Prevalence of Safer Needle Devices and Factors Associated with Their Adoption: Results of a National Hospital Survey

Abstract

Objectives.

In this study, we collected and analyzed the first data available on the extent of the adoption of safer needle devices (engineered sharps injury protections [ESIPs]) by U.S. hospitals and on the degree to which selected factors influence the use of this technology.

Methods.

We gathered data via a telephone survey of a random sample of 494 U.S. hospitals from November 1999 through February 2000.

Results.

Although 83% of the sample reported some ESIP adoption, adoption was inconsistent across types of devices. All of the appropriate units in 52% of the facilities had adopted needleless intravenous delivery systems, but the hospitals used other types of ESIPs less often. A respondent's perception that the cost of ESIPs would not be a problem for the hospital was the best predictor of adoption of ESIPs in the facility, explaining 8% of the variance. Other predictors of adoption included the size of the hospital and the presence or absence of state legislative activity on the needlestick issue.

Conclusions.

Smaller hospitals may require special encouragement and assistance from outside sources to adopt expensive risk-reduction innovations such as ESIPs. Although use of ESIPs is the mandated and preferred way to protect workers from needlesticks, complete adoption of this technology will depend on the support of the social systems in which it is used and the people who use it.

References

Moore

Kaczmarek

. Occupational hazards to health care workers: Diverse, ill-defined, and not fully appreciated. Am J Infect Control 1990; 18:316–27.

Rogers

Travers

. Overview of work-related hazards in nursing: Health and safety issues. Heart Lung 1991; 20:486–97.

McAbee

Gallucci

Checkoway

. Adverse reproductive outcomes and occupational exposures among nurses: An investigation of multiple hazardous exposures. Am Assoc Occup Health Nurses J 1993; 41(3):110–9.

Celentano

Johnson

. Stress in health care workers. Occup Med 1987; 2:593–608.

Sepkowitz

. Occupationally acquired infections in health care workers. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125:826–34.

Sepkowitz

. Occupationally acquired infections in health care workers, Part II. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125:917–28.

Henry

Campbell

. Needlestick/sharps injuries and HIV exposure among health care workers: National estimates based on a survey of U.S. hospitals. Minn Med 1995; 78:1765–8.

Panlilio

Cardo

Campbell

Srivastava

Williams

Jagger

, Estimate of the annual number of percutaneous injuries in U.S. health-care workers. In: Program and Abstracts of the 4th International Conference on Nosocomial and Healthcare-Associated Infections; 2000 Mar 5–9; Atlanta, GA; p. 61.

Centers for Disease Control. NaSH National Surveillance System for Hospital Health Care Workers, 1995–1999 [database]. Atlanta (GA): National Center for Infectious Diseases; 1999.

10.

Gerberding

. Incidence and prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and cytomegalovirus among health care personnel at risk for blood exposure: Final report from a longitudinal study. J Infect Dis 1994; 170:1410–7.

11.

Ippolito

Puro

Heptonstall

Jagger

DeCarli

Petrosillo

. Occupational human immunodeficiency virus infection in health care workers: Worldwide cases through September 1997. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 28:365–83.

12.

Alter

. The epidemiology of acute and chronic hepatitis C. Clin Liver Dis 1997; 1(3):559–69.

13.

Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related chronic disease. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1998; 47(RR-19):1–39.

14.

Immunization of health care workers: Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP) and the hospital infection control practices advisory committee (HIPAC). MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46(RR-18):1–42.

15.

Perspectives in disease prevention and health promotion update: Universal precautions for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and other bloodborne pathogens in healthcare settings. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1988; 37:377–88.

16.

Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health-care settings. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1987; 36(SU02):3S–18S.

17.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational exposure to blood borne pathogens; final rule. 29 CFR 1910.1030. Fed Regist 1991; 56(235):64004–182.

18.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens; needlestick and other sharps injuries; final rule. 29 CFR Part 1910.1030. Fed Regist 2001; 66:5318–25.

19.

Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act. 2000. Public Law 106-430. Available from: URL: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ430.106

20.

Rutkowski

Peterson

. A needleless intravenous system: An effective risk management strategy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993; 14:226–7.

21.

Owens

Iademarco

Jones

O'Rourke

Fraser

. Evaluation of three needleless intravenous devices. Am J Infect Control 1993; 21:81.

22.

Skolnick

LaRocca

Barba

Paicius

. Evaluation and implementation of a needleless intravenous system: Making needlesticks a needless problem. Am J Infect Control 1993; 21:39–41.

23.

Gartner

. Impact of a needleless intravenous system in a university hospital. Am J Infect Control 1992; 20:75–9.

24.

Younger

Hunt

Robinson

McLemore

. Impact of a shielded safety syringe on needlestick injuries among healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992; 13:349–53.

25.

Evaluation of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries among health-care workers during phlebotomy procedures—Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York City, and San Francisco, 1993–1995. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46(2):21–5.

26.

Billiet

Parker

Tanley

Wallas

. Needlestick injury rate reduction during phlebotomy: A comparative study of two safety devices. Lab Med 1991; 22(2):120–3.

27.

Chen

Bailey

Kogan

Finkelstein

LMM

. Prevention of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers: 27 month experience with a resheathable safety winged steel needle using CDC NaSH database. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21(2):108.

28.

Jagger

Bentley

. Injuries from vascular access devices: High risk and preventable. Collaborative EPINet Surveillance Group. J Intraven Nurs 1997; 20(6 Suppl):S33–9.

29.

Mendelson

Chen

Finkelstein

Bailey

Kogan

. Evaluation of a safety IV catheter (Insyte Autoguard, Becton Dickinson) using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Surveillance System for Hospital Healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21(2):108.

30.

Heinrich

, (US General Accounting Office). Letter To: Honorable Pete Stark, House of Representatives. Washington: 2000 Nov 17. Available from: URL: http://www.healthsafetyinfo.com/pdf/gao.pdf

31.

Damanpour

. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Management J 1991; 34:555–90.

32.

Kimberly

Evanisko

. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad Management J 1981; 24:689–713.

33.

Tornatzky

Klein

. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE TransEng Management 1982;EM-29:28–45.

34.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US). NIOSH alert: Preventing needlestick injuries in health care settings. Cincinnati: Department of Health and Human Services; 1999.

35.

Pedhazur

. Multiple regression in behavioral research. 2nd ed. Fort Worth (TX): Holt, Rinehart, & Winston; 1982.

36.

Anderson

Basilevsky

Hum

DJP

. Missing data: A review of the literature. In: Rossi

Wright

, editors. Handbook of survey research. New York: Academic Press; p. 415–94.

37.

American Hospital Association (US). Hospital statistics. Chicago: Healthcare Info Source; 2000.

38.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (US). Enforcement procedures for the occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Washington: Department of Labor; 1999 Nov 5; CPL 2-2.44D.

39.

Armstrong

. The cost of needlestick injuries: The impact of safer needle devices. Nurs Econom 1991; 9:426–30, 433.

40.

Jagger

Hunt

Pearson

. Estimated cost of needlestick injuries for six major needled devices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990; 11:584–8.

41.

Food and Drug Administration (US). FDA safety alert: Needlestick and other risks from hypodermic needles on secondary I.V. administration sets—piggyback and intermittent I.V. Rockville (MD): Department of Health and Human Services (US), Public Health Service; 1992.

42.

Rogers

. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995.

43.

Damanpour

. The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. J Management 1987; 13:675–88.

44.

Lai

Guynes

. An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: A discriminative approach. IEEE Trans Eng Management 1997; 44:146–57.

45.

Moch

Morse

. Size, centralization, and organizational adoption of innovations. Am Sociol Rev 1977; 42:716–25.

46.

Swanson

. Information systems innovation among organizations. Management Sci 1994; 40:1069–90.

47.

Flanigan

. Social pressures on organizational website adoption. Hum Commun Res 2000;26(4):618–46.