We sought to analyze the prevalence of patient-ventilator asynchronies in subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure because of COVID-19 ARDS and their association with clinical outcomes.
Methods:
This was a two-center observational cohort study using prospectively collected real-world data. We included adult subjects with COVID-19 ARDS who required mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. We analyzed the prevalence, characteristics, and clusters of the following patient-ventilator asynchronies detected using dedicated software on continuous respiratory recordings obtained from ventilators over the duration of mechanical ventilation (Better Care, Sabadell, Spain): double triggering, ineffective efforts (IE), and reverse triggering with and without breath-stacking (BS). The outcome measures evaluated were duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and ICU mortality.
Results:
We analyzed 82 subjects with COVID-19 ARDS. Over the complete duration of mechanical ventilation, the most frequent asynchronies and related clusters were reverse triggering without BS (0.72% of breaths [interquartile range (IQR), 0.17–3.07]) and 4.6 clusters/d [IQR, 2.0–8.1] and double triggering (0.44% of breaths [IQR, 0.19–0.80]) and 4.6 clusters/d [IQR, 2.1–7.3]. The use of neuromuscular blockers was associated with a lower prevalence of double triggering and IE, but reverse triggering was not significantly reduced. Double triggering significantly increased with longer mechanical ventilation time, whereas reverse trigger significantly decreased during this period. Double triggering and clusters of double triggering were independently associated with longer mechanical ventilation duration and better ICU survival, whereas clusters of reverse triggering with BS were associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.
Conclusions:
Reverse triggering was the most prevalent asynchrony in subjects with ARDS COVID-19, decreased over time, and was followed by double triggering. Survivors had a higher prevalence of double triggering and clusters of double triggering, mostly occurring during spontaneous modes.
GrasselliG, CalfeeCS, CamporotaL, et al.; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Taskforce on ARDS. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med, 2023; 49(7):727–759; doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7
2.
QadirN, SahetyaS, MunshiL, et al.An update on management of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: An official American thoracic society clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2024; 209(1):24–36; doi: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2011ST
3.
BeitlerJR, SandsSA, LoringSH, et al.Quantifying unintended exposure to high tidal volumes from breath stacking dyssynchrony in ARDS: The BREATHE criteria. Intensive Care Med, 2016; 42(9):1427–1436; doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4423-3
4.
HashimotoH, YoshidaT, FirstiogusranAMF, et al.Asynchrony injures lung and diaphragm in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med, 2023; 51(11):e234–e242; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005988
5.
ThilleAW, RodriguezP, CabelloB, et al.Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med, 2006; 32(10):1515–1522; doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0301-8
6.
de WitM, PedramS, BestAM, et al.Observational study of patient-ventilator asynchrony and relationship to sedation level. J Crit Care, 2009; 24(1):74–80; doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.08.011
7.
BlanchL, VillagraA, SalesB, et al.Asynchronies during mechanical ventilation are associated with mortality. Intensive Care Med, 2015; 41(4):633–641; doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3692-6
8.
VaporidiK, BabalisD, ChytasA, et al.Clusters of ineffective efforts during mechanical ventilation: Impact on outcome. Intensive Care Med, 2017; 43(2):184–191; doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4593-z
9.
RuéM, AndrinopoulouER, AlvaresD, et al.Bayesian joint modeling of bivariate longitudinal and competing risks data: An application to study patient-ventilator asynchronies in critical care patients. Biom J, 2017; 59(6):1184–1203; doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600221
10.
MagransR, FerreiraF, SarlabousL, et al.; ASYNICU group. The effect of clusters of double triggering and ineffective efforts in critically Ill patients. Crit Care Med, 2022; 50(7):E619–E629; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005471
11.
DamianiLF, EngelbertsD, BastiaL, et al.Impact of reverse triggering dyssynchrony during lung-protective ventilation on diaphragm function: An experimental model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2022; 205(6):663–673; doi: 10.1164/rccm.202105-1089OC
12.
RodriguesA, TeliasI, DamianiLF, et al.Reverse triggering during controlled ventilation: From physiology to clinical management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2023; 207(5):533–543; doi: 10.1164/rccm.202208-1477CI
13.
Mellado ArtigasR, DamianiLF, PirainoT, et al.Reverse triggering dyssynchrony 24 h after initiation of mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology, 2021; 134(5):760–769; doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003726
14.
PapazianL, ForelJ-M, GacouinA, et al.; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med, 2010; 363(12):1107–1116; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372
15.
MossM, HuangDT, BrowerRG, et al.; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PETAL Clinical Trials Network. Early neuromuscular blockade in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med, 2019; 380(21):1997–2008; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901686
16.
TarazanN, AlshehriM, SharifS, et al.; GUIDE Group. Neuromuscular blocking agents in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Intensive Care Med Exp, 2020; 8(1):61; doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00348-6
17.
HelmsJ, KremerS, MerdjiH, et al.Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med, 2020; 382(23):2268–2270; doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2008597
18.
MontalvanV, LeeJ, BuesoT, et al.Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections: A systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2020; 194:105921; doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105921
19.
EsnaultP, CardinaleM, HraiechS, et al.High respiratory drive and excessive respiratory efforts predict relapse of respiratory failure in critically Ill patients with COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020; 202(8):1173–1178; doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-1582LE
20.
FanE, Del SorboL, GoligherEC, et al.; American Thoracic Society, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and Society of Critical Care Medicine. An official American thoracic society/European society of intensive care medicine/society of critical care medicine clinical practice guideline: Mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2017; 195(9):1253–1263; doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0548ST
21.
SubiràC, de HaroC, MagransR, et al.Minimizing asynchronies in mechanical ventilation: Current and future trends. Respir Care, 2018; 63(4):464–478; doi: 10.4187/respcare.05949
22.
EsperanzaJA, SarlabousL, de HaroC, et al.Monitoring asynchrony during invasive mechanical ventilation. Respir Care, 2020; 65(6):847–869; doi: 10.4187/respcare.07404
23.
PhamT, MontanyaJ, TeliasI, et al.; BEARDS study investigators. Automated detection and quantification of reverse triggering effort under mechanical ventilation. Crit Care, 2021; 25(1):60; doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03387-3
24.
BatesD, MächlerM, BolkerBM, et al.Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Soft, 2015; 67(1):1–48; doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
25.
SeaboldS, PerktoldJ. Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python. proceedings of the 9th python in science conference. SciPy; 2010:92–96.
26.
AkoumianakiE, LyazidiA, ReyN, et al.Mechanical ventilation-induced reverse-triggered breaths: A frequently unrecognized form of neuromechanical coupling. Chest, 2013; 143(4):927–938; doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1817
27.
RodriguezPO, TiribelliN, FredesS, et al.; Grupo Argentino de Estudio de Asincronías en la Ventilación Mecánica Study Group. Prevalence of reverse triggering in early ARDS: Results from a multicenter observational study. Chest, 2021; 159(1):186–195; doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.018
28.
PohlmanMC, McCallisterKE, SchweickertWD, et al.Excessive tidal volume from breath stacking during lung-protective ventilation for acute lung injury. Crit Care Med, 2008; 36(11):3019–3023; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818b308b
29.
de HaroC, López-AguilarJ, MagransR, et al.; Asynchronies in the Intensive Care Unit (ASYNICU) Group. Double cycling during mechanical ventilation: Frequency, mechanisms, and physiologic implications. Crit Care Med, 2018; 46(9):1385–1392; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003256
30.
SousaMLEA, MagransR, HayashiFK, et al.Clusters of double triggering impact clinical outcomes: Insights from the Epidemiology of Patient-Ventilator aSYNChrony (EPISYNC) Cohort Study. Crit Care Med, 2021; 49(9):1460–1469; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005029
31.
ColomboD, CammarotaG, AlemaniM, et al.Efficacy of ventilator waveforms observation in detecting patient-ventilator asynchrony. Crit Care Med, 2011; 39(11):2452–2457; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318225753c
32.
ChacónE, EstrugaA, MuriasG, et al.Nurses’ detection of ineffective inspiratory efforts during mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care, 2012; 21(4):e89–e93; doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012108
33.
SuHK, LoringSH, TalmorD, et al.Reverse triggering with breath stacking during mechanical ventilation results in large tidal volumes and transpulmonary pressure swings. Intensive Care Med, 2019; 45(8):1161–1162; doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05608-y
34.
BourenneJ, GuervillyC, MechatiM, et al.Variability of reverse triggering in deeply sedated ARDS patients. Intensive Care Med, 2019; 45(5):725–726; doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5500-6
35.
Baedorf KassisE, SuHK, GrahamAR, et al.Reverse trigger phenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2021; 203(1):67–77; doi: 10.1164/rccm.201907-1427OC
36.
AlhazzaniW, Belley-CoteE, MøllerMH, et al.Neuromuscular blockade in patients with ARDS: A rapid practice guideline. Intensive Care Med, 2020; 46(11):1977–1986; doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06227-8
37.
BaumannMH, McAlpinBW, BrownK, et al.A prospective randomized comparison of train-of-four monitoring and clinical assessment during continuous ICU cisatracurium paralysis. Chest, 2004; 126(4):1267–1273; doi: 10.1378/chest.126.4.1267
38.
De WitM, MillerKB, GreenDA, et al.Ineffective triggering predicts increased duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med, 2009; 37(10):2740–2745; doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181a98a05
KyoM, ShimataniT, HosokawaK, et al.Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care, 2021; 9(1):50; doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00565-5
41.
de HaroC, OchagaviaA, López-AguilarJ, et al.; Asynchronies in the Intensive Care Unit (ASYNICU) Group. Patient-ventilator asynchronies during mechanical ventilation: Current knowledge and research priorities. Intensive Care Med Exp, 2019; 7(Suppl 1):43; doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0234-5
42.
MojoliF, PozziM, OrlandoA, et al.Timing of inspiratory muscle activity detected from airway pressure and flow during pressure support ventilation: The waveform method. Crit Care, 2022; 26(1):32; doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03895-4
43.
DocciM, RodriguesA, DuboS, et al.Does patient-ventilator asynchrony really matter? Curr Opin Crit Care, 2025; 31(1):21–29; doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001225
