Improving outcomes after myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial evaluating effects of a telephone follow-up intervention

Abstract

Background

Providing information is an important part of standard care and treatment for acute myocardial infarction inpatients. Evidence exists indicating that acute myocardial infarction patients experience an information gap in the period immediately after discharge from the hospital. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term effects of a nurse-led telephone follow-up intervention to provide information and support to patients with acute myocardial infarction after their discharge from hospital.

Design and method

A prospective randomized, controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up was conducted. A total of 288 patients were allocated to either an intervention group (n = 156) or a control group (n = 132). The latter received routine post-discharge care. The primary endpoint measured at 3 and 6 months after discharge was the health-related quality of life using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. Secondary endpoints included smoking and exercise habits.

Results

In both groups, health-related quality of life improved significantly over time on most subscales. A statistically significant difference in favour of the intervention group was found on the 36-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Health Component Summary Scale (P=0.034) after 6 months. No difference was found between the groups on the Mental Health Component Summary Scale. We found a significant difference with respect to frequency of physical activity in favour of the intervention group after 6 months (P=0.004). More participants in the intervention group than the control group had ceased smoking at the 6-month follow-up (P=0.055).

Conclusion

A nurse-led systematic telephone follow-up intervention significantly improved the physical dimension of health-related quality of life in patients in the intervention group compared with usual care patients. Participation in this intervention also seemed to promote health behaviour change in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Keywords

acute myocardial infarction follow-up intervention randomized clinical trial rehabilitation telephone

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Acute myocardial infarction: pre-hospital and in-hospital management. The task force on the management of acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 1996; 17:43–63.

Jones

West

Cardiac rehabilitation. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1995.

Thompson

Webster

RA.

Caring for the coronary patient. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004.

Ades

PA.

Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:892–902.

Pell

Cardiac rehabilitation: a review of its effectiveness. Coronary Health Care 1997; 1:8–17.

Wood

Backer

Faergeman

Graham

Mancia

Pyörälä

Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the second joint task force of European and other societies on coronary prevention. Eur Heart J 1998; 19:1434–1503.

7 Giannuzzi

Saner

Bjornstad

Fioretti

Mendes

Cohen-Solal

. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: position paper of the Working Group on Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2003; 24:1273–1278.

Worth

Tierney

Watson

NT.

Discharged from hospital: should more responsibility for meeting patients and carers' information needs now be shouldered in the community? Health Soc Care Commun 2000; 8:398–405.

Hanssen

Nordrehaug

Hanestad

BR.

A qualitative study of the information needs of acute myocardial infarction patients, and their preferences for follow-up contact after discharge. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2005; 4:37–44.

10.

10 Mayou

Thompson

Clements

Davies

Goodwin

Normington

. Guideline-based early rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52:89–95.

11.

Thompson

Quinn

Stewart

Effective nurse-led interventions in heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2002; 83:233–237.

12.

Soet

Basch

CE.

The telephone as a communication medium for health education. Health Educ Behav 1997; 24:759–772.

13.

Car

Sheikh

Telephone consultations. BMJ 2003; 326:966–969.

14.

McBride

Rimer

BK.

Using the telephone to improve health behaviour and health service delivery. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 37:3–18.

15.

15 Roberts

Browne

Streiner

Gafni

Pallister

Hoxby

. Problem-solving counseling or phone-call support for outpatients with chronic illness: effective for whom? Can J Nurs Res 1995; 27:111–137.

16.

Riegel

Carlson

Kopp

LePetri

Glaser

Unger

Effect of a standardized nurse case-management telephone intervention on resource use in patients with chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:705–712.

17.

Gallagher

McKinley

Dracup

Effect of a telephone counselling intervention on psychosocial adjustment in women following a cardiac event. Heart Lung 2003; 32:79–87.

18.

18 Frasure-Smith

Lespèrance

Price

Verrier

Garber

Juneau

. Randomized trial of home-based psychosocial nursing intervention for patients recovering from myocardial infarction. Lancet 1997; 350:473–479.

19.

Lazarus

Folkman

Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1984.

20.

Redman

BK.

The practice of patient education. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997.

21.

Lorig

Patient education. A practical approach. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.

22.

Cundey

Frank

MJ.

Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention after a myocardial event. Clin Cardiol 1995; 18:547–553.

23.

Linden

Stossel

Maurice

Psychosocial interventions for patients with coronary artery disease: a meta analysis. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:745–752.

24.

Thompson

Lewin

RJ.

Coronary disease. Management of the post-myocardial infarction patient: rehabilitation and cardiac neurosis. Heart 2000; 84:101–105.

25.

Ware

Kosinski

Gandek

SF-36 Health survey: manual & interpretation guide. 2nd ed. Lincoln, Rhode Island: Quality*Metric Inc.; 2000.

26.

Ware

Kosinksi

SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: a manual for users of version 1. 2nd ed. Lincoln, Rhode Island: QualityMetric Inc.; 2001.

27.

Dempster

Donnelly

Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischemic heart disease. Heart 2000; 83:641–644.

28.

McGee

Hevey

Horgan

Psychosocial outcome assessment for use in cardiac rehabilitation service evaluation: a 10-year systematic review. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48:1373–1393.

29.

Norman

Streiner

DL.

Biostatistics: the bare essentials. 2nd ed. Hamilton: Decker; 2000.

30.

Fayers

Machin

Qualityoflife. Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2000.

31.

Molstad

Andersen

Reduced mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2002; 122:1271–1275.

32.

32 Van de Werf

Ardissino

Betriu

Cokkinos

Falk

Fox

. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2003; 24:28–66.

33.

33 Scholte

Reimer

de Swart

De Bacquer

Pyorala

Keil

Heidrich

. Smoking behaviour in European patients with established coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:35–41.

34.

Wiggers

Smets

de Haes

Peters

Legemate

DA.

Smoking cessation interventions in cardiovascular patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 26:467–475.

35.

Rigotti

Munafo

Murphy

Stead

LF.

Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD001837.

36.

Simpson

Pilote

Quality of life after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Can J Cardiol 2003; 19:507–511.

37.

37 Muller-Nordhorn

Kulig

Binting

Voller

Gohlke

Linde

. Change in quality of life in the year following cardiac rehabilitation. Qual Life Res 2004; 13:399–410.

38.

Oldridge

NB.

Cardiac rehabilitation and risk factor management after myocardial infarction. Clinical and economic evaluation. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1997; 109 (Suppl 2):6–16.