Aims In this study we investigated the effects of the physical work environment on two physiological measures of the stress response.
Methods and results Circadian variations in vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV) and the morning rise in cortisol were evaluated in 60 participants working in a government building either in a traditional (individual offices and old cubicles; n= 40) or a modern workspace (individualized cubicles with improved views and lighting; n= 20). Results revealed significant linear (B = 1.03; confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.01, P [ 0.05) and quadratic (B = 1.001; confidence interval: 1.00041.002, P [ 0.05) trends by office type interactions for indices of vagally mediated HRV. Individuals in the old office space had flatter slopes and thus less circadian variation including less HRV at night, and a larger rise in cortisol upon awakening compared with those in the new office space.
Conclusion These results indicate that physical features of the work environment may affect two aspects of the physiological stress response: circadian variations in HRV and the morning rise in cortisol. These findings have important social, economic, and public health implications for work environment risk factors on health.
RosengrenAHawkenSOunpuuSSliwaKZubaidMAlmahmeedWAINTERHEART investigators. Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11 119 cases and 13 648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet2004; 364:953–962.
2.
ChandolaTBrittonABrunnerEHemingwayHMalikMKumariMWork stress and coronary heart disease: what are the mechanisms?Eur Heart J2008; 29:640–648.
3.
KornitzerMdeSmetPSansSDramaixMBoulenguezCDeBackerGJob stress and major coronary events: results from the job stress, absenteeism and coronary heart disease in Europe study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2006; 13:695–704.
4.
DuijtsSFAKantISwaenGMHVan den BrandtPAZeegersMPA.A metaanalysis of observational studies identifies predictors of sickness absence. J Clin Epidemiol2007; 60:1105–1115.
5.
HarterJKSchmidtFLHayesTL.Business-unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psych2002; 87:268–279.
6.
VeitchJACharlesKEFarleyKMJNewshamGR.A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. J Environ Psych2007; 27:177–189.
7.
TsujiHLarsonMGVendittiFJJrMandersESEvansJCFeldmanCLLevyD.Impact of reduced heart rate variability on risk for cardiac events. The Framingham heart study. Circulation1996; 94:2850–2855.
IrwinMValladaresEMotivalaSThayerJFEhlersC.Association between nocturnal vagal tone and sleep depth, sleep quality and fatigue in alcohol dependence. Psychosom Med2006; 68:159–166.
10.
Kunz-EbrechtSRKirschbaumCSteptoeA.Work stress, socioeconomic status and neuroendocrine activation over the working day. Soc Sci Med2004; 58:1523–1530.
11.
JacksonASBlairSNMaharMTWeirLTRossRMStutevilleJE.Prediction of functional aerobic capacity without exercise testing. Med Sci Sports Exerc1990; 22:863–870.
12.
PieperSBrosschotJFVan der LeedenRThayerJF.Cardiac effects of momentary assessed worry episodes and stressful events. Psychosom Med2007; 69:901–909.
13.
Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J1996; 17:354–381.
14.
PenttilaJHelminenAJarttiTKuuselaTHuikuriHVTulppoMPTime domain, geometrical and frequency domain analysis of cardiac vagal outflow: effects of various respiratory patterns. Clin Physiol2001; 21:365–376.
15.
LiZSniederHSuSDingXThayerJFTrieberFAWangX.A longitudinal study in youth of heart rate variability at rest and in response to stress. Int J Psychophysiol2009; 73:212–217.
16.
HruschkaDJKohrtBAWorthmanCM.Estimating between and within individual variation in cortisol levels using multilevel modeling. Psychoneuroendocrinology2005; 30:698–714.
17.
SingerJDWillettJB.Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
18.
Aboa-EbouleCBrissonCMaunsellEMasseBBourbonnaisRVezinaMJob strain and risk of acute recurrent coronary heart disease events. JAMA2007; 298:1652–1660.
19.
BelkicKLLandsbergisPASchnallPLBakerD.Is job strain a major source of cardiovascular disease risk?Scand J Work Environ Health2004; 30:85–128.
20.
BrosschotJFVan DijkEThayerJF.Daily worry is related to low heart rate variability during waking and the subsequent nocturnal sleep period. Int J Psychophysiol2007; 63:39–47.
21.
UlrichR.View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science1984; 224:420–421.
22.
LeatherPPyrgasMBealeDLawrenceC.Windows in the workplace: sunlight, view and occupational stress. Environment and Behavior1998; 30:739–762.
23.
BentonSLeventhallHG.The role of background stressors in the formation of annoyance and stress responses. Jnl Low Freq Noise Vibn1994; 13:95–102.
24.
HagermanIRasmanisGBlomkvistVUlrichREriksenCATheorellT.Influence of intensive coronary care acoustics on the quality of care and physiological state of patients. Int J Cardiology2005; 98:267–270.
