One crucial first step in bacteriophage therapy is choosing a phage to apply, which involves screening for effectiveness in a meaningful way. Increasingly, research suggests that in vitro tests of phage-mediated bacterial lysis poorly translate to in planta effectiveness.
Materials and Methods:
We tested a seedling-based method for rapidly screening phage effectiveness in vivo. In three trials, phages were prophylactically applied to tomato seedlings in sterile conical tubes before flooding with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. We recorded seedling disease progression and quantified endpoint bacteria and phage densities.
Results:
Phages replicated in all trials, but reduction of disease symptoms and endpoint P. syringae density varied across trials with different application densities.
Conclusions:
This resource-efficient method rapidly identified an effective phage and application density to mitigate disease on seedlings. We propose that this method could be used to screen candidate phages before testing in agricultural conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LalR.Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability. 2015; 7(5):5875–5895.
2.
GornallJ, BettsR, BurkeE, et al.Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010; 365(1554):2973–2989.
3.
FunkCC, BrownME. Declining global per capita agricultural production and warming oceans threaten food security. Food Secur. 2009; 1(3):271–289.
4.
DeutschCA, TewksburyJJ, TigchelaarM, et al.Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate. Science. 2018; 361(6405):916–919.
5.
SavaryS, WillocquetL, PethybridgeSJ, et al.The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019; 3(3):430–439.
6.
TilmanD, BalzerC, HillJ, et al.Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(50):20260–20264.
7.
RayDK, MuellerND, WestPC, et al.Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e66428.
8.
GottwaldTR, SunX, RileyT, et al.Geo-referenced spatiotemporal analysis of the urban citrus canker epidemic in Florida. Phytopathology. 2002; 92(4):361–377.
9.
HaapalainenM.Biology and epidemics of Candidatus Liberibacter species, psyllid-transmitted plant-pathogenic bacteria. Ann Appl Biol. 2014; 165(2):172–198.
10.
HopkinsDL, PurcellAH. Xylella fastidiosa: Cause of Pierce's disease of grapevine and other emergent diseases. Plant Dis. 2002; 86(10):1056–1066.
11.
BassaneziRB, MontesinoLH, StuchiES. Effects of huanglongbing on fruit quality of sweet orange cultivars in Brazil. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2009; 125(4):565–572.
12.
CoatesL, JohnsonG. Postharvest diseases of fruit and vegetables. In: BrownJF, and OgleHJ; eds. Plant Pathogens and Plant Diseases. Armidale, NSW: Rockvale Publications for the Division of Botany, University of New England; 1997: 53; 3–548.
13.
SundinGW, CastiblancoLF, YuanX, et al.Bacterial disease management: Challenges, experience, innovation and future prospects. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016; 17(9):1506–1518.
14.
CookseyDA.Molecular mechanisms of copper resistance and accumulation in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994; 14(4):381–386.
15.
SundinGW, WangN. Antibiotic resistance in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2018; 56:161–180.
16.
KearneyB, RonaldPC, DahlbeckD, et al.Molecular basis for evasion of plant host defence in bacterial spot disease of pepper. Nature. 1988; 332(6164):541–543.
17.
LamichhaneJR, MesséanA, MorrisCE. Insights into epidemiology and control of diseases of annual plants caused by the Pseudomonas syringae species complex. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2015; 81(5):331–350.
18.
LamichhaneJR, VarvaroL, ParisiL, et al.Disease and frost damage of woody plants caused by Pseudomonas syringae: Seeing the forest for the trees. In: SparksDL; ed. Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 126. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2014: 23; 5–295.
19.
EverettKR, TaylorRK, RombergMK, et al.First report of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae causing kiwifruit bacterial canker in New Zealand. Australas Plant Dis Notes. 2011; 6(1):67–71.
20.
MorrisCE, LamichhaneJR, NikolićI, et al.The overlapping continuum of host range among strains in the Pseudomonas syringae complex. Phytopathol Res. 2019; 1(1):4.
21.
GoodeMJ, SasserM. Prevention—The key to controlling bacterial spot and bacterial speck of tomato. Plant Dis. 1980; 64(9):831–834.
22.
IshigaY, UppalapatiSR, IshigaT, et al.The phytotoxin coronatine induces light-dependent reactive oxygen species in tomato seedlings. New Phytol. 2009; 181(1):147–160.
23.
McCarterSM, JonesJB, GitaitisRD, et al.Survival of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in association with tomato seed, soil, host tissue, and epiphytic weed hosts in Georgia. Phytopathology. 1983; 73(10):1393–1398.
24.
MorrisCE, SandsDC, VinatzerBA, et al.The life history of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae is linked to the water cycle. ISME J. 2008; 2(3):321–334.
25.
JacobsenBJ.Role of plant pathology in integrated pest management. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1997; 35(1):373–391.
26.
PitbladoRE, KerrEA. A source of resistance to bacterial speck—Pseudomonas tomato. Tomato Genet Coop Rep. 1979; 29:30.
27.
PitbladoRE, MacNeillBH. Genetic basis of resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in field tomatoes. Can J Plant Pathol. 1983; 5(4):251–255.
28.
PedleyKF, MartinGB. Molecular basis of Pto-mediated resistance to bacterial speck disease in tomato. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2003; 41(1):215–243.
29.
KunkeawS, TanS, CoakerG. Molecular and evolutionary analyses of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato race 1. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010; 23(4):415–424.
30.
BenderCL, CookseyDA. Indigenous plasmids in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato: Conjugative transfer and role in copper resistance. J Bacteriol. 1986; 165(2):534–541.
31.
CookseyDA.Characterization of a copper resistance plasmid conserved in copper-resistant strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987; 53(2):454–456.
32.
ButtimerC, McAuliffeO, RossRP, et al.Bacteriophages and bacterial plant diseases. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8:34.
Gordillo AltamiranoFL, BarrJJ. Phage therapy in the postantibiotic era. Clin Microbiol Revs. 2019; 32(2):e00066-18.
35.
Loc-CarrilloC, AbedonST. Pros and cons of phage therapy. Bacteriophage. 2011; 1(2):111–114.
36.
NilssonAS.Phage therapy-constraints and possibilities. Ups J Med Sci. 2014; 119(2):192–198.
37.
HernandezCA, KoskellaB. Phage resistance evolution in vitro is not reflective of in vivo outcome in a plant-bacteria-phage system. Evolution. 2019; 73(12):2461–2475.
38.
BaloghB. Characterization and use of bacteriophages associated with citrus bacterial pathogens for disease control. PhD thesis, University of Florida. 2006.
39.
BaloghB, NgaNTT, JonesJB. Relative level of bacteriophage multiplication in vitro or in phyllosphere may not predict in planta efficacy for controlling bacterial leaf spot on tomato caused by Xanthomonas perforans. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:2176.
40.
SabouriS, SepehrizadehZ, Amirpour-RostamiS, et al.A minireview on the in vitro and in vivo experiments with anti-Escherichia coli O157:H7 phages as potential biocontrol and phage therapy agents. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017; 243:52–57.
41.
IriarteFB, BaloghB, MomolMT, et al.Factors affecting survival of bacteriophage on tomato leaf surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73(6):1704–1711.
42.
FramptonRA, PitmanAR, FineranPC. Advances in bacteriophage-mediated control of plant pathogens. Int J Microbiol. 2012. DOI: 10.1155/2012/326452.
43.
JonesJB, ValladGE, IriarteFB, et al.Considerations for using bacteriophages for plant disease control. Bacteriophage. 2012; 2(4):e23857.
44.
MorellaNM, ZhangX, KoskellaB. Tomato seed-associated bacteria confer protection of seedlings against foliar disease caused by Pseudomonas syringae. Phytobiomes J. 2019; 3(3):177–190.
45.
MorellaNM, YangSC, HernandezCA, et al.Rapid quantification of bacteriophages and their bacterial hosts in vitro and in vivo using droplet digital PCR. J Virol Methods. 2018; 259:18–24.
46.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. 2017. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ (Accessed December1, 2020).
47.
BatesD, MächlerM, BolkerBM, et al.Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015; 67(1):1–48.
48.
LenthR. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.5.0. 2020. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans (Accessed December1, 2020).
49.
PohlertT. The pairwise multiple comparison of mean ranks package (PMCMR). R package version 4.3. 2018. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=PMCMR Last accessed December1, 2020.
50.
DinnoA. dunn.test: Dunn's Test of Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. R package version 1.3.5. 2017. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=dunn.test. (Accessed December1, 2020.
51.
DelbrückM.The growth of bacteriophage and lysis of the host. J Gen Physiol. 1940; 23(5):643–660.
52.
AbedonST.Lysis from without. Bacteriophage. 2011; 1(1):46–49.
53.
XinX-F, HeSY. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000: A model pathogen for probing disease susceptibility and hormone signaling in plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013; 51:473–498.
54.
UdeS, ArnoldDL, MoonCD, et al.Biofilm formation and cellulose expression among diverse environmental Pseudomonas isolates. Environ Microbiol. 2006; 8(11):1997–2011.
55.
VidakovicL, SinghPK, HartmannR, et al.Dynamic biofilm architecture confers individual and collective mechanisms of viral protection. Nat Microbiol. 2018; 3(1):26–31.
56.
HosseinidoustZ, TufenkjiN, van de VenTGM. Formation of biofilms under phage predation: considerations concerning a biofilm increase. Biofouling. 2013; 29(4):457–468.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
