Abstract
Previous studies have reported an association between concussion and suicidality in high school students in the United States. When controlling for multiple life stressors in adolescence (e.g., bullying, substance use, poor grades), however, the relationship between concussion and suicidality was either attenuated or became non-significant in one study. Rather than assessing concussion as a possible risk factor for suicidality, this study examined predictors of ideation, planning, and attempts among youth who experienced concussion in the past year. The sample included 13,677 participants from the 2019 Youth Behavior Risk Survey, of whom 1754 (13%) reported experiencing a concussion in the past year. Binary logistic regressions were conducted to predict ideation, planning, and attempts with modifiable stress factors, including physical activity, bullying, poor grades, insufficient sleep, binge drinking, marijuana use, illicit drug use, and depression. Among adolescents who experienced a concussion in the past year, 25% reported suicidal ideation (31% girls/19% boys), 20% reported suicide planning (25% girls/17% boys), and 15% reported a suicide attempt (17% girls/13% boys). In a multi-variable model among girls with prior year concussion, being bullied (odds ratio [OR] = 2.37), illicit drug use (OR = 2.80), current marijuana use (OR = 2.47), and depression (OR = 9.22) predicted suicidal ideation. Among boys with prior year concussion, being bullied (OR = 2.29) and depression (OR = 9.50) predicted suicidal ideation. Additional models were used to examine the association between having one or more modifiable stressors and suicidality, revealing that having three or more modifiable stressors was associated with a substantial increase in proportions of youth reporting suicidality. Among adolescents experiencing a concussion, treating depression and substance use, stopping bullying, and increasing physical activity may be associated with reduced risk for suicidality.
Introduction
Suicide is the second leading cause of death in adolescents in the United States. 1 A national survey study in 2019 revealed that 13.3% of high school boys and 24.1% of high school girls experienced suicide ideation during the past year. 2 Every two years, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States conducts a national survey of high school students called the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). 3 Using epidemiological data from the YRBS, researchers have found an association between sustaining a concussion, mostly during sports or recreational activities, and suicidality in high school students 4 –8 —even after controlling for depression 5 and bullying. 4,6
A recent study, however, analyzing the 2019 YRBS data, found that after controlling for a broader range of variables, the associations between concussion and suicidality were greatly attenuated or became nonsignificant. 9 For high school girls, there were no statistically significant associations in the multi-variable analyses between concussion and suicidal thoughts, plans, or attempts. For high school boys, there were no statistically significant associations in the multi-variable analyses between concussion and suicidal thoughts or plans, but there was an association between concussion and suicide attempts.
Over the years, researchers using data from the YRBS have reported that suicidality in adolescents is associated with (1) psychosocial adversity, such as adverse childhood experiences, 10,11 physical teen dating violence, 12 forced sexual intercourse, 13,14 bullying, 13,15 –17 and cyberbullying 13,15 –18 ; (2) substance use, such as alcohol use, 13,19 –21 marijuana use, 19,22,23 illicit drug use, 13,23 and prescription opioid misuse24–3426; (3) body weight perceptions, both underweight 16 and overweight 16,27 ; (4) excessive television/video game/internet use 28,29 ; and (5) insufficient sleep. 30 Therefore, it is difficult to determine whether, or the extent to which, concussion is truly an independent risk factor for suicidality at the population level, and certainly at the individual level, because injured youth might also experience several other risk factors.
That said, a subgroup of children and adolescents who sustain a concussion will experience significant mental health problems. For example, youth presenting to specialty clinics for treatment and rehabilitation after concussion often experience difficulties with anxiety and depression. 31,32 Moreover, youth who have pre-injury mental health problems are more likely to experience post-injury anxiety and depression 31,33 —both of which are risk factors for suicidality. Without question, more focused research is needed to better understand risk factors for suicidality in adolescents who have experienced a concussion. This work is essential for improving identification of youth at risk and informing medical management and psychological treatment.
Purpose of the present study
The purpose of this study is to examine the associations between a broad range of risk factors and suicidality in high school boys and girls who have sustained a concussion. All previous studies using the YRBS have focused on determining whether, or not, concussion was associated with, or a risk factor for, suicidality. Our approach is fundamentally different in that we will focus on studying youth who have sustained a concussion, which aligns with, and is relevant to, the normal medical management provided by athletic trainers, school nurses, pediatricians, and other healthcare providers—that is, we focus on risk factors associated with suicidality, particularly modifiable risk factors, in youth who have sustained a concussion within the past year.
First, we will examine single variable and multiple variable associations between a range of risk factors and suicidality in girls and boys who have sustained a concussion in the past year. Second, we will create a “stress index” comprising potentially modifiable risk factors and examine the association between that index and suicidality. We hypothesize that cumulative stressors are associated with greater risk for all aspects of suicidality in both girls and boys.
Methods
Sample
The CDC sponsors a national survey, of students in grades 9–12 every two years. Students from public and private schools across the United States are included. The survey is voluntary, anonymous, and is completed during a single class period (approximately 45 min). The CDC Institutional Review Board approved the protocol for the survey. During 2019, the total national sample included 13,872 students from 136 schools. 3 The response rate for the students was 80.3% and for the schools was 75.1%, yielding an overall response rate of 60.3% (i.e., [student response rate] × [school response rate]).
A survey was deemed to fail quality control if fewer than 20 responses remained after review, or if the student marked the same answer for 15 or more consecutive questions. Applying such, 195 questionnaires failed quality control. The survey data used in this study, from 2019, are publicly available. 34
The database includes 13,677 subjects. Of those, 11,549 answered the question relating to whether they had experienced a concussion in the past year. Of those, 1754 (15.2%) responded yes. Of that group, 1715 responded to the question assessing for suicidal ideation. Sixteen were age 13 or younger, and 17 had missing data for age or sex and were excluded. The final sample included 1683 students—753 girls (44.7%) and 930 boys (55.3%). Age was distributed across the sample as follows: 14 (n = 200, 11.9%), 15 (n = 424, 25.2%), 16 (n = 469, 27.9%), 17 (n = 372, 22.1%), and 18 or older (n = 218, 13.0%).
Self-identified race and ethnicity was as follows: (1) 47.8% White, (2) 16.4% multi-racial and Hispanic/Latinx, (3) 15.0% Black/African American, (4) 7.1% Hispanic/Latinx, (5) 4.6% multi-racial and non-Hispanic/Latinx, (6) 3.7% Asian, (7) 1.7% American Indian or Alaskan Native, (8) 0.7% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and (9) 3.0% with no reported race/ethnicity. For comparison, the total sample of adolescents who responded No to the question about concussion was used in some table entries.
Survey questions
The YRBS in 2019 included 99 questions, 89 of which were included in the standard questionnaire and 10 additional questions were added to address other areas of interest. The specific questions, recall periods, response options, and definitions of each variable are included in the YRBS questionnaire and data user's guide available on the website. 34 The specific questions used in this study, or variables that were combined based on two or more survey questions, are shown in Table 1.
Survey Questions and Combined Variables Used in This Study
Note: These questions were derived from the 2019 YRBS Data User's Guide (
We selected variables that have been associated with suicidality in previously published studies with adolescents—especially those of broad interest to clinicians and educators. We selected diverse variables, some representing past adversity (e.g., sexual abuse) and others representing potentially modifiable risk factors, such as bullying, substance use, and insufficient sleep.
Statistical analyses
Three sets of binary logistic regressions were conducted, with (1) suicidal ideation, (2) making a suicide plan, and (3) attempting suicide as dichotomous dependent variables. The analyses were conducted separately by gender. The variables included in the logistic regressions were selected based on their relevance in previously published studies and for their practical and clinical relevance.
Each suicidality variable was predicted by each of the following variables in bivariate models, with the unadjusted OR reported for each analysis: (1) being physically active for five or more days, (2) being bullied electronically or at school, (3) having on average D or F grades, (4) having insufficient sleep (i.e., five or fewer hours on school nights), (5) current binge drinking, (6) lifetime use of three or more illicit drugs, (7) current marijuana use, and (8) depression.
The specific questions for each of these variables are provided in Table 1. An OR above 1.00 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) not including 1.00 indicated the predictor was associated with greater odds of endorsing the suicidality question, whereas an OR below 1.00 with a 95% CI not including 1.00 indicated the predictor was associated with reduced odds of endorsing the suicidality item. A multi-variable logistic regression was conducted including all predictors in the same model to examine the magnitude of their associations after controlling for the other variables. The ORs can be interpreted in the same manner, but they reflect the increase or decrease in odds of suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempt among adolescents with a concussion in the prior year, controlling for all other variables in the model.
We are not attempting to build causal models or examine possible causal associations with these analyses, nor are we attempting to understand the interrelationships among these variables. We are simply illustrating which variables are associated with suicidality when depression is included in the multi-variable model.
A “stress index” was created by summing the binary responses to six of the eight variables included in the logistic regressions. The following six potentially modifiable risk factors were selected to form this stress index: (1) being bullied electronically or at school, (2) having on average D or F grades, (3) having insufficient sleep (i.e., five or fewer hours on school nights), (4) current binge drinking, (5) lifetime use of three or more illicit drugs, and (6) current marijuana use. This index is not an attempt to create a statistical model for predicting suicidality, but rather simply a practical and clinically relevant sum of risk factors.
The frequency distributions and unadjusted univariable analyses of the stress index were examined for boys and girls who endorsed concussion in the past year irrespective of reported depression, and respective subgroups who reported depression, stratified by endorsement of suicidal ideation, suicide plan, and suicide attempts.
Results
In the total sample of adolescents who reported experiencing a concussion and responded to the question assessing suicidal ideation (n = 1683), 25% endorsed experiencing suicidal ideation in the past year. Among adolescents who responded to the question regarding making a suicide plan (n = 1669), 20% endorsed making a plan; and among adolescents who responded to the question regarding making a suicide attempt in the past year (n = 1138), 15% endorsed having attempted suicide in the past year.
Girls endorsed suicidal ideation (31%) more frequently than boys (19%) (χ 2 [1, 1683] = 31.47, p < 0.001; OR = 1.89 [95% CI: 1.51, 2.37]). Similarly, girls endorsed making a suicide plan (25%) more frequently than boys (17%) (χ 2 [1, 1669] = 16.99, p < 0.001; OR = 1.65 [95% CI: 1.30, 2.10]). In contrast, girls did not report attempting suicide (17%) more frequently than boys (13%) (χ 2 [1, 1138] = 2.66, p = 0.10; OR = 1.31 [95% CI: 0.95, 1.82]). The percentages of adolescents endorsing suicidal ideation and attempts, stratified by gender and subgroups, are presented in Table 2.
Percentages of High School Students Endorsing Suicidality
Columns labeled n reflect the subgroup sample size and columns labeled % reflect the percent of that subgroup who endorsed suicidal ideation. See Table 1 for definitions of these variables. For comparison, the top row represents the total sample of youth who answered the questions of interest and who reported “no” for experiencing a concussion in the past year. The “Stress Index” is defined by the number of “yes” responses to questions relating to being bullied, low grades, insufficient sleep, current binge drinking, illicit drug use, current marijuana use, and depression; participants with missing data on any of the “Stress Index” questions were excluded from those analyses. The “Stress Index: Concussion Sample” includes participants in the sample who provided responses to items included in the “Stress Index.”
Variables associated with suicidal ideation, making a suicide plan, and suicide attempts among girls
Suicidal ideation
The results of the unadjusted univariable and adjusted multi-variable analyses for the girls are presented in Table 3. In unadjusted univariable analyses, endorsement of suicidal ideation was inversely associated with being physically active for five or more days per week, such that those who reported physical activity for five or more days per week were less likely to endorse suicidal ideation. In contrast, suicidal ideation was positively associated with being bullied, insufficient sleep, current binge drinking, illicit drug use, marijuana use, and depression, such that endorsement of these variables was associated with increased likelihood of reporting suicidal ideation in the past year.
Logistic Regressions Predicting Suicidality in Girls
In the adjusted multi-variable model, being bullied, illicit drug use, marijuana use, and depression remained significantly associated with suicidal ideation. Endorsement of suicidal ideation was not associated with low grades in either the univariable or multi-variable models.
Making a suicide plan
In unadjusted univariable analyses, endorsement of making a suicide plan was positively associated with being bullied, low grades, insufficient sleep, current binge drinking, illicit drug use, marijuana use, and depression, such that endorsement of these variables was associated with increased likelihood of reporting making a suicide plan in the past year. In the adjusted multi-variable model, being bullied, illicit drug use, marijuana use, and depression retained their association with making a suicide plan. Endorsement of making a suicide plan was not associated with being physically active for five or more days per week in either the univariable or multi-variable models.
Suicide attempts
In unadjusted univariable analyses, endorsement of suicide attempts was positively associated with being bullied, low grades, insufficient sleep, illicit drug use, marijuana use, and depression, such that endorsement of these variables was associated with increased likelihood of reporting suicide attempts in the past year. In the adjusted multi-variable model, most of those variables retained their association with suicide attempts except for reporting low grades and illicit drug use. Endorsement of suicide attempts was not associated with being physically active for five or more days per week or binge drinking in either the univariable or multi-variable models.
Variables associated with suicidal ideation, making a suicide plan, and suicide attempts among boys
Suicidal ideation
The results of the unadjusted univariable and adjusted multi-variable analyses for the boys are presented in Table 4. In unadjusted univariable analyses, suicidal ideation was positively associated with being bullied, low grades, insufficient sleep, current binge drinking, illicit drug use, marijuana use, and depression, such that endorsement of these variables was associated with increased likelihood of reporting suicidal ideation in the past year. In the adjusted multi-variable model, only being bullied and depression retained an association with suicidal ideation. Endorsement of suicidal ideation was not associated with being physically active for five or more days per week in either the univariable or multi-variable models.
Logistic Regressions Predicting Suicidality in Boys
Making a suicide plan
In unadjusted univariable analyses, endorsement of making a suicide plan was inversely associated with being physically active for five or more days per week, such that those who reported physical activity for five or more days per week were less likely to endorse making a suicide plan. In contrast, endorsement of making a suicide plan was positively associated with being bullied, low grades, insufficient sleep, current binge drinking, illicit drug use, marijuana use, and depression, such that endorsement of these variables was associated with increased likelihood of reporting making a suicide plan in the past year. In the adjusted multi-variable model, being bullied and illicit drug use retained their association with making a suicide plan.
Suicide attempts
In unadjusted univariable analyses, endorsement of suicide attempts was inversely associated with being physically active for five or more days per week, such that those who reported physical activity for five or more days per week were less likely to endorse suicide attempts. In contrast, reporting of suicide attempts was positively associated with being bullied, low grades, insufficient sleep, current binge drinking, illicit drug use, marijuana use, and depression, such that endorsement of these variables was associated with increased likelihood of reporting suicide attempts in the past year. In the adjusted multi-variable model, only being physically active for five or more days per week, being bullied, and depression retained their associations with suicide attempts.
Stress index in girls and boys
Frequencies of cumulative stress factors in girls and boys are displayed in Table 5. Among girls, univariable unadjusted analyses revealed a positive association between cumulative risk factors and suicidal ideation, making a suicide plan, and suicide attempts. The presence of additional stress factors was associated with greater proportions of those who endorsed suicidal ideation (i.e., 25–56%), making a suicide plan (i.e., 21–53%), and suicide attempts (i.e., 7–31%). The absence of risk factors was associated with much lower proportions endorsing suicidal ideation (i.e., 10%), making a suicide plan (i.e., 5%), and suicide attempts (i.e., 5%).
Cumulative Risk Factor Model Predicting Suicidality in Adolescents
The column labeled n reflects the subgroup sample size and columns labeled % reflect the percent of that subgroup who endorsed suicidal ideation or suicide attempts. The “Stress Index” is comprised of the following variables: being bullied, low grades, insufficient sleep, current binge drinking, illicit drug use, and current marijuana use. These analyses include adolescents who did and did not endorse depression.
Notably, ORs for suicidality appeared to show the largest change in magnitude when increasing from three to four stress factors. For example, 17.5% of girls with three stressors reported a suicide attempt, whereas 31% of girls with four or more stressors reported a suicide attempt.
Frequencies of cumulative stress factors in boys are displayed in Table 5. Univariable unadjusted analyses revealed a positive association between cumulative risk factors, at higher levels, and suicidal ideation, making a suicide plan, and suicide attempts. The presence of additional stress factors was associated with greater proportions of those who endorsed suicidal ideation (i.e., 19–50%), making a suicide plan (i.e., 14–39%), and suicide attempts (i.e., 5–33%). The absence of risk factors was associated with much lower proportions endorsing suicidal ideation (i.e., 9%) and making a suicide plan (i.e., 8%), and suicide attempts (i.e., 5%).
Similar to girls, ORs for suicidality showed the largest change in magnitude when increasing from three to four stress factors. For example, 10% of boys with three stressors reported a suicide attempt, whereas 33% of boys with four or more stressors reported a suicide attempt.
Stress index in girls and boys endorsing depression
Frequencies of stress factors in the subsample of girls and boys endorsing depression in the past year are displayed in Table 6. Among girls, univariable unadjusted analyses revealed a positive association between stress factors and suicidal ideation, making a suicide plan, and suicide attempts. The presence of additional stress factors was associated with a greater proportion endorsing suicidal ideation (i.e., 42–72%), making a suicide plan (i.e., 30–75%), and suicide attempts (i.e., 16–62.5%). Among boys, univariable unadjusted analyses revealed a positive association between four or more stress factors and suicidal ideation, making a suicide plan, and suicide attempts. The presence of additional stress factors was associated with a greater proportion endorsing suicidal ideation (i.e., 38–71%), making a suicide plan (22.5–65%), and suicide attempts (11–60%).
Cumulative Risk Factor Model Predicting Suicidality in Adolescents Endorsing Depression
The column labeled n reflects the subgroup sample size and columns labeled % reflect the percent of that subgroup who endorsed suicidal ideation or suicide attempts. The “Stress Index” comprises the following variables: being bullied, low grades, insufficient sleep, current binge drinking, illicit drug use, and current marijuana use.
Discussion
Researchers using CDC survey data from high school students in the United States have reported an association between sustaining a concussion and suicidality.4-–8 In a recent study, however, examining multi-variable models that control for a broad range of other risk factors for suicidality, the associations between concussion and suicidality were greatly attenuated or became nonsignificant. 9
For the present study, we adopted a different methodology than all previous studies on this topic by focusing specifically on youth who reported sustaining a concussion during the past year as the sample of interest. This allows us to draw inferences regarding youth who have been concussed, and factors associated with suicidality for them—as opposed to studying concussion, per se, as a factor of interest in relation to suicidality. This methodology is more clinically relevant because we are examining correlates of suicidality in youth who have been injured.
One of three (31%) girls and one of five (19%) boys who reported sustaining a concussion in the past year also reported experiencing suicidal ideation in the past year. Moreover, many of these adolescents reported attempting suicide in the past year (17% of girls and 13% of boys). There were numerous important correlates, or risk factors, for suicidality in both girls and boys, such as being bullied, being threatened or feeling unsafe at school, using illicit drugs (and opiates), and getting very low grades in school (Table 2). By far, the strongest predictor of all forms of suicidality, in both girls and boys, was experiencing depression (Tables 3-4).
In multi-variable analyses, however, that include depression, other modifiable risk factors remained significant. For girls, illicit drug use, marijuana use, and being bullied were independent risk factors (Table 3). Insufficient sleep was also an independent risk factor for planning suicide for girls. For boys, after controlling for depression, only being bullied was a consistent risk factor for suicidality. Being physically active for five or more days per week was independently associated with a lower likelihood of endorsing making a suicide plan and suicide attempts in boys (Table 4).
It is remarkably difficult to predict suicidality in youth, both at the population level and, of course, for individuals—and in the present study the amount of variance in suicidality accounted for by the predictors was modest. The amount of variance accounted for by the eight predictors, for girls, was lower for suicide attempts than for suicide ideation.
For the present study, we created a stress index comprised of potentially modifiable risk factors to examine the association between cumulative stressors and suicidality in youth who have sustained concussions. Previously published studies have illustrated that the six variables within the stress index—(1) being bullied, 13,15 –18 (2) having on average D or F grades, 9 (3) having insufficient sleep (i.e., five or fewer hours on school nights), 30 (4) binge drinking, (5) illicit drug use, 13,23 and (6) marijuana use 19,22,23 —are all associated with suicidality in high school students.
These variables are of practical, clinical, and societal interest. In the present study, for those students who denied all six stressors, approximately one of 10 endorsed suicidal ideation (9% of boys and 10% of girls). In contrast, for those who endorsed experiencing three of the stressors, one in four boys (25%) and half of the girls (47%) endorsed suicidal ideation.
In this study, we made no attempt to examine possible causal associations or to estimate how exposure (predictor) variables were interrelated. Future researchers could attempt to use YRBS data to examine specific combinations of risk factors and predictor variables, guided by clinical considerations, using a priori theorizing about possible causal and mediational relationships. Directed acyclic graphs could be used, methodologically, to examine theories and assumptions about the relationships among these variables. 35
Limitations
This study has several important limitations. First, we cannot draw inferences regarding causation. Specifically, it is not known whether concussion is directly or indirectly causally related to suicidality in high school students because this was a cross-sectional survey study for which we do not know when the students experienced their concussion or when they experienced suicidality. Second, we have no information in the survey about the mechanisms of injury, severity of injury, co-occurring injuries, clinical outcomes, or recovery times from the students' concussions.
Third, our stress index is not a validated index. It is an outcome measure of convenience created for this study, and we included variables, based on clinical experience and a review of the literature, that seemed clinically relevant and, importantly, modifiable through intervention. Fourth, all information was self-reported by the students; we do not know how accurate it is, and we do not know whether some students' approach to the survey was influenced by a response bias such as nay-saying (a response set of answering questions negatively regardless of the content) and yea-saying (an acquiescent response set). Notably, the percentage of adolescents reporting a concussion in the past year aligns with large-scale study of high school athletes. 36 Fifth, cell sizes were smaller than desirable for logistic regressions examining subsets of the sample (e.g., boys with four or more stressors).
Conclusions
This study has important clinical implications. First, a substantial number of high school students who sustain a concussion report experiencing suicidality, with rates modestly higher than in youth who have not sustained a concussion. Second, there is a very strong association, as expected, between experiencing depression and suicidality. Third, psychosocial stressors, such as bullying, are independently related to suicidality after controlling for depression. Finally, the experience of cumulative modifiable stressors is strongly associated with suicidality—meaning that adolescents who report no major stressors have a relatively low rate of suicidality but adolescents who report three or more life stressors have a high rate of suicidality.
Therefore, clinicians and school personnel should be watchful for not only depression in adolescents who have experienced concussions, but also cumulative life stressors. These at-risk youth should be referred for mental health services.
Transparency, Rigor, and Reproducibility Summary
This was not a pre-registered study. This study relied on secondary analyses of a publicly available national survey of high school students in the United States. The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 2019 national dataset is available online: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [2019] Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data. 34 There is extensive documentation on the website relating to their survey methodology and also a summary article for the 2019 survey 3 See the opening paragraph, of the “Sample” section of the current manuscript for a synopsis of information on transparency and rigor regarding the survey methodology.
Data analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 28.0). Analyses included reporting on item endorsement frequencies stratified by gender. Univariable and multi-variable logistic regressions were conducted to obtain odds ratios to characterize associations between reported behaviors and suicidality. Because of data limitations, some of the exploratory logistic regression models were not sufficiently powered to detect statistically significant associations. Coding syntax are available on reasonable request. We plan to conduct replication studies on publication of updated YRBS data.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The data used in the current study were from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 2019 national dataset, which is publicly available online: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [2019] Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data. 34
Authors' Contributions
Grant L. Iverson, PhD, conceptualized the study, conducted the literature review, helped conceptualize the statistical analyses, and drafted portions of the manuscript. Charles E. Gaudet, PhD, conducted the statistical analyses, created the tables, drafted the
section, and edited drafts of the manuscript. Justin E. Karr, PhD, assisted with conceptualizing the study and statistical analyses, supervised the analyses, and edited drafts of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Funding Information
This was not a sponsored study, and no direct funding for this study was provided. Grant Iverson, PhD, has received unrestricted philanthropic support from ImPACT Applications, Inc., the Mooney-Reed Charitable Foundation, the National Rugby League, the Boston Bolts, and the Spaulding Research Institute. None of the above entities were involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, or the decision to submit it for publication.
Author Disclosure Statement
Grant L. Iverson, PhD, serves as a scientific advisor for NanoDx® Inc., Sway Operations, LLC, and Highmark, Inc. He has a clinical and consulting practice in forensic neuropsychology, including expert testimony, involving individuals who have sustained mild TBIs (including athletes). He has received research funding from several test publishing companies, including ImPACT Applications, Inc., CNS Vital Signs, and Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR, Inc.). He has received research funding as a principal investigator from the National Football League, and salary support as a collaborator from the Harvard Integrated Program to Protect and Improve the Health of National Football League Players Association Members. Charles E. Gaudet, PhD, and Justin E. Karr, PhD, declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
