Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the link between individual behavior and public health, along with the importance of evidence-based efforts to promote prosocial individual behavior. Insights from behavioral science can inform the design of effective behavior change techniques, or nudges, to influence individual behavior. The MINDSPACE framework organizes 9 behavioral science principles that can be used to guide policy design: Messenger, Incentives, Norms, Defaults, Salience, Priming, Affect, Commitments, and Ego. Using MINDSPACE as an organizing framework, this article provides a review of the literature on nudges to influence prosocial behaviors relevant during a pandemic: handwashing, avoidance of social gatherings, self-isolation and social distancing, and sharing public health messages. Additionally, empirical evidence on the use of nudges during the first several months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 is summarized. Recommendations regarding the use of nudges to achieve public health policy goals during pandemics are provided. Organizational leaders, policymakers, and practitioners can use nudges to promote public health when mandates are not politically feasible or enforceable.
Introduction
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the importance of behavioral science to guide individuals toward actions that benefit public health. Few scenarios demonstrate a more dramatic link between individual behavior and public health than pandemic disease, along with the importance of evidence-based efforts to promote prosocial behavior. The legality of mandates requiring prosocial behaviors such as mask wearing has been challenged throughout the first 2 years of the pandemic. For example, in April 2020, County Judge Lina Hidalgo issued an order requiring that residents of Harris County, Texas, engage in behaviors to promote public health, such as wearing a face mask while in public, with violators subject to a fine of up to $1000.
The order drew fervent backlash from members of the public, police officers concerned about enforceability, 1 and local leaders, one of whom filed a lawsuit to block implementation on the basis that Hidalgo lacked authority to “force private citizens to wear masks, wash their hands, refrain from touching their face, or stay 6 feet away from another under the threat of fines,” 2 highlighting the distinction between guidance and legally enforceable mandates.
Controlling the spread of an outbreak calls for large-scale, rapid, and substantial changes to individual behavior patterns to reduce mortality and health care system strain. Infectious disease is a classic example of negative health externalities, leading to market failures that can justify government intervention in the form of authoritative policies, or “shoves.” 3,4 However, as the case of the mask order demonstrates, mandating that individuals engage in certain behaviors may not be enforceable or politically feasible. Society must then rely on individuals' uptake of recommended behaviors to reduce the spread of disease. In such scenarios, there can be failings in the behavioral market that also justify governmental intervention. 3
Thus, even in situations that warrant “shoves,” “nudges” that are based on behavioral science principles to motivate behavior change at the individual level can also be relevant. 5 Nudges are behavior change techniques developed within the field of behavioral economics that represent a form of libertarian paternalism, preserving choice while guiding individuals toward behaviors with population-level benefits. 6
In their book on the topic, Thaler and Sunstein defined a nudge as “any aspect of the choice architecture that alters people's behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives.” 5 Organizational, state, and local policymakers and public health officials can incorporate nudges informed by behavioral science to create opportunities that simultaneously preserve individual choices and encourage prosocial behavior, potentially as complements to regulations and mandates.
Nudges have been used to inform public policy around the globe, garnering bipartisan support in the United States. 7 They have been used to encourage public health and other prosocial behaviors, such as green energy use. 8,9 Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, states, cities, and federal agencies have employed creative nudges to prompt people to adopt simple actions in the name of public health. Alabama enacted legislation urging fist bumps rather than handshakes. 10 Boston used the number of iced coffees to help visualize 6 feet of distance. 11 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration now requires that businesses have alcohol-based hand sanitizers on hand.
To help categorize nudges based on underlying principles of behavioral economics and psychology, Ivo Vlaev and members of the Behavioral Insights Team from the United Kingdom's Cabinet Office, also referred to as the “Nudge Unit,” developed the MINDSPACE framework. MINDSPACE is an acronym developed from the names of several nudging mechanisms, which are largely automatic and contextual influences on behaviors: Messenger, Incentives, Norms, Defaults, Salience, Priming, Affect, Commitments, and Ego. 12
The Behavioral Insights Team aims to help the UK government develop and apply lessons from behavioral science to public policymaking. The MINDSPACE framework has been widely used to guide effective policy utilizing the latest insights from behavioral sciences and nudge theory, 13 with researchers, government departments, and both public and private organizations using MINDSPACE as their guiding theoretical framework.
In a time when exercise of civil liberties must be carefully weighed against compelling public health interests, choice-preserving nudges can be employed to influence individual behaviors not amenable to regulation. Published literature provides evidence on the effectiveness of various mechanisms to increase uptake of behaviors that promote public health and social welfare.
In this article, literature is reviewed on nudges as behavior change techniques to promote the following prosocial behaviors: handwashing, avoidance of social gatherings, self-isolation and social distancing, and sharing public health messages. Using MINDSPACE as an organizing framework, this study describes what is known from the literature regarding public health emergencies and circumstances in which individual behavior impacts social welfare. Examples of nudges that were utilized in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic are highlighted, and early empirical evidence on their support and effectiveness is summarized. Organizational leaders, policymakers, and practitioners can use nudges to promote public health when mandates are not politically feasible or enforceable.
Methods
Using the 9 MINDSPACE principles to guide search queries, a search was conducted for existing original peer-reviewed articles, manuscript preprints, and news articles using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Google News. Searches were designed to collect information on the use of nudges, both during public health crises and in general, to promote the following behaviors: handwashing, avoidance of social gatherings, self-isolation, and social distancing, and sharing public health messages. Original searches were conducted from April to May 2020.
A data abstraction form organized by principle was developed to facilitate abstraction of information about the intervention/recommendation, supporting references, question/problem, specific nudge outcome, behaviors addressed, key takeaways, ethical issues, and costs. Additionally, nudges utilized in US state-level policy were examined using resources available from the National Governor's Association, state government websites, and popular press outlets. Findings were narratively summarized according to the MINDSPACE principle.
Results
Information was abstracted from the literature related to 96 nudges. Descriptions of each principle and examples of their uses are displayed in Table 1. Findings related to each principle are summarized below.
Using the MINDSPACE Framework 12 to Identify Nudges to Promote Public Health During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic
AL, Alabama; AR, Arkansas; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CO, Colorado; COVID-19, coronavirus disease; IA, Iowa; LA, Los Angeles; MA, Massachusetts; NC, North Carolina; NY, New York.
Nudges to promote public health
M—Messenger
Who communicates information matters, especially in terms of the perceived authority of the messenger. 12,13 In general, public health authorities and medical professionals are the most trusted messengers during a public health emergency. In the spring of 2020, Pew Research Center poll data suggested 74% of US adults had a mostly positive view of medical doctors overall. 14 Similarly, the vast majority of Americans had a favorable view of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; 79%) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS; 80%), with no significant difference along political party lines. 15 In comparison, only 51% of Americans reported trusting the news media. 16
The presence of organizations such as the CDC on social media can extend the reach of messages and provide a trusted and recognized source to counter the spread of false information online. At the end of 2019, the official CDC Twitter account (@CDCgov) had 1.2 million followers, which had increased to 2.6 million by April 20, 2020. 17 The CDC created a COVID-19 social media toolkit, including sample messages and accompanying graphics and videos bearing the CDC logo for Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, and LinkedIn. 18 Americans are likely to engage with such messages, as approximately 70% of Americans use some form of social media, the most common platform being Facebook. 19 Moreover, stay-at-home orders led to an increase in time spent on social media, with a 27% increase in Facebook usage between January and April 2020. 20
I—Incentives
Mental biases influence how individuals evaluate potential outcomes, including avoidance of losses, overweighting small probabilities, and present bias (preferring more immediate rewards). 13 The intuition behind incentives during a pandemic is that interventions that increase the cost of activities that are high-transmission risk (eg, instituting penalties), decrease the benefit of doing these activities (eg, bans on large gatherings, closure of entertainment venues), or decrease the cost of not doing them (eg, alcohol and food takeout, paid sick leave, freezing evictions and utility shutoffs) will encourage proper social isolation.
For example, 8 states announced temporary relaxation of liquor laws and regulations to allow bars and restaurants to sell liquor to-go and/or offer home delivery in the early months of 2020. Before these changes, just 12 states allowed alcohol delivery and 31 allowed direct-to-home shipping of beer/wine. 21,22
Paid sick leave makes it less costly to self-quarantine if sick. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act, signed into law in March 2020, required certain employers to provide paid sick leave to eligible employees who are sick, need to quarantine or self-isolate, care for a sick or quarantined family member, or care for a child whose school has been closed. 23 State legislatures also enacted policies in response to the pandemic regarding paid sick leave, rental assistance, and temporary freezes on foreclosures, evictions, mortgages, and utility shutoffs. 10 These interventions aimed to promote housing and financial security during the crisis to defray the cost of staying home.
On March 15, 2020, the CDC released guidelines recommending cancellation or postponement of in-person events with 50 or more people. 24 These guidelines rendered socializing and leaving the house relatively less appealing. Additionally, 42 states along with Washington, DC and Puerto Rico issued “shelter-in-place” orders as of May 2020. While governors of 3 additional states (Oklahoma, Utah, Wyoming) had not mandated quarantine, individual counties or cities across these states had.
Of the 44 stay-at-home orders, 31 imposed fines ranging from $100 to $25,000 (median $1000) and 26 threatened jail time ranging from 1 to 18 months for violators. Most governors explicitly noted that they did not plan to aggressively enforce these penalties except for egregious or repeat offenses. These orders, therefore, represented “strong suggestions” intended to nudge citizens into staying home due to a potential financial or judicial penalty. 25,26
Two lead economists at the World Bank proposed “carrots” that governments could use to incentivize staying at home. These include subsidizing the following: useful home-based activities such as data labeling or document digitization, human capital development in the form of online courses, and entertainment through web-based streaming services. 27 Regarding subsidized education, the Australian government offered discounted online courses targeting areas of national demand as part of a coronavirus relief package. 28
N—Norms
Individuals are strongly influenced by what others do, which shape the social and cultural norms in a society or social network. 12,13 Moderate social distancing for 3–4 months beginning in March 2020 was projected to save 1.7 million lives by October 1, corresponding to economic benefits from reduced mortality worth about $8 trillion, or $60,000 per US household, when applying the US government's value of a statistical life. 29
Such social distancing, however, required establishment of new norms. For example, Americans reported adopting new norms regarding crowds and public transport, with 89% reporting avoidance of public transportation such as planes, buses, subways, or trains in a March 2020 Gallup poll. 30 Arkansas and Iowa officially banned groups of 10 or more; there were statewide school closures in all states, and limitations on domestic travel by Executive Order in 22 states, with recommendations in 12 additional states. 10
Social media can also promote social distancing as a new norm within social circles. Instagram users were able to add a “Stay Home” sticker to any of their stories, demonstrating their support for staying home to their social networks. 31 Snapchat also introduced filters and stickers promoting various prosocial behaviors such as washing hands, staying home, physical distancing, and avoiding face touching. 32
There has been widespread public shaming online of individuals who deviate from prosocial COVID-19 norms. In addition, public shaming of companies' decisions to stay open against norms, including Waterstones and Sports Direct, led to reversal of their policies. 33
D—Defaults
In many situations, individuals rely on default options, the options that are preselected if an individual does not make an active choice. 12,13 To encourage social distancing, video conferences (such as Skype, Zoom, Microsoft Teams) or phone calls replaced face-to-face meetings as the new default. 34 Employer work-from-home policies made telecommuting the new status quo, with 25%–30% of the US workforce predicted to be working remotely 1 or more days per week by the end of 2021, compared with less than 4% working from home half-time or more in early 2020. 35
Similarly, dating apps added video chat capabilities and introduced new features such as virtual happy hours to default to a new form of virtual dating, at least early in relationships. Some apps reported that conversation volume increased by 20%–30%, suggesting that people defaulted to video chatting and online dating, which some experts suggest could be a permanent switch. 36
A former staple of the boardroom, the handshake may also give way to a new default greeting in efforts to reduce the need for handwashing. Alabama enacted legislation urging all individuals to fist bump rather than shake hands. 10 Similarly, creative alternatives to handshakes were proposed in the popular press. 37 The increased popularity of online grocery purchase, a new potential default option in lieu of in-person shopping at grocery stores, represents an additional example of potential new defaults. 38
S—Salience
Individuals' behaviors are influenced by what draws attention and seems relevant. 12,13 One image to promote the salience of engaging in social distancing and handwashing behaviors showed the impact of such nonpharmaceutical interventions for slowing the spread of COVID-19 and helped visualize what it means to “flatten the curve,” which quickly became a household phrase. Since first being shared on March 8, 2020, 1 iteration of this graphic made 4.5 million impressions on Twitter, including more than 12,700 retweets by the end of the next month. 39 It was also shown on broadcast media, and 71% of Americans reported having seen or heard about flattening the curve, with 56% agreeing with the premise, according to a March 2020 Civic Science poll. 40
Appeals to local culture also increased the salience of messages. A city of Round Rock meme that reminded Texans to “Wash your hands like you just got done slicing jalapeños for a batch of nachos and you need to take your contacts out” was shared 3 million times as a vivid and regionally specific reminder to scrub for 20 seconds. 41 Similarly, the City of Boston translated the 6 feet social distancing recommendation into the number of iced coffees that would need to be lined up in a row to reach the recommended distance, salient to the local population. 11
As the pandemic worsened, 74% of Americans reported being “very” or “somewhat worried” that they or a family member will be exposed to the coronavirus by beginning of April 2020 according to Gallup polling data. 42 Impacts associated with a shuttered economy, such as job loss, appeared to increase salience of the pandemic among some population groups, as Pew poll data suggest that 33% of individuals with low incomes experienced high distress versus only 17% of those with high incomes. 43
P—Priming
Individuals are often subconsciously influenced by situational cues that activate, or prime, information in their memory. 12,13 Priming prosocial behavior, such as social distancing, can be achieved through visual aids. For example, brightly colored tape lines on the floor in grocery stores were placed to help people maintain distance between other shoppers. Local government orders in San Francisco, California and Austin, Texas required social distancing in stores using methods such as tape lines. 44,45 An order for social distancing in stores was also in place in Los Angeles County, along with a requirement for stores to provide easy access to alcohol-based hand sanitizers. 46
To promote handwashing, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration released a set of guidelines requiring businesses to have alcohol-based hand sanitizers during the pandemic, the mere presence of which is linked to increased hand hygiene behaviors. 47 Stores such as Costco created store policies to prevent returns on items such as toilet paper and sanitizing wipes, 48 priming shoppers to buy fewer units of these items which were commonly in short supply. The UK government designed a poster linking handwashing to regular daily tasks in an effort to prime formation of a new handwashing habit.
A—Affect
Emotional associations can powerfully shape individuals' actions, with good moods leading to unrealistically optimistic judgments and bad moods leading to unrealistically pessimistic judgments. 12,13 An increasing number of Americans, approximately 37% by mid-April 2020, reported feeling less connected in Gallup polls. 49 One nudge to encourage connection while staying physically separated was rebranding the phrase “social distancing” as “physical distancing.” 50 Physical distancing became the recommended terminology for use by policymakers and other public officials to promote social solidarity and virtual interaction while maintaining physical distance. 51
C—Commitments
Commitment devices can help achievement of long-term goals, as individuals seek to be consistent with public promises, and commitment is linked to reciprocity through a desire for fairness. 12,13 Commitment devices that promote social distancing included several social media campaigns in the early months of the pandemic. Facebook profile frames have been shown to promote fidelity to the advertised topic. 52 Facebook users could add a “Stay At Home” frame to their profile photo to encourage self-isolation. 53 As of April 30, 2020, more than 2600 people had taken the pledge to #StandAgainstCorona online, publicly committing to wash hands, cover coughs, keep distance, and care for others. 54 Similarly, more than 124,000 people had taken the following online pledge: “As a Global Citizen, I'm Staying Home!” 55
E—Ego
Individuals tend to behave in ways that support the impression of a positive and consistent self-image. 12,13 When our behavior and self-beliefs conflict, nudges that rely on the ego mechanism encourage changes in behavior rather than beliefs. Messages that emphasize protection of others (eg, “others” are more likely to get sick) and deontological messages (duties to protect others) can motivate behavior change. 56
While data from Pew polling suggested that younger Americans viewed COVID-19 as a bigger threat to finances than health, 57 individuals perceived COVID-19 as a more serious threat when messages highlighted risks to younger adults in addition to older adults, which may inspire recommended actions such as self-isolation and social distancing. 58 “Six Feet Saves,” a social media campaign developed by Monroe County and the City of Rochester, New York, encouraged social distancing to protect yourself and your loved ones. 59,60
In an appeal to ego through gamification, a location-tracker app called Zenly launched a stay-at-home leaderboard, which individuals could share to various social media accounts to show friends and followers how well they were doing at socially distancing and staying home. 61 For men, who on average believed that they were less likely to become sick due to coronavirus and were less compliant with prosocial health behaviors, tailored messaging could include framing protection of one's family and community via adoption of prosocial behavior as a masculine habit. 62
Factors associated with efficacy of public health-promoting nudges
Insights from behavioral analyses during previous pandemics can inform design of specific nudge mechanisms. For example, during the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic, adoption of protective behaviors such as self-quarantine, mask wearing, and handwashing was associated with individual characteristics—being older in age, female, more educated, and a race or ethnicity other than White. 63
Additionally, individuals' political affiliation is consistently associated with perceptions of public health and threat of pandemic disease. 64 –66 Based on data from early stages of the pandemic, these associations held true in the context of COVID-19. Data from a mid-March 2020 Pew poll showed that Americans' knowledge and understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic and perceived appropriateness of media coverage differed by main source for political news. 67
News source was strongly correlated with political affiliation, with the majority (76%) of those who mainly viewed Fox News identify as conservative Republicans and Republican leaning, while Democrats and Democratic leaners made up most (57%) of MSNBCs primary viewership. 67 Precautionary behavior changes and threat perceptions of the coronavirus measured in an NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll also from mid-March 2020 showed that a majority of Republicans (54%) perceived the threat as overblown, while the majority of Democrats (76%) considered it a legitimate threat. 68
In a US county-level analysis of vote share in the 2016 presidential election and COVID-19 risk perceptions, support of President Trump in a county was also associated with lower risk perceptions, as measured by searches for information on the virus and social distancing behavior assessed using cell phone location data. 69 A greater proportion of Trump voters was associated with fewer individuals searching for information on the virus and less social distancing, even after school closure and work-from-home orders took effect. These trends only reversed following White House issuance of social distancing guidelines and exposure of conservative politicians to the virus. 69 Moreover, states with Republican governors and governors from states with more Trump supporters were slower to adopt social distancing policies. 70
In addition to political leanings, other individual attitudes have also been associated with uptake of prosocial behaviors. The theory of planned behavior may provide a useful conceptual framework for analysis of individuals' compliance with public health guidelines during a pandemic. In an analysis of compliance with self-isolation, attitude was the strongest predictor of compliance with self-isolation, while subjective norms and perceived behavioral control also had a significant influence. 71 During the first week of the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States, perception of likelihood of personal infection was the strongest predictor of engagement in prosocial behaviors, such as social distancing and handwashing, compared with likelihood of transmission or severity of potential transmitted infections. 72
There was also evidence of optimism bias. In a survey of individuals in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, respondents underestimated the risk of getting infected with COVID-19 and of infecting others (relative to someone similar to them infecting others). 73 The more optimistic individuals were about not infecting others, the less likely they were to think social distancing is necessary, practice social distancing, and follow handwashing guidelines. Among teenagers, attitudes about COVID-19 severity, social responsibility values, social trust, and self-interest were associated with news monitoring, social distancing, and disinfecting behaviors. 74
Discussion
While authoritative policies such as mandates and bans enacted in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis have garnered much backlash, evidence from previous outbreaks of viral disease and early experience with the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that policymakers can employ nudges to encourage compliance with public health-promoting behaviors, such as handwashing and social distancing. Medical doctors and public health officials are highly trusted messengers by members of the public across the spectrum of political orientation.
Policymakers should involve physicians, public health experts, and science communicators when communicating with the public about recommended behaviors. Messages that emphasize the ability of anyone to become ill regardless of age and that highlight physicians' experience of caring for critically ill patients may have the greatest chance of being impactful and potentially encouraging behavior change in the widest range of individuals.
Footnotes
Authors' Contributions
H.S.S., J.S.B.-B., and I.V. conceptualized and designed the study, reviewed and revised the article, and approved the final article as submitted. H.S.S. drafted and revised the article. R.C., O.H., A.H., and R.K. coordinated the review and the data collection, critically reviewed the article, and approved the final article as submitted.
Disclaimer
The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Information
Prof. Ivo Vlaev was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands.
