Adipose-Derived Stromal Cell-Based Therapies for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis

Abstract

Significance:

Half of all cancer patients receive radiation therapy as a component of their treatment regimen, and the most common resulting complication is radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) of the skin and soft tissue. This thickening of the dermis paired with decreased vascularity results in functional limitations and esthetic concerns and poses unique challenges when considering surgical exploration or reconstruction. Existing therapeutic options for RIF of the skin are limited both in scope and efficacy. Cell-based therapies have emerged as a promising means of utilizing regenerative cell populations to improve both functional and esthetic outcomes, and even as prophylaxis for RIF.

Recent Advances:

As one of the leading areas of cell-based therapy research, adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) demonstrate significant therapeutic potential in the treatment of RIF. The introduction of the ADSC-augmented fat graft has shown clinical utility. Recent research dedicated to characterizing specific ADSC subpopulations points toward further granularity in understanding of the mechanisms driving the well-established clinical outcomes seen with fat grafting therapy.

Critical Issues:

Various animal models of RIF demonstrated improved clinical outcomes following treatment with cell-based therapies, but the cellular and molecular basis underlying these effects remains poorly understood.

Future Directions:

Recent literature has focused on improving the efficacy of cell-based therapies, most notably through (1) augmentation of fat grafts with platelet-rich plasma and (2) the modification of expressed RNA through epitranscriptomics. For the latter, new and promising gene targets continue to be identified which have the potential to reverse the effects of fibrosis by increasing angiogenesis, decreasing inflammation, and promoting adipogenesis.

Derrick C. Wan, MD

SCOPE AND SIGNIFICANCE

Radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) of the skin is the most common complication resulting from radiation therapy for cancer treatment. While this therapy can be lifesaving from an oncologic standpoint, the collateral damage caused to the skin can result in functional limitations and litany of sequela, including ulceration, atrophy, and necrosis. Microscopic changes to the dermis, including thickening and decreased perfusion, result in poor surgical outcomes when reconstruction or re-exploration of the area is performed. Current therapies for RIF are limited to noninvasive modalities such as physical therapy, topical treatments, or more invasive techniques such as fat grafting. However, cell-based therapies provide hope of improved functional and esthetic outcomes for patients and surgeons alike.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

Although many in vitro and animal model studies point to the potential of cell-based therapies to improve treatment of RIF, translating these therapies to common clinical practice presents several challenges. Notably, fibrotic tissue acts as a hostile graft recipient site, and typical lipoaspirate grafting results in frequent complications and poor retention. While adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) have addressed these concerns in part, logistical complications of harvesting a large enough volume of these cells, particularly from specific subpopulations, remain an important area of future consideration.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

RIF commonly occurs in cancer patients who often require repeated surgical or reconstructive procedures. Fibrotic skin poses a particular surgical challenge due to a lack of perfusion leading to poor wound healing. Consequently, surgical complications following operations on fibrotic skin are more common. Interestingly, the same characteristics of fibrotic skin that create challenges in surgery lead to similar challenges in fat grafting as well, especially concerning fat graft retention. Therefore, recent developments in augmentation of fat grafts with ADSCs and other agents provide a promising future for the increased utility of this therapy for RIF.

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy

Less than 1 year following the discovery of x-rays in 1895, radiation was used therapeutically by Emil Herman Grubbe to treat a patient with breast cancer.¹ Recognition of radiation therapy's utility in cancer treatment grew rapidly as the intervention became integrated into curative, palliative, preoperative, postoperative, and combination chemotherapy regimens.² Today, approximately half of cancer patients receive radiation therapy during the course of their illness, marking the enduring presence of radiation as a pillar of modern cancer treatment.^1,3 The population of 3.4 million radiation-treated cancer survivors is expected to grow to 4.2 million by 2030.⁴ While radiation therapy improved recurrence and mortality rates in oncologic pathologies, this medical intervention is not without complications.

Radiation-induced fibrosis

Since Grubbe's era, significant advances in the field of radiation oncology have increased controllability and spatial specificity of radiation therapy.¹ Despite the resulting improvement in safety for patients, significant and unwanted side effects of all forms of radiation therapy persist. One of the most notable long-term sequelae of radiation therapy is radiation fibrosis syndrome. This process most frequently affects the skin and subcutaneous tissue, but has been notably documented in the pulmonary system, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts, and any organ system present in the radiation field.⁵

When focusing specifically on the skin and soft tissue, chronic effects of radiation therapy include tissue atrophy, alopecia, as well as increased stiffness. Functional limitations, secondary to reduced skin elasticity and mobility, can significantly impact patients' quality of life. Furthermore, vascularity and perfusion of the affected skin are decreased in the chronic stage of RIF, resulting in complications with wound healing as these tissues often undergo repeated surgical procedures either for oncologic recurrence or for reconstructive purposes.^6,7 RIF can also cause undesirable esthetic results, including telangiectasia, induration, ulceration, hyperplasia, atrophy, and necrosis of the dermis.⁸

Pathogenesis and molecular basis of RIF

The organ system most often affected by radiotherapy is the skin, making it the most studied organ system in relation to RIF. Skin injury resulting from radiation therapy can be understood in two stages, acute and chronic. While the acute stage can begin within days or weeks of radiation injury, the findings associated with the chronic stage may take 4–12 months to develop and progressively worsens for many years.⁹

Initial exposure to ionizing radiation results in DNA damage to cells in the radiation field and the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated from radiolysis of water to hydroxyl free radicals. This acute phase of injury initiates a number of cytokine cascades which triggers a massive inflammatory response, manifesting clinically as erythema, discoloration, or desquamation.

In some cases of more significant damage, atrophy and ulceration can occur.^6,10 The high level of proliferation in hair follicle stem cells and basal keratinocytes makes them particularly susceptible to damage by radiotherapy.^8,11 The damage to these cells, as well as resident fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and epidermal cells, results in the release of cytokines and attraction of neutrophils to the region. The neutrophils proceed to release additional pro-inflammatory cytokines in the area, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and IL-6.⁷

As a result, the inflammatory process progresses, ROS are released, and monocytes and lymphocytes migrate to the irradiated area. The ROS which are generated directly damage genetic material, inhibiting normal cell function and can induce apoptosis.¹² Monocytes subsequently differentiate to macrophages upon arriving to the damaged tissue. The release of platelet-derived growth factor by macrophages has been shown to stimulate angiogenesis and the migration of fibroblasts, which play an important role in the progression of fibrosis, to the area (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Visualizes the progressive effects of radiation on the skin, from immediate (far left), effect after days (middle left), effect after weeks (middle right), to the long-term formation of chronic RIF after months and years (far right). Corresponding text descriptions below detail the changes occurring in each timeframe. RIF, radiation-induced fibrosis.

These fibroblasts, along with the macrophages that stimulate their migration, and native endothelial and epidermal cells, secrete transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), a growth factor/cytokine which appears to play a principal role in the pathogenesis of RIF. Increased TGF-β1 levels are detectable within hours after radiation exposure.¹³ TGF-β1 promotes fibrosis through binding to the transmembrane serine and threonine kinase receptors TGF-β receptors I and II (TβRI and TβRII) and inducing phosphorylation and activation of the intracellular Receptor-associated Suppressor of Mothers against Decapentaplegic (R-Smads).¹⁴ Upon activation/phosphorylation, R-Smads join with a co-Smad (Smad4) to form heteromeric complexes before translocating to the nucleus to act as a transcription factor for several profibrotic genes (Fig. 2).^15,16

Figure 2.

Depicts the TGF-β signaling pathway, an important pro-fibrotic pathway in RIF. TGF-β is secreted by fibroblasts and macrophages in tissue damaged by RIF. TGF-β binds to the transmembrane receptors TβRI and TβRII, which subsequently induces phosphorylation of intracellular Receptor-associated Suppressor of Mothers against Decapentaplegic (R-Smads). These R-Smads are also known as Smad2 and Smad3, as denoted in the figure. The R-Smads join with a co-Smad (Smad4) to form heteromeric complexes. These complexes translocate to the nucleus and act as a transcription factor for profibrotic genes. TGF-β, transforming growth factor β.

Through this pathway, the downstream profibrotic effects of TGF-β1 are numerous and play a large role in the pathogenesis of the chronic stage of RIF, which can involve scarring, retraction, hair loss, and changes in pigmentation. In some cases, hyperplasia, atrophy, ulcers, or skin tumors may emerge.^17
–19 One of the primary ways TGF-β1 mediates the formation of fibrosis is through the activation of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts.

While quiescent dermal fibroblasts undergo low levels of gene transcription and translation with few interactions with nearby cells, myofibroblasts upregulate expression of contractile proteins that promote tensile interactions with neighboring cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins.²⁰ Myofibroblasts uniquely express a component of anchorage molecules, α-smooth muscle actin, which is associated with the formation of focal adhesions.²¹ Myofibroblasts additionally are known to play an important role in the homeostasis of the ECM.⁸

When TGF-β1, among other factors, induces fibroblast differentiation into myofibroblasts (Fig. 3), increased secretion of proteins such as collagen, fibronectin, and proteoglycans into the ECM begins.⁷ In addition to promoting the secretion of ECM proteins, TGF-β1 also reduces matrix metalloproteinase activity within myofibroblasts, particularly metalloproteinase-2, -9, and -1, which impair ECM degradation.^6,10 The increase in contractile force between myofibroblasts and their ECM, as well as increased deposition of ECM proteins, promotes tissue stiffness and thickness, contributing to the pathological presentation observed in RIF.²²

Figure 3.

Illustrates the transition from fibroblast to myofibroblast. Quiescent dermal fibroblasts (far left) undergo low levels of gene expression and do not contribute to excessive deposition of ECM proteins. When these fibroblasts are exposed to TGF-β, mechanical tension, and other factors, the transition to pro-myofibroblasts (middle) and finally to myofibroblasts occurs. Myofibroblasts (far right), in comparison to quiescent fibroblasts, are characterized, in part, by increased focal adhesions, cytoplasmic actin stress fibers, and α-SMA. These cellular components contribute to the clinical presentation of RIF. ECM, extracellular matrix; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin.

In addition, TGF-β1 further contributes to the progression of fibrosis by activating the interferon γ response and the release of TNF-α and IL-1.^22,23 Activation of these profibrotic pathways is believed to persist for years after initial exposure to radiation.⁸ Support for this hypothesis has been demonstrated by increased levels of type I and III collagen, as well as TGF-β1, up to 20 years following radiation therapy.²⁴

Tissue changes in radiation fibrosis

Vasculature

Chronic fibrosis results in changes to the rich vasculature of the dermis. Radiation most significantly affects smaller arterioles and capillaries, resulting in decreased microvascular network density and pericapillary fibrosis.^8,25 Histological changes in vessel morphology and permeability have been suggested, including endothelial hyperplasia and swelling, as well as perivascular fibrosis.^8,24,26 In the acute stage following radiation therapy, vessels become obstructed with fibrin and leukocytes within hours of radiation exposure.^7,8,27

The resulting decrease in perfusion to the tissue and lower oxygen delivery results in expression of collagen type 1 alpha1, which further exacerbates fibrosis, and ultimately can lead to atrophy.^8,28 While the resultant hypoxia stimulates neovascularization, these are often irregular and easily occluded capillaries that cannot effectively reperfuse the tissue.⁸ Overall, blood flow to irradiated skin has been shown to be significantly reduced compared to nonirradiated skin.^29,30

Cellular consequences

The combined effect of these cellular changes in the area results in significant impacts on the form and function of the affected tissue. The fibrotic process can impede vascular and lymphatic drainage, resulting in decreased perfusion and subsequent hypoxia.³¹ This process can make the affected tissue susceptible to ulceration and poor wound healing. Furthermore, these changes in tissue affected by RIF are particularly unideal for surgery, resulting in delayed healing and increased complication rates.^32,33

DISCUSSION

Current therapeutic options

Physical therapy

Physical therapy for those who have undergone radiation therapy aims to improve functionality by physically manipulating the treated area. The goal of this treatment is to improve range of motion through reduction of scar tissue adhesion, ultimately improving patient quality of life. Treatment regimens often include guided stretches, exercise, and massage.³⁴ Studies have demonstrated that the addition of physical therapy to treatment regimens improves quality of life, particularly for breast cancer, as well as head and neck cancer, patients who are at higher risk to suffer contractures in the shoulder and neck area following radiation that can impair movement at the corresponding joints.^35,36

One study found that patients who had undergone radiation therapy reported decreased erythema, pain, pruritus, induration, and skin toughness after 1 month of mechanical massage treatment.³⁷ Another study indicated that deep friction massage may decrease spasms that can result from radiation fibrosis.³⁸ While physical therapy can be useful in treatment of mechanical limitations associated with RIF, no evidence has shown that physical therapy alone can slow the progression of RIF on a cellular level.

Deferoxamine

Deferoxamine (DFO) is an iron-chelating agent naturally produced by Streptomyces pilosus.³⁹ Systemic administration of DFO is FDA approved and has previously been utilized clinically in the treatment of hemochromatosis and thalassemia.^31,40,41 After preclinical studies demonstrated locally administered DFO to increase vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production, interest in the agent's utility to improve wound healing, particularly for RIF, emerged.

DFO is thought to act through inactivation of prolyl 4-hydroxylase (PHD), by sequestering iron which acts as its necessary cofactor. PHD constitutively degrades hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1ɑ), and in PHD's absence an increased amount of HIF-1ɑ results in increased VEGF transcription.⁴² This pathway is hypothesized to result in the improved vascularization of irradiated mouse tissue when treated with topical DFO.^3,43 In addition, DFO's sequestration of iron is thought to reduce iron-catalyzed ROS and free radical formation.⁴⁴

These mechanisms are thought to contribute to the findings that local administration of DFO onto irradiated mouse skin can enhance vascularization and increase fat graft retention while reducing dermal thickness.⁴⁵ Another study demonstrated that collagen fibril disorganization can be decreased in irradiated mouse skin by transdermal DFO application.⁴⁶ These results indicate the potential of DFO to diminish and prevent the skin fibrosis resulting from radiation therapy.

Vitamin E and pentoxifylline

Finally, several studies have focused on the use of the antioxidant alpha-tocopherol (Vitamin E) alone or in conjunction with the anti-inflammatory pentoxifylline to improve tissue compliance in cancer patients who have undergone radiation therapy.^47,48 The combination of these two therapies is thought to work by reducing the large inflammatory response following radiation in addition to blocking TGF-β signaling in irradiated tissues.⁴⁹

Fat grafting

While fat grafting has long been used as a method of providing volume restoration in the setting of reconstructive surgery, renewed interest in the use of this tool for therapeutic treatment of RIF emerged in 2007 when a study by Rigotti et al reported symptomatic and esthetic improvements in 20 breast cancer patients with RIF following autologous fat transfer. These patients exhibited neovessel formation, improved hydration, and regeneration of healthy tissue in the treated area, leading to an explosion in interest regarding this therapy and the molecular mechanisms behind it.⁵⁰

Since this study, these results have been reproduced and expanded upon by a number of clinical research articles.^51

–54 One group, Salgarello et al, found reduced radiation-related complications in patients undergoing breast reconstruction when fat grafting was used, first in a case study of two patients, and later in a retrospective review of 16 patients.^55,56 An additional large prospective clinical study followed 65 postmastectomy patients who had undergone radiation therapy and received tissue expanders and fat grafting as part of their breast reconstruction and were found to have reduced capsular contracture and improved skin quality with this approach.⁵⁷

These clinical results have been corroborated in animal models, where fat grafting in irradiated mice has been shown to decrease thickening of the dermal layer and improve collagen organization. In addition, increased skin perfusion and improved vascularity have been demonstrated in this model.²⁷ While initial evidence suggested that physical or dilutional effects associated with fat grafting were responsible for the therapeutic benefits, recent evidence has pointed toward ADSCs as the responsible agent.^8,58
–60

Irradiated fields present as hostile graft sites

Although the utility of fat grafting in treatment of RIF demonstrates great promise, the preexisting radiation damage to the tissue in the graft site presents several challenges to this treatment modality. Irradiated tissue is suboptimal as a recipient due to hypo-vascularity, inflammation, and fibrosis.^27,61 This environment can result in necrosis of the graft and promote additional inflammation in the area, further exacerbating fibrosis, calcification, cyst formation, and infection.^62
–64 Fat graft volume retention in a radiated site has been shown to be lower than in healthy tissue.⁶¹ Approaches to overcoming challenges presented by the recipient site include preconditioning of the area before fat grafting, as well as to changes to the processing and augmentation of harvested fat.²⁴

DFO preconditioning

In 2018, Flacco et al found that pretreating irradiated tissue with DFO before fat grafting resulted in improved fat graft volume retention, vascularity, and perfusion, as well as decreased dermal thickness.⁴⁵

Vitamin E supplementation

A study by Abbas et al integrated vitamin E and pentoxifylline into fat grafts in mice to demonstrate that vitamin E treated grafts had improved dermal thickness and collagen density in mice.⁶⁵ This study also showed that vitamin E improved fat graft retention.⁶⁵

Serial fat transfer

Panettiere et al attempted to improve fat transfer outcomes in radiated breast tissue using a “serial fat transfer technique,” involving multiple sessions of lipofilling.⁵³ In 20 clinical patients with irradiated reconstructed breasts, this study found improved functional and cosmetic outcomes compared with a control group which underwent only one round of lipofilling.⁵³

Adipose-derived stromal cells

To address the uniquely hostile graft site presented by RIF, one technique developed to augment the volume retention and benefits of autologous lipotransfer is the enrichment of fat grafts with ADSCs, a method coined “cell-assisted lipo-transfer” (CAL) (Fig. 4). Whole adipose tissue contains both adipose progenitor cells, as well as multipotent stem cells, that can differentiate primarily into osteogenic, adipogenic, myogenic, and chondrogenic lineages (Fig. 5). Several other lineages have also been reported in the literature. Stem cells have been noted to possess several qualities, including capacity for self-renewal, long-term viability, and multilineage potential, which make them appealing in the setting of fat grafting, particularly to treat RIF.⁶⁶ ADSCs represent a comparatively readily available and easily obtained population of mesenchymal progenitor cells, as those obtained from bone marrow are in shorter supply and harvested with more difficulty.

Figure 4.

Illustrates the process of creating a fat graft augmented with either ADSCs or the stromal vascular fraction. At point 1, lipoaspirate is harvested by liposuction from the adipose tissue. This lipoaspirate is processed, at point 2, by a digestion with collagenase and centrifugation. The resulting product separates into four identifiable layers, the oil layer, adipose tissue, infranatant, and the stromal vascular fraction (in descending order). The stromal vascular fraction (which includes a heterogenous mix of preadipocytes, endothelial cells, pericytes, hematopoietic cells, and ADSCs) is at that time isolated and either directly added to lipoaspirate or expanded by cell cultured (point 3) to specifically increase the number of ADSCs. One or both of these products are added to lipoaspirate to create an augmented fat graft, seen at point 4.

Figure 5.

(lineages) ADSCs are multipotent progenitor cells that can differentiate into a variety of lineages, as depicted in Fig. 5. ADSC, adipose-derived stromal cell.

Studies have indicated that during the process of liposuction, the resulting lipoaspirate contains a relatively low proportion of ADSCs compared to whole fat, potentially contributing to the volume retention concerns and necrosis complications in fat grafting.⁶⁷ This technique aims to enrich lipoaspirate with additional ADSCs and ultimately improve clinical outcomes.

Indeed, CAL has been demonstrated to increase fat retention and improve cosmetic outcomes clinically.^68,69 Microvasculature has been detected more prominently following CAL, indicating its potential effect of increasing angiogenesis.⁶⁸ Animal studies have demonstrated decreased dermal thickness, lower collagen density, improved structural quality, and increased vascularity when CAL was utilized in RIF compared to whole fat graft.⁸ In this mouse model, irradiated skin treated with CAL was also found to be less stiff and have improved elasticity compared to radiated skin treated with normal fat grafting.⁶¹ Another study utilizing a rat model demonstrated that ADSCs promote hair follicle and sebaceous gland regeneration, in addition to having anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and antiapoptotic effects in RIF. This study also found that ADSCs can have a protective effect against the formation of RIF (Fig. 6).⁷⁰

Figure 6.

Demonstrates the numerous beneficial effects associated with treating irradiated skin with a fat graft containing ADSCs. Findings in typical irradiated skin include epidermal thinning, atrophy of the hair follicles and sebaceous glands, dermal thickening, increased collagen density and linear collagen organization, and decreased vascularization. The addition of a fat graft containing ADSCs to irradiated skin has been shown to decrease dermal atrophy, promote hair follicle and sebaceous gland growth, decrease dermal thickness, decrease density, and increase basket weave organization of collagen, improve fat graft retention, and improve vasculo- and angiogenesis.

Acquisition/processing of ADSCs

CAL follows a protocol similar to that of basic fat grafting, beginning with the harvesting of adipose tissue through liposuction.

The lipoaspirate is mechanically processed or digested with a mixture of PBS and collagenase I and III to separate the mature adipocytes and connective tissue from the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) or “pellet.”⁶⁸ This pellet contains a heterogeneous mix of cells from various lineages, including ADSCs, preadipocytes, premature endothelial cells, mature endothelial cells, hematopoietic cells, and pericytes.⁷¹ The SVF is then isolated, resuspended, filtered, and, depending on use, further processed.^24,68 Studies indicate that ∼10% of the SVF is constituted of ADSCs by flow cytometry.⁷² Therefore, SVF has been used for various cell-based therapies, including CAL.⁶⁸

However, to isolate and purify the heterogenous mix of ADSCs from SVF, surface immunophenotypes are used as a mechanism to identify and sort subpopulations. Immunomagnetic beads and flow cytometry have both been used to select for and against cell types of interest.^73
–75 ADSCs have also been found to readily adhere to plastic culture flasks, providing another method of isolating ADSCs from the SVF for expansion by culture.⁷⁰ Once the ADSCs have been isolated and/or cultured to the desired specificity and volume, they are attached to unaugmented lipoaspirate, which acts as a scaffold to create an ADSC-rich lipoaspirate ready for fat grafting.¹³

Some studies have considered the use of the SVF “cell pellet” without additional processing or addition of lipoaspirate. A clinical study involving five patients who had undergone radiation therapy and developed subsequent RIF experienced improved wound healing and pain relief following autogenous SVF cell pellet injection.⁷² While use of the SVF in entirety has demonstrated potential benefit over fat grafting alone, implementation of immunogenic beads and flow cytometry has allowed for investigation into specific populations of fibroblasts within the SVF. Recent interest has emerged in characterization of specific ADSC subpopulations within the SVF and the associated benefits of each in RIF treatment.

ADSC subpopulations

As interest in ADSCs has expanded, current research has focused on the identification of subpopulations of ADSCs with various immunophenotypic markers and to define the specific physiologic role of each individual population (Table 1). While research has been done on a multitude of markers, we focus only on those particularly relevant to wound healing and radiation fibrosis below.

Table 1.

General information and potential of notable adipose-derived stromal cell subpopulations

Cell Line	General Information	Potential
CD74	Antifibrotic qualities in vitro and in vivo Causes an increase in IF staining on several extracellular matrix components Fibrillin interacts with TGF-β1	Causes reduction in stiffness, dermal thickness, and collagen content of overlying skin Increases expression of HGF, FGF2, and TGF-β3 Decreases expression of TGF-β1 Decreases production of procollagen type 1, collagen type 1, and collagen type 3 Improves histological quality Decreases resorption of fat graft Decreases fibrotic fibroblast subpopulations
CD146	Less fibrillin staining on irradiated skin compared to normal skin Irradiated skin has a greater amount of elastin present compared to normal skin	Increases vascularization and decreases dermal thickness and collagen deposition Increases CD31 staining Produces lower levels of TGFβ-1, which creates less inflammation in the fat grafts Increases expression of vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) and angiopoietin-1 Increased expression of fibroblast growth factor-2 Enhanced induction of tube-formation Less resorption, improved histologic quality, and improved fat retention Mediates blood vessel formation
BMPR1A	Activated by the binding of BMP2 High concentrations promote differentiation into osteoblasts and Chondrocytes Low concentrations promote adipogenesis Activation of BMP2 induces activation of Smads and p38 kinase High PPAR-γ expression Higher BMPR1A expression in overweight and obese people compared to those with normal BMIs	Expresses high levels of adipogenic growth factors and improves retention of autologous fat grafts Enhanced adipogenesis in vitro and in vivo Increases ability to generate de novo fat within an adipogenic niche “The increased formation of adipocytes by BMPR1A(+) cells is likely due to increased functioning of the PPAR-γ protein, and thus would not be reflected in levels of PPAR-γ gene expression.”
CD248	Has angiogenic mechanism/effects Causes significantly more wound healing by 7 days in vivo with mice	Causes higher levels of vascularization Expresses multiple angiogenic genes (VEGF, FGF2, PDGFRA, PDGFRB) Produces more tubules and higher levels of HGF Causes keratinocyte migration over damaged dermis Promotes endothelial cell migration and proliferation Reduces vessel regression in late wound healing stages Rescues hypoxic areas in tissue
CD105	Has an inverse relationship with adipogenic differentiation (increase osteogenic differentiation = decreases adipogenic differentiation) Expression of CD105 on the surface is predictive for other osteogenic gene expressions	Lower levels of CD105 increase osteogenic gene expression Shows osteogenic differentiation in vitro Shows bone regeneration in vivo Causes greater expression of the BMP pathway genes

Antifibrotic CD74⁺

CD74 is a cell surface receptor for macrophage inhibitory factor and has been found to suppress production of amyloid beta and interact with the class II major histocompatibility complex. It also appears on cells showing antifibrotic qualities in tissues and acts as a receptor for cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factors on the surface of cells.^9,76

CD74⁺ ADSCs have been shown to reduce skin stiffness, dermal thickness, and collagen production of damaged adipose tissue by increasing levels of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), and TGF-β3 and decreasing the levels of TGF-β1 in mice.⁷⁷ The changing levels of these growth factors allow for there to be a decrease in the production of multiple types of collagen, such as procollagen type 1, collagen type 1, and collagen type 2, as well as a decrease in fibrotic fibroblasts.⁷⁷ These qualities of CD74⁺ ASDCs demonstrate an antifibrotic role that has been observed both in vitro and in vivo. ⁷⁷

Vasculogenic CD146⁺

Recent evidence has shown CD146, also known as melanoma cell adhesion molecule, to be a cell-surface receptor that binds with miscellaneous ligands, growth factors, and extracellular matrices.⁷⁸ CD146⁺ ADSCs have been found to improve RIF by increasing vascularization and decreasing dermal thickness and collagen production.⁷⁹ The antifibrotic effects of CD146⁺ ADSCs are modulated by an increase in VEGF, angiopoietin-1, and FGF2 and a decrease in TGF-β1 expression.^79
–81 Fat grafts augmented with CD146⁺ ADSCs also demonstrated improved graft survival and retention, likely mediated by their increased vascularity.^80,81

Adipogenic BMPR1A^+s

Bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1A (BMPR1A) is a protein receptor that specifically binds ligands from the TGF-β superfamily, transmitting signals between the cell membrane and then nucleus.⁸² BMPR1A⁺ ADSCs have been shown to decrease RIF by increasing levels of adipogenic growth factors in fat grafts, which in turn helps with volume retention of the fat graft.⁸³ In vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that when BMPR1A⁺ ADSCs are activated by the binding of bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP2), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) protein expression is subsequently upregulated, which leads to increased adipogenesis.⁸⁴

Angiogenic CD248⁺

CD248, also known as endosialin, is a transmembrane receptor that binds to ligands, including fibronectin, type I collagen, and type IV collagen.⁸⁵ CD248⁺ ADSCs also serve an angiogenic role within wounded tissue. In vivo fat grafting in a mouse model of CD248⁺ ADSCs resulted in increased expression of several angiogenic genes, including VEGF, FGF2, platelet derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA), and PDGFRB, and HGF.⁸⁶ CD248⁺ ADSCs have been linked to faster wound healing and increased vascularization thought to be mediated by decreased vessel regression toward the end of the wound healing process.⁸⁶ While the vasculogenic effects of CD248⁺ ADSCs have been observed both in vivo and in vitro, the characterization of CD248⁺ ADSCs is still widely debated. Some believe CD248 to be a marker for tumor related fibroblasts, while others believe CD248 to be a marker for stromal fibroblasts.⁸⁶

Cellular Mechanisms underlying regenerative potential of ADSCs

Despite clinical evidence of their therapeutic potential, the mechanisms underlying the regenerative effect of ADSCs on radiated skin remain unclear. Initial theories suggested that ADSCs simply function by replacing the native irradiated senescent adipose stromal cell population; however, further research has uncovered various alternative pathways that may contribute synergistically to their therapeutic actions.^8,87 These functions include the ability of ADSCs to transdifferentiate, alter the wound environment through paracrine signaling, and to recruit other host stromal cells to the area of injury. Accordingly, two main hypotheses for the mechanism of ADSCs in fat grafting have emerged: the first is that ADSCs differentiate into adipocytes, and the second is that the vascularization and tissue remodeling of fat and surrounding soft tissue are driven by cytokines and growth factors, which are delivered through the paracrine system.⁸⁸

Adipocyte differentiation

Given the multipotent nature of ADSCs, some of their differentiation into de novo adipocytes and endothelial cells likely facilitate their effect on ameliorating cutaneous radiation injury.^87,89 The ability of ADSCs to differentiate into mature adipocytes has been demonstrated in numerous cell-tracking studies.^90
–92 Restoring cutaneous fat may be a potential way through which ADSCs serve to reverse dermal RIF. Recent studies have demonstrated that mature adipocytes can exert both an antifibrotic effect, through the activation of PPARγ, and can promote regeneration.^93,94

Second, differentiation of ADSCs into endothelial cells has also been verifiably demonstrated in numerous studies.^95
–97 Notably, in a rat model of radiation injury, injection of DiI-labeled ADSC into a radiation ulcer resulted in the formation of hybrid neovasculature composed of both host and ADSC-derived endothelial cells.⁹⁸ Furthermore, other studies have shown that ADSCs can also take on a pericyte-like role, stabilizing newly formed vessels to further support angiogenesis.⁹⁹

Given that ischemia secondary to hypovascularity mediates both radiation injury and fat graft necrosis, as well as the demonstrated benefits of augmenting angiogenesis to improve RIF in skin, the direct promotion of angiogenesis by ADSCs likely plays a major therapeutic role.^3,61,100

Paracrine signaling

An alternative mechanism through which ADSCs are postulated to function is through paracrine signaling. The secretome of ADSCs has been a subject of extensive research and has uncovered various growth factors and cytokines that are thought to catalyze their therapeutic actions.¹⁰¹

The most extensively studied are their angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic functions, although many others have also been identified. VEGF, HGF, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and angiopoietin-1 are all angiogenic growth factors known to be expressed by ADSCs.^{80,102
–104} These growth factors can stimulate both host endothelial cells, as well as grafted endothelial cells, from the SVF to proliferate and contribute to capillary tube formation.

It has been shown that the introduction of ADSCs into an ischemic environment, such as a newly transplanted fat graft, results in the secretion of VEGF.⁸⁷ A study by Garza et al demonstrated increased expression of VEGF in ADSCs extracted from fat grafts in mice, which correlated with increased vascularity.⁸⁸

The antifibrotic function of ADSCs is thought to result from modulation of nearby fibroblasts. Studies have demonstrated reduced expression of TGF-β1 and collagen in dermal fibroblasts cocultured with ADSC, findings which have further been validated in animal studies of radiation fibrosis.^77,104 Reduced expression of TGF-β1 may result in lower chance of fibroblast activation to myofibroblasts. The consequent absence of intercellular contractile forces and excessive ECM deposition may contribute to the decrease in skin fibrosis observed clinically in patients with RIF who are treated with ADSCs.⁶⁰

Finally, ADSCs can also serve an anti-inflammatory role through their expression of immunosuppressive cytokines, including IL-10 and prostaglandin E2, and modulation of T and B cell activation.^105
–107 Furthermore, given the oxidative mechanism of radiation-induced soft tissue damage, ADSCs could further reduce inflammation by mitigating ROS generation; studies have shown a capacity to upregulate superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase in cocultured dermal fibroblasts.¹⁰⁸ In all, ADSCs appear to target many of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of radiation damage through their varied paracrine activities.

Recruitment of host stem cells

A final potential therapeutic pathway of ADSCs is their recruitment of host stem cells to the site of RIF by increasing the release of stromal derived factor-1.^109,110 The release of this homing chemokine is capable of attracting a variety of stem cells, ranging from ADSCs in nearby skin to mesenchymal stem cells from distant bone marrow, to the site of injury.^111,112 Once honed to the site of injury, these distant stem cells can locally exert the therapeutic roles outlined above to the sequelae of RIF.

In summary, ADSCs likely potentiate their therapeutic and regenerative effects on irradiated tissues through a synergistic combination of differentiation, paracrine signaling, and host stem cell recruitment to increase adipogenesis and angiogenesis, minimize fibrosis, and attenuate inflammation in radiation-damaged soft tissues.

Commercial availability and potential

Autologous and allogenic ADSC therapies have generated interest on the regenerative medicine commercial market in recent years. Their attributes of pluripotency, low immunogenicity, and high availability (due to esthetic liposuction procedures) contribute to their therapeutic promise and profitability potential.¹¹³ Interest in the clinical utility of ADSCs extends far beyond the scope of RIF, as recent studies have demonstrated possible therapeutic use in bone regeneration, autoimmune diseases, and neurodegenerative processes.^107,114,115

Numerous and diverse preclinical and clinical trials are currently underway to assess the efficacy of ADSC treatment in diseases such as systemic sclerosis, chronic kidney disease, neurological and degenerative diseases, atherothrombotic diseases, and more. At this point in time, many preclinical investigations have been done in animal models and those done in humans have been limited by sample size. Clinical trials related to ADSC applications are predominantly in phases I and II rather than III and IV.¹¹⁶

While interest in bringing ADSCs to the commercial market and clinical practice appears abundant, broad availability of ADSCs commercially is yet to come to fruition. Lack of standardization in the harvesting, processing, and storage of these cells has been identified as a contributing factor. In addition, significant adverse effects of SVF therapy have been described, such as macular degeneration, which has increased emphasis on patient safety and oversight as these therapies become available.^113,117

Future directions of cell-based therapy to reverse fibrosis in irradiated tissue

Recent advances in fat graft survival and viability have focused on cell-based therapies utilizing adipocytes or ADSCs. Emerging techniques to augment these cell-based therapies to improve their efficacy have created exciting potential growth in RIF treatment and in the field of wound healing and tissue regeneration more broadly. One of these techniques utilizes platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a popular clinical therapy within orthopedics, reconstructive and esthetic surgery, and dermatology, to enrich adipocytes and ADSC populations.

Platelets are a well-known component of the hematologic system that remain inactive in their native state. However, when platelets encounter damaged endothelial cells within injured tissue, they are activated to help create a thrombus and prevent further damage to the injured tissue and initiate the first phase of wound healing: hemostasis.¹¹ These activated platelets release a plethora of growth factors and cytokines to facilitate tissue repair by improving surrounding cells' resistance to oxidative damage while simultaneously promoting angiogenesis.¹¹⁸ Not only does PRP improve adipocyte survival but also it has been shown to improve ADSC survival and differentiation.^119

–122

Epitranscriptomics is a blossoming field within basic science research to modify RNA expressed by cells, and applications with regeneration secondary to fat grafting is not exempt. Most RNA modifications occur to alter the two main factors affecting adipocyte and fat graft viability that was discussed above: inflammation and vascularity. Yu et al transfected human ADSCs with VEGF modified mRNA (modRNA) and were able to increase levels of cellular proliferation and pro-angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. ¹²³

Modification of N6-methyladenosine (m6A), N6-adenosine methyltransferases (Mettl3), fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO), and alpha ketoglutarate beta homolog 5 (Alkbh5) mRNA within ADSCs has been the focus of numerous ground-breaking studies. Lin et al showed that upregulation of Mettl3 resulted in increased vascular smooth muscle differentiation, and silencing of Mettl3 decreased expression of VEGF, TGF-β1, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.¹²⁴

FTO has been shown to regulate the inclusion of Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1T1), an adipocyte regulatory factor, and suppressed differentiation of preadipocytes.^125,126 Wu et al demonstrated that FTO regulated cell cycle progression of adipocytes by affecting expression of cyclin A2 (CCNA2) and cyclin dependent kinase 2.¹²⁷ Furthermore, Zhang et al showed that PPARγ, a potent and well-studied adipogenic differentiating factor, is a downstream target of FTO during adipogenesis.¹²⁸

M6A deletion was found to inhibit adipogenesis by uncoupling protein-2 (UCP2) but, conversely, promoted adipogenesis in the presence of patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 2 (PNPLA2).¹²⁹ Most recently, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein zeta (C/EBPZ) expression inhibits preadipocyte differentiation and increases preadipocyte proliferation, potentially identifying a novel negative regulator of adipogenesis.

Finally, as recent effort to elucidate the specific mechanisms of ADSC subpopulations progresses, future directions of cell-based therapies may be more tailored. With interest growing in the discovery and characterization of ADSC subpopulations, future research may continue to reveal previously undescribed populations of ADSCs.

As technology advances, these novel techniques will drive the identification of new ADSC subpopulations, better define the physiologic roles of current ADSC populations, and develop additional modulating factors to improve the viability and functionality of these ADSC populations. The exciting potential of these stem cell populations and the ability to delve deeper into the transcriptomic modulation of these populations could revolutionize the field of regenerative medicine, wound healing, and tissue engineering to improve the lives of millions of patients worldwide dealing with RIF and any other fibroproliferative disease.

SUMMARY

As radiation therapy has emerged as an effective means of treating cancer, so, too, has associated complications. The most common of these is RIF, which is associated with numerous undesirable clinical features, such as decreased skin perfusion, dermal thickening, and poor wound healing. Fat grafting has gained popularity as a therapeutic approach for preventing and treating these sequelae, after studies reported improved functional and esthetic clinical outcomes associated with its application in RIF. However, while promising outcomes have been reported, radiated skin and soft tissue provides a relatively hostile host site for a graft given decreased vascularity and poor fat graft retention in the RIF-affected area.

Various modalities of improving upon fat grafting as a therapeutic approach have been investigated and reported, including preconditioning the tissue with DFO, supplementing the graft with vitamin E, and using serial fat transfer techniques. Perhaps the greatest interest has been taken in reported use of contents of the SVF, including ADSCs, to augment fat grafts. These techniques have been reported to increase fat graft volume retention, decrease fat graft necrosis, increase angiogenesis, decrease collagen density, decrease dermal thickness, among other clinical benefits.

The cellular mechanisms underlying these observed benefits have not yet been fully elucidated but are thought to be related to the ability of ADSCs to differentiate into various cell lines, act through paracrine signaling pathways, and recruit host stem cells. As this area of research continues to develop, expected areas of further exploration include fat graft enrichment with PRP, incorporation of epitranscriptomics, and increased understanding of the specific roles played by specific ADSC subpopulations.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGES

One half of cancer patients receive radiation therapy as part of their treatment, the most common complication of which is RIF.

RIF results in changes to the skin that can create functional limitations, cause esthetic concerns, and cause increased surgical complications.

Fat-grafting emerged as a possible therapeutic option for RIF in 2007 when Rigotti et al reported symptomatic and esthetic improvements in radiated skin following its application in the affected area.

Various improvements upon this therapy have been proposed, the most notable of which is augmenting the fat graft with ADSCs, which are multipotent progenitor cells.

Augmentation of a fat graft with ADSCs has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, increase perfusion, improve structural quality, decrease dermal thickness, and provide additional positive benefits in the setting of radiation-induced skin fibrosis.

Several subpopulations of ADSCs have been identified and associated with specific therapeutic benefits, providing promise for increased specificity in the future of this field.

Footnotes

AUTHORs' CONTRIBUTION

C.E.B.: Writing-original draft and review/editing (equal); visualization (lead). D.A.: Writing-original draft and review/editing (equal). H.A.L.: Writing-original draft and review/editing (equal). A.A.C.: Writing-original draft and review/editing (supporting). M.G.: Writing-review and editing (supporting). J.L.G.: Writing- review and editing (supporting). A.C.C.: Writing-review and editing (supporting). J.B.L.P.: Writing-review and editing (supporting). M.A.D. Jr.: Writing-review and editing (supporting). M.T.L.: Supervision (equal); conceptualization (equal). D.C.W.: Supervision (equal); conceptualization (equal); writing-review and editing (equal).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING SOURCES

Derrick C. Wan was supported by NIH DE027346. Michael T. Longaker was supported by the NIH grant R01 GM 116892, RO1 GM 136659, Gunn/Olivier Research Fund, Stinehart-Reed Fund, and the NIH grant U01 HL099776.

AUTHOR DISCLOSURE AND GHOSTWRITING

No competing financial interests exist. The content of this article was expressly written by the authors listed. No ghostwriters were used to write this article.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Charlotte Berry, BA is a Dartmouth College graduate and medical student interested in plastic and reconstructive surgery and currently completing a research fellowship at Stanford University's Hagey Laboratory. Darren B. Abbas, MD is a former postdoctoral fellow in Hagey laboratory and current general surgery resident at Mayo Clinic. Hendrick Lintel, BS is a Washington University of St. Louis medical student and former Hagey Laboratory research fellow.

Andrew Churukian is an undergraduate student at Stanford University majoring in Bioengineering. Michelle Griffin, MD and Jason Guo, PhD are a postdoctoral research fellows at Hagey Laboratory. Jennifer Parker, BS is a medical student completing her PhD at Hagey Laboratory. Asha Cotterell, BS and Mauricio Downer, BS are medical students completing research fellowships in Hagey Laboratory. Michael T. Longaker, MD, MBA, is Professor and Vice Chair of Surgery at Stanford University, Co-Director at the Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Program Director in Regenerative Medicine, and Director of Children's Surgical Research. Derrick C. Wan, MD, is a Johnson and Johnson Distinguished Professor of surgery in the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Stanford University. He is also the Director of Maxillofacial Surgery at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital and Hagey Family Faculty Scholar in Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine.

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

References

Gianfaldoni

, Gianfaldoni

, Wollina

, et al. An overview on radiotherapy: From its history to its current applications in dermatology. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2017; 5(4):521–525; doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.122

Jaffray

, Gospodarowicz

. Radiation Therapy for Cancer. In: Cancer: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 3). (Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R, et al. eds.) The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank: Washington, DC; 2015.

Lavin

, Abbas

, Fahy

, et al. A comparative analysis of deferoxamine treatment modalities for dermal radiation-induced fibrosis. J Cell Mol Med, 2021; 25(21):10028–10038; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16913

Bryant

, Banegas

, Martinez

, et al. Trends in Radiation Therapy among Cancer Survivors in the United States, 2000–2030. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2017; 26(6):963–970; doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1023

Purkayastha

, Sharma

, Sarin

, et al. Radiation fibrosis syndrome: The evergreen menace of radiation therapy. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2019; 6(3):238–245; doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_71_18

Straub

, New

, Hamilton

, et al. Radiation-induced fibrosis: Mechanisms and implications for therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2015; 141(11):1985–1994; doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1974-6

Yarnold

, Brotons

M-CV

. Pathogenetic mechanisms in radiation fibrosis. Radiother Oncol, 2010; 97(1):149–161; doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.002

Borrelli

, Patel

, Sokol

, et al. Fat Chance: The rejuvenation of irradiated skin. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2019; 7(2):e2092; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002092

Bentzen

, Thames

, Overgaard

. Latent-time estimation for late cutaneous and subcutaneous radiation reactions in a single-follow-up clinical study. Radiother Oncol, 1989; 15(3):267–274; doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(89)90095-9

10.

O'Sullivan

, Levin

. Late radiation-related fibrosis: Pathogenesis, manifestations, and current management. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2003; 13(3):274–289; doi: 10.1016/S1053-4296(03)00037-7

11.

Landau

, Birnbaum

, Kurtz

, et al. Review: Proposed methods to improve the survival of adipose tissue in autologous fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2018; 6(8):e1870; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001870

12.

Mikus

, Koufman

, Kilpatrick

. Fate of liposuctioned and purified autologous fat injections in the canine vocal fold. Laryngoscope, 1995; 105(1):17–22; doi: 10.1288/00005537-199501000-00007

13.

Gimble

, Katz

, Bunnell

. Adipose-derived stem cells for regenerative medicine. Circ Res, 2007; 100(9):1249–1260; doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000265074.83288.09

14.

Huang

. TGF-β signalling is mediated by two autonomously functioning TβRI:TβRII pairs. EMBO J, 2011; 30(7):1263–1276; doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.54

15.

Salibian

, Widgerow

, Abrouk

, et al. Stem cells in plastic surgery: A review of current clinical and translational applications. Arch Plast Surg, 2013; 40(6):666–675; doi: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.6.666

16.

Frese

, Dijkman

, Hoerstrup

. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells in regenerative medicine. Transfus Med Hemother, 2016; 43(4):268–274; doi: 10.1159/000448180

17.

Malkinson

, Keane

. Radiobiology of the skin: Review of some effects on epidermis and hair. J Invest Dermatol, 1981; 77(1):133–138; doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12479347

18.

Freites-Martinez

, Shapiro

, van den Hurk

, et al. Hair disorders in cancer survivors. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2019; 80(5):1199–1213; doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.056

19.

Archambeau

, Pezner

, Wasserman

. Pathophysiology of irradiated skin and breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1995; 31(5):1171–1185; doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00423-I

20.

Kumar

, Griffin

, Adigbli

, et al. Lipotransfer for radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Br J Surg, 2016; 103(8):950–961; doi: 10.1002/bjs.10180

21.

Hinz

, Dugina

, Ballestrem

, et al. α-Smooth muscle actin is crucial for focal adhesion maturation in myofibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell, 2003; 14(6):2508–2519; doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-11-0729

22.

Gonzalez

, Lobocki

, Kelly

, et al. An alternative method for harvest and processing fat grafts: An in vitro study of cell viability and survival. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007; 120(1):285–294; doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000264401.19469.ad

23.

Ullmann

, Hyams

, Ramon

, et al. Enhancing the survival of aspirated human fat injected into nude mice. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1998; 101(7):1940–1944; doi: 10.1097/00006534-199806000-00026

24.

Borrelli

, Shen

, Lee

, et al. Radiation-induced skin fibrosis: Pathogenesis, current treatment options, and emerging therapeutics. Ann Plast Surg, 2019; 83(4S Suppl 1):S59–S64; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002098

25.

Mildmay-White

, Khan

. Cell surface markers on adipose-derived stem cells: A systematic review. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther, 2017; 12(6):484–492; doi: 10.2174/1574888X11666160429122133

26.

Harris

, Plastini

, Kappy

, et al. Endothelial differentiated adipose-derived stem cells improvement of survival and neovascularization in fat transplantation. Aesthet Surg J, 2019; 39(2):220–232; doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy130

27.

Garza

, Paik

, Chung

, et al. Studies in fat grafting: Part III. Fat grafting irradiated tissue—improved skin quality and decreased fat graft retention. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2014; 134(2):249–257; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000326

28.

Falanga

, Zhou

, Yufit

. Low oxygen tension stimulates collagen synthesis and COL1A1 transcription through the action of TGF-beta1. J Cell Physiol, 2002; 191(1):42–50; doi: 10.1002/jcp.10065

29.

Gir

, Oni

, Brown

, et al. Human adipose stem cells: Current clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2012; 129(6):1277–1290; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecae6

30.

Condé-Green

, de Amorim

NFG

, Pitanguy

. Influence of decantation, washing and centrifugation on adipocyte and mesenchymal stem cell content of aspirated adipose tissue: A comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg, 2010; 63(8):1375–1381; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.07.018

31.

Koerdt

, Rohleder

, Rommel

, et al. An expression analysis of markers of radiation-induced skin fibrosis and angiogenesis in wound healing disorders of the head and neck. Radiat Oncol, 2015; 10:202; doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0508-3

32.

Wang

, Boerma

, Fu

, et al. Radiation responses in skin and connective tissues: Effect on wound healing and surgical outcome. Hernia, 2006; 10(6):502–506; doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0150-y

33.

Classen

, Nitzsche

, Wallwiener

, et al. Fibrotic changes after postmastectomy radiotherapy and reconstructive surgery in breast cancer. A retrospective analysis in 109 patients. Strahlenther Onkol, 2010; 186(11):630–636; doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2158-6

34.

Leal NFB da

, Oliveira

HF de

, Carrara

HHA

. Supervised physical therapy in women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 2016; 24:e2755; doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0702.2755

35.

Oliveira

MMF de

, Souza

GA de

, Miranda M de

, et al. [Upper limbs exercises during radiotherapy for breast cancer and quality of life]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2010; 32(3):133–138; doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000300006

36.

Ramia

, Bodgi

, Mahmoud

, et al. Radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with head and neck cancer: A review of pathogenesis and clinical outcomes. Clin Med Insights Oncol, 2022; 16:11795549211036898; doi: 10.1177/11795549211036898

37.

Bourgeois

, Gourgou

, Kramar

, et al. A randomized, prospective study using the LPG technique in treating radiation-induced skin fibrosis: Clinical and profilometric analysis. Skin Res Technol, 2008; 14(1):71–76; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00263.x

38.

Warpenburg

. Deep friction massage in treatment of radiation-induced fibrosis: Rehabilitative care for breast cancer survivors. Integr Med Clin J, 2014; 13(5):32.

39.

Telvin

, Longaker

, Wan

. Deferoxamine to minimize fibrosis during radiation therapy. Adv Wound Care, 2022; 11(10):548–559; doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0021

40.

Brittenham

, Griffith

, Nienhuis

, et al. Efficacy of deferoxamine in preventing complications of iron overload in patients with thalassemia major. N Engl J Med, 1994; 331(9):567–573; doi: 10.1056/NEJM199409013310902

41.

Cazzola

, Locatelli

, De Stefano

. Deferoxamine in thalassemia major. N Engl J Med, 1995; 332(4):271–272; author reply 272-273

42.

Beerepoot

, Shima

, Kuroki

, et al. Up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor production by iron chelators. Cancer Res, 1996; 56(16):3747–3751.

43.

Shen

, Borrelli

, Adem

, et al. Prophylactic treatment with transdermal deferoxamine mitigates radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):12346; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69293-4

44.

Duscher

, Neofytou

, Wong

, et al. Transdermal deferoxamine prevents pressure-induced diabetic ulcers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015; 112(1):94–99; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413445112

45.

Flacco

, Chung

, Blackshear

, et al. Deferoxamine preconditioning of irradiated tissue improves perfusion and fat graft retention. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018; 141(3):655–665; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004167

46.

Snider

, Lynn

, Urlaub

, et al. Topical deferoxamine alleviates skin injury and normalizes atomic force microscopy patterns following radiation in a murine breast reconstruction model. Ann Plast Surg, 2018; 81(5):604–608; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001592

47.

Jacobson

, Bhatia

, Smith

, et al. Randomized trial of pentoxifylline and vitamin E vs standard follow-up after breast irradiation to prevent breast fibrosis, evaluated by tissue compliance meter. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2013; 85(3):604–608; doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.042

48.

Kaidar-Person

, Marks

, Jones

. Pentoxifylline and vitamin E for treatment or prevention of radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer. Breast J, 2018; 24(5):816–819; doi: 10.1111/tbj.13044

49.

Ejaz

, Greenberger

, Rubin

. Understanding the mechanism of radiation induced fibrosis and therapy options. Pharmacol Ther, 2019; 204:107399; doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107399

50.

Rigotti

, Marchi

, Galiè

, et al. Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: A healing process mediated by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007; 119(5):1409–1422; doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000256047.47909.71

51.

Lindegren

, Schultz

, Sinha

, et al. Autologous fat transplantation alters gene expression patterns related to inflammation and hypoxia in the irradiated human breast. Br J Surg, 2019; 106(5):563–573; doi: 10.1002/bjs.11072

52.

Mohan

, Singh

. Use of fat transfer to treat a chronic, non-healing, post-radiation ulcer: A case study. J Wound Care, 2017; 26(5):272–273; doi: 10.1296/8/jowc.2017.26.5.272

53.

Panettiere

, Marchetti

, Accorsi

. The serial free fat transfer in irradiated prosthetic breast reconstructions. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2009; 33(5):695–700; doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9366-4

54.

Phulpin

, Gangloff

, Tran

, et al. Rehabilitation of irradiated head and neck tissues by autologous fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009; 123(4):1187–1197; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819f2928

55.

Salgarello

, Visconti

, Farallo

. Autologous fat graft in radiated tissue prior to alloplastic reconstruction of the breast: Report of two cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2010; 34(1):5–10; doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9367-3

56.

Salgarello

, Visconti

, Barone-Adesi

. Fat grafting and breast reconstruction with implant: Another option for irradiated breast cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2012; 129(2):317–329; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6619

57.

Serra-Renom

, Muñoz-Olmo

, Serra-Mestre

. Fat grafting in postmastectomy breast reconstruction with expanders and prostheses in patients who have received radiotherapy: Formation of new subcutaneous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2010; 125(1):12–18; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c49458

58.

Carlson

, Longaker

, Thompson

. Wound splinting regulates granulation tissue survival. J Surg Res, 2003; 110(1):304–309; doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(02)00098-7

59.

Fluck

, Querfeld

, Cremer

, et al. Normal human primary fibroblasts undergo apoptosis in three-dimensional contractile collagen gels. J Invest Dermatol, 1998; 110(2):153–157; doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00095.x

60.

Verhoekx

JSN

, Mudera

, Walbeehm

, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells inhibit the contractile myofibroblast in Dupuytren's disease. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2013; 132(5):1139–1148; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3bf2b

61.

Luan

, Duscher

, Whittam

, et al. Cell-assisted lipotransfer improves volume retention in irradiated recipient sites and rescues radiation-induced skin changes. Stem Cells, 2016; 34(3):668–673; doi: 10.1002/stem.2256

62.

Coleman

. Long-term survival of fat transplants: Controlled demonstrations. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 1995; 19(5):421–425; doi: 10.1007/BF00453875

63.

Coleman

. Structural fat grafting: More than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006; 118(3 Suppl):108S–120S; doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000234610.81672.e7

64.

Maillard

. Liponecrotic cysts after augmentation mammaplasty with fat injections. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 1994; 18(4):405–406; doi: 10.1007/BF00451348

65.

Abbas

, Lavin

, Fahy

, et al. Fat grafts augmented with vitamin E improve volume retention and radiation-induced fibrosis. Aesthet Surg J, 2022; 42(8):946–955; doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac066

66.

Zuk

, Zhu

, Ashjian

, et al. Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell, 2002; 13(12):4279–4295; doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-02-0105

67.

Yoshimura

, Shigeura

, Matsumoto

, et al. Characterization of freshly isolated and cultured cells derived from the fatty and fluid portions of liposuction aspirates. J Cell Physiol, 2006; 208(1):64–76; doi: 10.1002/jcp.20636

68.

Matsumoto

, Sato

, Gonda

, et al. Cell-assisted lipotransfer: Supportive use of human adipose-derived cells for soft tissue augmentation with lipoinjection. Tissue Eng, 2006; 12(12):3375–3382; doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.3375

69.

Yoshimura

, Sato

, Aoi

, et al. Cell-assisted lipotransfer for cosmetic breast augmentation: Supportive use of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2008; 32(1):48–55; doi: 10.1007/s00266-007-9019-4

70.

Yao

, Zhou

, Wang

, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells alleviate radiation-induced dermatitis by suppressing apoptosis and downregulating cathepsin F expression. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2021; 12(1):447; doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02516-1

71.

Khazaei

, Keshavarz

, Bozorgi

, et al. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells: A comparative review on isolation, culture, and differentiation methods. Cell Tissue Bank, 2022; 23(1):1–16; doi: 10.1007/s10561-021-09905-z

72.

, Zhang

, Mo

, et al. Transplantation of the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) mitigates severe radiation-induced skin injury. Radiat Res, 2021; 196(3):250–260; doi: 10.1667/RADE-20-00156.1

73.

Hutley

, Herington

, Shurety

, et al. Human adipose tissue endothelial cells promote preadipocyte proliferation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2001; 281(5):E1037–E1044; doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.5.E1037

74.

Sengenès

, Lolmède

, Zakaroff-Girard

, et al. Preadipocytes in the human subcutaneous adipose tissue display distinct features from the adult mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells. J Cell Physiol, 2005; 205(1):114–122; doi: 10.1002/jcp.20381

75.

Nakagami

, Morishita

, Maeda

, et al. Adipose tissue-derived stromal cells as a novel option for regenerative cell therapy. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2006; 13(2):77–81; doi: 10.5551/jat.13.77

76.

Gil-Yarom

, Radomir

, Sever

, et al. CD74 is a novel transcription regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017; 114(3):562–567; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612195114

77.

Borrelli

, Patel

, Adem

, et al. The antifibrotic adipose-derived stromal cell: Grafted fat enriched with CD74+ adipose-derived stromal cells reduces chronic radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2020; 9(11):1401–1413; doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0317

78.

Wang

, Xu

, Zhang

, et al. CD146, from a melanoma cell adhesion molecule to a signaling receptor. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2020; 5(1):1–15; doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00259-8

79.

Deleon

NMD

, Adem

, Lavin

, et al. Angiogenic CD34+CD146+ adipose-derived stromal cells augment recovery of soft tissue after radiotherapy. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2021; 15(12):1105–1117; doi: 10.1002/term.3253

80.

Borrelli

, Patel

, Blackshear

, et al. CD34+CD146+ adipose-derived stromal cells enhance engraftment of transplanted fat. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2020; 9(11):1389–1400; doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0195

81.

Diaz Deleon

, Borrelli

, Adem

, et al. Abstract 155: Cd146+ subpopulation of adipose-derived stromal cells augmentation of fat grafts reduce soft tissue atrophy caused by radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2020; 8(4 Suppl):104; doi: 10.1097/01.GOX.0000667676.54009.a2

82.

Anonymous. BMPR1A Gene: MedlinePlus Genetics. n.d. Available from: https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/gene/bmpr1a/[Last accessed: July 14, 2022].

83.

Diaz Deleon

, Adem

, Borrelli

, et al. Adipose-derived stromal cell (ASC) subpopulation with adipogenic capabilities increase fat graft quality in irradiated tissue. J Am Coll Surg, 2021; 233(5):e197; doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.08.534

84.

Zielins

, Paik

, Ransom

, et al. Enrichment of adipose-derived stromal cells for BMPR1A facilitates enhanced adipogenesis. Tissue Eng Part A, 2016; 22(3–4):214–221; doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2015.0278

85.

Di Benedetto

, Liakouli

, Ruscitti

, et al. Blocking CD248 molecules in perivascular stromal cells of patients with systemic sclerosis strongly inhibits their differentiation toward myofibroblasts and proliferation: A new potential target for antifibrotic therapy. Arthritis Res Ther, 2018; 20(1):223; doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1719-4

86.

Brett

, Zielins

, Chin

, et al. Isolation of CD248-expressing stromal vascular fraction for targeted improvement of wound healing. Wound Repair Regen, 2017; 25(3):414–422; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12542

87.

Naderi

, Combellack

, Griffin

, et al. The regenerative role of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Int Wound J, 2017; 14(1):112–124; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12569

88.

Garza

, Rennert

, Paik

, et al. Studies in Fat Grafting: Part IV. Adipose-derived stromal cell gene expression in cell-assisted lipotransfer. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015; 135(4):1045–1055; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001104

89.

Shukla

, Morrison

, Shayan

. Adipose-derived stem cells in radiotherapy injury: A new frontier. Front Surg, 2015; 2:1; doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00001

90.

Zhang

, Liu

L-N

, Yong

, et al. Intralesional injection of adipose-derived stem cells reduces hypertrophic scarring in a rabbit ear model. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2015; 6(1):145; doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0133-y

91.

Mizuno

, Itoi

, Kawahara

, et al. In vivo adipose tissue regeneration by adipose-derived stromal cells isolated from GFP transgenic mice. Cells Tissues Organs, 2008; 187(3):177–185; doi: 10.1159/000110805

92.

Tsuji

, Inamoto

, Yamashiro

, et al. Adipogenesis induced by human adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A, 2009; 15(1):83–93; doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0297

93.

Chan

CKF

, Longaker

. Fibroblasts become fat to reduce scarring. Science, 2017; 355(6326):693–694; doi: 10.1126/science.aam6748

94.

Hoerst

, van den Broek

, Sachse

, et al. Regenerative potential of adipocytes in hypertrophic scars is mediated by myofibroblast reprogramming. J Mol Med Berl Ger, 2019; 97(6):761–775; doi: 10.1007/s00109-019-01772-2

95.

, Li

, Gao

, et al. Improvement of the survival of human autologous fat transplantation by using VEGF-transfected adipose-derived stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009; 124(5):1437–1446; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181babbb6

96.

Hutchings

, Janowicz

, Moncrieff

, et al. The proliferation and differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells in neovascularization and angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(11):3790; doi: 10.3390/ijms21113790

97.

Cao

, Sun

, Liao

, et al. Human adipose tissue-derived stem cells differentiate into endothelial cells in vitro and improve postnatal neovascularization in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2005; 332(2):370–379; doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.04.135

98.

Huang

S-P

, Huang

C-H

, Shyu

J-F

, et al. Promotion of wound healing using adipose-derived stem cells in radiation ulcer of a rat model. J Biomed Sci, 2013; 20:51; doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-20-51

99.

Traktuev

, Prater

, Merfeld-Clauss

, et al. Robust functional vascular network formation in vivo by cooperation of adipose progenitor and endothelial cells. Circ Res, 2009; 104(12):1410–1420; doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.190926

100.

Lintel

, Abbas

, Lavin

, et al. Transdermal deferoxamine administration improves excisional wound healing in chronically irradiated murine skin. J Transl Med, 2022; 20(1):274; doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03479-4

101.

Kapur

, Katz

. Review of the adipose derived stem cell secretome. Biochimie, 2013; 95(12):2222–2228; doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.06.001

102.

Suga

, Glotzbach

, Sorkin

, et al. Paracrine mechanism of angiogenesis in adipose-derived stem cell transplantation. Ann Plast Surg, 2014; 72(2):234–241; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318264fd6a

103.

Rehman

, Traktuev

, Li

, et al. Secretion of angiogenic and antiapoptotic factors by human adipose stromal cells. Circulation, 2004; 109(10):1292–1298; doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121425.42966.F1

104.

Liu

, Li

, Liu

, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell exosomes inhibit transforming growth factor-β1-induced collagen synthesis in oral mucosal fibroblasts. Exp Ther Med, 2021; 22(6):1419; doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10854

105.

Ceccarelli

, Pontecorvi

, Anastasiadou

, et al. Immunomodulatory effect of adipose-derived stem cells: The cutting edge of clinical application. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2020; 8:236; doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00236

106.

Corcione

, Benvenuto

, Ferretti

, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B-cell functions. Blood, 2006; 107(1):367–372; doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2657

107.

Gonzalez-Rey

, Gonzalez

, Varela

, et al. Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammatory and T cell responses and induce regulatory T cells in vitro in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010; 69(1):241–248; doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101881

108.

Kim

W-S

, Park

B-S

, Kim

H-K

, et al. Evidence supporting antioxidant action of adipose-derived stem cells: Protection of human dermal fibroblasts from oxidative stress. J Dermatol Sci, 2008; 49(2):133–142; doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.08.004

109.

Chang

, Qu

, Liu

, et al. Multi-therapeutic effects of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on radiation-induced intestinal injury. Cell Death Dis, 2013; 4(6):e685; doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.178

110.

Murohara

, Shintani

, Kondo

. Autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells for therapeutic angiogenesis. Curr Pharm Des, 2009; 15(24):2784–2790; doi: 10.2174/138161209788923796

111.

Aiuti

, Webb

, Bleul

, et al. The chemokine SDF-1 is a chemoattractant for human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells and provides a new mechanism to explain the mobilization of CD34+ progenitors to peripheral blood. J Exp Med, 1997; 185(1):111–120; doi: 10.1084/jem.185.1.111

112.

Marquez-Curtis

, Janowska-Wieczorek

. Enhancing the migration ability of mesenchymal stromal cells by targeting the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. BioMed Res Int, 2013; 2013:561098; doi: 10.1155/2013/561098

113.

Mazini

, Ezzoubi

, Malka

. Overview of current adipose-derived stem cell (ADSCs) processing involved in therapeutic advancements: Flow chart and regulation updates before and after COVID-19. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2021; 12(1):1–17; doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-02006-w

114.

Widgerow

, Salibian

, Lalezari

, et al. Neuromodulatory nerve regeneration: Adipose tissue-derived stem cells and neurotrophic mediation in peripheral nerve regeneration. J Neurosci Res, 2013; 91(12); doi: 10.1002/jnr.23284

115.

Anonymous. Clinical Application of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Progressive Hemifacial Atrophy (Parry-Romberg Disease) with Microfat Grafting Techniques Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography and 3-Dimensional Camera - PubMed. n.d. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.dartmouth.idm.oclc.org/22907186/[Last accessed: October 10, 2022].

116.

Chu

D-T

, Phuong

TNT

, Tien

NLB

, et al. Adipose tissue stem cells for therapy: An update on the progress of isolation, culture, storage, and clinical application. J Clin Med, 2019; 8(7):917; doi: 10.3390/jcm8070917

117.

Anonymous. Vision Loss after Intravitreal Injection of Autologous “Stem Cells” for AMD - PubMed. n.d. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.dartmouth.idm.oclc.org/28296617/[Last accessed: October 10, 2022].

118.

Senzel

, Gnatenko

, Bahou

. The platelet proteome. Curr Opin Hematol, 2009; 16(5):329–333; doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32832e9dc6

119.

, Guo

, Li

, et al. Improved fat graft survival by different volume fractions of platelet-rich plasma and adipose-derived stem cells. Aesthetic Surg J, 2015; 35(3):319–333; doi: 10.1093/asj/sju046

120.

Eppley

, Woodell

, Higgins

. Platelet quantification and growth factor analysis from platelet-rich plasma: Implications for wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2004; 114(6):1502–1508; doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138251.07040.51

121.

Nakamura

, Ishihara

, Takikawa

, et al. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) promotes survival of fat-grafts in rats. Ann Plast Surg, 2010; 65(1):101–106; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181b0273c

122.

Pires Fraga

, Nishio

, Ishikawa

, et al. Increased survival of free fat grafts with platelet-rich plasma in rabbits. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg, 2010; 63(12):e818–e822; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.07.003

123.

, Witman

, Yan

, et al. Human adipose-derived stem cells enriched with VEGF-modified mRNA promote angiogenesis and long-term graft survival in a fat graft transplantation model. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2020; 11(1):1–20; doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-02008-8

124.

Lin

, Zhu

, Huang

, et al. Hypoxia promotes vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) differentiation of adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) by regulating Mettl3 and paracrine factors. Stem Cells Int, 2020; 2020:2830565; doi: 10.1155/2020/2830565

125.

Ben-Haim

, Moshitch-Moshkovitz

, Rechavi

. FTO: Linking m6A demethylation to adipogenesis. Cell Res, 2015; 25(1):3–4; doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.162

126.

Zhao

, Yang

, Sun

B-F

, et al. FTO-dependent demethylation of N6-methyladenosine regulates mRNA splicing and is required for adipogenesis. Cell Res, 2014; 24(12):1403–1419; doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.151

127.

, Liu

, Yao

, et al. FTO regulates adipogenesis by controlling cell cycle progression via m6A-YTHDF2 dependent mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids, 2018; 1863(10):1323–1330; doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.08.008

128.

Zhang

, Zhang

, Ma

, et al. The demethylase activity of FTO (Fat Mass and Obesity Associated Protein) is required for preadipocyte differentiation. PLoS One, 2015; 10(7):e0133788; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133788

129.

Wang

, Sun

, Jiang

, et al. mRNA m6A plays opposite role in regulating UCP2 and PNPLA2 protein expression in adipocytes. Int J Obes, 2018; 42(11):1912–1924; doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0027-z

Adipose-Derived Stromal Cell-Based Therapies for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis

Abstract

Significance:

Recent Advances:

Critical Issues:

Future Directions:

SCOPE AND SIGNIFICANCE

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy

Radiation-induced fibrosis

Pathogenesis and molecular basis of RIF

Tissue changes in radiation fibrosis

Vasculature

Cellular consequences

DISCUSSION

Current therapeutic options

Physical therapy

Deferoxamine

Vitamin E and pentoxifylline

Fat grafting

Irradiated fields present as hostile graft sites

DFO preconditioning

Vitamin E supplementation

Serial fat transfer

Adipose-derived stromal cells

Acquisition/processing of ADSCs

ADSC subpopulations

Antifibrotic CD74+

Vasculogenic CD146+

Adipogenic BMPR1A +s

Angiogenic CD248+

Cellular Mechanisms underlying regenerative potential of ADSCs

Adipocyte differentiation

Paracrine signaling

Recruitment of host stem cells

Commercial availability and potential

Future directions of cell-based therapy to reverse fibrosis in irradiated tissue

SUMMARY

TAKE-HOME MESSAGES

Footnotes

AUTHORs' CONTRIBUTION

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING SOURCES

AUTHOR DISCLOSURE AND GHOSTWRITING

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

References

Antifibrotic CD74⁺

Vasculogenic CD146⁺

Adipogenic BMPR1A^+s

Angiogenic CD248⁺