Research indicates that the portrayal and representation of transgender individuals within society, or lack thereof, impact the way in which they are able to reconcile their gender identity. Quantitative research methodology often requires that participants select one identity label from a limited list for each identity characteristic (e.g., race, sexual orientation, and relationship status). The process of choosing from limited items that do not represent one's identities limits our understanding of the nuances of identity and may create minority stress for the participant.
Methods:
This study included 325 diverse transgender adults who participated in a national anonymous online survey as part of a broader study focused on minority stress and mental health. Participants answered questions about gender, sexual orientation, relationship status, race, and religion, and were given the option to select multiple response options and to write in additional identities that were not listed.
Results:
Descriptive results indicated that 95 unique gender identities written in were not captured by the 14 gender labels provided, over 43% of participants selected multiple sexual orientations, and participants wrote in additional options for every identity variable.
Conclusion:
The nuance of transgender identities may not be adequately captured by standard demographic research methodologies and research would benefit from ongoing revision of demographic response options informed by the literature. Through the process of acknowledging and validating less visible identities, transgender individuals will be better represented and understood by researchers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association (APA). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People: Adopted by the Council of Representatives, August 5 & 7, 2015. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
2.
GrantJM, MottetL, TanisJE, et al. Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. National Center for Transgender Equality, Penn State Consortium of Higher Education, 2011.
3.
JamesSE, HermanJL, RankinS, et al.The report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality, 2016.
4.
SmithLC, ShinRQ, OfficerLM. Moving counseling forward on LGB and transgender issues. Couns Psychol. 2012; 40:85–408.
5.
McculloughR, DispenzaF, ParkerLK, et al.The counseling experiences of transgender and gender nonconforming clients. J Couns Dev. 2016; 95:423–434.
6.
CarrotteER, VellaAM, BowringAL, et al.“I am yet to encounter any survey that actually reflects my life”: a qualitative study of inclusivity in sexual health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16:86.
7.
de VriesKM.Intersectional identities and conceptions of the self: the experience of transgender people. Symb Interact. 2012; 35:49–67.
8.
StaplesJM, BirdER, MastersTN, et al.Considerations for culturally sensitive research with transgender adults: a qualitative analysis. J Sex Res. 2018; 55:1065–1076.
9.
FernandezT, GodwinA, DoyleJ, et al. More Comprehensive and Inclusive Approaches to Demographic Data Collection. School of Engineering Education Graduate Student Series, Purdue University, 2016.
10.
MatthewsJ, CramerEP. Using technology to enhance qualitative research with hidden populations. Qual Rep. 2008; 13:301–315.
11.
Ellard-GrayA, JeffreyNK, ChoubakM, CrannSE. Finding the hidden participant. Int J Qual Methods. 2015; 14:160940691562142.
12.
TownsendSSM, MarkusHR, BergsiekerHB. My choice, your categories: the denial of multiracial identities. J Soc Issues. 2009; 65:185–204.
13.
TownsendSS, FrybergSA, WilkinsCL, MarkusHR. Being mixed: who claims a biracial identity?. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2012; 18:91–96.
14.
StaplesJ, BirdE, GreggJ, et al.Improving the gender-affirmation process for transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals: associations among time since transition began, body satisfaction, and sexual distress. J Sex Res. 2019; 57:1–9.
15.
StaplesJ, NeilsonE, GeorgeW, et al.A descriptive analysis of alcohol behaviors across gender subgroups within a sample of transgender adults. Addict Behav. 2017; 76:355–362.
16.
StaplesJM, NeilsonEC, BryanAEB, et al.The role of distal minority stress and internalized transnegativity in suicidal ideation and nonsuicidal self-injury among transgender adults. J Sex Res. 2017; 55:591–603.
17.
MoleiroC, PintoN. Sexual orientation and gender identity: review of concepts, controversies and their relation to psychopathology classification systems. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015; 6. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01511 Accessed January20, 2021.
18.
HughesJL, CamdenAA, YangchenT. Rethinking and updating demographic questions: guidance to improve descriptions of research samples. Psi Chi J Psychol Res. 2016; 21:138–151.
19.
Rainbow HealthOntario, HartT. Research methods: designing surveys and questionnaires. 2012. Available at: http://www.rainbowhealthontario.ca/ Accessed January20, 2021.
20.
ConleyTD, MoorsAC, MatsickJL, et al. The fewer the merrier?: assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2013;13;1–30.
21.
RubelAN, BogaertAF. Consensual nonmonogamy: psychological well- being and relationship quality correlates. J Sex Res. 2014; 52:961–982.
22.
MoorsAC, MatsickJL, ZieglerA, et al.Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual nonmonogamy: robust and worthy of additional research. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2013; 13:52–69.
23.
LevineEC, HerbenickD, MartinezO, et al.Open relationships, nonconsensual nonmonogamy, and monogamy among U.S. adults: findings from the 2012 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior. Arch Sex Behav. 2018; 47:1439–1450.
24.
MccoyMA, StinsonMA, RossDB, et al.Whos in our clients' bed? A case illustration of sex therapy with a polyamorous couple. J Sex Marital Ther. 2013; 41:134–144.
25.
SchechingerHA, SakalukJK, MoorsAC. Harmful and helpful therapy practices with consensually non-monogamous clients: toward an inclusive framework. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018; 86:879–891.
26.
CrenshawK.Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ Chic Leg Forum. 1989; 1:139–167.
27.
Patricia Hill Collins. Social inequality, power, and politics. J Speculative Philos. 2012; 26:442.
28.
BowlegL.When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: the methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles. 2008; 59:312–325.
29.
HendricksML, TestaRJ. A conceptual framework for clinical work with transgender and gender nonconforming clients: an adaptation of the minority stress model. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2012; 43:460–467.
30.
MeyerIH.Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2003; 1:3–26.
31.
PazGM, HeniseSB, DavisKS. “Transgender microaggressions in the context of friendship: patterns of experience across friends' sexual orientation and gender identity. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2014; 1:461–470.
32.
NadalKL, SkolnikA, WongY. Interpersonal and systemic microaggressions towards transgender people: implications for counseling. J LGBT Issues Couns. 2012; 6:55–82.
33.
TestaRJ, HabarthJ, PetaJ, et al.Development of the gender minority stress and resilience measure. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2015; 2:65–77.
34.
GhazaliS, NorAM. Media roles in male-to-female transsexual identity formation among university students in Malaysia. Int Conf Humanity Hist Soc. 2012; 34:184–190.
35.
RingoP.Media roles in female-to-male transsexual and transgender identity formation. Int J Transgend. 2002;6. Available at: https://cdn.atria.nl/ezines/web/IJT/97-03/numbers/symposion/ijtvo06no03_01.htm#References Accessed January21, 2021.
36.
ShelleyCA.Transpeople: Repudiation, Trauma, Healing. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 2008.
37.
BrewsterME, MoradiB, DeblaereC, et al.Navigating the borderlands: the roles of minority stressors, bicultural self-efficacy, and cognitive flexibility in the mental health of bisexual individuals. J Couns Psychol. 2013; 60:543–545
38.
BrewsterME, VelezBL, MennickeA, et al.Voices from beyond: a thematic content analysis of transgender employees' workplace experiences. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2014; 1:159–169.
39.
LombardiEL, WilchinsRA, PriesingD, et al.Gender violence: transgender experiences with violence and discrimination. J Homosex. 2002; 42:89–101.
40.
WallsEN, LaserJ, NickelsSJ, et al.Correlates of cutting behavior among sexual minority youths and young adults. Soc Work Res. 2010; 34:213–226.
41.
SueDW.Microaggressions and Marginality: Manifestation, Dynamics, and Impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010.
42.
American Psychological Association Task Force on Gender Identity and Gender Variance. Report of the Task Force on Gender Identity and Gender Variance. 2008. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
43.
ParkA.Reachable: data collection methods for sexual orientation and gender identity. The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law, 2016. Available at: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/SOGI-Data-Collection-Mar-2016.pdf Accessed January20, 2021.
44.
AgyemangC, BhopalR, BruijnzeelsM. Negro, Black, Black African, African Caribbean, African American or what? Labelling African origin populations in the health arena in the 21st century. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59:1014–1018.
45.
OlsonJ, SchragerSM, BelzerM, et al.Baseline physiologic and psychosocial characteristics of transgender youth seeking care for gender dysphoria. J Adolesc Health. 2015; 57:374–380.
