‘It is in the genes’ is an expression commonly used by patients in the surgery. The use of genetic information in general practice has become more common place in recent years. Family history is recorded as part of new patient checks and it is usual to ask patients with symptoms suggestive of a disease with a genetic component about family history of that disease and other potentially related diseases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aktan-CollanK.HaukkalaA.PylvänäinenK.Direct contact in inviting high-risk members of hereditary colon cancer families to genetic counselling and DNA testing. Journal of Medical Genetics (2007) 44: p. 732–8
2.
AshcroftR.ParkerM.WidershovenG.VerkerkM.LucassenA.M.Alternative approaches to bioethics (2005) Cambridge University Press ISBN-13:9780521543156
3.
BorryP.StultiensL.NysH.Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Clinical Genetics (2006) 70: p. 374–81
4.
ClaesE.Evers-KieboomsG.BoogaertsA.DecruyenaereM.DenayerL.LegiusE.Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics (2003) 116A: p. 11–19
5.
ClarkeA.The genetic testing of children. Working party of the Clinical Genetics Society (UK). Journal of Medical Genetics (2004) 31: p. 785–97
6.
ClarkeA.RichardsM.Kerzin-StorrarL.Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families. European Journal of Human Genetics (2005) 13(5): p. 556–62
7.
Consent and confidentiality in genetic practice: guidance on genetic testing and sharing genetic information. A report of the Joint Committee on Medical Genetics (2006) Accessed via www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/books/ccgp/ [date last accessed 16.07.2008]
8.
DaveyA.NewsonA.O'LearyP.Communication of genetic information within families: the case for familial comity bioethical inquiry (2006) 3: p. 161–166
9.
DoukasD.J.BergJ.W.The family covenant genetic testing. The American Journal of Bioethics (2001) 1: p. 2–10
10.
General Medical Council. Confidentiality: protecting and providing information. Duties of a Doctor (2000)
11.
GIG response to the Clinical Genetics Society report: the genetic testing of children (1995) Accessed via www.gig.org.uk/docs/gig_testingchildren.pdf [date last accessed 16.07.2008]
12.
Human Genetics Commission. Inside information. Balancing interests in the use of personal genetic data (2002)
13.
Julian-ReynierC.EisingerF.ChabalF.Disclosure to the family of breast/ovarian cancer genetic test results: patient's willingness and associated factors. American Journal of Medical Genetics (2000) 94: p. 13–18
14.
LucassenA.ParkerM.Revealing false paternity: some ethical considerations. Lancet (2001) 357(9261): p. 1033–5
15.
LucassenA.ParkerM.Confidentiality and serious harm in genetics—preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to relatives. European Journal of Human Genetics (2004) 12(2): p. 93–7
16.
LucassenA.M.ParkerM.The UK Genethics Club. Clinical Ethics (2006) 1(4): p. 219–223 (5)
17.
ParkerM.LucassenA.Genetic information: a joint account?British Medical Journal (2004) 329: p. 165–167
18.
Pate v Threlkel, 661 So2d. 278 (FL, 1995)
19.
PencarinhaD.F.BellN.K.EdwardsJ.G.BestR.G.Ethical issues in genetic counseling: a comparison of M.S. counselor and medical geneticist perspectives. Journal of Genetic Counseling (1992) 1: p. 19–30
20.
Safer v Pack, 677 A.2d 1188, 683 A 2d 1163 (NJ, 1996)
21.
SuthersG.K.ArmstrongJ.McCormackJ.TrottD.Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder. Journal Medical Genetics (2006) 43(8): p. 665–70
22.
W v Egdell, 1 All ER 855, 1990
23.
WertzD.C.FletcherJ.C.MulvihillJ.J.Medical geneticists confront ethical dilemmas: cross-cultural comparisons among 18 nations. Am J Hum Genet (1990) 46: p. 1200–1213
