43.

Cecil

, Hills

, Sandel

, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for detection of axonal injury in the splenium of the corpus callosum of brain-injured patients. J Neurosurg, 1998; 88(5):795-801; doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.5.0795.

44.

Chamard

, Henry

, Boulanger

, et al. A follow-up study of neurometabolic alterations in female concussed athletes. J Neurotrauma, 2014; 31(4):339-345; doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3083.

45.

Chamard

, Lassonde

, Henry

, et al. Neurometabolic and microstructural alterations following a sports-related concussion in female athletes. Brain Inj, 2013; 27(9):1038-1046; doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.794968.

46.

Chamard

, Théoret

, Skopelja

, et al. A prospective study of physician-observed concussion during a varsity university hockey season: Metabolic changes in ice hockey players. Part 4 of 4. Neurosurg Focus 2012;33(6); doi:10.3171/2012.10.FOCUS12305.

47.

Choe

, Suh

, Choi

, et al. Neuronal dysfunction in patients with closed head injury evaluated by in-vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Investig Radiol, 1995; 30(8):502-506; doi:10.1097/00004424-199508000-00008.

48.

Churchill

, Hutchison

, Di Battista

, et al. Strutural, functional, and metabolic brain markers differentiate collision versus contact and non-contact athletes. Front Neurol 2017;8(390); doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00390.

49.

Cimatti

Assessment of metabolic cerebral damage using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Sci, 2006; 50(4):83-88.

50.

Condon

, Oluoch-Olunya

, Hadley

, et al. Early 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of acute head injury: four cases. J Neurotrauma, 1998; 15(8):563-571; doi:10.1089/neu.1998.15.563.

51.

Danielsen

, Christensen

, Arlien-Søborg

, et al. Axonal recovery after severe traumatic brain injury demonstrated in vivo by 1H MR spectroscopy. Neuroradiol, 2003; 45(10):722-724; doi:10.1007/s00234-003-1068-z.

52.

Davitz

, Gonen

, Tal

, et al. Quantitative multivoxel proton MR spectroscopy for the identification of white matter abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury: Comparison between regional and global analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019; 50(5):1424-1432; doi:10.1002/jmri.26718.

53.

De Beaumont

, Tremblay

, Henry

, et al. Motor system alterations in retired former athletes: The role of aging and concussion history. BMC Neurol 2013;13(109); doi:10.1186/1471-2377-13-109.

54.

de Lanerolle

, Hamid

, Kulas

, et al. Concussive brain injury from explosive blast. Ann Clin Trans Neurol, 2014; 1(9):692-702; doi:10.1002/acn3.98.

55.

Dean

PJA

, Otaduy

MCG

, Harris

, et al. Monitoring long-term effects of mild traumatic brain injury with magnetic resonance spectroscopy: A pilot study. NeuroReport, 2013; 24(12):677-681; doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283637aa4.

56.

Dean

PJA

, Sato

, Vieira

, et al. Multimodal imaging of mild traumatic brain injury and persistent postconcussion syndrome. Brain Behav, 2015; 5(1):45-61; doi:10.1002/brb3.292.

57.

Dennis

, Babikian

, Alger

, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of fiber tracts in children with traumatic brain injury: A combined MRS – Diffusion MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp, 2018; 39(9):3759-3768; doi:10.1002/hbm.24209.

58.

Dhandapani

, Sharma

, et al. Comparative evaluation of MRS and SPECT in prognostication of patients with mild to moderate head injury. J Clin Neurosci, 2014; 21(5):745-750; doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.07.038.

59.

, Li

, Lan

. H-1-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy correlates with injury severity and can predict coma duration in patients following severe traumatic brain injury. Neurol India, 2011; 59(5):31-36; doi:10.4103/0028-3886.86540.

60.

Ferrazzano

, Rosario

, Wisniewski

, et al. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: Assessment of current practice. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2019; 23(4):471-479; doi:10.3171/2018.10.PEDS18374.

61.

Friedman

, Brooks

, Jung

, et al. Quantitative proton MRS predicts outcome after traumatic brain injury. Neurology, 1999; 52(7):1384-1391; doi:10.1212/wnl.52.7.1384.

62.

Friedman

, Brooks

, Jung

, et al. Proton MR spectroscopic findings correspond to neuropsychological function in traumatic brain injury. Am J Neuroradiol, 1998; 19(10):1879-1885.

63.

Friedman

, Poliakov

, Budech

, et al. GABA alterations in pediatric sport concussion. Neurology, 2017; 89(21):2151-2156; doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004666.

64.

Gardner

, Iverson

, Wojtowicz

, et al. MR spectroscopy findings in retired professional rugby league players. Int J Sports Med, 2017; 38(3):241-252; doi:10.1055/s-0042-120843.

65.

Garnett

, Blamire

, Corkill

, et al. Early proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in normal-appearing brain correlates with outcome in patients following traumatic brain injury. Brain, 2000; 123(10):2046-2054; doi:10.1093/brain/123.10.2046.

66.

Garnett

, Blamire

, Rajagopalan

, et al. Evidence for cellular damage in normal-appearing white matter correlates with injury severity in patients following traumatic brain injury: A magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Brain, 2000; 123(7):1403-1409; doi:10.1093/brain/123.7.1403.

67.

Garnett

, Corkill

, Blamire

, et al. Altered cellular metabolism following traumatic brain injury: A magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Neurotrauma, 2001; 18(3):231-240; doi:10.1089/08977150151070838.

68.

Gasparovic

, Yeo

, Mannell

, et al. Neurometabolite concentrations in gray and white matter in mild traumatic brain injury: An 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Neurotrauma, 2009; 26(10):1635-1643; doi:10.1089/neu.2009.0896.

69.

George

, Roys

, Sours

, et al. Longitudinal and prognostic evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury: A 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Neurotrauma, 2014; 31(11):1018-1028; doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3224.

70.

Giugni

, Sabatini

, Hagberg

, et al. Fast detection of diffuse axonal damage in severe traumatic brain injury: Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and turbo proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging MRI sequences. Am J Neuroradiol, 2005; 26(5):1140-1148.

71.

Govind

, Gold

, Kaliannan

, et al. Whole-brain proton MR spectroscopic imaging of mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury and correlation with neuropsychological deficits. J Neurotrauma, 2010; 27(3):483-496; doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1159.

72.

Govindaraju

, Gauger

, Manley

, et al. Volumetric proton spectroscopic imaging of mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Neuroradiol, 2004; 25(5):730-737.

73.

Grossman

, Kirov

, Gonen

, et al. N-acetyl-aspartate levels correlate with intra-axonal compartment parameters from diffusion MRI. NeuroImage 2015;118(334-343; doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.061.

74.

Haseler

, Arcinue

, Danielsen

, et al. Evidence from proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for a metabolic cascade of neuronal damage in shaken baby syndrome. Pediatrics, 1997; 99(1):4-14; doi:10.1542/peds.99.1.4.

75.

Henry

, Tremblay

, Boulanger

, et al. Neurometabolic changes in the acute phase after sports concussions correlate with symptom severity. J Neurotrauma, 2010; 27(1):65-76; doi:10.1089/neu.2009.0962.

76.

Henry

, Tremblay

, Leclerc

, et al. Metabolic changes in concussed American football players during the acute and chronic post-injury phases. BMC Neurol 2011;11(doi:10.1186/1471-2377-11-105.

77.

Hetherington

, Hamid

, Kulas

, et al. MRSI of the medial temporal lobe at 7 T in explosive blast mild traumatic brain injury. Magn Reson Med, 2014; 71(4):1358-1367; doi:10.1002/mrm.24814.

78.

Hillary

, Liu

, Genova

, et al. Examining lactate in severe TBI using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Brain Inj, 2007; 21(9):981-991; doi:10.1080/02699050701426964.

79.

Holshouser

, Pivonka-Jones

, Nichols

, et al. Longitudinal metabolite changes after traumatic brain injury: A prospective pediatric magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging study. J Neurotrauma, 2019; 36(8):1352-1360; doi:10.1089/neu.2018.5919.

80.

Holshouser

, Tong

, Ashwal

. Proton MR spectroscopic imaging depicts diffuse axonal injury in children with traumatic brain injury. Am J Neuroradiol, 2005; 26(5):1276-1285.

81.

Holshouser

, Tong

, Ashwal

, et al. Prospective longitudinal proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in adult traumatic brain injury. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2006; 24(1):33-40; doi:10.1002/jmri.20607.

82.

Hunter

, Thornton

, Wang

, et al. Late proton MR spectroscopy in children after traumatic brain injury: Correlation with cognitive outcomes. Am J Neuroradiol, 2005; 26(3):482-488; doi:10.1093/brain/123.7.1403.

83.

Johnson

, Gay

, Zhang

, et al. The use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the subacute evaluation of athletes recovering from single and multiple mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2012; 29(13):2297-2304; doi:10.1089/neu.2011.2294.

84.

Johnson

, Zhang

, Gay

, et al. Metabolic alterations in corpus callosum may compromise brain functional connectivity in MTBI patients: An 1H-MRS study. Neurosci Lett, 2012; 509(1):5-8; doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.11.013.

85.

Kierans

, Kirov

, Gonen

, et al. Myoinositol and glutamate complex neurometabolite abnormality after mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology, 2014; 82(6):521-528; doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000105.

86.

Kim

, Kang

, Jeong

, et al. Low prefrontal GABA levels are associated with poor cognitive functions in professional boxers. Front Hum Neurosci 2019;13(193); doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00193.

87.

Kirov

, Fleysher

, Babb

, et al. Characterizing 'mild' in traumatic brain injury with proton MR spectroscopy in the thalamus: Initial findings. Brain Inj, 2007; 21(11):1147-1154; doi:10.1080/02699050701630383.

88.

Kirov

, Tal

, Babb

, et al. Diffuse axonal injury in mild traumatic brain injury: A 3D multivoxel proton MR spectroscopy study. J Neurol, 2013; 260(1):242-252; doi:10.1007/s00415-012-6626-z.

89.

Kirov

, Tal

, Babb

, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy correlates diffuse axonal abnormalities with post-concussive symptoms in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2013; 30(13):1200-1204; doi:10.1089/neu.2012.2696.

90.

Koerte

, Lin

, Muehlmann

, et al. Altered neurochemistry in former professional soccer players without a history of concussion. J Neurotrauma, 2015; 32(17):1287-1293; doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3715.

91.

Kontos

, Van Cott

, Roberts

, et al. Clinical and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging findings in veterans with blast mild traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. Mil Med, 2017; 182(Suppl 1):99-104; doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00177.

92.

Kubas

, Łebkowski

, Łebkowska

, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy in mild traumatic brain injury. Pol J Radiol, 2010; 75(4):7-10.

93.

Kumar

, Ghosh

, Dhibar

, et al. Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury. Indian J Neurotrauma, 2017; 14(2-3):75-82; doi:10.1055/s-0037-1612649.

94.

Lawrence

, Steel

, Ezra

, et al. MRS and DTI evidence of progressive posterior cingulate cortex and corpus callosum injury in the hyper-acute phase after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj, 2019; 33(7):854-868; doi:10.1080/02699052.2019.1584332.

95.

Lefebvre

, Chamard

, Proulx

, et al. Increased myo-inositol in primary motor cortex of contact sports athletes without a history of concussion. J Neurotrauma, 2018; 35(7):953-962; doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5254.

96.

Lin

, Ramadan

, Stern

, et al. Changes in the neurochemistry of athletes with repetitive brain trauma: Preliminary results using localized correlated spectroscopy. Alzheimer's Res Ther 2015;7(1); doi:10.1186/s13195-015-0094-5.

97.

MacMaster

, McLellan

, Harris

, et al. N-acetyl-aspartate in the dorsolateral prrefrontal cortex long after concussion in youth. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2019; 35(2):E127-E135; doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000535.

98.

MacMillan

CSA

, Wild

, Andrews

PJD

, et al. Quantitative head injury assessment: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and intensive care management during MR. Clin Intensive Care, 2000; 11(4):187-193; doi:10.3109/tcic.11.4.187.193.

99.

Macmillan

CSA

, Wild

, Wardlaw

, et al. Traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage: In vivo occult pathology demonstrated by magnetic resonance spectroscopy may not be "ischaemic". A primary study and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir, 2002; 144(9):853-862; doi:10.1007/s00701-002-0966-x.

100.

Makoroff

, Cecil

, Care

, et al. Elevated lactate as an early marker of brain injury in inflicted traumatic brain injury. Pediatric Radiol, 2005; 35(7):668-676; doi:10.1007/s00247-005-1441-7.

101.

Mamere

, Saraiva

LAL

, Matos

ALM

, et al. Evaluation of delayed neuronal and axonal damage secondary to moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using quantitative MR imaging techniques. Am J Neuroradiol, 2009; 30(5):947-952; doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1477.

102.

Manning

, Schranz

, Bartha

, et al. Multiparametric MRI changes persist beyond recovery in concussed adolescent hockey players. Neurology, 2017; 89(21):2157-2166; doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004669.

103.

Mao

, Zhuang

, Chen

, et al. Imaging of glutamate in acute traumatic brain injury using chemical exchange saturation transfer. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2019; 9(10):1652-1663; doi:10.2103/7/qims.2019.09.08.

104.

Marino

, Zei

, Battaglini

, et al. Acute metabolic brain changes following traumatic brain injury and their relevance to clinical severity and outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2007; 78(5):501-507; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.099796.

105.

Maudsley

, Govind

, Levin

, et al. Distributions of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measures with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2015; 32(14):1056-1063; doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3505.

106.

Maudsley

, Govind

, Saigal

, et al. Longitudinal MR spectroscopy shows altered metabolism in traumatic brain injury. J Neuroimaging, 2017; 27(6):562-569; doi:10.1111/jon.12463.

107.

Maugans

, Farley

, Altaye

, et al. Pediatric sports-related concussion produces cerebral blood flow alterations. Pediatrics, 2012; 129(1):28-37; doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2083.

108.

Mayer

, Ling

, Dodd

, et al. A longitudinal assessment of structural and chemical alterations in mixed martial arts fighters. J Neurotrauma, 2015; 32(22):1759-1767; doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3833.

109.

Menshchikov

, Semenova

, Manzhurtsev

, et al. Disturbances of cerebral metabolism of aspartate, glutamate, and N-acetylaspartate after traumatic brain injury according to 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biophys (Russ Fed), 2018; 63(6):975-980; doi:10.1134/S0006350918060209.

110.

Mewmark

, Richards

. Delayed unilateral post-traumatic tremor: Localization studies using single-proton computed tomographic and magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques. Mil Med, 1999; 164(1):59-64.

111.

Meyer

, Stout

, Chung

, et al. Longitudinal changes in magnetic resonance spectroscopy in pediatric concussion: A pilot study. Frontiers Neurol 2019;10(556); doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00556.

112.

Nakabayashi

, Suzaki

, Tomita

. Neural injury and recovery near cortical contusions: A clinical magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Neurosurg, 2007; 106(3):370-377; doi:10.3171/jns.2007.106.3.370.

113.

Narayana

, Yu

, Hasan

, et al. Multi-modal MRI of mild traumatic brain injury. NeuroImage Clin 2015;7(87-97; doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.010.

114.

O'Phelan

, Ernst

, Park

, et al. Impact of methamphetamine on regional metabolism and cerebral blood flow after traumatic brain injury. Neurocritical Care, 2013; 19(2):183-191; doi:10.1007/s12028-013-9871-9.

115.

Özlen

, Sanus

, Ak

, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the hippocampus after severe traumatic brain injury. Turk Neurosurg, 2004; 14(3-4):71-75.

116.

Panchal

, Sollmann

, Pasternak

, et al. Neuro-metabolite changes in a single season of university ice hockey using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Frontiers Neurol 2018;9(616); doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00616.

117.

Parry

, Shores

, Rae

, et al. An investigation of neuronal integrity in severe paediatric traumatic brain injury. Child Neuropsychol, 2004; 10(4):248-261; doi:10.1080/09297040490909279.

118.

Poole

, Abbas

, Shenk

, et al. MR spectroscopic evidence of brain injury in the non-diagnosed collision sport athlete. Dev Neuropsychol, 2014; 39(6):459-473; doi:10.1080/87565641.2014.940619.

119.

Poole

, Breedlove

, Shenk

, et al. Sub-concussive hit characteristics predict deviant brain metabolism in football athletes. Dev Neuropsychol, 2015; 40(1):12-17; doi:10.1080/87565641.2014.984810.

120.

Rae

CD.

A guide to the metabolic pathways and function of metabolites observed in human brain 1H magnetic resonance spectra. Neurochem Res, 2014; 39(1):1-36; doi:10.1007/s11064-013-1199-5.

121.

Ramos-Zuniga

, Gonzalez-de La Torre

, Jimenez-Maldonado

, et al. Postconcussion syndrome and mild head injury: The role of early diagnosis using neuropsychological tests and functional magnetic resonance/spectroscopy. World Neurosurg, 2014; 82(5):828-835; doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.09.018.

122.

Rango

, Lenkinski

, Alves

, et al. Brain pH in head injury: An image-guided 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Ann Neurol, 1990; 28(5):661-667; doi:10.1002/ana.410280510.

123.

Rao

, Munro

, Rosenberg

, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of depression in post traumatic brain injury: Preliminary results of a pilot study. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2010; 22(2):231-235; doi:10.1176/jnp.2010.22.2.231.

124.

Rao

, Spiro

, Degoankar

, et al. Lesion location in depression post traumatic brain injury using magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Preliminary results from a pilot study. Eur J Psychiatry, 2006; 20(2):65-73; doi:10.4321/S0213-61632006000200002.

125.

Ross

, Ernst

, Kreis

, et al. H-1 MRS in acute traumatic brain injury. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1998; 8(4):829-840; doi:10.1002/jmri.1880080412.

126.

Sabati

, Zhan

, Govind

, et al. Impact of reduced k-space acquisition on pathologic detectability for volumetric MR spectroscopic imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014; 39(1):224-234; doi:10.1002/jmri.24130.

127.

Sarmento

, Moreira

, Brito

, et al. Proton spectroscopy in patients with post-traumatic headache attributed to mild head injury. Headache, 2009; 49(9):1345-1352; doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01494.x.

128.

Schranz

, Manning

, Dekaban

, et al. Reduced brain glutamine in female varsity rugby athletes after concussion and in non-concussed athletes after a season of play. Hum Brain Mapp, 2018; 39(4):1489-1499; doi:10.1002/hbm.23919.

129.

Semenova

, Akhadov

, Petryaykin

, et al. Metabolic dysfunction and relationship in human frontoparietal cortex in severe traumatic brain injury: Single-voxel 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Biochem (Mosc), 2012; 77(4):388-394; doi:10.1134/s0006297912040104.

130.

Semenova

, Menshchikov

, Manzhurtsev

, et al. Dynamics of in vivo metabolites concentrations in posttraumatic period of human brain. 1H MRS study. Dokl Biochem, 2019; 484(1):25-28; doi:10.1134/s1607672919010071.

131.

Semenova

, Sidorin

, Akhadov

, et al. Effect of cell therapy on metabolite content in brain structures of children with consequences of severe brain injury: 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Bull Exp Biol and Med, 2011; 151(4):532-535; doi:10.1007/s10517-011-1374-0.

132.

Shutter

, Tong

, Holshouser

. Proton MRS in acute traumatic brain injury: Role for glutamate/glutamine and choline for outcome prediction. J Neurotrauma, 2004; 21(12):1693-1705; doi:10.1089/neu.2004.21.1693.

133.

Signoretti

, Marmarou

, Aygok

, et al. Assessment of mitochondrial impairment in traumatic brain injury using high-resolution proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neurosurg, 2008; 108(1):42-52; doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/108/01/0042.

134.

Sikoglu

, Liso Navarro

, Czerniak

, et al. Effects of recent concussion on brain bioenergetics: A phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Cogn and Behav Neurol, 2015; 28(4):181-187; doi:10.1097/WNN.0000000000000076.

135.

Sinson

, Bagley

, Cecil

, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging and proton MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of axonal injury: Correlation with clinical outcome after traumatic brain injury. Am J Neuroradiol, 2001; 22(1):143-151.

136.

Sivák

, Bittšanský

, Grossmann

, et al. Clinical correlations of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy findings in acute phase after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj, 2014; 28(3):341-346; doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.865270.

137.

Sours

, George

, Zhuo

, et al. Hyper-connectivity of the thalamus during early stages following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav, 2015; 9(3):550-563; doi:10.1007/s11682-015-9424-2.

138.

Stovell

, Mada

, Carpenter

, et al. Phosphorus spectroscopy in acute TBI demonstrates metabolic changes that relate to outcome in the presence of normal structural MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2020; 40(1):67-84; doi:10.1177/0271678X18799176.

139.

Stovell

, Mada

, Helmy

, et al. The effect of succinate on brain NADH/NAD+ redox state and high energy phosphate metabolism in acute traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep, 2018; 8(1):11140; doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29255-3.

140.

Sutton

, Wang

, Duhaime

, et al. Tissue lactate in pediatric head trauma- a clinical study using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Pediatr Neurosurg, 1995; 22(2):81-87; doi:10.1159/000120881.

141.

Takase

, Igarashi

, Taneichi

, et al. Infantile traumatic brain injury with a biphasic clinical course and late reduced diffusion. J Neurol Sci 2018;390(63-66; doi:10.1016/j.jns.2018.04.010.

142.

Tollard

, Galanaud

, Perlbarg

, et al. Experience of diffusion tensor imaging and H-1 spectroscopy for outcome prediction in severe traumatic brain injury: Preliminary results. Crit Care Med, 2009; 37(4):1448-1455; doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819cf050.

143.

Tremblay

, Beaulé

, Proulx

, et al. Multimodal assessment of primary motor cortex integrity following sport concussion in asymptomatic athletes. Clin Neurophysiol, 2014; 125(7):1371-1379; doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.040.

144.

Tremblay

, De Beaumont

, Henry

, et al. Sports concussions and aging: A neuroimaging investigation. Cereb Cortex, 2013; 23(5):1159-1166; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs102.

145.

Tremblay

, Iturria-Medina

, Mateos-Pérez

, et al. Defining a multimodal signature of remote sports concussions. Eur J Neurosci, 2017; 46(4):1956-1967; doi:10.1111/ejn.13583.

146.

Uzan

, Albayram

, Dashti

SGR

, et al. Thalamic proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vegetative state induced by traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2003; 74(1):33-38; doi:10.1136/jnnp.74.1.33.

147.

Vagnozzi

, Signoretti

, Cristofori

, et al. Assessment of metabolic brain damage and recovery following mild traumatic brain injury: A multicentre, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in concussed patients. Brain, 2010; 133(11):3232-3242; doi:10.1093/brain/awq200.

148.

Vagnozzi

, Signoretti

, Floris

, et al. Decrease in N-acetylaspartate following concussion may be coupled to decrease in creatine. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2013; 28(4):284-292; doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182795045.

149.

Vagnozzi

, Signoretti

, Tavazzi

, et al. Temporal window of metabolic brain vulnerability to concussion: A pilot H-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in concussed athletes - Part III. Neurosurgery, 2008; 62(6):1286-1295; doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000333300.34189.74.

150.

Veeramuthu

, Seow

, Narayanan

, et al. Neurometabolites alteration in the acute phase of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): An in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) study. Acad Radiol, 2018; 25(9):1167-1177; doi:10.1016/j.acra.2018.01.005.

151.

Walz

, Cecil

, Wade

, et al. Late proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy following traumatic brain injury during early childhood: Relationship with neurobehavioral outcomes. J Neurotrauma, 2008; 25(2):94-103; doi:10.1089/neu.2007.0362.

152.

Widerström-Noga

, Govind

, Adcock

, et al. Subacute pain after traumatic brain injury is associated with lower insular N-acetylaspartate concentrations. J Neurotrauma, 2016; 33(14):1380-1389; doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4098.

153.

Wild

, Macmillan

CSA

, Wardlaw

, et al. 1H-spectroscopic imaging of acute head injury-evidence of diffuse axonal injury. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med, 1999; 8(2):109-115; doi:10.1007/BF02590527.

154.

Wilke

, List

, Mekle

, et al. No effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in patients with recurrent mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2017; 34(2):281-290; doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4399.

155.

Xia

, Sun

, Guo

, et al. Evaluation of non-typical diffuse axonal injury by magnetic resonance techniques. Neural Regen Res, 2010; 5(17):1337-1341; doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374. 2010.17.010.

156.

Xia

, Sun

, Luo

, et al. Evaluation of diffuse axonal injury by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Tissue Eng Res, 2009; 13(26):5185-5188; doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2009.26.042.

157.

Yang

, Xiao

, Liu

, et al. A multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study of recovery of consciousness in severe traumatic brain injury: Preliminary results. J Neurotrauma, 2018; 35(2):308-313; doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5335.

158.

Yasen

, Smith

, Christie

. Glutamate and GABA concentrations following mild traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. J Neurophysiol, 2018; 120(3):1318-1322; doi:10.1152/jn.00896.2017.

159.

Yeo

, Gasparovic

, Merideth

, et al. A longitudinal proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2011; 28(1):1-11; doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1578.

160.

Yeo

, Phillips

, Jung

, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy detects brain injury and predicts cognitive functioning in children with brain injuries. J Neurotrauma, 2006; 23(10):1427-1435; doi:10.1089/neu.2006.23.1427.

161.

Yoon

, Lee

, Kim

, et al. Evaluation of traumatic brain injured patients in correlation with functional status by localized H-1-MR spectroscopy. Clin Rehabil, 2005; 19(2):209-215; doi:10.1191/0269215505cr813oa.

162.

Zampolini

, Tarducci

, Gobbi

, et al. Localized in vivo H-1-MRS of traumatic brain injury. Eur J Neurol, 1997; 4(3):246-254; doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.1997.tb00343.x.

163.

Zivadinov

, Polak

, Schweser

, et al. Multimodal imaging of retired professional contact sport athletes does not provide evidence of structural and functional brain damage. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2018; 33(5):E24-E32; doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000422.

164.

Badre

, Nee

. Frontal Cortex and the Hierarchical Control of Behavior. Trends Cogn Sci, 2018; 22(2):170-188; doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.005.

165.

Dixon

, Thiruchselvam

, Todd

, et al. Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: An integrative review. Psychol Bull, 2017; 143(10):1033-1081; doi:10.1037/bul0000096.

166.

Frati

, Cerretani

, Fiaschi

, et al. Diffuse Axonal Injury and Oxidative Stress: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci, 2017; 18(12):2600; doi:10.3390/ijms18122600.

167.

Smith

, Hicks

, Povlishock

. Therapy development for diffuse axonal injury. J Neurotrauma, 2013; 30(5):307-323; doi:10.1089/neu.2012.2825.

168.

Falchook

, Porges

, Nadeau

, et al. Cognitive–motor dysfunction after severe traumatic brain injury: A cerebral interhemispheric disconnection syndrome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 2015; 37(10):1062-1073; doi:10.1080/13803395.2015.1077930.

169.

Warnock

, Toomey

, Wright

, et al. Damage mechanisms to oligodendrocytes and white matter in central nervous system injury: The Australian context. J Neurotrauma, 2020; 37(5):739-769; doi:10.1089/neu.2019.6890.

170.

Goryawala

, Sheriff

, Maudsley

. Regional distributions of brain glutamate and glutamine in normal subjects. NMR Biomed, 2016; 29(8):1108-1116; doi:10.1002/nbm.3575.

171.

Zhang

, Shen

Regional and tissue-specific differences in brain glutamate concentration measured by in vivo single voxel MRS. J Neurosci Methods 2015;239(94-99; doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.09.021.

172.

Govindaraju

, Young

, Maudsley

Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. NMR Biomed 2000;13(129-153; doi:10.1002/1099-1492(200005)13:3 <129::aid-nbm619>3.0.co;2-v.

173.

Menshchikov

, Ivantsova

, Manzhurtsev

, et al. Separate N-acetyl aspartyl glutamate, N-acetyl aspartate, aspartate, and glutamate quantification after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury in the acute phase. Magn Reson Med, 2020; 84(6):2918-2931; doi:10.1002/mrm.28332.

174.

Oeltzschner

, Saleh

, Rimbault

, et al. Advanced Hadamard-encoded editing of seven low-concentration brain metabolites: Principles of HERCULES. Neuroimage 2019;185(181-190; doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.002.

175.

Ramadan

, Lin

, Stanwell

. Glutamate and glutamine: a review of in vivo MRS in the human brain. NMR Biomed, 2013; 26(12):1630-1646; doi:10.1002/nbm.3045.

176.

Vagnozzi

, Tavazzi

, Signoretti

, et al. Temporal window of metabolic brain vulnerability to concussions: mitochondrial-related impairment–part I. Neurosurgery, 2007; 61(2):379-389; doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000280002.41696.D8.

177.

Vagnozzi

, Signoretti

, Cristofori

, et al. Assessment of metabolic brain damage and recovery following mild traumatic brain injury: a multicentre, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in concussed patients. Brain, 2010; 133(11):3232-3242; doi:10.1093/brain/awq200.

178.

Giza

, Kutcher

. An introduction to sports concussions. Continuum (Minneap Minn), 2014; 20(6 Sports Neurology):1545-1551; doi:10.1212/01.CON.0000458975.78766.11.

179.

Giza

, Hovda

. The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion. Neurosurgery 2014;75(S24-33; doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000505.

180.

Schneider

, Leddy

, Guskiewicz

, et al. Rest and treatment/rehabilitation following sport-related concussion: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med, 2017; 51(12):930-934; doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-097475.

181.

Simon

, McGeachy

, Bayır

, et al. The far-reaching scope of neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol, 2017; 13(3):171-191; doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.13.

182.

Osier

, Carlson

, DeSana

, et al. Chronic histopathological and behavioral outcomes of experimental traumatic brain injury in adult male animals. J Neurotrauma, 2015; 32(23):1861-1882; doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3680.

183.

Figaji

AA.

Anatomical and Physiological Differences between Children and Adults Relevant to Traumatic Brain Injury and the Implications for Clinical Assessment and Care. Frontiers Neurol 2017;8(doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00685.

184.

Blüml

Metabolites of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and normal age-dependent changes. In: MR Spectroscopy of Pediatric Brain Disorders. (Panigrahy A ed. Springer: New York, NY; 2013; pp. 25-38.

185.

Wang

, Li

. Differentiation of metabolic concentrations between gray matter and white matter of human brain by in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med, 1998; 39(1):28-33; doi:10.1002/mrm.1910390107.

186.

Krukowski

, Podgórski

, Guziński

, et al. Analysis of the brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy – differences between normal grey and white matter. Pol J Radiol, 2010; 75(2):22-26.

187.

Schuff

, Ezekiel

, Gamst

, et al. Region and tissue differences of metabolites in normally aged brain using multislice 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2001; 45(5):899-907; doi:10.1002/mrm.1119.

188.

Lebel

, Deoni

The development of brain white matter microstructure. NeuroImage 2018;182(207-218; doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.097.

189.

Arain

, Haque

, Johal

, et al. Maturation of the adolescent brain. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2013;9(449-461; doi:10.2147/NDT.S39776.

190.

Narayana

PA.

White matter changes in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: MRI perspective. Concussion, 2017; 2(2):CNC35; doi:10.2217/cnc-2016-0028.

191.

Dennis

, Spiegler

, Juranek

, et al. Age, plasticity, and homeostasis in childhood brain disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2013; 37(10 Pt 2):2760-2773; doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.09.010.

192.

Gupte

, Brooks

, Vukas

, et al. Sex Differences in Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Should Know. J Neurotrauma, 2019; 36(22):3063-3091; doi:10.1089/neu.2018.6171.

193.

Skandsen

, Stenberg

, Follestad

, et al. Personal factors associated With postconcussion symptoms 3 Months after mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2020; 102(6):1102-1112; doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.106.

194.

Cnossen

, van der Naalt

, Spikman

, et al. Prediction of persistent post-concussion symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2018; 35(22):2691-2698; doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5486.

195.

Mikolic

, van Klaveren

, Oude Groeniger

, et al. Differences between Men and Women in Treatment and Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma, 2021; 38(2):235-251; doi:10.1089/neu.2020.7228.

196.

Levin

, Temkin

, Barber

, et al. Association of Sex and Age With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury–Related Symptoms: A TRACK-TBI Study. JAMA Netw Open, 2021; 4(4):e213046; doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3046.

197.

Colantonio

, Harris

, Ratcliff

, et al. Gender differences in self reported long term outcomes following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. BMC Neurology, 2010; 10(1):102; doi:10.1186/1471-2377-10-102.

198.

Das

, Dey

, Sabesan

, et al. Putative Astroglial Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of 1H-MRS Studies of Medial Prefrontal Myo-Inositol. Front Psychiatry 2018;9(438; doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00438.

199.

Romeo

, Petillion

, Martelli

, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies in subjects with high risk for psychosis: A meta-analysis and review. J Psychiatr Res 2020;125(52-65; doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.03.006.

200.

Roalf

, Sydnor

, Woods

, et al. A quantitative meta-analysis of brain glutamate metabolites in aging. Neurobiol Aging 2020;95(240-249; doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.07.015.

201.

Akbar

, Pranata

, Wibowo

, et al. The association between serum prealbumin and poor outcome in COVID-19 - Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2021; 25(10):3879-3885; doi:10.2635/5/eurrev_202105_25955.

202.

Hariyanto

, Kurniawan

. Statin and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2021; 31(6):1662-1670; doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.020.

203.

Alves Donato

, Waclawovsky

, Tonello

, et al. Association between cardiorespiratory fitness and depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord, 2021; 282(2021):1234-1240; doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.032.

204.

Mathias

, Dennington

, Bowden

, et al. Community versus orthopaedic controls in traumatic brain injury research: How comparable are they?. Brain Inj, 2013; 27(7-8):887-895; doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.793398.

205.

Ware

, Yeates

, Geeraert

, et al. Structural connectome differences in pediatric mild traumatic brain and orthopedic injury. Hum Brain Mapp, 2022; 43(3):1032-1046; doi:10.1002/hbm.25705.

206.

Wilson

, Andronesi

, Barker

, et al. Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations. Magn Reson Med, 2019; 82(2):527-550; doi:10.1002/mrm.27742.

207.

Veliz

, McCabe

, Eckner

, et al. Trends in the prevalence of concussion reported by US adolescents, 2016-2020. JAMA, 2021; 325(17):1789; doi:10.1001/jama.2021.1538.

208.

Mikkelsen

, Rimbault

, Barker

, et al. Big GABA II: Water-referenced edited MR spectroscopy at 25 research sites. Neuroimage 2019;191(537-548; doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.059.

209.

Cianfoni

, Law

, Re

, et al. Clinical pitfalls related to short and long echo times in cerebral MR spectroscopy. J Neuroradiol, 2011; 38(2):69-75; doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2010.10.001.

210.

Pouwels

PJW

, Brockmann

, Kruse

, et al. Regional age dependence of human brain metabolites from infancy to adulthood as detected by quantitative localized proton MRS. Pediatr Res, 1999; 46(4):474-474; doi:10.1203/00006450-199910000-00019.

211.

Aubert-Broche

, Fonov

, García-Lorenzo

, et al. A new method for structural volume analysis of longitudinal brain MRI data and its application in studying the growth trajectories of anatomical brain structures in childhood. Neuroimage 2013;82(393-402; doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.065.

212.

Eisele

, Hill-Strathy

, Michels

, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy following mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the potential to detect posttraumatic neurodegeneration. Neurodegener Dis, 2020; 20(1):2-11; doi:10.1159/000508098.

213.

Brown

, Baradaran

, Christos

, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy abnormalities in traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. J Neuroradiol, 2018; 45(2):123-129; doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2017.09.004.

214.

Peek

, Rebbeck

, Puts

, et al. Brain GABA and glutamate levels across pain conditions: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 1H-MRS studies using the MRS-Q quality assessment tool. Neuroimage 2020;210(116532; doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116532.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

0.02 MB

7.67 MB

2.34 MB

0.59 MB

0.49 MB

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Traumatic Brain Injury and Subconcussive Hits: A Systematic Review and Meta–Analysis

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Literature search and systematic review selection criteria

Meta-analysis selection criteria

Data extraction

Statistical analysis

Risk of bias assessment

Results

NAA

Cr

Cho

Glu + Gln, Glx

mI

Risk of bias assessment

Sensitivity analyses

Discussion

Brain region and tissue composition

Injury severity

Time since injury

Age and sex

Control groups

Technical moderators

Sensitivity analyses

Limitations

Areas for future research

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Authors' Contributions

Funding Information

Author Disclosure Statement

Supplementary Material

References

Supplementary Material