Physical activity,C-reactive protein levels and the risk of future coronary artery disease in apparently healthy men and women: the EPIC–Norfolk prospective population study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2006
Physical activity,C-reactive protein levels and the risk of future coronary artery disease in apparently healthy men and women: the EPIC–Norfolk prospective population study
Physical activity is inversely associated with the risk of future coronary artery disease. Whether this relationship is in part mediated by lower levels of systemic inflammation, as indicated by C-reactive protein concentrations, is unknown.
Methods
We performed a nested case-control study among apparently healthy men and women enrolled in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk prospective population study, to investigate the relationship among habitual (work-related and leisure time) physical activity, cardiovascular risk factors and the risk of future coronary artery disease.
Results
Among men, those with an active lifestyle had a significantly lower risk of future coronary artery disease than those with an inactive lifestyle [odds ratio (OR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47–0.90; P for linearity, 0.008], after adjustment for smoking, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, body mass index and low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Additional adjustment for C-reactive protein levels attenuated this relationship only slightly (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49–0.93; P for linearity, 0.02). Similarly, active women had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.48 (0.28–0.82; P for linearity < 0.001) for future coronary artery disease compared with inactive women. Additional adjustment for C-reactive protein levels attenuated this relationship slightly (OR 0.51; 0.30–0.87; P for linearity, 0.003).
Conclusions
We observed that people with an active lifestyle had a substantially lower risk of future coronary artery disease than people with an inactive lifestyle, and that this relationship was partly mediated through lower levels of established cardiovascular risk factors and in addition, C-reactive protein. This observation suggests that reduced systemic inflammation may be one of the mechanisms through which physical activity leads to reduced cardiovascular risk.
MorrisJNChaveSPAdamCSireyCEpsteinLSheehanDJ. Vigorous exercise in leisure-time and the incidence of coronary heart-disease. Lancet1973; 1:333–339.
2.
HuFBWillettWCLiTStampferMJColditzGAMansonJE. Adiposity as compared with physical activity in predicting mortality among women. N Engl J Med2004; 351:2694–2703.
3.
CrespoCJPalmieriMRPerdomoRPMcGeeDLSmitESemposCTThe relationship of physical activity and body weight with all-cause mortality: results from the Puerto Rico Heart Health Program. Ann Epidemiol2002; 12:543–552.
4.
LeeIMSessoHDOgumaYPaffenbargerRS. Relative intensity of physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease. Circulation2003; 107:1110–1116.
5.
MansonJEGreenlandPLaCroixAZStefanickMLMoutonCPObermanAWalking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med2002; 347:716–725.
6.
SessoHDPaffenbargerRSHaTLeeIM. Physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk in middle-aged and older women. Am J Epidemiol1999; 150:408–416.
7.
SessoHDPaffenbargerRSLeeIM. Physical activity and coronary heart disease in men: The Harvard Alumni Health Study. Circulation2000; 102:975–980.
8.
ThompsonPDCullinaneEMSadySPFlynnMMBernierDNKantorMAModest changes in high-density lipoprotein concentration and metabolism with prolonged exercise training. Circulation1988; 78:25–34.
9.
YusufSHawkenSOunpuuSDansTAvezumALanasFEffect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet2004; 364:937–952.
10.
HuGErikssonJBarengoNCLakkaTAValleTTNissinenAOccupational, commuting, and leisure-time physical activity in relation to total and cardiovascular mortality among Finnish subjects with type 2 diabetes. Circulation2004; 110:666–673.
KimmSYGlynnNWObarzanekEKriskaAMDanielsSRBartonBARelation between the changes in physical activity and body-mass index during adolescence: a multicentre longitudinal study. Lancet2005; 366:301–307.
13.
HuFBSigalRJRich-EdwardsJWColditzGASolomonCGWillettWCWalking compared with vigorous physical activity and risk of type 2 diabetes in women: a prospective study. JAMA1999; 282:1433–1439.
14.
HuFBMansonJEStampferMJColditzGALiuSSolomonCGDiet, lifestyle, and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. N Engl J Med2001; 345:790–797.
15.
KullerLHSimkin-SilvermanLRWingRRMeilahnENIvesDG. Women's Healthy Lifestyle Project: A randomized clinical trial: results at 54 months. Circulation2001; 103:32–37.
16.
StefanickMLMackeySSheehanMEllsworthNHaskellWLWoodPD. Effects of diet and exercise in men and postmenopausal women with low levels of HDL cholesterol and high levels of LDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med1998; 339:12–20.
17.
ReavenPDBarrett-ConnorEEdelsteinS. Relation between leisure-time physical activity and blood pressure in older women. Circulation1991; 83:559–565.
18.
NelsonLJenningsGLEslerMDKornerPI. Effect of changing levels of physical activity on blood-pressure and haemodynamics in essential hypertension. Lancet1986; 2:473–476.
19.
KatjaBTiinaLVeikkoSPekkaJ. Associations of leisure time physical activity, self-rated physical fitness, and estimated aerobic fitness with serum C-reactive protein among 3803 adults. Atherosclerosis (in press).
20.
EspositoKPontilloADi PaloCGiuglianoGMasellaMMarfellaREffect of weight loss and lifestyle changes on vascular inflammatory markers in obese women: a randomized trial. JAMA2003; 289:1799–1804.
21.
DayNOakesSLubenRKhawKTBinghamSWelchAEPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of CancerBr J Cancer1999; 80 (Suppl 1):95–103.
22.
WarehamNJJakesRWRennieKLSchuitJMitchellJHenningsSValidity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr2003; 6:407–413.
23.
JakesRWDayNELubenRWelchABinghamSMitchellJAdjusting for energy intake: what measure to use in nutritional epidemiological studies?Int J Epidemiol2004; 33:1382–1386.
24.
FriedewaldWTLevyRIFredricksonDS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem1972; 18:499–502.
25.
BruinsPte VelthuisHYazdanbakhshAPJansenPGvan HardeveltFWde BeaumontEMActivation of the complement system during and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: postsurgery activation involves C-reactive protein and is associated with postoperative arrhythmia. Circulation1997; 96:3542–3548.
26.
KoenigWSundMDoringAErnstE. Leisure-time physical activity but not work-related physical activity is associated with decreased plasma viscosity. Results from a large population sample. Circulation1997; 95:335–341.
27.
ThompsonPDCullinaneEMSadySPFlynnMMBernierDNKantorMAModest changes in high-density lipoprotein concentration and metabolism with prolonged exercise training. Circulation1988; 78:25–34.
28.
LeeIM. Physical activity in women: how much is good enough?JAMA2003; 290:1377–1379.
29.
LeeIMSkerrettPJ. Physical activity and all-cause mortality: what is the dose-response relation?Med Sci Sports Exerc2001; 33 (Suppl):S459–S471.
30.
MansonJEGreenlandPLaCroixAZStefanickMLMoutonCPObermanAWalking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med2002; 347:716–725.
31.
ThompsonPDCrouseSFGoodpasterBKelleyDMoynaNPescatelloL. The acute versus the chronic response to exerciseMed Sci Sports Exerc2001; 33 (Suppl):S438–S445.
32.
KatzmarzykPTLeonASRankinenTGagnonJSkinnerJSWilmoreJHChanges in blood lipids consequent to aerobic exercise training related to changes in body fatness and aerobic fitness. Metabolism2001; 50:841–848.
33.
IrwinMLYasuiYUlrichCMBowenDRudolphRESchwartzRSEffect of exercise on total and intra-abdominal body fat in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA2003; 289:323–330.
34.
MansonJELeeIM. Exercise for women–how much pain for optimal gain?N Engl J Med1996; 334:1325–1327.
35.
FagardRH. Exercise characteristics and the blood pressure response to dynamic physical trainingMed Sci Sports Exerc2001; 33 (Suppl):S484–S492.
36.
StefanickMLMackeySSheehanMEllsworthNHaskellWLWoodPD. Effects of diet and exercise in men and postmenopausal women with low levels of HDL cholesterol and high levels of LDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med1998; 339:12–20.
37.
FranzoniFGhiadoniLGalettaFPlantingaYLubranoVHuangYPhysical activity, plasma antioxidant capacity, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation in young and older men. Am J Hypertens2005; 18:510–516.
38.
Mayer-DavisEJD'AgostinoRKarterAJHaffnerSMRewersMJSaadMIntensity and amount of physical activity in relation to insulin sensitivity: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA1998; 279:669–674.
39.
WannametheeSGLoweGDWhincupPHRumleyAWalkerMLennonL. Physical activity and hemostatic and inflammatory variables in elderly men. Circulation2002; 105:1785–1790.
40.
GrisJCSchvedJFFeugeasOAguilar-MartinezPArnaudASanchezNImpact of smoking, physical training and weight reduction on FVII, PAI-1 and hemostatic markers in sedentary men. Thromb Haemost1990; 64:516–520.
41.
McTiernanATworogerSSRajanKBYasuiYSorensonBUlrichCMEffect of exercise on serum androgens in postmenopausal women: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2004; 13:1099–1105.
42.
McTiernanATworogerSSUlrichCMYasuiYIrwinMLRajanKBEffect of exercise on serum estrogens in postmenopausal women: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Cancer Res2004; 64:2923–2928.
43.
LeeIM. Physical activity in women: how much is good enough?JAMA2003; 290:1377–1379.
44.
MansonJEGreenlandPLaCroixAZStefanickMLMoutonCPObermanAWalking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med2002; 347:716–725.
45.
LeeIM. Physical activity in women: how much is good enough?JAMA2003; 290:1377–1379.
