Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals and their families face numerous challenging decisions. To better understand their decision processes, we conducted a scoping review of the existing literature and of decision-support tools in use at pediatric gender-care clinics.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus CINAHL, PsychINFO, and EBM Reviews for studies that were original research focused on decisions, decision making, or decision support for TGD individuals and/or their families. All studies were reviewed for inclusion by at least two researchers. Additionally, we reviewed clinical tools used to support decision making by TGD youth and their families.
Results:
We retrieved 3306 articles. Thirty-two met criteria for data extraction. Studies focused on three major decisions: gender-confirming surgery, fertility preservation, and gender-affirming hormone therapy. Several themes that cut across clinical topics emerged: decision-making processes, decision-making roles, and sources of decision support. Only three articles focused on decision-support interventions, two of which discussed development of support tools and one evaluated a class designed to help with surgical decision making. None of the clinical tools reviewed met criteria for a decision aid.
Conclusions:
There is a dearth of studies related to decision support interventions, an absence validated by the resources currently in clinical use. This scoping review suggests an opportunity for the development of tools to aid in the decision-making processes for TGD youth and their families.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
OlsonJ, ForbesC, BelzerM. Management of the transgender adolescent. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011; 165:171–176.
2.
KimberlyLL, FolkersKM, FriesenP, et al.Ethical issues in gender-affirming care for youth. Pediatrics. 2018; 142:e20181537.
3.
Olson-KennedyJ, OkontaV, ClarkLF, BelzerM. Physiologic response to gender-affirming hormones among transgender youth. J Adolesc Health. 2018; 62:397–401.
4.
PolitiMC, LewisCL, FroschDL. Supporting shared decisions when clinical evidence is low. Med Care Res Rev. 2013; 70(1Suppl):113S–128S.
5.
EpsteinRM, GramlingRE. What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclear. Med Care Res Rev. 2013; 70(1Suppl):94S–112S.
6.
DaleyT, GrossoehmeD, McGuireJK, et al.“I Couldn't See a Downside”: decision-making about gender-affirming hormone therapy. J Adolesc Health. 2019; 65:274–279.
7.
MakoulG, ClaymanML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 60:301–312.
8.
TriccoAC, LillieE, ZarinW, et al.PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169:467–473.
9.
University of Minnesota Libraries. Search terms & Strategies. Library Resources for Transgender Topics Web site. Available at: https://libguides.umn.edu/transgender_topics/search_terms. Accessed November18, 2019.
10.
Human Rights Campaign. Interactive Map: clinical Care Programs for Gender-Expansive Children and Adolescents. Available at: www.hrc.org/resources/interactive-map-clinical-care-programs-for-gender-nonconforming-childr Accessed April4, 2019.
11.
DurandMA, WittJ, Joseph-WilliamsN, et al.Minimum standards for the certification of patient decision support interventions: feasibility and application. Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 98:462–468.
12.
JohnsonEK, ChenD, GordonEJ, et al.Fertility-related care for gender and sex diverse individuals: a provider needs-assessment survey. Transgend Health. 2016; 1:197–201.
13.
ÖzerM, PigotGL, BoumanM-B, et al.Development of a decision aid for genital gender-affirming surgery in transmen. J Sex Med. 2018; 15:1041–1048.
14.
MokkenSE, OzerM, van de GriftTC, et al.Evaluation of the decision aid for genital surgery in transmen. J Sex Med. 2020; 17:2067–2076.
15.
PocetaJ, CousinsS, WenzelC, et al.Effectiveness of a gender affirming surgery class for transgender and non-binary patients and their caregivers in an integrated healthcare setting. Int J Transgend. 2019; 20:81–86.
16.
AtnasC, MiltonM, ArcherS. Making the decision to change–the experiences of trans men. Couns Psychol Rev. 2015; 30:33–42.
17.
HoffklingA, Obedin-MaliverJ, SeveliusJ. From erasure to opportunity: a qualitative study of the experiences of transgender men around pregnancy and recommendations for providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(Suppl 2):332.
18.
BernackiJM, WeimerAK. Role of development on youth decision-making and recovery from gender-affirming surgery. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2019; 7:312.
19.
de BlokCJM, StaphorsiusAS, WiepjesCM, et al.Frequency, determinants, and satisfaction of breast augmentation in trans women receiving hormone treatment. J Sex Med. 2020; 17:342–348.
20.
JacobssonJ, AndreassonM, KolbyL, et al.Patients' priorities regarding female-to-male gender affirmation surgery of the genitalia-a pilot study of 47 Patients in Sweden. J Sex Med. 2017; 14:857–864.
21.
JiangD, WittenJ, BerliJ, DugiD, 3rd. Does depth matter? factors affecting choice of vulvoplasty over vaginoplasty as gender-affirming genital surgery for transgender women. J Sex Med. 2018; 15:902–906.
22.
EttnerR, EttnerF, WhiteT. Choosing a surgeon: an exploratory study of factors influencing selection of a gender affirmation surgeon. Transgend Health. 2016; 1:124–128.
23.
BensonTA, BoskeyER, GanorO. The effect of forearm tattoos on flap choice in transmasculine phalloplasty patients. MDM Policy Pract. 2020; 5:2381468320938740.
24.
RachlinK.Factors which influence individual's decisions when considering female-to-male genital reconstructive surgery. Int J Transgend. 1999; 3:3.
25.
Aguayo-RomeroRA, ReisenCA, ZeaMC, et al.Gender affirmation and body modification among transgender persons in Bogotá, Colombia. Int J Transgend. 2015; 16:103–115.
26.
Jokic-BegicN, Lauri KorajlijaA, JurinT. Psychosocial adjustment to sex reassignment surgery: a qualitative examination and personal experiences of six transsexual persons in croatia. Sci World J. 2014; 2014:960745.
27.
van de GriftTC, PigotGLS, BoudhanS, et al.A Longitudinal study of motivations before and psychosexual outcomes after genital gender-confirming surgery in transmen. J Sex Med. 2017; 14:1621–1628.
28.
GarciaMM, ChristopherNA, De LucaF, et al.Overall satisfaction, sexual function, and the durability of neophallus dimensions following staged female to male genital gender confirming surgery: the Institute of Urology, London U.K. experience. Transl Androl Urol. 2014; 3:156–162.
29.
KywelukMA, SajwaniA, ChenD. Freezing for the future: transgender youth respond to medical fertility preservation. Int J Transgend. 2018; 19:401–416.
StrangJF, JarinJ, CallD, et al.Transgender youth fertility attitudes questionnaire: measure development in nonautistic and autistic transgender youth and their parents. J Adolesc Health. 2018; 62:128–135.
32.
RiggsDW, BartholomaeusC. Fertility preservation decision making amongst Australian transgender and non-binary adults. Reprod Health. 2018; 15:181.
33.
Birenbaum-CarmeliD, InhornMC, PatrizioP. Transgender men's fertility preservation: experiences, social support, and the quest for genetic parenthood. Cult Health Sex. 2021; 23:945–960.
34.
ChenD, KywelukMA, SajwaniA, et al.Factors affecting fertility decision-making among transgender adolescents and young adults. LGBT Health. 2019; 6:107–115.
35.
KermanHM, PhamA, CrouchJM, et al.Gender diverse youth on fertility and future family: a qualitative analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2021; 68:1112–1120.
36.
PerskyRW, GruschowSM, SinaiiN, et al.Attitudes toward fertility preservation among transgender youth and their parents. J Adolesc Health. 2020; 67:583–589.
37.
StuyverI, SomersS, ProvoostV, et al.Ten years of fertility treatment experience and reproductive options in transgender men. Int J Transgend Health. 2021; 22:294–303.
38.
VyasN, DouglasCR, MannC, et al.Access, barriers, and decisional regret in pursuit of fertility preservation among transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Fertil Steril. 2021; 115:1029–1034.
39.
ChenD, MatsonM, MacapagalK, et al.Attitudes toward fertility and reproductive health among transgender and gender-nonconforming adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2018; 63:62–68.
40.
BartholomaeusC, RiggsDW. Transgender and non-binary Australians' experiences with healthcare professionals in relation to fertility preservation. Cult Health Sex. 2020; 22:129–145.
41.
Pullen SansfaçonA, Temple-NewhookJ, Suerich-GulickF, et al.The experiences of gender diverse and trans children and youth considering and initiating medical interventions in Canadian gender-affirming speciality clinics. Int J Transgend. 2019; 20:371–387.
ClarkBA, ViraniA. This Wasn't a Split-Second Decision”: an empirical ethical analysis of transgender youth capacity, rights, and authority to consent to hormone therapy. J Bioethical Inquiry. 2021; 18:151–164.
44.
FeinLA, SalgadoCJ, AlvarezCV, EstesCM. Transitioning transgender: investigating the important aspects of the transition: a brief report. Int J Sex Health. 2017; 29:80–88.
45.
BeekTF, KreukelsBP, Cohen-KettenisPT, SteensmaTD. Partial treatment requests and underlying motives of applicants for gender affirming interventions. J Sex Med. 2015; 12:2201–2205.
46.
EysselJ, KoehlerA, DekkerA, et al.Needs and concerns of transgender individuals regarding interdisciplinary transgender healthcare: a non-clinical online survey. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0183014.
47.
VrouenraetsLJ, FredriksAM, HannemaSE, et al.Early medical treatment of children and adolescents with gender dysphoria: an empirical ethical study. J Adolesc Health. 2015; 57:367–373.
48.
ClarkBA, ViraniA, SaewycEM. “The edge of harm and help”: ethical considerations in the care of transgender youth with complex family situations. Ethics Behav. 2020; 30:161–180.
49.
ClarkBA, ViraniA, MarshallSK, SaewycEM. Conditions for shared decision making in the care of transgender youth in Canada. Health Promot Int. 2021; 36:570–580.
50.
LinanderI, AlmE, HammarstromA, HarrysonL. Negotiating the (bio)medical gaze - Experiences of trans-specific healthcare in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 2017; 174:9–16.
51.
MayerTK, KoehlerA, EysselJ, NiederTO. How gender identity and treatment progress impact decision-making, psychotherapy and aftercare desires of trans persons. J Clin Med. 2019; 8:749.
52.
AgenorM, CottrillAA, KayE, et al.Contraceptive beliefs, decision making and care experiences among transmasculine young adults: a qualitative analysis. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020; 52:7–14.
53.
EvansYN, GridleySJ, CrouchJ, et al.Understanding online resource use by transgender youth and caregivers: a qualitative study. Transgend Health. 2017; 2:129–139.
54.
RileyEA, SitharthanG, ClemsonL, DiamondM. The needs of gender-variant children and their parents: a parent survey. Int J Sex Health. 2011; 23:181–195.
55.
RaffertyJ, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and FamilyHealth, et al.Ensuring comprehensive care and support for transgender and gender-diverse children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2018; 142:e20182162.
56.
VanceSRJr., EhrensaftD, RosenthalSM.Psychological and medical care of gender nonconforming youth. Pediatrics. 2014; 134:1184–1192.
57.
GabeJ, OlumideG, BuryM. ‘It takes three to tango’: a framework for understanding patient partnership in paediatric clinics. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59:1071–1079.
58.
WyattKD, ListB, BrinkmanWB, et al.Shared decision making in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Pediatr. 2015; 15:573–583.
59.
FeenstraB, BolandL, LawsonML, et al.Interventions to support children's engagement in health-related decisions: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2014; 14:109.
60.
ShafferVA, Zikmund-FisherBJ. All stories are not alike: a purpose-, content-, and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision AIDS. Med Decis Making. 2013; 33:4–13.
61.
PetersMD, GodfreyCM, KhalilH, et al.Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthcare. 2015; 13:141–146.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
